The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon




By TLB Contributor: Ken LaRive

Every person who has ever lived on this earth has tried in their own way to understand their place in it. Before children can talk they are already questioning the world. It is what we are as human beings. Even infants have an ability to be amazed by life’s beauty and grandeur. We marveled at the stripe of crystalline glitter on a rock as we held it to the sun, danced laughing in sprinkler rainbows, and watched cloud shapes on a summer’s day from piles of autumn clover. A glass prism held magic for a dimpled hand, and gave us inklings to creation’s awesome complexity. We saw life struggling in our garden, astonished by its diversity, convolution and splendor, and both the smell of the rose and multicolored butterfly dust on our fingertips stirred our souls.

Beetle shine

When we are young, before perception was formulated by our mostly well-meaning teachers, good and bad melted together, and both Christmas angels and shooting stars were caught in the corner of our eyes.

Experience was fringed with awe, where meaning longed to be understood, but was not yet assigned and categorized. Learning is, and of itself, a self realization, and it may be in the mere trying where both solace and comprehension lie. It is our very nature to learn, and to travel this world in search of answers, but it is the particle of the child in us that motivates that.

Early men lived in a dark, dangerous, and bewildering world. When the sun set there was only the moon and stars, and a tiny flickering firelight. Even this fire wasn’t a pure comfort to him, and though it gave him warmth and light, it also distorted shadows and shapes in its flickering. His imagination flickered too, and was pulled into the sharp edges of the dark where fear of the unknown longed for the light of day.

He attempted to temper imagination with understanding, and he saw it to be the key to his very survival. The lack of perception was the essence that darkened his mind, and that primeval glimmer stirred his psyche nurtured into what we call consciousness. It became the greatest survival tactic this world has ever seen, and spurred him into new-found quests with fresh tools …faith and hope!

The marks he made in his pursuit for knowledge are still visible today. High atop mountains he etched patterns under ledges of rock pierced by a single ray of sunlight. He measured this beam as it traveled through the day and into the changing seasons, and he etched the patterns it made on the stationary rocks below. From there, he held burning embers and clay lamps as he traveled deep into caves, drawing pictures of the world of day, and his new-found dreams.

The night sky glowed in a glory unhampered by modern electric lights, holding his fascination long into the night. Eyes upward, wrapped to the cool night winds, human faces would shine from the firmament glow, and stars hung like pendulums of glass just beyond reach. Some saw the sky with the glazed look of bewilderment, but a few, as years progressed, realized that there was a redundancy to the seasons, and the glittering dots of light that moved across the heavens were the maps to future events. Predictions of the next occurrence gave that person a special instrument, a knowledge that other men had not observed. Forecasting them gave him power, and as civilization progressed, mystery and magic became tools for a new societal elite where religion and government became one.

Now, with the sun, moon, planets and stars as template, the knowledge taken from these observations could be transferred from one generation to another. Longer annotations beyond our life span could be predicted, like a comet’s return, or a solar eclipse. Early primitive religions governments found these predictions to be useful, as a naturally reoccurring phenomenon could accent a religious dance, or worship service, instilling credibility not only for their invented supernatural gods, but for the priest who was their self made mediator.

These new Astronomer/Astrologer priests were found all around the world, and though historians think that they observed the heavens quite independently from each other, all were poised to make an astounding discovery almost at the same time. This amazing paradox would go unnoticed in the casual observer’s lifetime, but longer observations, possibly for many thousands of years, and a phenomenon called The Procession of the Equinox was found. To his amazement, he saw that the point of reference he was using to mark time was not finite, but somehow moving along the skies axis! His great grandfather’s observation had moved, slowly but perceptually slipping past his line of sight!

To understand this we must start near the beginning, when one year was divided into four, and the seasonal Equinox and Solstice was used to predict the time to plant and harvest. Men found that the heavens moved across the sky in a predictable manor, and measuring its shadow or the number of days between each section could predict the seasons. A primitive calendar was found.

Sounds so simple today, but it was quite a psychological leap for early man. He was able to actually tie in the external world into his own life, and this semblance of order must have given him, the astrologer, a great comfort.

Just before the eastern sunrise each year, on a particular chosen night, observers would mark the view of sky by the stars on the horizon. This was done mostly in December, where the New Year was brought in. An observer would sit in the exact same position and gaze at the eastern horizon set between two objects, just before dawn. These objects could be man made, like the stones of Stonehenge, pyramids, or natural mountains. These amazing star gazers found that an unexplained wobble made the stars shift ever so slightly every year, and with time they would move completely out of their line of sight. So slight was this wobble that it took 24,000 years to go a full 360 degrees, and yet these men found it!

An illustration of this is simple. A top is spinning, just like the earth, with the point of reference being the poles. The top, just as the earth, always has a slight wobble, so that if a person was observing the heavens, marking them, measuring them, this wobble would finally be evident. What makes it difficult is the time element!

After this revelation, the more advanced observers began to divide the sky into sections. Our Zodiac has twelve sections, or houses, but some civilizations, like the Chinese, have more. Each section of sky has inside a star cluster constellation representing some religious metaphor, or possibly a symbolic representation of that society itself. Ancient European observers have us traveling from the sign of Pisces, the fish, to the Age of Aquarius, the lady with the water jug, at this time, and each one of these star clusters took about 2000 years to move past that observable arc. Now this may seem a simple concept today, but remember that just a few hundred years ago it was understood that the earth was flat. Back then most thought the wobble was caused by a glob of dirt, where we actually lived, found on the back of a great turtle making its way through the stars. The wobble was his steps. Others observed that we were the exact center of the universe, and everything was revolving around us.

Even with these misconceptions, our ancestors were truly amazing. They tried and found order in what seemed like a world of chaos. Can you imagine the reasoning patience it must have taken to understand such a phenomena as The Procession? What in the world would motivate a string of people to take on what the other left off, if not faith and hope? And then, how far back could these observations actually go? Would they in fact name a constellation that wouldn’t be seen for 24,000 years? Or is it possible that these Astrologers have seen the Procession make full arc many times as some think the Maya have in their Long Count Calendar, 3 X 33,000 years. In perspective, it would take more than forty generations of observations to witness and record one house!

Man’s inquisitive imagination has propelled him into ground breaking revelations. Without this singular intrepid spirit our brave new world would still be afraid of flickering shadows. With tremendous leaps of faith today’s explores pull from the same spectrum of hope our ancestors did, where unknown realms of knowledge are found on the sharp edge of reality.

Physicists today are actually questioning our linear way of thinking as inadequate to understand their science, and see that possibly an artistic mind would be more effective. We men relentlessly pick and probe the unknown, and now with break-neck speed forge exponentially our store of knowledge by computer catapults, extensions of our selves, and that same spirit for learning our ancestors had.

