The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon





Photo by Matt Cardy/Getty Images

By TLB Contributor: Ken LaRive

Author’s Notes: The following was taken from my travel diary back in 2005. It was published in several Louisiana Newspapers from 2005 to 2008, and found its way into the Lafayette Political Buzz Examiner page in 2009. At the time, who could have foreseen that with just a simple and singular vote, Scotland might be free from Britain’s domination, and yet, it seems there may be a chance that the vote might keep everything just the same… you see, the Progressive left has a great hand in that say, and Unions do not want to relinquish their hold on labor… we will just have to wait and see…

Scotland, and the idea of Liberty...

Right now, I’m working on a North Sea platform, and as usual, pumping the locals for ‘color.’ I had a conversation with a Scottish friend who gave me an interesting insight into a bit of Scottish psyche. He has traveled extensively in the States, and loves the idea of the Constitution guaranteeing personal freedom, and he spoke to me about the Bill of Rights in a way that is lost to one born to it, and taken for granted. He was trying to explain the frustrations of being proud of his Scottishness, while at the same time being frustrated at the lack of freedom, and liberty in his country, when compared to being an American in America. He told a story, which highlighted this problem that I would like to share…

He had two friends, let’s call them Tommy and Bill, who worked for the railroads, maintaining and repairing track as members of a ‘rail gang.’

“These rail gangs were made up of hard men. Tommy and Bill played at right and left back (defense) for the railway soccer team, which was infamous as being the hardest team in the league. Bill and Tommy’s motto was “they shall not pass!” and woe to any opposing forward who tried to run past them with the ball!

The rail gangs were also noted for their extreme left wing political views, and during their lunch breaks there were always discussions on the merits of various forms of Socialism. The only ganger’s who weren’t stanch members of the Labour party, were staunch members of the Communist party! These were men who would, in times of war, have helped form the backbone of any fighting unit of the famous ‘Gordon Highlanders’ regiment in the British army. Their foremen at work treated them with the respect that was due to hard working, hard fighting men. They had a fiercely independent streak, and were proud of the fact that they felt themselves to be the equal of any of their so-called ‘betters’ in the aristocracy. They were proud of the fact that they worked in all weathers… and no train would be stuck because they were inside a hut warming their hands. Not that they did it for the railway company mind you, but because of pride in their own toughness, with ability to brave the elements. It was their responsibility, and they took that serious…

One day, as they were repairing a section of track, the whistle blew to warn them of an approaching train, and they moved to the side of the track to allow it to pass. The train slowed to go over the damaged track, and crawled along at less than walking speed.

As the train passed this rugged line of men, they looked up at the carriages and the many faces looking out. And there, they were so surprised to see, was the Queen Mother, the most respected member of the British royal family. When she saw the men, she smiled and waved her hand gracefully (as only she can do). Then, this group of hard men, these hardened socialists, who would punch a boss rather than take any abuse, all at the same instant… doffed their caps to her! When the train had passed, each of them avoided the eyes of their mates, put their caps on, and never mentioned the incident to each other ever again!

“It seemed that, in spite of their strongly held socialist beliefs, that ‘we are a’ Jock Tamson’s bairns’ (we are all equal), centuries of kow-towing to the aristocracy had made the cap-doffing an instinctive reaction. These men would have had their eye teeth removed rather than admit this, but nevertheless it was so. Because there has never been a revolution in the UK, and because the ruling classes are still there, the ordinary people have never known what it feels like to be truly free. There are still hereditary peers in the house of Lords who have the right to vote on legislation, not because they are qualified in any way, shape, or form, but because their forefathers were part of the ancient aristocracy!

In the distant past, people were elevated to the peerage for performing some service to the king, perhaps even providing women for his pleasure, and their sons and grandsons have been reaping the benefit for generation after generation. Only recently has the Labour government made changes to the House of Lords, with some of the hereditary peers being turfed out of their cozy club. Even this radical Labour government didn’t have the courage of their convictions, however, and left some of the hereditary peers in place. If the ruling government still doffs its cap to the aristocracy, small wonder that Tommy and Bill doffed theirs!”

Now, before we Americans start to scoff at the serf-like attitudes of these men, it’s worth thinking about the fact that our forefathers were probably driven out from Scotland (or countries like it) – and had to fight tooth and nail in the War of Independence, so that their children would never have to doff their caps to their ‘betters’. Even so, think about how the east coast intelligentsia in America fall over themselves to get close to visiting British royalty, even after nearly 260 years of freedom. Take these railwaymen out of Scotland for a couple of generations, let them breathe the free air of America, and they would be no different from any of us.

Finally, a few words of warning about America which my Scottish friend passed on, and which I quote almost word for word: “Freedom is a precious commodity that has to be re-won each generation. A lazy and apathetic population will have their freedoms eroded slowly and smoothly by those in the halls of Congress who ‘know what’s best for you.’ Don’t, as a people, allow a ruling class to get too entrenched in the corridors of power! This is not a party political statement. I don’t care if you vote Democrat, Republican, or any other political party, it behooves each of you to vote regularly, and to regularly call your government representatives to account. Are two generations of Bush in the White House enough? Should you even contemplate voting for another Kennedy? Remember, it’s only a few years since Richard Nixon contemplated the idea of changing the constitution so that he could run for a third term! And it was only through the incompetence of a few burglars that it was discovered how far he was prepared to go to hang on to power! You should make sure that you elect more Thomas Jeffersons, rather than the scions of a few ruling dynasties. Don’t create your own royal families, so that your children don’t ever feel too ashamed to look each other in the eye as they stand with doffed caps and watch some dignitary sweep past in an armored limo”.

Far fetched? Maybe, but we should check even the smallest tendency for the ruling classes to rear their ugly heads in this fine country of ours – just in case! My friend tells me that he cannot openly write about his feelings, and envies my ability to do so. I felt a lump in my throat when I realized the implications of what he said, and how much for granted I have taken our freedoms… Liberty, in danger.

I had not paid much attention to the political climate of America or the world until I started to travel. And of all the cultures I have met along the way, from the high road to the low, Scotland and its people are a part of my heart. I hope they can find enough patriots who want to be free from the yoke of tyranny. God bless you Scotland.

De featured article here:

agenda21 1

By: Rory

With so much technology at our fingertips you would think our societies intellect would be on the rise, sadly that is not the case. The problem is a total disconnect with reality and with our world. The world is a big place and as Stacy Herbert points out, in America, if one watches or listens only to mainstream media Europe does not exist. The entire planet, with the exception of “the Middle East” does not exist. Russia wouldn’t exist if the Pentagon didn’t need a new enemy in President Putin. There is never any news about what is happening around the world; the economy, the civil unrest and the uprisings that are going on around the world do not exist if one watches or listens to mainstream media. On the other hand if you get your news from the internet or your favorite You Tube news channel you are labeled as a conspiracy nut, tin-foil hat wearing, basement dweller. gold economy world preparednessI ask you, does Europe exist? Isn’t it a fairly large land mass on planet Earth with millions of people living and dying everyday? What about the countries that comprise “the Middle East”? Places like Iran, Iraq, Qatar, Bahrain and Turkey? Do these places exist only in the minds of conspiracy nuts who get their news from the internet!?

I bring this to table in an attempt to show how small minded people have become. If the masses in the United States are so blind that even Europe doesn’t exist, it is a far stretch to getting someone to accept a global virus like the UN’s Agenda 21. On the surface this policy may be appealing to some people, especially the people that buy into the nonsense known as climate change or is it global warming or is it global cooling, which would be closer to the truth. The people that have bought into this must not have seen the study that shows three times the current global population could fit into the land mass known as Oklahoma—three times the global population!

Agenda 21 is one of these little known policies that gets rolled out during the Bilderberg meetings and begins spreading, like an out of control virus, around the world. Simple, small steps that progress over a decade or more that hardly anyone notices. Followed by larger steps that have a direct impact on people. Then after all the supporting policies and laws are in place, something as sinister as Common Core seemingly comes from nowhere. Common Core effects nations and, at this stage, will be difficult for anyone to reverse all the policies that have been implemented that support Common Core. These policies will take ignorance to a whole new level. I once heard that ignorance is a curable disease, but once Common Core takes root those days may be over.

Before the term “sustainability” was in vogue, the late UN Deputy Secretary General Robert Muller, the architect of UNESCO’s “World Core Curriculum,” also offered some insight into the purpose of UN-led, globalized pseudo-education. The goals: “Assisting the child in becoming an integrated individual who can deal with personal experience while seeing himself as a part of ‘the greater whole.’ In other words, promote growth of the group idea, so that group good, group understanding, group interrelations and group goodwill replace all limited, self-centered objectives, leading to group consciousness.” Put another way, smash individualism and notions of individual rights, replacing them with collectivism. [Source]

common coreDavid Risselada has written an exhaustive report to help everyone better understand Agenda 21. So far, he has released three different articles to break it down in simple, easy to understand language and to bring out the details of how this global virus is going to affect every person on the planet. How is it that a very small group of megalomaniacs, sociopaths and criminals can get together and decide what is best for EVERYONE? When did we become so complacent in our responsibilities as human beings that something like Agenda 21 has not only taken root, but is now infesting communities the world over.