We have in each of us the same childlike fascination that initially started us on this fantastic road of learning so long ago. While lying on a blanket with a couple of kids and field glasses we can melt away all layers of time, again viewing the great expanse with wonder. We have in us the same needs as our so called primitive ancestors did, and those wonderful oohs and ahs that children have for shooting star sparks and comet streams still runs hot in our blood. Our human connection to the stars, and the consciousness that set us free, makes full circle every Precession, by a tiny wobble.


By: Roger Landry (TLB)

Humanity is a methodical process of eons of evolution, precise in its design, amazing in its functionality, and still relatively uncharted in its true nature. Yet there are those among us who feel they can do better … improve the species, but for who’s gains? What you will read (attached article) is not a future projection or a future fantasy … It is real, here, now and with implications that may influence our lives in ways we cannot fathom.

The big essentially Omnipotent bio-tech companies that bring you such mega disasters as GE foods, trees insects etc… have not learned their lesson at all. As a matter of fact quite the contrary! In their rush to play God they have eagerly stepped into a realm that could easily be the plot straight out of a 1950′s B rated science fiction horror movie “ The Curse of the Genetically Modified Micro Humans”.

Once again a new science will invade the lives of us that are most vulnerable to its ramifications, and those may not be truly know for a decade or a generation. Again we are being told the effects will be benign, and will only benefit society, virtually the same line of bull we were handed about Genetically Modified Organisms at their inception. This may in fact be true in all aspects, but with the track record of these bio-tech companies to date, this is in serious doubt!

A Lie told over and over again will eventually become the truth in a society under the constant barrage of intentional propaganda … but it will always remain a Lie!

To date the only observable benefits being realized from the huge and reckless push to genetically modify everything, are the huge financial gains to entities who exercise almost absolute control over those who make our regulations and laws … to their benefit. The down side we as the recipients of these products suffer is increased disease via compromised immune systems, increased sterility, increased liver and kidney dysfunction, increased cancer rates etc … and a bio-system on the verge of collapse.

As the peer reviewed science rolls in at an ever increasing rate, heralding the catastrophic consequences of these perpetrators arrogance. facilitated by science never properly completed, or adequately tested, their arrogance and greed for ever increasing power and wealth continues to expand exponentially, and unchecked. The ultimate ramifications to humanity and this planets fragile biosphere are approaching a point of criticality … yet they push on.

The consequences of the type of science indicated in the attached article have no precedent, no base for comparison in either nature or science. Though the reasons for this avenue of research may in fact herald an end to a massive amount of animal cruelty practiced by research facilities planet wide … one only needs to look at the hellish consequences brought about by these mechanisms of similar research, only now coming to light, to elicit elevated levels of doubt, distrust and outright fear for the future of humanity!

Why must humanity constantly be proving the extremely overworked adage, hindsight is 20/20

Why must We The People continue to suffer the diabolical actions of:


Please read more …


Mad Science: ‘Genetically Modified Micro Humans’ to be ‘Farmed’ for Drug Testing by 2017


“Developers of artificial micro-humans, or ‘mini GM humans,’ are hoping to release their technology on the market by 2017. No this isn’t a sci-fi joke. Scientists are developing artificial humans in the same vein as GM plants with the hope that these creations will replace the need for using animals in laboratory testing.”

Artificial humans will be ‘farmed’ with interacting organs that can be used in drug tests, speeding up the process of FDA and other government regulatory approvals, and supposedly without damaging rats or other animals currently used in laboratories. The GM humans will contain smartphone-sized microchips that will be programmed to replicate up to 10 major human organs.

Each GM human will be tiny – roughly the size of a microchip itself, simulating the response of humans to substances inhaled, absorbed in the blood, or exposed to in the intestinal tract.

Early versions comprising an artificial kidney, heart, lung or gut are already being used by the cosmetic industry and to observe the use of chemical drugs on non-GMO humans.

The Times of India reported that researchers said this could replace up to 90 million animals each year in labs. Uwe Marx, a tissue engineer from Technische Universitat Berlin and founder of TissUse, a firm developing the technology said:

“If our system is approved by the regulators, then it will close down most of the animal-testing laboratories worldwide.” said.

Currently, this type of technology is already used on artificial organs like hearts and livers, but the results must be verified on a ‘live’ being – animals in a lab, for instance, to prove that substances are safe when interacting with a living being with real organs.

The problem with current testing, and obviously this proposed ‘solution,’ is that artificial organs, like animals, won’t respond the same way as a human body. We have already observed unforeseen side effects during human trials after animal trials that are far from ‘safe’ – GM crops are a perfect example of this phenomenon.

Organs cannot be divided into ‘fake’ computerized components. They interact with one another, the endocrine system, the brain, the nervous system, environmental cues, emotions, and according to advanced research, even our energetic bodies.

This reminds me of how genetically modified humans are planned to be the next venture for biotechnology companies working with the United States military, with the admitted goal of producing a ‘super soldier’ that does not require food or sleep to perform Olympic-style physical feats. The genetically modified humans, or ‘super soldiers’, will even be able to regrow limbs that were destroyed by enemy fire and live off of their fat stores for extreme lengths of time. You can read more on GMO super-humans here.

While the new GM human farms seem great on paper, since eliminating animal testing is indeed noble, they do not address possible far-reaching, negative ramifications for trying to re-create the complexities of Mother Nature’s form. It seems the pharmaceutical industry and biotech don’t learn from their mistakes at all.

TLB recommends you visit Natural Society for more great/pertinent articles and information.

child-on-meds 1

By TLB Contributor: Dave Hodges

The pharmaceutical industry has completely taken over the treatment of medical and psychiatric treat-ment (intended). Everything, and I am mean everything is geared towards getting every American on medication and keeping them on medication for the rest of their lives. There is no more vulnerable population, to this medical tyranny, than our children.

have-you-drugged-your-kid-todayThere is no greater example of this medical tyranny than the latest craze in unscientific psychiatric diagnostics than the brand new condition now being referred to as “Sluggish Cognitive Tempo” (SLT). As a former mental health therapist, I can barely hold back my laughter at this thinly veiled attempt to separate parents from their hard earned money by making them think that the their perfectly normal child is mentally ill.

Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (lol)

This is a remarkably ridiculous name for an even more ludicrous diagnosis. The main characteristics of SLT  are vaguely described but include some combination of daydreaming, lethargy and slow mental processing, you know, like we do when we watch television.

The advocates of this diagnosis contend that SCT afflicts about two million children. And that great pharmaceutical whore, Eli Lilly, is waiting in the wings preparing to medicate the developing and highly vulnerable brains of these two million children with the latest in dangerous and mind-destroying psychotropic medications which will leave the user with a brain damaged future and a medical treatment history which will render many of these children with an uninsurable medical insurance future.

The Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology has sold its professional soul and its professional ethics to Big Pharma as it is seriously promoting this voodoo form of diagnostics. The latest issue of their publication donates a record 136 pages to the topic of SLT. And where do we find children with SLT? Probably standing next to the adults who have Restless Leg Syndrome.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-Edition IV & V

DSM is the Bible of mental illnesses. The book serves a training guide for graduate and the PhD students as well as serving as a professional guide for treatment intervention amongst mental health practitioners.

By the time a child is 21 years of age, under DSM -IV guidelines, 80% of all young adults  qualify to be diagnosed as mentally ill and, as such, are subject to being medicated.

The newest version of DSM has made this problem far worse. Normal temper tantrums have been turned into a diagnosable and pharmacologically treatable illness called ‘Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder”. Normal adolescent rebellion is now being labeled as “Oppositional Defiant Disorder”. Normal childhood restlessness is now diagnosed as “ADHD” in children as early as two years of age.  Childhood Autism and childhood Bipolar Disorder are pharmaceutical goldmines and have increased forty fold in the last 20 years

The ADHD Scam

More than 10,000 American toddlers 2 or 3 years old are being medicated for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder outside established pediatric guidelines and professional medical practices, according to data recently presented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

According to the CDC, 11% of the country’s children are diagnosed with ADHD. This is ludicrous and is just not possible. These children have ADHD according to whom? The answer to this question consists of two parts. First, Big Pharma is using its influence to “push” the diagnostic criteria in the direction of many more positive diagnoses. More diagnoses means more profit-making pill pushing. Second, there is no illness, with these kinds of unsustainable rates of diagnosis that could impact the population to this degree. If there really were an 11% rate of autism in this country, we would be forced to change what is considered to be normal behavior since most mental illness models are loosely based upon a bell curve distribution. Therefore, just based on the surface evidence, these diagnostic rates cannot justified.

If these medications are dangerous for children, we would not know because very few scientific studies have examined the use of ADHD stimulant medications in young children. A widely referenced 2006 study found that the ADHD medication, methylphenidate, could “somewhat” mitigate ADHD like symptoms in preschoolers. However, the study’s conclusions were based on researched derived from insufficiently sized researched groups. Only about a dozen 3-year-olds were included in the study, and there were no 2-year-olds, yet we continue to medicate these young vulnerable minds. Most researchers on that study, sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health, have significant financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that made ADHD medications.

A multitude of studies indicates that children who are prescribed psychotropic drugs are much more likely to become drug addicts as adults.

Parents Are the First Line of Defense

If you have ever sat in the waiting room of your child’s pediatrician’s office and you have seen well-dressed, attractive young adults enter the office armed with notebooks as they are ushered in to see the doctor ahead of the waiting patients, then there is a very good chance that your doctor is a Big Pharma whore. The well-dressed pill pushers are there to your child’s doctor in order to “make deals” and promise bonuses for prescribing certain drugs. The odds are stacked against your child before they ever their doctor.

In combating this medical tyranny, parents are the only line of defense. However, parents must be very careful in how they express their refusal in not allowing their children to be diagnosed with bogus conditions and treated with dangerous drugs.

When your doctor offers to put your child on mind-numbing drugs, seek a second opinion. However, be very, very, careful how seek that second opinion as it could cost you custody of your child.

Beware of CPS

There is no system ever devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or father, mother and child apart so bitterly than our present Family Court System.

Judge Brian Lindsay

Retired Supreme Court Judge

New York, New York

Just ask  Jodi Ferris, Anna Nikolayev, or Justina Pelltier’s parents what happens when a parent dares to question the almighty doctor and seek a second opinion for their child. The doctor and his wounded ego will frequently call CPS and the parent’s problem goes from bad to worse.

My advice is simple if you desire to seek a second medical opinion for your child. Do not tell your child’s pediatrician that is your intention. Take the prescription that the doctor writes, just do not fill the prescription. Then schedule a second opinion visit with another doctor. If you get a disconfirming diagnosis, then make immediate arrangements to change doctors. Once your child has a different doctor, the authorities are powerless in seizing your child for medical neglect when the complaining doctor is no longer the physician of record and the second doctor is not making a recommendation to medicate.


Thirty million adults, about 40% of the adult population, are on anti-depressants. Twenty million, or about 66% of this group, should not be on anti-depressants. Adults can say no, it is not the same issue when it comes to medicating your child. However, your child doesn’t have that same choice. You, as the parent, must make that choice for them.

About the Author

Dave Hodges is the host of the popular radio talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.

© 2014. The Common Sense Show. The Logo and Articles are protected by U.S. Copyright Laws, and are not to be downloaded or reproduced in any way without the written permission of Dave Hodges. Copyright 2014. Dave Hodges. All Rights Reserved

TLB recommends you visit Dave here:


Click on image to visit site

See featured article and read comments HERE


By TLB Contributor: Rabah JL

The past few weeks have seen ISIS used as a basis to vilify Islam through a variation of methods.

The most prominent of which has been an insinuated animosity between Islam and Christianity. Especially by professing such animosity is rooted in Qur’anic teaching.

As a person who has studied Islam my whole life, I can confirm that this is complete and utter nonsense. Christians and Jews are among the most respected people in the Qur’an, singled out and named “the people of the book” in every verse they are mentioned.

Having said that, there is no need to take my word for it. Here are a few examples demonstrating the strong bond between Christians, Jews, and Muslims cited from the Book itself:

“The same religion has He established for you as that which He enjoined on Noah … and that which We enjoined on Abraham, Moses, and Jesus” (42:13).

“We (Muslims) believe in the Revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you (Jews & Christians); our Allah and your Allah is One” (29:46).

“We believe in Allah, and in what has been revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and in (the Books) given to Moses, Jesus, and the Prophets, from their Lord: We make no distinction between one and another among them” (3:84).

Islam-is-the-Religion-of-Peace 1

Hence, the aforementioned implication is clearly nothing more than a baseless fabrication aimed at inciting hatred.

Another myth being perpetuated is the notion that ISIS are “a religious movement”. This is also ill-founded.

Every single action ISIS have taken so far has been glaringly political.

Their first step upon entering Iraq was armament- a very clear military maneuver with no religious incentive.

The ultimate goal is to colonize two countries (Syria and Iraq)- colonization is a form of political control through forced settlements.

In the process, they have attempted a genocide of any (Muslim, Christian, or other) who does not pledge allegiance to their self-proclaimed caliphate- for them, this is “treason”, yet another political concept.

Every aim undertaken has been heavily politicized, regardless of the rationale or labels declared towards purported religious teaching.

These falsified claims of religious value have a multitude of aims, one of which is manipulating a steady source of recruitment through brainwashed support. Much like the Christian Crusades- a mass slaughter in the name of religion, but if one were to look at its true nature, it was simply a territorial conflict.