Ed [citizens the world over] fails to grasp the fact that anytime any country enters into a treaty with another country, both countries tend to lose a bit of sovereignty. That should be obvious to Ed who claims to be a “Writer, lawyer and politico turned history teacher.” Unfortunately, he sees no connection between entering into a treaty and the resultant loss of sovereignty. His big question is “what’s the harm?” because he thinks if the “good” outweighs the “bad,” then a treaty is fine. Loss of sovereignty is never good but Ed [citizens the world over] doesn’t mind as long as his definition of “good” comes from it.

By the way, we haven’t even discussed the fact that the UN is not a sovereign nation of its own. It is a body of representatives from various nations. The US Senate cannot enter into a treaty with anything that is not a sovereign nation, so why are we entering into treaties with the UN? A good question for an upcoming article.

Gangs have turf. The object is to keep your own turf and even gain more if possible by taking over new turf from a gang next door. But let’s say two gangs enter into an agreement (treaty). They agree that members of each gang will not go into the other gang’s territory and they will both join together to fight off outside invaders if the need arises.

The only problem with that treaty or agreement is that each gang has removed a bit of its own sovereignty. They are now limited by not being able to freely go anywhere they want. They have to avoid the other gang’s territory. By the way, this is only an example. I’m not defending gang’s rights. [Source]

We give up a little of our sovereignty here, a little sovereignty there and the next thing you know, our national sovereignty has been happily handed over to a small group of crazies. Do these crazies have their best interest at heart or ours? Does Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller or Nathan Rothschild even know you exist? Do you represent a threat to their plan for one world government, one world currency and one world religion? Absolutely.

Where do we go from here? What can we do, as individuals, to combat Agenda 21? With the policies coming from an entity like the United Nations, how do we get our local “representatives” to address our concerns? What is the push back on something like Common Core?


TLB recommends you visit The Daily Coin for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:



By TLB Contributor: Rabah JL

The past few weeks have seen ISIS used as a basis to vilify Islam through a variation of methods.

The most prominent of which has been an insinuated animosity between Islam and Christianity. Especially by professing such animosity is rooted in Qur’anic teaching.

As a person who has studied Islam my whole life, I can confirm that this is complete and utter nonsense. Christians and Jews are among the most respected people in the Qur’an, singled out and named “the people of the book” in every verse they are mentioned.

Having said that, there is no need to take my word for it. Here are a few examples demonstrating the strong bond between Christians, Jews, and Muslims cited from the Book itself:

“The same religion has He established for you as that which He enjoined on Noah … and that which We enjoined on Abraham, Moses, and Jesus” (42:13).

“We (Muslims) believe in the Revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you (Jews & Christians); our Allah and your Allah is One” (29:46).

“We believe in Allah, and in what has been revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and in (the Books) given to Moses, Jesus, and the Prophets, from their Lord: We make no distinction between one and another among them” (3:84).

Islam-is-the-Religion-of-Peace 1

Hence, the aforementioned implication is clearly nothing more than a baseless fabrication aimed at inciting hatred.

Another myth being perpetuated is the notion that ISIS are “a religious movement”. This is also ill-founded.

Every single action ISIS have taken so far has been glaringly political.

Their first step upon entering Iraq was armament- a very clear military maneuver with no religious incentive.

The ultimate goal is to colonize two countries (Syria and Iraq)- colonization is a form of political control through forced settlements.

In the process, they have attempted a genocide of any (Muslim, Christian, or other) who does not pledge allegiance to their self-proclaimed caliphate- for them, this is “treason”, yet another political concept.

Every aim undertaken has been heavily politicized, regardless of the rationale or labels declared towards purported religious teaching.

These falsified claims of religious value have a multitude of aims, one of which is manipulating a steady source of recruitment through brainwashed support. Much like the Christian Crusades- a mass slaughter in the name of religion, but if one were to look at its true nature, it was simply a territorial conflict.

It is absurd to think that highly educated journalists, analysts, and politicians have fallen to such a naive standard where they would unequivocally believe an organization’s claim for what it is, rather than defining it through its actions. A self-evident truth is extremely apparent, yet the public is still deliberately bludgeoned with the same xenophobic implications.

Beyond this, the propelled image of ISIS has instigated a new form of Islamophobia which seeks to blame Islam for all that is wrong in history, the world, and anything in between.

In a world full of problems, the urge to find a focal point for one’s frustration is understandable. However, Islam is an ironic choice to make.

Through centuries of history, spanning the Spanish Inquisition, the Holocaust, European Antisemitism, the Cuban genocide, the American genocide of more than 100 million Native Indians, and the brutal British colorization which stole the lives of more than 15 million Indians (among others).

Even taking into account the First World War, Second World War, nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (with a lasting impact to this very day), the British concentration camps of Africans and the enslavement of black Africans which resulted in the death of 88% of 180 million- corpses which were then dumped into the Atlantic Ocean.

Also, the ethnic cleansing of Australia’s Aboriginals, Vietnamese being subjected to phosphorous gas by the US, 200,000 killed in the Mexican Caste War of Yucatan, and millions of Russians by the hand of Stalin. Human beings have clearly suffered much disparity.

Though there is more to list, a cynical irony already forms. Not one of the above (more than a billion) corpses piled, involved a single Islamic role.

Still, Islam is where we have fallen to lay all blame?

A religion which:

- Is so victimized and relentlessly portrayed with negativity through every and any media platform.

- Is demonized to the point where it has become absurd.

- Through its own laws dictates that not even a tree can be harmed during war, let alone an animal or innocent human being.

- Teaches that no man can kill another, lest they be prosecuted as though they had murdered all of humanity.

- Has close to 2 billion adherents across the planet.

Catholicism, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, and other ideologies or religions (even though they do not provoke any form of violence) can quite easily be argued as the overbearing objective for instigating many major conflicts in world history from the aforementioned tragedies.

Therefore, if people were to rely on statistics or any historical context to support their racially charged claims, blame for religious war would not be so particular.

The fact of the matter is that political motivation and certain traits within human nature (greed, self-importance, vengeance, egotism) constitute the only real reasons for these acts of barbarism. Religion is merely manipulated as justification for the masses, thus it cannot be liable as a “cause”.

The appeal in blaming religion is in its simplicity. It is far easier to blame an idea which acts as an umbrella over anyone and everyone you are meant to despise, rather than going through the hindrance of patience to identify those solely responsible then punishing their perverse agenda in isolation.

Today Islam is thrown around far too easily as a scapegoat for evil, and this is only becoming worse as it is fed by mass ignorance. The utility this unsubstantiated hatred now encompasses is at the point where it is an embarrassment to our proclamation of existing as “intelligent beings”.


Do not let abhorrent individual acts represent any religious ideology. Do not let ISIS overshadow fact and spread bitterness.

Most importantly: do not become empty puppets, connected by the strings of media, to the fingers of ISIS.



By TLB Contributor: Rabah JL

A revolution that came to a halt on our TV screens more than two years ago, but rages on to this very moment in reality. A revolution for democracy, and the right to have such a revolution.

How many of us are aware that in a certain country:

1) Every Friday, thousands are attending peaceful protests across major cities. Every Friday, hundreds of those protesters are murdered where they stand.

2) Every day sees the army and police kidnap, rape, and mercilessly kill young girls as well as women; publicly and without reprisal.

3) Every opposition or group which raise their heads to make a statement are deemed and declared a “terrorist organization”- thereby excusing any excessive force used against them.

4) Many independent human rights organizations have been attempting to launch on-site investigations in this state. Their members are always deported upon arrival.

5) Every single diplomat, foreign or domestic, is subjected to a full-body search before being allowed near the President.

6) Any ounce of political strategy, critical thinking, diplomatic appeal, or even basic education is absent in this President’s history and course of action.

7) Every oppression and attack is aimed at defenseless civilians by a military armed with weapons of industrial warfare.

8) Every week, hundreds of University students are expelled from their studies due to their political views.

9) Relentless psychological attacks consisting of fear, paranoia, and distrust have been inflicted upon the populace. Resulting in a deafening silence while their death toll continues to accumulate.

The list goes on, and only grows more horrifying.

This is Egypt.

1) Protests have been inhabiting Cairo, and almost every other city since the military coup took place.

Despite mass casualties, attendees have braved the overwhelming opposition and stood for their rights for more than a year so far.

Do not make the mistake of referring to these protesters as “Islamists” or pro-Muslim Brotherhood supporters. Such protests consist of Muslims, Christians, and even major secular groups. Al-Sisi’s attacks are neither targeted nor sympathetic.

Liberty is not confined to any religion. These people march under the flag of humanity first, basic freedoms second, and the hope of a real Egyptian democracy overall.

2) Over its history, Egypt has suffered many dictatorships. It is a past filled with power-hungry feudal-type leaders whom advocate violence as a method of control.

However, never before have women been targeted so repulsively and consistently.

The past year has seen it become a norm to witness women blatantly abducted in broad daylight. They are usually raped then mutilated, thrown away, or killed.

Just to draw on a recent and particularly horrific example. Last week, the Egyptian Ministry of Interior admitted to police torturing and raping a detained mentally-ill girl. The same officers also desecrated a corpse in Khanka hospital.