It is absurd to think that highly educated journalists, analysts, and politicians have fallen to such a naive standard where they would unequivocally believe an organization’s claim for what it is, rather than defining it through its actions. A self-evident truth is extremely apparent, yet the public is still deliberately bludgeoned with the same xenophobic implications.

Beyond this, the propelled image of ISIS has instigated a new form of Islamophobia which seeks to blame Islam for all that is wrong in history, the world, and anything in between.

In a world full of problems, the urge to find a focal point for one’s frustration is understandable. However, Islam is an ironic choice to make.

Through centuries of history, spanning the Spanish Inquisition, the Holocaust, European Antisemitism, the Cuban genocide, the American genocide of more than 100 million Native Indians, and the brutal British colorization which stole the lives of more than 15 million Indians (among others).

Even taking into account the First World War, Second World War, nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (with a lasting impact to this very day), the British concentration camps of Africans and the enslavement of black Africans which resulted in the death of 88% of 180 million- corpses which were then dumped into the Atlantic Ocean.

Also, the ethnic cleansing of Australia’s Aboriginals, Vietnamese being subjected to phosphorous gas by the US, 200,000 killed in the Mexican Caste War of Yucatan, and millions of Russians by the hand of Stalin. Human beings have clearly suffered much disparity.

Though there is more to list, a cynical irony already forms. Not one of the above (more than a billion) corpses piled, involved a single Islamic role.

Still, Islam is where we have fallen to lay all blame?

A religion which:

- Is so victimized and relentlessly portrayed with negativity through every and any media platform.

- Is demonized to the point where it has become absurd.

- Through its own laws dictates that not even a tree can be harmed during war, let alone an animal or innocent human being.

- Teaches that no man can kill another, lest they be prosecuted as though they had murdered all of humanity.

- Has close to 2 billion adherents across the planet.

Catholicism, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, and other ideologies or religions (even though they do not provoke any form of violence) can quite easily be argued as the overbearing objective for instigating many major conflicts in world history from the aforementioned tragedies.

Therefore, if people were to rely on statistics or any historical context to support their racially charged claims, blame for religious war would not be so particular.

The fact of the matter is that political motivation and certain traits within human nature (greed, self-importance, vengeance, egotism) constitute the only real reasons for these acts of barbarism. Religion is merely manipulated as justification for the masses, thus it cannot be liable as a “cause”.

The appeal in blaming religion is in its simplicity. It is far easier to blame an idea which acts as an umbrella over anyone and everyone you are meant to despise, rather than going through the hindrance of patience to identify those solely responsible then punishing their perverse agenda in isolation.

Today Islam is thrown around far too easily as a scapegoat for evil, and this is only becoming worse as it is fed by mass ignorance. The utility this unsubstantiated hatred now encompasses is at the point where it is an embarrassment to our proclamation of existing as “intelligent beings”.


Do not let abhorrent individual acts represent any religious ideology. Do not let ISIS overshadow fact and spread bitterness.

Most importantly: do not become empty puppets, connected by the strings of media, to the fingers of ISIS.



By: Roger Landry (TLB)

Let me start buy saying I single NO politician out, nor do I absolve ANY! If you can show me any politician who has not lied, masked the truth in doublespeak, or hidden the truth, I will kiss you bare butt on Main Street at high noon … and let you sell tickets to the event. Now that said …

The fact is all politicians lie as a matter of course, a vast majority without hesitation or conscience, and most without thinking the long-term consequences or ramifications through.

Long-term is not germane to most (a vast majority) politicians mindset. What matters is the emotions or loyalties they extract from the crowd standing before them, or those seeing or listening to them via the media, right now. They are conditioned to elicit maximum and immediate response, regardless of, and in some cases, in spite of the efficacy of their spoken words.

The standard mindset of a politician is “what happens later or as a result of …” can be dealt with later. And we wonder why this country sinks ever quicker into a quagmire of utter chaos!

A Lie, is a Lie, is a Lie, and nothing can change that. But if a lie is programed strong enough via the mechanism of twisted speech or intentionally convoluted meaning … it enjoys a very long life masked as the truth … A masquerading lie that most Sheeple will share as the “God given truth”!

CIA Director William Casey 1981: We will know our program of disinformation is a success when all the American people believe is a lie. It is by far the politician, elected or appointed, who is most responsible for the propagation of that disinformation or lie.

Would you like a window into the doublespeak of these minions of the puppet masters, the all powerful ruling oligarchy? Would you like to be able to divine the truth from spoken lies and false promises? Then please watch the video below for “Political Doublespeak 101” …


The EyeOpener Report- Doublespeak Decoded

Politicians & the Doublespeak Dictionary

Ever wonder what politicians are really saying? Well wonder no more. With this handy dandy doublespeak dictionary from Boiling Frogs Post you can find out what all that hot air is really about!

TLB recommends you visit Boiling Frogs Post for more great/pertinent articles and information

See original video and read comments here:

bedroom-scene 1

BY TLB Contributor: Robin Koerner

Rape may represent the greatest possible violation against a human being except, perhaps, for murder.

Any decent person sympathizes with the intent of those who would seek to prevent it by any reasonable means. Moreover, there are plenty of statistics regarding the prevalence of rape in our society – mostly, but not exclusively against women – that indicate a moral and cultural epidemic that must be addressed. I, like far too many people, am close to more than one victim of this evil and so nothing I write here is written lightly.

But I am genuinely concerned about what has recently occurred in California with a view to tackling the crime of rape on college campuses. As is so often the case when the details of behavior are legislated in reaction to the actions of the worst people among us, the results are likely to be much less noble than the intention, because the legislation eliminates the most general rights that should be enjoyed by everyone at all times, to protect a few people some of the time.

Late last week, the first state bill to require colleges to adopt an “affirmative consent” model in their sexual assault policies passed the California senate unanimously.

This bill seeks to change the perfectly moral and behaviorally natural “no means no” standard of consent to sexual activity into “everything except an explicitly verbalized “yes” (along with the acquisition of positive evidence of the same that can be later presented just in case you are ever accused of anything untoward), means “no.”

Let us be absolutely clear what such a rule does and does not do. It does not require that sex always be consensual. That is already the law and the policy of any sane institution. Rather, this bill seeks to make most heretofore consensual sexual activity between adults punishable by requiring a specific form of consent – explicit agreement to a specific request.

Most consensual sexual activity between normal people does not involve the kind of explicit, subsequently provable statement of consent, that this bill demands. Sex usually happens between people who trust each other and – precisely because they know each other well enough to engage in sexual activity – wouldn’t wish to receive or provide such encounter-specific and explicit consent to continue with what to both parties is natural behavior – behavior which, some would say, is often most fulfilling when engaged in with just that trust, naturalness and spontaneity.

The Californian bill would make the majority of such normal encounters punishable. Avoidance of punishment would require either a) refraining from normal (consensual) sexual activity or b) engaging in positive behavior that is mandated by the rule. Both are affronts to basic human rights.

Moreover, the California bill states that past sexual encounters or a romantic relationship do(es) not imply consent. It also specifies that “lack of protest or resistance does not mean consent, nor does silence mean consent.”

Seriously? It is of course true that “a current relationship or prior sex doesn’t imply consent” per se, but “a current relationship or prior sex” most certainly does bear on what does imply consent. Consider an ongoing sexual relationship. Does explicit consent have to be given for the 200th sexual encounter between the couple? And if so, how should it be recorded? That there is clear implied ongoing consent of a kind that stands behind most sexual encounters among human beings is not a prescriptive statement or a normative one: it’s just a recognition of reality. California is thus making normal sexual encounters – of which the sexual act is the culmination – punishable.

Of course, relationships can end and the contextual element of consent can thereby be changed. But consider a relationship that ends acrimoniously. By California’s new bill, since the man cannot provide proof of explicit consent for that last sexual encounter, he has, a priori committed an offense if the woman seeks to declare that an offense was committed. He is, in other words, guilty until he can prove himself innocent. “Slippery slope” does not even come close.

Were this rule to be generalized beyond California’s educational institutions, then most men who’ve ever engaged in sex would be deemed guilty of having engaged in non-consensual sex. Of course that is absurd: all they would really have been guilty of is failing to engage in a mandated form of speech.

For what it’s worth (and it is worth a great deal), the mandating of speech or behavior is against all premises of common law and the healthiest norms of a genuinely free society. And it may even be against the first amendment: even if California’s bill doesn’t force specific words to be said before sex, it nevertheless does force certain behaviors or speech that is designed to elicit a certain response.

Defenders of such a rule might argue only that nothing is mandated because no one is forced to have sex. That would, of course, be to miss the point entirely, but let’s address it for completeness: if someone is willing to have consensual sex with me, then we have a natural right as human beings to engage in that activity, regardless of how we have expressed our willingness to do so. No public institution can impinge on that – or any other – natural right.

Let us generalize away from sex to focus on the principles at stake here.

If you were to say to me that I may not perform any other activity unless I communicate something to someone in a certain way, then you would not be protecting anyone from the outcome of that activity: you would be merely removing my freedom to engage in it with the positive purpose of controlling my communication. You would be preventing me from exercising a natural right, from being a normal human being, going about my business without harming others. This is exactly what happens in prison: which operates by firstly removing a natural freedom (to move freely, for example), and then requiring the incarcerated person to earn that right back in limited fashion as a privilege by performing positive, specified activities. I truly don’t wish to be over-dramatic or reactionary, and obviously the degree of infringement of freedom caused by California’s bill is not quantitatively comparable to that caused by imprisonment, but the principle must be starkly seen.

And what do we get for this basic violation of natural rights? Will California’s bill prevent campus rape? Under the bill, any dispute will still come down to she-said, he-said. Whereas a real rapist would in the past have tried to lie his way out by claiming “she consented to sex,” he will now lie his way out by saying, “she affirmatively consented to sex.”

So in the best case, California’s rule does nothing; in the worst, it punishes decent, sexually active adults and compromises natural rights.

Either way, it is dangerous. The passing of such a law gives lazy politicians and institutional officers the sense that a very real and serious problem has been taken care of when it has not at all. By defining consent so narrowly, non-consent is defined so broadly that its true instances cannot be identified. The genuine moral responsibility of educational institutions to identify actual sexual predators – and to engage in the self-examination necessary to identity the cultural causes of the presumed heightened prevalence of rape at the institution – is entirely abdicated.

Of secondary import is the negative contribution of such a bill to an even broader, if less dangerous, problem: men’s generational inability to understand women, with all those mysterious-to-men female modes of communication, all the ways they communicate their desires, all the ways they like to be made to feel like women, and the way in which everything on that list is mediated by context.

To summarize in British vernacular, “don’t bother with any of that, mate. Just get her to sign here.” That’s where we are going. A law that forces free people, harming no one, to do things they choose not to do can only be consistently enforced with repeated refinements to specify, in ever-increasing detail, the mandated action whenever a case is brought. Such law-making turns the real meaning of rights on its head. Just as all human beings have the (negative) right to the integrity of their bodies, they have the same (negative) right not to be forced to do things they do not want to do when they are harming no one.

I don’t claim to have all the answers, obviously – so I am really seeking to contribute to a debate that I believe must be had. But for sure, college students are legally responsible adults at institutions that are designed to teach them how to think for themselves, and become responsible decision-makers. So as an initial suggestion, why not tackle this devastating moral and cultural problem by educating them about the issue, and requiring them to rise to both the challenge and the responsibility of negotiating, setting and implementing their own policies to deal with it in their community?

Cultures, after all, are the sum total of the attitudes and expectations of the people in them. Therefore, requiring individuals to consider the issue of sexual consent with the other members of their community may be the only way to get to the real roots of the problem – to treat its causes, and not just its terrible symptoms. Education before the crime – rather than punishment after the non-crime – would seek to help men and women understand and genuinely respect each other’s modes of communication and expectations in social contexts.

Without such an approach, we are surely just diminishing our moral sensitivity and giving up personal responsibility – in the name, ironically, of moral sensitivity and personal responsibility.

And meanwhile, the Californian government will be not only in your bedroom, but also in the conversation you have on the way there.

Robin-KoernerRobin Koerner is Publisher,, Founder, Blue Republican (TLB partner), Contributor to The Liberty Beacon project and Contributor to the Huffington Post, Daily Paul , Moderate Voice and Ben Follow Robin on Twitter:



The Gilmer Mirror

Quit trashing Obama’s accomplishments.  He has done more than any other President before him.  Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments:

First President to be photographed smoking a joint.

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.

First President to violate the War Powers Act.

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling  in the Gulf of Mexico.

First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on “shovel-ready” jobs when there was no such thing as “shovel-ready” jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.

First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.

First President to terminate America ’s ability to put a man in space.

First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.

First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.

First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.

First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).

First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).

First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.

First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office.

First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records.

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

First President to go on multiple “global apology tours” and concurrent “insult our friends” tours.

First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers.

First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.

First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.

First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense.

First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.

First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).

First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they “volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences.”

Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.

It’s hard to comprehend all this guy has gotten away with.  Any other president would have been impeached!  What in God’s name is wrong with our government that they allow this guy carte blanch.  It absolutely boggles the mind!

I feel much better now.  I had been under the impression he hadn’t been doing ANYTHING!!

TLB recommends you visit this site:


Click on image to visit site

See featured article and read comments here:



Here is the scathing letter from Aaron Vaughn’s parents to Obama!