3) After Al-Sisi’s coup, the Muslim Brotherhood were declared a terrorist organization.

This move, even if it is from Sisi’s distorted perception of reality, can be empathized with and prescribed some rationale. Such a label would allow him to freely arrest and execute any opposition members, therefore minimizing risk of rebellion. It is by many standards a natural course of action.

However, more recently Al-Sisi has declared “The Ultras” a terrorist organization. The Ultras are an Egyptian football team’s fan club.

This demonstrates the length trespassed by an authoritarian government in this context to ascertain their unrivaled control. Even sporting associations are no longer safe from the pretext of terrorism.

4) On August 10th, Egyptian authorities refused to allow Human Rights Watch Executive Director Kenneth Roth and Middle East and North Africa Director Sarah Leah Whitson into Egypt. They were both sent back at the airport.

Egypt’s government then swiftly identified the Egyptian whom had acted as a source for Human Rights Watch. No one has heard a squeak of his whereabouts since.

5) During his visit, US Secretary of State John Kerry was stopped by security staff at Egypt’s Presidential palace and checked for weapons. All of his companions were searched too.

It is not normal for diplomatic figures to be treated this way.

In Al-Sisi’s case, and considering how many he has slaughtered, depraved, and tortured, paranoia becomes a natural part of his persona. Anyone whom feels justified in their position would not hold everyone else in complete and utter contempt this way.

In fact, if anyone still had some residual support for such a President, this report should alleviate it. The man’s conduct itself is a guilty confession, and it is literally impossible to vindicate guilt.

6) The President’s predecessor Morsi had an array of academic titles, lectured at California State University, and worked with NASA developing space shuttles. Al-Sisi’s educational background consists of nothing more than a military school in the US.

This is not to show support for any political ideology nor personality, but merely to demonstrate the stark comparison of experience, knowledge, and understanding which overbears the previous two leaderships in Egypt- and realistically, any other leadership in the democratic world.

Al-Sisi continues to demonstrate his incompetence as Egypt’s “leader”. The economy has plummeted, tourism is in disarray, and poverty becoming even more rampant. His only focus besides killing anyone who can spell “Morsi” seems to be digging a $4 billion canal which does naught for any of Egypt’s political, financial, or social problems.

He has also been attempting to amend Egypt’s Constitution in order to further extend his own powers- effectively making himself a new dictator.

7) The police and military in Egypt do not hide their attacks- why should they? There is no risk of accountability.

Clips, photographs, and witnesses are common to every crime they commit under or without governmental orders. Videos show bodies bedraggled across streets and corpses loaded on to military vans- corpses of children no less. The attacks are systematic and the effect is frightening.

8) 13th of July 2014 alone saw Azhar University Student Union head Baqri condemn the expulsion of more than 1000 students in Egyptian Universities who dared express their anti-coup views.

These students, mostly teenagers, are losing opportunities, a future, and the vital importance of education for no reason besides gross injustice.

9) The same people that rallied against Morsi when he was elected screaming for “democracy” are now nowhere to be seen, regardless of the monstrosities taking place.

The fear they feel under this oppressive regime has rendered proclamations for fairness and dignity completely out of reach.

Most of us closed our eyes, clapped our hands, and turned our heads the day dictator Hosni Mubarak was forced to resign in 2011. We deemed it a happy end to a tragic story.

An election process was finally instilled and the Muslim Brotherhood controversially won. Barely a year later, small protests formulated once more and a coup was initiated by the army.

General Al-Sisi assumed command as “interim President”, promising he would only remain “until a General Election”.

Elections were staged- there was a less than 10% turnout. Al-Sisi had overturned his promise and ran for President, winning with a purported 96% of votes (even of the small 10% turnout, vote rigging had apparently taken place to ensure his victory). However, with the popular support of the West, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, Sisi’s Presidency was deemed legitimate.

By this time he had already massacred thousands during his illegal seizure of government. It is worth noting that Hosni Mubarak (the target of Egypt’s 2011 revolution) during a rare interview on 11th February 2014 declared his support for Al-Sisi. This in itself speaks volumes- one dictator’s support for another.

Al-Sisi and the West claim Egypt is now a democracy.

We should keep in mind that a democracy does not mean bowing your head in shame and accepting everything your government deems appropriate.

One undisputed element of democracy is that power remains with the people. This notion comes in many forms: independent journalism, reports criticizing parliamentary decisions, and most effectively, demonstrations to wield public scrutiny of the government.

Even if one were to disregard Al-Sisi’s obsession with the use of force through creating a suppressed police state, continued crimes against humanity, and martial overthrow of the previous government, there is still no democracy in Egypt for one very simple reason.

The moment indiscriminate military measures and live ammunition are utilized against democratic protests, is the very same moment any claim of democracy by the aggressor becomes baseless.

The Free People of Egypt

So, to the Egyptians continuously reaching towards their inherent rights as human beings… continue.

To the Egyptians being forced to kneel upon the rights their children deserve… stand up.

Egypt is your land.


Commentary by: Roger Landry (TLB)

We at The Liberty Beacon project constantly push back against eugenics, genocide or programed population reduction, and will continue to do so going forward. We know, given the total population, and considering the total arable land mass of this planet, that this planet is far from overpopulated … but is that an inevitability?

Our global resources are finite and dwindling at an alarming rate, but to sacrifice your legacy, your ability to choose when and if you shall have a family, and leave this decision to the mercy of a cold, calculating, privileged global bureaucrat, is something that most of us would rebel against.

What will the criteria be for the granted privilege of parenthood, intellect, health, social standing, longevity, racial purity? And what assurance will we have that this privilege will not be corrupted and confined to those who consider themselves elite, as we already see in the wholesale corruption and complicity that festers in our governments today?

We suspect (and in many cases can prove) the mechanisms of population reduction are already in use on the global population with the USA not only immune to none of this, but is in fact the focus of many of said mechanisms. Among these we can include vaccines, GMO’s, pharmaceutical drugs, Geo-engineering and bio-toxins (just to name the top dogs). We have no say in any of this, and the poisons perpetuating this project are all legal and in many cases recommended by our very government and many other governments.

This is being facilitated by such entities as the UN (Agenda 21), WHO, Big Pharma, Monsanto, FDA, EPA, CDC etc… Research the rising infertility rate in the USA for a real shock, and the rest of the globe is not far behind. Your right to procreate may be fading fast without your knowledge or consent, driven by the ideals of this self proclaimed elite.

population-control 1

Liberty is our root drive in TLB, the liberty to make the decisions that affect us personally and our families. But what if these decisions combine to have a serious impact on the world as a whole, then what is the answer? I for one would never acquiesce my right or ability to procreate, to a global corporatocracy.… But for how much longer will this be a decision I will be allowed to make.

What we present to you here (attached below) is a different view and one we do not necessarily agree with. We present it to you because our mandate at TLB is to eradicate programed ignorance through education, and if you don’t know what those you disagree with are thinking, considering or planning, then you can never defend or push back against it until is is too late.

The information in this (attached) commentary is compelling, and some of the argument is based on a solid foundation, while other concepts are based on future technological innovations. It should all be considered to be within the realm of possibility, either today or in the near future. And those possibilities all directly effect the future of humanity in both positive or catastrophic fashions.

We are entering the realm of “the global good” infringing on personal rights and freedoms in a very large and dominant way, and once we traverse this path there is no turning back … outside bloody revolution.

This is a topic that must be discussed and debated if we are ever to leave a viable planet and peaceful society to the children we may or may-not be allowed to have.

Please read on …


population-control 4In this transhumanist future, should everyone still be allowed to have unlimited children whenever they want?

It’s time to consider restricting human breeding

By: Zoltan Istvan

Given the number of children that starve each day, dwindling planetary resources and the coming transhumanist era, it might be time to consider restricting human breeding, argues futurist Zoltan Istvan in this guest post

A few years ago, I was at a doctor party, the kind where tired residents drop by in their scrubs, everyone drinks red wine, and discussion centers around medical industry gripes. I wandered over to a group of obstetricians and listened in. One tall blonde woman said something that caught my attention: with 10,000 kids dying everyday around the world from starvation, you’d think we’d put birth control in the water.

The controversial idea to restrict or control human breeding is not new. In 1980, Hugh LaFollette, Ethics professor at the University of South Florida, wrote a seminal essay on the topic titled Licensing Parents. Since then, philosophers and even some politicians have considered the idea, especially in light of China, the most populated country in the world, implementing a one-child policy that is in effect today.

For most people in the 21st Century, however, the idea of restricting the right to have offspring for any reason whatsoever seems blatantly authoritarian. Telling a person when and how many children they can have violates just about every core value we possess in a free society. It’s a thorny issue made even more complicated by the coming transhumanist era, which is almost upon us.

The transhumanist age — where radical science and technology will revolutionize the human being and experience — will eventually bring us indefinite lifespans, cyborgization, cloning, and even ectogenesis, where people use artificial wombs outside of their bodies to raise fetuses.

Breeding controls and measures make more sense when you consider that some leading life extensionist scientists believe we will conquer human mortality in the next 20 years. Already, in 2010, scientists had some success with stopping and  reversing ageing in mice. The obvious question is: In this transhumanist future, should everyone still be allowed to have unlimited children whenever they want?