By: Billy and Karen Vaughn

After finally choosing to view the barbaric, on-camera beheading by ISIS of freelance war correspondent James Foley, I have been left with a level of rage known only to those of us who have sacrificed unspeakable offerings on the altar of world peace.

My offering was my only son — Aaron Carson Vaughn. Aaron was a member of SEAL Team VI. He was killed in action when a CH47D Chinook, carrying thirty Americans and eight Afghans was shot down in the Tangi River Valley of Afghanistan on Aug. 6, 2011.

Many times over the past three years, I have been asked what drove my son to choose his particular career. What made him want to be a Navy SEAL? My answer is simple.

Aaron Vaughn was a man who possessed the courage to acknowledge evil. And evil, once truly acknowledged, demands response. Perhaps this is why so few are willing to look it in the eye. It is much simpler — much safer — to look the other way.

That is, unless you are the leader of the Free World.

As Commander-in-Chief, your actions — or lack thereof — Mr. President, cost lives. As you bumble about in your golf cart, slapping on a happy face and fist-pounding your buddies, your cowardly lack of leadership has left a gaping hole — not only in America’s security — but the security of the entire globe. Your message has come across loud and clear, sir: You are not up to this job. You know it. We know it. The world knows it.

Please vacate the people’s house and allow a man or woman of courage and substance to seize the reigns of this out-of-control thug-fest and regain the balance we, America, have provided throughout our great history.

Thanks to your “leadership” from whatever multi-million dollar vacation you happen to be on at any given moment, the world is in chaos. What’s been gained, you’ve lost. What’s been lost, you’ve decimated. You’ve demolished our ability to hold the trust of allies. You’ve made a mockery of the title “President.” And you’ve betrayed the nation for which my son and over 1.3 million others have sacrificed their very lives.

But this should come as no surprise, since your wife uttered a vile statement on Feb. 18, 2008, during the primary campaign — one that speaks volumes of your true convictions. “For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country,” she said.

I am sure my deceased son thanks you for that, Mrs. Obama. Oh, and you’re welcome.

Never in my lifetime have I witnessed such despair and such growing fear that the world’s last best hope, America, has finally been dismantled. Perhaps the better word is transformed — fundamentally transformed. Come to think of it, it’s become difficult — if not impossible — to believe things haven’t gone exactly as you planned, Mr. President.

Amazingly, in five short years, your administration has lurched from one disaster to another. You spearheaded the ambitious rush to end the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan — with no plan on how to do so effectively. Also, the release of “the Taliban five” in exchange for one American — without consulting Congress — is also on your shoulders.

You have been at the helm during unprecedented national security leaks — including, but not limited to the outing of SEAL Team VI on the Bin laden raid, the outing of the Pakistani doctor who provided the intelligence for that raid, the outing of Afghanistan’s CIA station chief, and the outing of your personal “kill list” to make you look tough. In addition, 75 percent of American deaths in Afghanistan and 83 percent of Americans-wounded-in-action have occurred on your watch, according to

And now, we have this recent, heinous event: the beheading of an American citizen by a barbaric organization you foolishly referred to as “the JV team” in your statements to the New Yorker magazine in January.

You, sir, are the JV team. It’s time for you to step down and allow a true leader to restore our honor and protect our sons and daughters.

America has always been exceptional. And she will be again. You, Mr. President, are a bump in our road.                                                                                            

 Billy and Karen Vaughn


TLB recommends you click on the graphic below to visit this great site for more pertinent articles and information …


See featured article and read comments here:


Commentary by: Roger Landry (TLB)

We at The Liberty Beacon project constantly push back against eugenics, genocide or programed population reduction, and will continue to do so going forward. We know, given the total population, and considering the total arable land mass of this planet, that this planet is far from overpopulated … but is that an inevitability?

Our global resources are finite and dwindling at an alarming rate, but to sacrifice your legacy, your ability to choose when and if you shall have a family, and leave this decision to the mercy of a cold, calculating, privileged global bureaucrat, is something that most of us would rebel against.

What will the criteria be for the granted privilege of parenthood, intellect, health, social standing, longevity, racial purity? And what assurance will we have that this privilege will not be corrupted and confined to those who consider themselves elite, as we already see in the wholesale corruption and complicity that festers in our governments today?

We suspect (and in many cases can prove) the mechanisms of population reduction are already in use on the global population with the USA not only immune to none of this, but is in fact the focus of many of said mechanisms. Among these we can include vaccines, GMO’s, pharmaceutical drugs, Geo-engineering and bio-toxins (just to name the top dogs). We have no say in any of this, and the poisons perpetuating this project are all legal and in many cases recommended by our very government and many other governments.

This is being facilitated by such entities as the UN (Agenda 21), WHO, Big Pharma, Monsanto, FDA, EPA, CDC etc… Research the rising infertility rate in the USA for a real shock, and the rest of the globe is not far behind. Your right to procreate may be fading fast without your knowledge or consent, driven by the ideals of this self proclaimed elite.

population-control 1

Liberty is our root drive in TLB, the liberty to make the decisions that affect us personally and our families. But what if these decisions combine to have a serious impact on the world as a whole, then what is the answer? I for one would never acquiesce my right or ability to procreate, to a global corporatocracy.… But for how much longer will this be a decision I will be allowed to make.

What we present to you here (attached below) is a different view and one we do not necessarily agree with. We present it to you because our mandate at TLB is to eradicate programed ignorance through education, and if you don’t know what those you disagree with are thinking, considering or planning, then you can never defend or push back against it until is is too late.

The information in this (attached) commentary is compelling, and some of the argument is based on a solid foundation, while other concepts are based on future technological innovations. It should all be considered to be within the realm of possibility, either today or in the near future. And those possibilities all directly effect the future of humanity in both positive or catastrophic fashions.

We are entering the realm of “the global good” infringing on personal rights and freedoms in a very large and dominant way, and once we traverse this path there is no turning back … outside bloody revolution.

This is a topic that must be discussed and debated if we are ever to leave a viable planet and peaceful society to the children we may or may-not be allowed to have.

Please read on …


population-control 4In this transhumanist future, should everyone still be allowed to have unlimited children whenever they want?

It’s time to consider restricting human breeding

By: Zoltan Istvan

Given the number of children that starve each day, dwindling planetary resources and the coming transhumanist era, it might be time to consider restricting human breeding, argues futurist Zoltan Istvan in this guest post

A few years ago, I was at a doctor party, the kind where tired residents drop by in their scrubs, everyone drinks red wine, and discussion centers around medical industry gripes. I wandered over to a group of obstetricians and listened in. One tall blonde woman said something that caught my attention: with 10,000 kids dying everyday around the world from starvation, you’d think we’d put birth control in the water.

The controversial idea to restrict or control human breeding is not new. In 1980, Hugh LaFollette, Ethics professor at the University of South Florida, wrote a seminal essay on the topic titled Licensing Parents. Since then, philosophers and even some politicians have considered the idea, especially in light of China, the most populated country in the world, implementing a one-child policy that is in effect today.

For most people in the 21st Century, however, the idea of restricting the right to have offspring for any reason whatsoever seems blatantly authoritarian. Telling a person when and how many children they can have violates just about every core value we possess in a free society. It’s a thorny issue made even more complicated by the coming transhumanist era, which is almost upon us.

The transhumanist age — where radical science and technology will revolutionize the human being and experience — will eventually bring us indefinite lifespans, cyborgization, cloning, and even ectogenesis, where people use artificial wombs outside of their bodies to raise fetuses.

Breeding controls and measures make more sense when you consider that some leading life extensionist scientists believe we will conquer human mortality in the next 20 years. Already, in 2010, scientists had some success with stopping and  reversing ageing in mice. The obvious question is: In this transhumanist future, should everyone still be allowed to have unlimited children whenever they want?

The philosophical conundrum of controlling human procreation rests mostly on whether all human beings are actually responsible enough to be good parents and can provide properly for their offspring. Clearly, untold numbers of children — for example, those millions that are slaves in the illegal human trafficking industry — are born to unfit parents.

In an attempt to solve this problem and give hundreds of millions of future kids a better life, I cautiously endorse the idea of licensing parents, a process that would be little different than getting a driver’s licence. Parents who pass a series of basic tests qualify and get the green light to get pregnant and raise children. Those applicants who are deemed unworthy — perhaps because they are homeless, or have drug problems, or are violent criminals, or have no resources to raise a child properly and keep it from going hungry — would not be allowed until they could demonstrate they were suitable parents.

Transhumanist Hank Pellissier, founder of the Brighter Brains Institute, also supports the idea, insisting on humanitarian grounds that it would bring a measured sense of responsibility to raising kids. In an essay, he notes professor and bioethics pioneer Joseph Fletcher saying that “many births are accidental”. Accidentally getting pregnant often leaves women unable to pursue their careers and lives as they might’ve hoped for and wanted.

Naturally, some environmentalists, such as American educator Paul L Ehrlich, author of landmark book The Population Bomb, also advocate for government intervention to control human population, which would be one sure way to help the planet’s fragile and depleted ecosystems.

One of the most comprehensive works about the idea of restricting breeding is Peg Tittle’s book Should Parents be Licensed? Debating the Issues. It’s a balanced collection of essays by experts with various views on the subject.

There’s no question that some of the ideas of licensing parents make sense. After all, we don’t allow people to drive cars on crack cocaine. Why would we allow them to procreate if they want while on it? The goal with licensing parents is not so much to restrict freedoms, but to guarantee the maximum resources to those children that exist and will exist in the future.

Of course, the problem is always in the details. How could society monitor such a licensing process? Would governments force abortion upon mothers if they were found to be pregnant without permission? These things seem unimaginable in most societies around the world. Besides, who wants the government handling human breeding when it can’t do basic things like balance its own budgets and stay out of wars? Perhaps a nonprofit entity like the World Health Organization might be able to step in and offer more confidence.

I see near-term hope in what can be called a new transhuman-inspired  birth control device  originally developed at MIT and now backed by funding from Microsoft founder Bill Gates. The implanted microchip lasts for up to 16 years — three times current implantable devices, including IUDs — and can deliver hormones into the body via an on-off switch on your mobile phone. It’s not a huge jump to imagine governments seeing opportunity in using this. Many children born into poverty end up costing taxpayers billions. Sadly, a high percentage of those same kids will end up on the streets, in gangs, or in prison after they become adults. Just as legalization of abortion has helped drive down crime rates, licensing parents would likely have the same effect.

The approximate  10,000  starving child deaths a day that that the aforementioned doctor cited come from various reports and studies, all of which point to the fact that well over 50 million kids have died due to hunger and malnutrition in the last 30 years. That’s a lot of kids.

What’s more, 15 percent  of kids in the US — the supposed wealthiest country in the world — suffer from hunger. A large portion of them are born to families that don’t have the resources to properly raise a child. After all, if you can’t feed a child, you probably shouldn’t have one. Licensing would’ve restricted many of those births until the parents were more able to deal with the challenges of procreation, which is undoubtedly the most intense and serious long term responsibility most human beings will face in their lives.

As a liberty-loving person, I have always eschewed giving up any freedoms. However, in some cases, the statistics are so overwhelming, that at the very least, given the coming era of indefinite lifespans and transhumanist technology, we must remain open-minded to consider how best to move the species forward to produce the happiest and healthiest children for the planet. Anything less will leave us with millions more preventable deaths and incalculable suffering of innocent kids.

Zoltan Istvan is a futurist, philosopher, journalist, and transhumanist. He is the author of the bestselling novel The Transhumanist Wager

TLB recommends you visit Wired for more articles and information.

See featured (attached) article and read comments here:

Keepers of the Faith

By TLB Contributor: Ken LaRive

Mix together threatened political power structures, economic instability and default, cultural experiments gone haywire, then pepper them with un-reasoned fear, selfish and self-centered concerns for evil intent, further salted by mandated and instilled standards without a sound moral compass… one that justifies without reason, motivates by blind faith and trust, and then… finally stirred together by a great and powerful elitist spoon creating an amniotic and chaotic vortex for the profit of a black bottom line… and this, you will find, is our world in the year 2014, and our future if we allow it.

There are so many problems, giant problems, and they are found not only in the power structures in competition with other mega power structures, but cultural changes too… so emphatic and seemingly without empathy, it is putting into question fundamental strings that have held us together since civilization’s organization. We are asking questions of morality and ethics, liberty from tyranny, God and religion, men and machine, and the most powerful of all, slavery and self worth.

In the U.S., workers are raging against the welfare state, international corporate war for profit, debt enslavement, the destruction of civil liberty and the shredding of our Constitution, Socialism and the coming Progressive Liberal Communism, Government spying and the militarization of local police, the threats of gun confiscation and marshal law, anti-social lawlessness and violence, an open border invitation to illegals from around the world with the promise of free services and the destruction of our sovereignty, and a president who laughs while teeing off. But this is a short list. The actual list is a mile long…

Around the world, and for many various reasons, people are incensed and outraged, and dying in the streets in protest. As Gaza shoots off fireworks and throws rocks in protest, Hamas, who Israel actually created and armed, has turned into a terrorist group, and for each one of them bombed into oblivion, about fifty innocent people are killed with them, and yet they do not give up. Israel’s Zionists Church/State government calls them collateral damage, and has told the world that they will do anything to stay in power, and their own terrorist organization called, The Mossad, are causing chaos all around the world, from infiltration into governments, to covert assassinations, to sabotage and torture. Their influence is so powerful, their US lobby has to be consulted before any President can be hand-picked, as free elections are suspended, and they have intelligence so insightful, they not only knew beforehand that 9-11 was about to happen, but evidence suggests that it was their military expertise that actually brought down the twin towers and building 7 in free-fall. It was an event that has never happened in the world before or since. The most immediate and telling evidence was the seven dancing Israelis who were arrested in New York, Mossad Agents, and in days they were whisked back to Israel, without charges. They, without any show of fear, admitted prior knowledge of the attack in interviews on their own televisions stations They stated: “We were only there to record the event.”