The philosophical conundrum of controlling human procreation rests mostly on whether all human beings are actually responsible enough to be good parents and can provide properly for their offspring. Clearly, untold numbers of children — for example, those millions that are slaves in the illegal human trafficking industry — are born to unfit parents.

In an attempt to solve this problem and give hundreds of millions of future kids a better life, I cautiously endorse the idea of licensing parents, a process that would be little different than getting a driver’s licence. Parents who pass a series of basic tests qualify and get the green light to get pregnant and raise children. Those applicants who are deemed unworthy — perhaps because they are homeless, or have drug problems, or are violent criminals, or have no resources to raise a child properly and keep it from going hungry — would not be allowed until they could demonstrate they were suitable parents.

Transhumanist Hank Pellissier, founder of the Brighter Brains Institute, also supports the idea, insisting on humanitarian grounds that it would bring a measured sense of responsibility to raising kids. In an essay, he notes professor and bioethics pioneer Joseph Fletcher saying that “many births are accidental”. Accidentally getting pregnant often leaves women unable to pursue their careers and lives as they might’ve hoped for and wanted.

Naturally, some environmentalists, such as American educator Paul L Ehrlich, author of landmark book The Population Bomb, also advocate for government intervention to control human population, which would be one sure way to help the planet’s fragile and depleted ecosystems.

One of the most comprehensive works about the idea of restricting breeding is Peg Tittle’s book Should Parents be Licensed? Debating the Issues. It’s a balanced collection of essays by experts with various views on the subject.

There’s no question that some of the ideas of licensing parents make sense. After all, we don’t allow people to drive cars on crack cocaine. Why would we allow them to procreate if they want while on it? The goal with licensing parents is not so much to restrict freedoms, but to guarantee the maximum resources to those children that exist and will exist in the future.

Of course, the problem is always in the details. How could society monitor such a licensing process? Would governments force abortion upon mothers if they were found to be pregnant without permission? These things seem unimaginable in most societies around the world. Besides, who wants the government handling human breeding when it can’t do basic things like balance its own budgets and stay out of wars? Perhaps a nonprofit entity like the World Health Organization might be able to step in and offer more confidence.

I see near-term hope in what can be called a new transhuman-inspired  birth control device  originally developed at MIT and now backed by funding from Microsoft founder Bill Gates. The implanted microchip lasts for up to 16 years — three times current implantable devices, including IUDs — and can deliver hormones into the body via an on-off switch on your mobile phone. It’s not a huge jump to imagine governments seeing opportunity in using this. Many children born into poverty end up costing taxpayers billions. Sadly, a high percentage of those same kids will end up on the streets, in gangs, or in prison after they become adults. Just as legalization of abortion has helped drive down crime rates, licensing parents would likely have the same effect.

The approximate  10,000  starving child deaths a day that that the aforementioned doctor cited come from various reports and studies, all of which point to the fact that well over 50 million kids have died due to hunger and malnutrition in the last 30 years. That’s a lot of kids.

What’s more, 15 percent  of kids in the US — the supposed wealthiest country in the world — suffer from hunger. A large portion of them are born to families that don’t have the resources to properly raise a child. After all, if you can’t feed a child, you probably shouldn’t have one. Licensing would’ve restricted many of those births until the parents were more able to deal with the challenges of procreation, which is undoubtedly the most intense and serious long term responsibility most human beings will face in their lives.

As a liberty-loving person, I have always eschewed giving up any freedoms. However, in some cases, the statistics are so overwhelming, that at the very least, given the coming era of indefinite lifespans and transhumanist technology, we must remain open-minded to consider how best to move the species forward to produce the happiest and healthiest children for the planet. Anything less will leave us with millions more preventable deaths and incalculable suffering of innocent kids.

Zoltan Istvan is a futurist, philosopher, journalist, and transhumanist. He is the author of the bestselling novel The Transhumanist Wager

TLB recommends you visit Wired for more articles and information.

See featured (attached) article and read comments here:


By TLB Contributor: Rabah JL

Questions which resonate in our minds and from our tongues; Questions which ring the loudest whenever Israel initiates a new massacre; Questions which land the hardest against every innocent death Gaza’s defenseless inhabitants encounter:

Where are the Arabs? Where are the Arab leaders? Where is the Arab league? Why do they not help?

Saudi Arabia is a 24 hour drive from Israel. In all their might and influence, a week had to pass- consisting of hundreds of casualties- before this “pinnacle of Arab civilization” could even release a statement condemning the recent onslaught.

This is only one such example demonstrating the indifference, deafening silence, and betrayal Palestinians feel from their neighboring Arabs. Many Gazans have communicated their lost hope of any well-pronounced, long-lasting, or meaningful interference from the “brethren” which surround them.

Although Arab states have undoubtedly provided some aid (usually economic) to Gaza, it would be a severe mistake to praise any of their contributions. Every contribution barely reflects the context within which it was made, does not correlate to the urgency of circumstances, and is always focused on a short-lived purpose rather than achieving any lasting goals.

In fact, after every bombardment Gaza suffers, there is only one convenient source of reconstruction. The materials necessary to rebuild homes, schools, and hospitals are sold to Palestinians by Israel. So ultimately, who profits from any money given to Gaza?

There is sound basis as to why Arab leaders are criticized so harshly. Kings and Presidents of the Arab states have their pockets lined with money, oil, and military assets. They effectively retain all necessary wealth and possibility of action to secure fundamental human rights, an end to Israeli apartheid, blockades, allowing clean water, economic development, and technological advances for every single Palestinian, a thousand times over.

Therefore, it is not some blameless inability which disallows progress, it is a conscious decision being constantly made.


The answer is a complex array of political relations, irrational fear, hostile responses, and prioritized domestic issues.

Over the past 66 years, differing responses have been enacted by different “Arab leaders”. The past few years in particular have witnessed a barrage of Israeli assaults upon Gaza. Assaults which have led to a death toll surpassing 10,000, as well as 18,000 abducted children. This time period will be the main focus.

Any number of states can be called into question with the term “Arab league”. However, in the Palestinian situation, there are some of expected reliability considering their close proximity.

Each will be discussed in turn.

- Jordan: After the Arab-Israeli war in 1948, instead of helping Palestinians maintain ownership of their land, Jordan occupied the West Bank for nearly two decades. This despicable historical reaction to the British mandate can be interpreted to reflect their selfish response ever since.

Admittedly, Jordan helped Palestinians in the sense of financial and medical support, especially by allowing them to enter and leave freely from the West Bank.

Even so, Jordan does not interfere with the undermined rights of those same Palestinians living in Israel. The past three months have seen more than 30 Palestinians killed in the West Bank, and even more homes destroyed. Jordan has made no real reaction even though these attacks quite literally occur on the edge of their domain.

Jordan may provide further undisclosed aid to Palestine, but besides that, no more is done. This is due to the bordering relations with Israel, essentially outlined in the Jordan-Israel peace treaty of 1994.

The recent conflict saw King Abdullah II publicly condemn Israel as war criminals, beseeching the world to convict them of their savage attack on Gaza. This went further than the usual lip service paid by Arab leaders- though having said that, it was still nothing more than lip service. Israeli relations seem to steep any further public aid Jordan can provide.

It is worth mentioning that in 1997, when Hamas’s leader Khaled Meshaal was poisoned during an attempted assassination by Mossad agents, the reigning King responded exceptionally. He demanded an antidote and declared that “if Meshaal dies, our peace treaty [with Israel] dies with him”. This saved Meshaal’s life. Hamas was however exiled from Jordan after this King’s death.

- Egypt: Many of us are aware of the barricaded Rafah crossing. A crossing between Egypt and Gaza which Palestinians tend to rely on for the reception of basic humanitarian supplies and any chance of international transport.

During Mubarak’s time, the crossing was kept closed and Israeli orders controlled Egyptian-Gazan relations. Any aid delivered was due to international pressure alone.

Post-Mubarak rule saw an increase in aid towards Gaza. The Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange was facilitated by Egypt, and the 2012 Israeli Operation saw the Rafah crossing permanently open as well as resources, refugees, and sustenance gaining unparalleled free movement. This was under the rule of the elected Muslim Brotherhood government.

It was not to last. Al-Sisi and his supporters ousted the Muslim Brotherhood following a coup d’état in 2013. Since then, a deep hatred and lack of collaboration with Palestine has festered.

This is due to the fact that Hamas, Gaza’s elected government, is the historical off-shoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood- the very same party Sisi had overthrown to come into power.

The animosity Sisi holds for the Muslim Brotherhood interferes with any developments in a relationship between Gaza and Egypt. On the other hand, strong diplomatic ties have bound Israel and Egypt ever since the peace treaty signed in 1979.

As things stand, Egypt is arguably the closest ally Israel have, in not just the Middle East, but the entire planet. During the recent conflict, Israel received some backlash from even the UK and US, whereas Egypt continued providing unconditional public, military, political, and financial support.

- Saudi Arabia: Due to the wealth, religious authority, and public perception of leadership Saudi Arabia hold, their lack of intervention is relentlessly criticised by Palestine’s supporters.

Although Saudi Arabia provide monetary grants (with ease considering the abundant resources they have) to Gaza, the aid they provide has particularly dwindled over the past few years.

Saudi Arabia are staunch supporters of their “protege”, President Al-Sisi. This has caused much difference in their recent contributions to Gaza. Their main goal now is to further encourage Al-Sisi’s reign in Egypt. Within this trusting relationship, Sisi has (among other things) convinced Saudi leaders that Hamas will “target them” next.

In Saudi’s belief of Egypt’s President, the hatred he himself had for the Muslim Brotherhood has infected many Arab leaders. This ultimately led to the further alienation of Hamas, and hence Gaza. Previous enmity towards Muslim Brotherhood branches also helped Al-Sisi succeed in this process.

Saudi Arabia’s military and financial support towards Hamas stopped immediately. Although they provide no particular statement in this regard for the sake of maintaining their domestic public image, they have withdrawn all support on “the fight against Israel”.

- Syria: Before the Arab Spring in 2011, Bashar Al-Assad provided military and financial assistance to Gaza.

After the attempted (and still ongoing) uprising in Syria, Al-Assad requested help in the form of a public declaration of support from Hamas. This was in the hope of quenching rebellion before any further developments.

Hamas refused to commentate. This is due to their solid policy in not interfering with foreign matters. Since their formation, they have repeatedly clarified themselves as solely a liberation party for the Palestinian people and an unwillingness to be involved in irrelevant affairs.

This prompted a hostile response from Al-Assad and all aid has since then been completely severed.

- Iraq: Though geographically close to the Palestinians, Iraq has suffered more problems than any state in the past decade. After a brutal occupation by the US which resulted in the death of more than one million Iraqis, domestic issues have taken priority. Before then, Iraq suffered constant sectarian conflict, and currently the ISIS matter, followed by further US intervention.

Iraq could not help even if they wanted to. Before 2000 though, they provided continuous financial support to Gaza, Hamas, and Palestinians generally.

- Lebanon: Lebanon is a small poor country and contain barely enough resources to maintain themselves.


This variation of responses and the reasons behind them draw four main conclusions:

1) Though most leaders provide public statements against Israel and occasional monetary grants for the sake of high standing or a charitable perception by the Arab world and their domestic communities, there has been no real move towards supporting Palestinians through any real commitment. In fact, the more horrific incidents during the past few decades have seen more Arab nations take bigger steps back.

2) Gaza is in dire need, yes, but not every Arab state is capable of providing aid without damaging their own necessities. Post-colonial interference has sabotaged any democratic inclination these countries could have.

3) With the ever-changing spectacle and extremely conflicting positions through recent history (even within the same state by different leaders), it seems the Arab world has absolutely no idea what they want from Gaza, let alone Israel.

4) The solidarity presented by the Arab population (as opposed to the Arab leaders) is overwhelmingly in favor of Palestine. Nevertheless, demonstration numbers are remarkably small compared to the rallies in European and South American countries. Arab governments have also been quick to suppress any public show of support for the Palestinians.

In face of this horrid tacit approval for brutal murder and recurring deprivation of basic needs, it is always important to mention those who have consistently supported Palestine. Notably, Qatar and Turkey have shown a persistent determination.

Their support does not go unnoticed.

During an interview a week ago, Hamas’s leader Khaled Meshaal responded in the following way when asked about Turkey:

“What is your assessment of the Turkish position on the Palestinian issue?

Turkey’s position has always been distinguished both at the official and popular level. It has made generous initiatives and they are much appreciated by the Palestinian, Arab and Muslim people and we will never forget the nine martyrs of the Mavi Marmara. Turkey has left its mark by means of its leaders, people, responsibilities, various commissions and media, and we appreciate this greatly. In the last war, and despite the Turkish leadership’s distraction and preoccupation with elections, it was present with its political, moral and popular support and sent aid throughout the war, especially during the humanitarian ceasefires. Throughout, I have remained in contact with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (and I would like to congratulate him on his victory in the presidential elections); and with Dr Ahmet Davutoglu, the Turkish Foreign Minister; we communicated and coordinated. Therefore, we are grateful for the Turkish position and we thank the Turkish people and the Turkish leadership.

Indeed, I salute the Turkish people and express my appreciation to them. The people of Palestine have not forgotten the people of Turkey and its leadership, and we express our gratitude and appreciation towards them. I say to them and to all the nations that supported us that the reward from Allah to those who assisted the people of Gaza and supported Palestine and the resistance, will not be lost.”


Red Herring 1The Liberty Beacon project is proud to present the following recorded ‘Exclusive Discussion’ and Article on the extreme dangers of Glyphosate brought to you by our partners Locals Supporting Locals and featuring their special guest Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist at the world-famous Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Please listen to and read this information presented as never before!


While activists around the world scramble to label GMO food products, the real culprit is getting away with the farm

By: Dee Nicholson

In this day and age, when you see a massive public battle going on and whole countries and presidents and potentates are involved, you have to smell rotting fish somewhere on the breeze. You just know it’s there. And in this particular case, it’s an old wind that bodes no good:


French Magazine “J’ai Tout Compris” publishes a statement from former US Secretary of State, then head of the World Bank, Robert McNamara: “”One must take draconian measures of demographic reduction against the will of the populations. Reducing the birth rate has proved to be impossible or insufficient. One must therefore increase the mortality rate. How? By natural means: famine and sickness.”

It’s almost as if, in response to McNamara’s bizarre statement, somebody raised his hand and said “I think we can help with that…”, because what followed was a devilishly clever process that, in one fell swoop, satisfied McNamara’s “orders”, and made Monsanto a massive pot of money. And the sub-plots in this little drama are both intricate and fascinating; if the whole thing didn’t read as so terribly, inconceivably evil, it would rate as one of the most brilliant marketing schemes ever invented.


In 1970, John E. Franz, an organic chemist working at Monsanto, discovers that Glyphosate is a powerful herbicide, despite having been developed by its inventors as a de-scaling agent to clean industrial pipes of lime and other water deposits. Renamed RoundUp®, Glyphosate enters the marketplace in 1974. The herbicide quickly establishes itself as a mainstream product for widespread agricultural and consumer use. Then Monsanto starts manipulating plant genomes to develop genetically-modified crops that not only tolerate a heap of RoundUp® , but require its use (Assisted by major funding from guess who? The Rockefeller Foundation ). Neat plan: create both the need and the solution, and profit from both.

Monsanto had pretty much laid the golden egg. Almost magically, a bunch of other market conditions came together in the 90’s that allowed the corporate giant to maximize it all: trade agreements, drafted between nations in complete secrecy, creating international contracts that guarantee “investor” corporations the ability to profit from the sale of their patented goods under “TRIPS” , which are defined thusly on the WTO website:

What are intellectual property rights?
Intellectual property rights are the rights given to people over the creations of their minds.

That’s a fancy way of saying “patented or copyrighted inventions” – like the ones Monsanto holds on such things as RoundUp®, for instance – and all their genetically-modified seeds. And so, Monsanto can win in court against innocent farmers like Saskatchewan’s Percy Schmeiser, whose canola field was cross-pollinated by natural factors (wind, insects, animal and/or bird droppings, etc.) with RoundUp Ready® Canola next door. Monsanto sues farmers like poor Percy for theft of their “intellectual property”, and wins, routinely. As an “investor” with patented products involved, Monsanto’s profits are protected, and our courts must comply, thanks to the trade agreements.

And here is where the rubber meets the road, because this is where the blame gets shifted, where the sleight of hand happens, and where the activists of the world are sent off on a wild goose chase that nets them nothing, and the biotech industry chuckles to itself and trots off to the bank to deposit its harvest.

How does this happen?

It’s all a matter of public perception – or the lack thereof. Remember that RoundUp® came onto the market in the 70’s, and as a common, garden-variety pesticide, hardly raised a hair in the eyes of the average Joe Citizen. But when the first genetically-modified foods were announced, a lot of people yelled “Ew! Frankenfoods!” Glyphosate, AKA RoundUp®, having already been on the market for a long time, didn’t draw anyone’s attention, but the GMO foods evoked a horrified gut response from the marketplace.

So when the French Seralini study came out, showing rats with huge tumors, son of a gun, even the authors opined that these were all because of the genetic modification, unwittingly skirting the fact that the genetically modified foods were made toxic by the Glyphosate they were infused with and required for growth, and that all the negative effects on living things were being damaged by this herbicide, and not by the GMO’s all by themselves!

Result: Thousands of activists and hundreds of groups world-wide, campaigning against GMO food, and demanding labeling of GMO-containing food products. Around the same time, in 2013, long after the Seralini study was published in 2008, and therefore with no conceivable excuse whatsoever for the additional load of toxic crap dumped into the American food supply, the EPA increased the allowable limits of Glyphosate  in oilseed crops, which include sesame and  flax,  from 20 parts per million (ppm), to 40 ppm (soy is at 20 ppm). It also raised the allowable glyphosate contamination level for sweet potatoes and carrots from 0.2 ppm to 3 ppm for sweet potatoes and 5ppm for carrots, that’s 15 and 25 times the previous levels.

“That herbicide-laced soy winds up in thousands of nonorganic packaged foods and in animal feed for livestock like pigs, cows, chickens, and turkeys.

Why is this happening? Genetically engineered crops are manipulated in a way that could never occur in nature so plants like corn, soy, canola, cotton, and sugar beets can withstand high doses of glyphosate-containing herbicides that would normally kill them. The result? Roundup in food that people and farm animals eat.” ~ Rodale News

Do yourself a favor and scroll through this page at “The Liberty Beacon” site, to learn about the damage that RoundUp, and its main ingredient, Glyphosate, does to living organisms, all by itself. Glyphosate does not require a plant to be a GMO to be “useful”. According to the well-respected journal Entropy, “Contrary to the current widely-held misconception that Glyphosate is relatively harmless to humans, the available evidence shows that Glyphosate may rather be the most important factor in the development of multiple chronic diseases and conditions that have become prevalent in Westernized societies.”

What is Glyphosate known to do to living organisms? The following is a list presented to the EPA by Zen Honeycutt, founder of Moms Across America, and despite its length and its shock value, is not even complete:

Exposure to Glyphosate correlates with chronic illness. Chronically ill people have significantly higher levels of Glyphosate in their systems than healthy people.

Glyphosate is an endocrine disruptor which is toxic to placental cells. This means it may impact our ability to conceive and carry healthy babies to term. It may also cause breast cancer.

Glyphosate destroys the gut bacteria we need for good health. Scientists have observed that in chickens and cattle, Glyphosate kills the good gut bacteria while leaving behind bacteria that cause food poisoning. Glyphosate’s negative impact on our microbiome may be the reason for increasing rates of allergies, celiac sprue and gluten intolerance, and colitis and Crohn’s disease.

Glyphosate makes vaccines far more toxic than they would otherwise be. When children are overexposed to Glyphosate, they are more likely to react badly to vaccination. There’s an intricate connection between the gut and the brain, such that an unhealthy digestive system translates into pathologies in the brain. Aluminum, mercury and Glyphosate work synergistically to create severe deficiency in sulfate supplies to the brain. This may be what’s causing the epidemic levels of autism and other diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

Glyphosate is a chelator that deprives living things of vital nutrients, vitamins and minerals. This is how Glyphosate kills plants. It may also be how it’s killing people. Glyphosate-induced vitamin deficiency may be a factor in the growing cancer rates.

Glyphosate has been directly linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A recent meta-analysis found that exposure to Glyphosate doubled the likelihood of contracting B-cell lymphoma.”

Glyphosate is shown to debilitate the Cytochrome P450 Gene, which is responsible for the production of critical enzymes in the body. If impeded, this prevents the metabolization of antidepressant medications, while allowing the liver and kidneys to become overloaded with poison, causing widespread organ distress and serious illness. It also stops the production of amino acids like L-Tryptophan, and Serotonin, which psychiatry claims as the key factor in depression, is similarly disabled. Sri Lanka has just banned Glyphosate due to an overwhelming number of liver and kidney problems in that country.

Honeycutt asks, “Will the EPA do what is right, consider this evidence and move to protect our children from Monsanto’s poison?”

Don’t hold your breath.

As they say in court: “The defendant knew, or ought to have known….” Yes. They knew. But they did it anyway. And they did it without much of a stink being raised at the time, because by then, all the activists were chasing GMO’s exclusively, demanding labeling, and leaving Glyphosate, for the most part, out of the picture.

Now, if you go to the grocery store produce section and you know your PLU (Product Look Up) Codes, you know that by and large, most fresh produce is unaltered, genetically. Anything that is modified shows up with a code beginning with a 5 or an 8. Organic produce codes begin with a 9, while conventionally-grown produce codes start with a 3 or a 4. Many consumers are looking for PLU codes as a guide to what is relatively safe, absolutely safe, and definitely not safe. But is that really the case?
No. Conventionally-grown produce can still have been subjected to Glyphosate in RoundUp, and still merit use of the codes beginning with 3 or 4, and you will not know, short of interviewing the farmer who grew the stuff, whether or not there is Glyphosate in the produce you’re buying. So even if you are meticulously avoiding GMO foods, you are not avoiding the Glyphosate, and therefore, not avoiding the damage that you’re trying to avoid, unless you have never eaten anything that isn’t organic.

Good luck with that. About 90% of the foods on the shelves of any supermarket include some form of ingredient that is infused, to some degree, with Glyphosate.

It is estimated that Americans consume their own weight in GMO’s annually, and that more than 90% of processed, prepackaged foods in the supermarkets contain GMO’s – and therefore, Glyphosate. Like it or not, we are all rather chock full of Glyphosate, because we’ve been unwittingly stuffing our faces with this junk for decades. And we wonder how come our society is so unhealthy!

Meanwhile, the battle to label GMO’s continues. But for what purpose, when the damage is not confined to GMO foods at all? Glyphosate is ubiquitous, and therefore, so is the damage. So when folks come down with this or that disease, and have not been consuming GMO’s, Monsanto says “See? It’s not our GMO’s, it’s something else”. Righty-ho.

Furthermore, GMO labeling may, to some teensy extent, assist consumers in choosing healthy food. But labeling is a waste of time if Glyphosate is the culprit here (it is), and is used conventionally (it has). And it won’t stop the genetic drift that occurs in nature: Plant the fields, the seeds will spread. That’s how nature works. Ever try to stop a flood with a napkin?

Worse yet, Monsanto’s RoundUp patent protection expired in 1991, and since then, copycats have popped up everywhere, because everybody wanted a piece of that highly profitable action. So now, while Monsanto still takes most of the heat, other producers of similar products sell their damaging goods completely unimpeded. And our entire ecosystem is at risk because of it.

The funny thing is, that while diverse, informed and intelligent groups around the world are wagging their index fingers furiously at Glyphosate, the majority of more famous, established sources will point only at the GMO labeling issue. Even the much-vaunted Organic Consumers’ Association will not sway from its appointed mission to label GMO’s. Millions have been spent on both sides of the argument, probably over 100 million, coming from the pro-biotech side.

And here, at the heart of the issue, is where that odor of rotting fish is coming from — this is where the red herring, the sleight-of-hand, comes into play. Why spend all that money to prevent labeling of genetically-modified foods, when labeling actually legitimizes their products, by allowing them to be sold as “fit for human consumption”? Why not say, sure, label away, why, we’re that proud to show you how artful we’ve been with what you feed your family?

Why indeed, unless it was to divert attention from the issue of that Glyphosate, that is infused in so much more than just the genetically-modified foods: It is everywhere, and it’s been everywhere, since 1974, and it’s in almost everything we consume. We think we’re smart by avoiding genetically-modified foods, but we only think we’re avoiding the damage, because we believe it’s the GMO part that hurts – and we’re wrong.

Monsanto, with its near-bottomless pockets, along with its equally rich pals, has us fishing in the wrong pond, deeply embroiled in the GMO labeling issue, and gosh, even our elected officials have got into the act, with various states, cities and a whole bunch of countries all stirring the pot.

But it’s the wrong pot. An absolutely classic red herring, if ever there was one. And it is one big mother of a fish.

Red HerringThe real damage is in the Glyphosate, and always has been. The GMO’s are damaging because they use the stuff, and even require it. It’s killing us, and it’s killing our food supply. There are enough studies out there to sink a battleship, proving that the human gene pool has been sabotaged, deeply damaged, poisoned in perpetuity, by Monsanto’s Glyphosate, and will continue to be, as long as we keep chasing the labeling of GMO’s as any sort of solution at all.

Yep, we have to admit it: we were fooled. GMO’s are really not much more than a delivery system for Glyphosate. And it’s time for those activist groups to come to grips with that fact, and get on the correct band wagon. It’s Glyphosate that needs labeling. It needs banning, really. But since it is already regulated, there is no reason not to demand that it be included in the “ingredient” list of our foodstuffs, just as the government demands of the slightest random molecule in a natural health product. To all intents and purposes, it is an additive: Nature didn’t put it there, man did, no matter how he did it.

At least, if Glyphosate-containing foods are labeled, an informed consumer can avoid swallowing a measure of poison with his potato chips. The government wasn’t shy about having Aspartame listed on food labels, and we all know that’s poisonous, so what’s stopping them from labeling things containing Glyphosate?

Ah, but there, dear reader, is the rub. Our government can’t warn about things if they might impede profits. That would only be the case if they wanted to warn us. If they did, they wouldn’t have signed the trade agreements.

What we all have to grok, to understand fundamentally, is that the way this has played out is anything but accidental. And the collusion between the government, its health agencies, and Monsanto, et al, is stunningly obvious: all of the alphabet soup gang is there, from the NIH to the EPA to the FDA, the WHO, and the WTO, along with the multinational biotech/chemical/pharmaceutical companies, all were involved, consciously. They cannot claim otherwise, because they’ve had nearly 50 years and a ton of studies to tell them.

Furthermore, with all the money being spent to keep us distracted, diverted, and disengaged, like kids throwing tantrums, it does not take a rocket scientist to see that these things did not come together by accident, nor is there one iota, one scintilla, of an excuse available to those behind the scam. They all lied, and they keep on lying.

Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist at the world-famous Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), has been bell-ringing about the dangers of Glyphosate for years now. She points to a quickly-growing body of evidence being presented to the public, and how the truth has been suppressed by the powers-that-be all along, and a growing list of researchers coming forward to stop the madness. Dr. Thierry Vrain, former genetic engineer and soil biologist with Agriculture Canada, lectures across Canada, warning that Glyphosate is the real enemy, along with famed Health Canada whistleblower Dr. Shiv Chopra and Glyphosate-testing promoter Tony Mitra. Former US Navy scientist Dr. Nancy Swanson is another, one of a host of scientific luminaries around the globe, warning that a focus on GMO’s is all very well and fine, but it’s like chasing down a pickpocket while the bank is being robbed.

How can this be anything but deliberate, when in the face of this damning – and growing — pile of evidence, forming a very pregnant baby bump under the rug in the living room, the EPA turns around and quietly, inexplicably, increases the “safe” levels for human consumption in food crops – by 3000%?

Most people simply cannot wrap their heads around the obvious: McNamara was not kidding; the Rockefeller Foundation doesn’t throw money at things that are good for us; the EPA is protecting something, but it isn’t us; and as unthinkable as it may be, applied eugenics is the order of the day.

The human herd is indeed being culled. Glyphosate is one of the weapons fulfilling the wet dream of Robert McNamara, the former US Secretary of State and President of the World Bank: the death of millions.

What, gentle reader, does that make of Monsanto?

Trail and Tail of terror 2


In the ongoing effort by the establishment to demonize the Tea Party and resistance to an expanding federal government, a new narrative is emerging that could provide justification for a nation-wide crackdown on dissent.

The riots in Ferguson, Missouri are a focal point for an unfolding historical drama that could further divide the nation. Tribal passions are being stirred across the world by outside manipulators.

Members of The Islamic State (ISIS) are announcing their support for protesters in Ferguson, with one member saying on twitter “It’s time to strike fear into the hearts of the oppressors.” Another tweet from ISIS supporter Abu Ottoman says, “Blacks in #Ferguson, there’s an alternative to this indignity: pick yourselves up with Islam, like #IS in #Iraq.”

The support of ISIS for racial violence will further exacerbate the rising tensions in the U.S. and distract from the larger issue of government oppression of every individual regardless of race. As the Washington Post reports, ISIS is “hoping to use black disenchantment as a recruiting tool.”

In March of 2013 – several months prior to the Syrian gas attacks that helped spark the current mid-east unrest – Intelligence Chief James Clapper testified before Congress that Al-Qaeda was no longer a major threat to the United States.

A year later, ISIS is a renewed Al-Qaeda terror force backed by the west that is being used to reshape the middle east and threaten domestic terror inside the United States. The terror group has its hands on at least 52 American made howitzer artillery guns and almost 2,000 Humvees.

In response to the reported execution of American journalist James Foley, Neocon John McCain said that unless the United States stops ISIS, “…these people are going to attack us in the United States of America.”

If citizens of the United States have any hope of remaining free, we must look through the fog of war and see the globalist forces at work manipulating us all. Police and military pay attention; If ISIS happens to suddenly announce its support for the resistance in America against a corrupt federal government, the American people are not your enemy.

TLB recommends you visit OLD-THINKER NEWS for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:


11 Jets “Stolen” in Libya

By: Jim Stone

The next 911 probably set in stone

UPDATE: The list of planes “possibly” taken include models that can fly anywhere in the world. But nothing confirmed, only that they can “only hit Egypt” which means it is PATENT B.S.

Planes purportedly taken: 7 Airbus A320′s with a range of 6,150 kilometers, 3 Airbus A330′s with a range of 10,100 kilometers, and an Airbus A340, with a range of 14,500 Kilometers. Yet these can only hit Egypt? That is patent B.S., WE HAVE BEEN SET UP FOR THE NEXT 911, FLIGHT 370 BE DAMNED.

So this is the plan? Since the “beheadings” suffered badly from poor special effects, now they are claiming that 11 commercial jets have been stolen from the Tripoli airport. Obvious B.S., and they are saying they can do Africa but not America. OK. fine. Please give us the tail numbers and if they cannot, they cannot also report the jets stolen.

Theft means the aircraft is identified, and there is no way they could not possibly end up NOT IDENTIFIED. Any report that does not read like “Allahu Akbar Airlines lost a 737 with registration number __________ and a capacity of ________ and a range of _____________” is a load of crap, if 11 jets really did get stolen that info would be front and center. The fact it is not means FALSE FLAG WITH JETS THAT HAVE BEEN PARKED OUT AT THE MOJAVE BONEYARD FOR 10 YEARS ON SCHEDULE FOR SEP11 2014.

To see the backup plan for failed beheadings which now involves airliners, CLICK HERE

See featured article here:

Vaccine Infertility

Written for

Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute


The Liberty Beacon project


Preface by: Roger Landry (TLB)

The rising level of infertility globally is an issue of much contemplation. Nowhere is it more evident or rising at a faster rate than in the USA.

Is it a coincidence that America is also the most vaccinated society on this planet?

Is it even believable that the US government and its health agencies claim to have no answers for us?

Is it conceivable that there are forces and global organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), plotting a serious reduction in our numbers … whether we like it or not, leaving us no say in such a vital and person matter?

Do you wish to have the decision on whether you will “be allowed” or “able” to have a child left in the hands of some cold heartless global statistician, without your knowledge or consent?

In fact there are many among us who herald the concept of population reduction today saying (mistakenly), it is required to save the planet.

BUT what would their reaction be if they suddenly became aware that via the mechanism of vaccination, THEY had been robbed (permanently and intentionally) of the ability to have a family, a legacy … WITHOUT their knowledge or permission. I would guarantee a change in mindset so fast it would throw you into a spin

And if you think this is only happening in poor third world countries … get your head out of your butt, and please read the first and second comments again !!!

What follows should come as a serious wake up call to you because all said above … is in fact already a reality!

Please read on …


By TLB Staff Writer: Christina England

A report of a meeting, recently uncovered from the Internet archives, revealed that in 1992, the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the World Bank, met in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the then-current status for the development of “fertility regulating vaccinations.”

Also see;jsessionid=D4C66F20E0B115579C9308EDFB7EE7B6.jahia02

At first glance, it appeared the WHO were discussing various methods of family planning with women’s health advocates and scientists from developing countries. On further reading however, something far more worrying emerged.

During the introduction, the WHO discussed “fertility regulation” and how their specialist program would carry out activities to strengthen the research capabilities of developing countries, enabling them to meet their own research needs and participate in the global effort in human reproduction research.

The Meeting Takes a Sinister Turn

There were twenty participants at the meeting, ten scientists and clinicians from Australia, Europe, India and the USA involved in funding Fertility Regulatory Vaccines (FRVs) research; and ten women’s health advocates from Africa, North and South America, Asia and Europe, with backgrounds in immunology, service delivery and social and clinical research, as well as a wide experience of working with women.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a new approach to “fertility regulation.”

On page 12 of the report, the groups can be found discussing the development of vaccinations against hCG, a hormone produced by the cells surrounding the early embryo and later by the placenta during pregnancy.

Primates are Rendered Infertile

The WHO stated that hCG is a hormone produced by the body to establish and maintain a pregnancy and further stated that when primates were vaccinated using anti-hCG vaccines, they were rendered infertile without any detectable alteration to their menstrual cycle!

What I found even more worrying was the lack of indication as to whether their infertility was permanent or temporary.

According to the WHO, anti-hGC vaccinations were being developed independently by the National Institute of Immunology (NII) in New Delhi, the Population Council in New York and Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP).

The report stated that most of the work was still in the experimental stages; however, vaccines using other hormones had reached the clinical testing stages.

The Plot Deepens

On page 15, the report stated that it had been “noted that the research on all three anti hCG vaccines was still at an early stage and that a further 5-10 years of testing, evaluation and further development would probably be needed before any of these vaccines would be suitable for marketing.”

Nothing strange here; however, on page 17, alarm bells began to ring as the authors revealed that the main carriers being used in the prototype vaccines were the diphtheria toxoid DT and the tetanus toxoid TT.

The WHO is Caught Red-Handed Experimenting on Women in India

In 1994, the World Health Organization gave many women in developing countries aged between 15 and 45 a tetanus vaccine containing the hCG hormone.

An organization known as the Comité Pro Vida de Mexico became suspicious of the protocols surrounding the vaccines and obtained several vials for testing. It was discovered that some of the vials contained human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This is the exact same hormone that the WHO, the UNDP, the UNFPA and the World Bank were discussing just two years earlier. (Link to organization)

When combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, the vaccines caused a woman’s body to produce antibodies against pregnancy, forcing her body to abort the fetus spontaneously. The ThinkTwice Global Vaccine Institute, reporting on the story, stated:

“In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman’s body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.

However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.”

Curiously, no men, boys or babies were vaccinated during the program. The only people vaccinated with this particular vaccine were women aged between 15 and 45. Was it a coincidence that these vaccines were only given to women of childbearing age? After all, anyone can contract tetanus, can’t they?

If the Comité had not become suspicious, then no one would have been any wiser. However, one question still remains: Was this a deliberate attempt by the WHO to reduce the population? The answer may lay in a paper written in 1997.

Girls and Women as Fertility Control Guinea Pigs

In 1997, a paper by G.P. Talwar titled Vaccines for Control of Fertility and Hormone Dependent Cancers, published by Immunology and Cell Biology stated:

“The twentieth century is marked by an unprecedented rise in the population. Four billion people will be added to the world population in 73 years of this century, whereas the global population attained the two billion mark only in 1927. In India, the population increases by 18 million per year, equivalent to the entire population of Australia.

Although a number of methods are available for contraception, they are not suited to many people in economically developing countries and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the contraceptive needs of 350 million couples are unmet.”

Once again, at first glance, it appears that the scientists were trying to develop a vaccine to use as an alternative method of contraception, to be offered at fertility clinics; that is, until you read deeper into the paper.

On page 185 in the section titled Operational Strategy, the author stated:

“Both hCG and LHRH are self hormones in humans and are poor antigens. To improve their immunogenicity, they are derivatized with haptenic groups as followed by Stevens ct al. in their initial studies or they are chemically linked to carriers to enlist T helper cell activity. We used carriers, first tetanus toxoid (TT) and later diphtheria toxoid (DT) or cholera toxin chain B (CTB). Tetanus accounts a large mortality of women at the time of delivery, which in developing countries, often occurs in places other than maternity homes/clinics. TT conjugates conferred immunoprophylactic benefit against tetanus, besides overcoming immunological tolerance to the self hormone. Diversification of carriers on repeat immunization avoided hyperimmunization against a given carrier and carrier-induced immunosuppression.”

Reading on, the section titled Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, reads as follows:

“Human chorionic gonadotropin was a preferred choice as a target for a contraceptive vaccine of three groups of investigators. Although the existence of’ leaky genes making small amounts of hCG in the non-pregnant state has been observed by William Odell. the hormone thus made is not conspicuous in its bioactivity nor appreciable in amount, hCG is a definite marker of pregnancy, when trophoblastic and other tumors are excluded. Its synthesis and secretion begins at the pre-implantation stage, as observed in the vitro-fertilized human embryo. It is involved in implantation since marmoset (south or central American monkey) embryos exposed to anti-phCG antibodies do not implant.’”

The author continued by adding:

Interception of conception by anti-hCG antibodies is also supported by phase II clinical trials where no lengthening of the luteal phase was observed in women who were protected from becoming pregnant. As pregnancy is deemed to begin only after implantation of the embryo to the endometrium. hCG vaccine by preventing it is not an abortifacient but a contraceptive vaccine. hCG is also required for corpus luteum support and production of progesterone during the first 7 weeks until the placenta takes over. It thus has a role in both establishing and supporting pregnancy. Its chemistry was known by the early 1970s and it could be purified from pregnancy urine.”

These vaccines appear to be strikingly similar not only to the vaccines that were given to the women in developing countries for tetanus in 1994, but also the vaccinations that were being discussed by the WHO, the UNDP, the UNFPA and the World Bank, in 1992.

So, were the women and children living in developing countries in 1994 deliberately experimented on? It certainly appears that they were, as the vaccine trials using the tetanus vaccine on women and girls of childbearing age took place three years before the 1997 paper was written.

The Deception Continues a Decade After the WHO Meeting in Geneva

In 2012, the British Medical Journal published a paper by Dr. Deidrie Little titled Premature Ovarian Failure 3 Years After Menarche in a 16 Year-Old Girl Following Human Papillomavirus Vaccination, in which she detailed the case of a sixteen year-old girl suffering from premature menopause after receiving the HPV vaccine Gardasil. The summary of the paper stated:

“Premature ovarian failure in a well adolescent is a rare event. Its occurrence raises important questions about causation, which may signal other systemic concerns. This patient presented with amenorrhoea after identifying a change from her regular cycle to irregular and scant periods following vaccinations against human papillomavirus. She declined the oral contraceptives initially prescribed for amenorrhoea. The diagnostic tasks were to determine the reason for her secondary amenorrhoea and then to investigate for possible causes of the premature ovarian failure identified.

Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination. The young woman was counseled regarding preservation of bone density, reproductive implications and relevant follow-up. This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry.”

As the BMJ charges a fee to read their articles, interested readers can find a report about the case on the Weekly Briefing of the Population Research Institute’s website. The report stated that Dr. Little said that before the sixteen year-old received the vaccine Gardasil during the fall of 2008, her menstrual cycle was perfectly normal. However, by January 2009, her cycle had become irregular, and over the course of the next two years, her menses (bleeds) had become increasingly irregular. By 2011, she had ceased menstruating altogether.

The Weekly Briefing stated:

“In the Australian case, after testing the levels of numerous hormones, and the function of various internal organs, the girl was diagnosed by Dr. Little as having “premature ovarian failure”, which is defined as “the presence of menopausal gonadotrophin levels in association with over 3 months of amenorrhoea or oligomenorrhoea before age 40 years.”
Further testing confirmed that all of her eggs—every last one—were dead. She was and is totally and irrevocably infertile.”

The Weekly Briefing article has since been removed, but a complete copy of the article can be found on several websites, including Population Research Institute.

Yet More Evidence Emerges

In 2013, a paper titled Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine and Primary Ovarian Failure: Another Facet of the Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants was written by Serena Colafrancesco, Carlo Perricone, Lucija Tomljenovic, and Yehuda Shoenfeld and published by the American Journal of Reproductive Immunology.

Their paper identified three cases of young women who had presented with ovarian failure after receiving the HPV vaccine. After studying each case in detail, Dr. Colafrancesco and her team determined that:

“All three patients developed secondary amenorrhea following HPV vaccinations, which did not resolve upon treatment with hormone replacement therapies. In all three cases sexual development was normal and genetic screen revealed no pertinent abnormalities (i.e., Turner’s syndrome, Fragile X test were all negative). Serological evaluations showed low levels of estradiol and increased FSH and LH and in two cases, specific auto-antibodies were detected (antiovarian and anti thyroid), suggesting that the HPV vaccine triggered an autoimmune response. Pelvic ultrasound did not reveal any abnormalities in any of the three cases. All three patients experienced a range of common non-specific post-vaccine symptoms including nausea, headache, sleep disturbances, arthralgia and a range of cognitive and psychiatric disturbances. According to these clinical features, a diagnosis of primary ovarian failure (POF) was determined which also fulfilled the required criteria for the ASIA syndrome.”

The team concluded that:

“We documented here the evidence indicating the potential of the HPV vaccine to trigger a life disabling autoimmune-mediated condition such as POF. Given that persistently infected women with HPV seem not to develop cancer if they are regularly screened and that the long-term clinical benefits of HPV vaccination are still a matter of speculation, a more rigorous assessment of vaccine risks and benefits is recommend. Thus, physicians should remain within the rigorous rules of evidence-based medicine, to adequately assess the risks versus the benefits of HPV vaccination.”

The CMSRI Supporting Scientists From Around the World
It is a well-known fact that scientists researching the dangers of vaccinations have immense difficulty in having their work funded and this is where an organization known as the CMSRI steps in.

The CMSRI was established to provide funding for research to address eroding national health, particularly in very young and elderly populations and funds research into the biological effects of vaccines.

Their mission is:

• “To provide scientific research to address gaps in the knowledge about the biological and genetic risk factors for vaccine induced brain and immune dysfunction, including lack of adequate safety data, particularly for delayed or chronic health outcomes;
• Evaluate the biological and genetic reactivity of vaccine additives such as aluminum adjuvants (immune stimulating agents), mercury preservatives and other toxic ingredients;
• Research the effects of multiple vaccine exposures and their potential impact on development of chronic illness, disability, cancer, fertility and neurodegenerative disease;
• Evaluate bias in reporting of vaccine risks and benefits; and
• Research and quantify incidence of novel vaccine-associated autoimmune diseases;
• To provide information to government agencies responsible for developing national vaccine policies, the media and the public to address real and perceived vaccine safety concerns.”

If were not for organizations like CMSRI, funding scientists carrying out such important work, then the public would remain ignorant of the truth surrounding the dangers of vaccinations.

To see the important work funded and/or supported by the CMSRI, or to simply offer a donation go to


Although the HPV vaccines do not contain the hCG hormone, they do contain the stabilizer Polysorbate 80, which has also been proven in studies to cause infertility.


What I have discovered, I am sure that many would agree, is absolutely horrific. Vaccinations known to cause infertility have been used intentionally for many years. It is obvious that the World Health Organization, who have stated on their website that they are “articulating ethical and evidence-based policy options,” do not practice what they preach.

We must ask ourselves two questions:

1. How ethical it is to inject thousands of women and children in India with a vaccine known to cause infertility?

2. How ethical is it to inject thousands of women and children with a vaccine containing ingredients proven in studies to cause primary ovarian failure?

My research has led me to believe that for many years our governments have chosen to play God with our lives, without our consent or our knowledge. This is not only barbaric, it is also unlawful.

Extra research papers from

TLB asks that you to please visit the site (below this comment) for some outstanding/pertinent information. Be a part of something great …


Click on the above image to visit the site

christina_englandChristina England was born and educated in London, U.K. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980. For the last decade, Christina England has been investigating the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Her articles have had over 500,000 hits and she is now known worldwide for her groundbreaking journalism work.

  • Your support in the Liberty Beacon will be appreciated