And only a few of us bloggers remember the 134.5 billion in U.S. Bearer Bonds found in a false bottom suitcase trying to make their way to Switzerland from Italy by Japanese Nationals, and the immediate media blackout… and we are not allowed an investigation into these profound matters, and life goes on as football season is upon us.

But it isn’t just the lack of truth, the overwhelming deceit and outright lies from a media owned by international corporations, but we have respectable men, honorable men of virtue who are telling us that unless we stand up, as we the people, the next bubble will be the death of America, by foreclosure… The same kind of meltdown that happened to Russia, not so very long ago… And the scary thing is this: if we go down, the entire world will go down with us, culminating into WW3.

And all around the world people are pushing agendas, to manipulate, to confiscate, to overrule and over run, from the Egyptians, Syrians, and Yemenis as they rage against their rulers. The Wukan uprising in China is changing the political landscape, slowly, and furious Russians are pounding at Putin’s door, as he tries to withdraw from the European Jewish-owned banking systems, (as he put it) and bring to justice what he called the Jewish Mafia, at great monetary and cultural expense, and displace a religious void created during the cold war with fundamental Orthodox Christianity, who want nothing more than to save your soul and make a mandatory Church State there. And Europe, no longer allowed to own a gun, is being overrun by Middle Easterners bent on taking over the EURO tapestry from the inside out, and without a shot, as they play the system… and it is a system designed by myopic leaders, or traitorous ones, mirror images of the ones controlling France, Australia, and America. And if it is intended or not, the outcome will be the same, unless, of course, some push back.

And yes, when the push will come, as it without a doubt will, there are some who will make unimaginable profit…
The four forces that control us all… Yes, everything happening around the planet, overwhelming our very diverse and hapless citizens of Earth… are driven by the same four forces, and they are all corrosive, self-serving, and at times… overtly irresponsible:

(1) Un-reasoned, misdirected, unorganized, misinformed, and frustrated anger (rage) is our primary and universal reaction. Frustrated, because there is no way seen to organize, and no avenue to find real truth. This is the basic commonality, though all seemingly reason that our liberty is god-give, how to wrest it from a strong and far reaching power is not yet understood.

(2) Borrowing without the intent to pay it off is called debt slavery. Ponzi schemes utilizing, unchecked, both government and private debt, and it’s violation of fundamental human rights, from a rigged presidential election, a military industrial complex owned by international conglomerate business and financed by international banking systems in league with an unaccountable Federal Reserve System who prints money our of thin air to pay for it all, and all of that is incorporated as future debt, American debt. We pay, with our future, for their profit. And the process creates the hidden tax of inflation, and a piece of your life and country is forfeited. War is a racket.

(3) What controls us is a competition without a moral standard, honor, or national alliance. In other words, an international corporation, bank, and the independent and unaccountable Federal Reserve System….has no allegiance to America. All of them are interested in one thing, their survival, and their profit. A bank who makes money on both sides of war, and arms dealers who supply both side of that coin, are enemies of humanity, and should be brought to justice by international law. So too, is any individual who holds office in our government who has duel citizenship. One can not serve both. On side is a traitor to the other.

(4) The last can only be described as a deadlock. This inability to formulate a way out of this fine mess by those in power is easily understood. Firstly, they do not want to be held accountable, or lose what they have acquired. Indeed, they know full well the problems at hand, and how to fix it, but will not change the institution that created this chaos… But take small steps, putting on little band aids, usually by more borrowing from a central bank to bolster their economy. Spending into further debt, is no solution… Instead they shore it up, to put off the inevitable, the unavoidable…

These so-called leaders are puppet members of a powerful and dominating structure, a shadow government, and as they dither, those who pull their strings have no fear at all… You see the greatest of all profit is made in chaos… Just like the put options just prior to 9-11 indicated that big banks and corporations knew that United and American airlines would be hijacked; they also knew that those stocks would take a dive. They bet on this, called “put options,” and made fortunes… and just like the carpetbaggers that made their way into the south after our civil war, buying up at bankrupt prices anything not tied down, so too will these bankers not only survive a total world collapse, but afterwards, vie to own it all.

Author’s note: I love my country, and that comes not only from what I was propagandized to believe, but the love I have for what I consider my American people. And I do love the entire human race as well, and have pleaded my life to do no harm. I also try to practice the teachings of Jesus Christ, and have found that if respect and love is freely given, most always you will get it back. With this said, I see what I consider real evil in this world too… and as a Libertarian, one idea that nails all four above on the wall of my very soul, is the thought that there is a force out there so powerful, individually and collectively, that I, and all of us, are being played the fool.

Nothing on this earth, except perhaps the killing of an innocent person for profit, and both war and abortion comes to mind, but the enslavement of the spirit, by lies and deceit, is the worst of all. Of all the kinds of enslavement that power has wrought on the powerless, and throughout history, what could be more evil? The enslavement of the mind, by instilling weakness, is scientifically done. The creation of dependence, the installation of fear, the initiation of a selfish, myopic, and self-serving ego by media taboo that subverts a free thought or free speech to fearful silence, the creation of lustful, lurid, and base addictions where a war on drugs become lucrative… And it is manufactured, from the protected poppy fields of Afghanistan by our own military, to our own open borders where gangs of mafia cross into my beloved America… and all of it, every element, every motivation, to the last moment before our final destruction, is all about money. It is about people who justify what they are doing, because they work in a collective environment, a corporation, a bank, a government, who just want to ride that wave a few more moments… And they know, if they stand up and make themselves accountable, their lives will no longer be their own. They see how other people of conscience are treated by the power elite… and they sit back waiting for the bubble to pop, prepping for that final transaction, caught up in a wheel.

Yes, I see hope, and what else but optimism do we have? But I can tell you this, nothing, nothing since the dawn of mankind has anything so threatened our humanity, our very existence, as what is happening right this minute. Look around. We are being herded into a corner, fleeced, and instead of breaking free, we show them our soft underside, and kill for them without so much as a question why… is the kind we accept from our own complacency. And our children’s future will be assured, having to ask permission to polish their own chains, just as you do. We are indeed a product of our environment, like father, like son.

See featured article and read comments here: