The film VaXXed could be outlawed in California, if this bill passes…

by Jon Rappoport

“Let’s see, Mr. Reporter. You received an undercover recording of a medical researcher confessing his crimes. You posted the recording and wrote about it. You’re the one who is guilty of a crime. Next case!”

“Wait, Your Honor! That recording is vital information for the public. It shows that a vaccine considered to be safe actually causes brain damage in children.”

“No. It shows you violated the law by posting the recording. It was illegally made, and you aided and abetted and forwarded that crime. As I said, next case!”

Buckle up.

The shocking film Vaxxed (trailer) is drawing audiences all over the country. It details the confessions of a CDC researcher, William Thompson, who states that he and his colleagues buried data in a key study on the MMR vaccine.

In the study, the vaccine was given a free pass, with assurances that it didn’t increase the risk of autism in children—when, in fact, the data showed it did increase that risk.

***The key moments in Vaxxed are audio recordings of CDC researcher Thompson confessing his sins.

But wait. Now we have a bill, AB 1671, up before the California legislature. If it passes, it could make it a crime to screen Vaxxed or even write an article about it.

Those recordings of Thompson could be labeled “undercover,” and “illegal,” and therefore make them the target of AB 1671.

Furthermore, AB 1671 specifically seeks to protect “healthcare providers” from “exposure” via “undercover recordings” documenting their crimes. Certainly, by stretching the definitions a bit, the CDC, for whom Thompson works, and Thompson himself, could be considered such healthcare providers. Lawyers could argue that position until the cows come home and hang up a case in various courts for years—while an injunction prohibiting the screening of Vaxxed remains in force.

Nick Cahill, at the Courthouse News Service, reports on AB 1671 (“Abortion Clinic Sting Videos Sprout Free-Speech Battle”, Thursday, August 11, 2016):

“The bill would criminalize publishing undercover video footage of ‘health care providers’ and subject third parties, including journalists, to penalties for reporting and distributing the illegally recorded footage.” [My comment: It appears criminal penalties could be applied to anyone who posts the videos and comments on them, online. Not just reporters. And surely, audio recordings, as well as videos, would be banned.]

Cahill continues: “Under AB 1671, a journalist receiving and posting footage from an anonymous source could be punished by the state as well as be opened up to potential civil lawsuits. Whistleblowers would not be exempt from the proposal either, regardless of how they obtained the illegal footage.”

In the case of Vaxxed, the film makers received or obtained the recordings of CDC researcher Thompson and used them to make their case: Thompson was confessing to crimes he and colleagues committed at the CDC.

But if AB 1671 passes, releasing those recordings and commenting on them, in a film, could be considered a crime, punishable by fine, jail—and the film makers could also be open to lawsuits.

And of course, Vaxxed could be banned from all theaters in California.

As bizarre as it seems, AB 1671 isn’t just targeting people who make the undercover recordings. Its focus is on reporters who receive those recordings and then use them, post them, and write about them.

This lunatic attack on free speech coordinates tightly with the infamous 2015 California law, SB277, which made vaccinating California school children mandatory.

Vaxxed certainly raises ominous questions about that law—and now the government of California is considering the addition of a new law that could ban Vaxxed.


“Your kids must get vaccinated, and don’t report vaccine crimes and vaccine damage, when the knowledge of that damage comes from ‘undercover recordings’.”

That’s quite stunning, when you think about it.

The California Gestapo is trying to expand its reach.

Do you really think all this effort is coming from some genuine concern for “protecting the children?”

If so, you’re badly mistaken. This is about naked suppression of the truth, big profits for vaccine manufacturers, and neurological damage in kids.

If you don’t think so, see Vaxxed.

While you can.

~Jon Rappoport


TLB recommends other great articles by Jon Rappoport

Jon is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at orOutsideTheRealityMachine.


Join UsFind out about our great (WOW) TLB Project Membership package and benefits, add your voice and help us to change the world!

6 Comments on The film VaXXed could be outlawed in California, if this bill passes…

  1. In 1986 the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was established by Congress because the drug manufacturers threatened to stop manufacturing vaccines if they were not granted legal immunity from damages due to vaccines. It was no longer profitable for them to continue manufacturing vaccines in a free market, because of the large amount of lawsuits for injuries and deaths due to vaccines. So instead of requiring the drug companies to produce safer vaccines, Congress granted them total immunity from civil litigation due to injuries or deaths resulting from vaccines. Claims to the “Vaccine Court” were first filed in 1989. [Since then, over $3 billion in compensation has been paid out to victims of vaccine injury. Yup – vaccines are totally safe! NOT. If they’re so safe, why do we need to protect the makers of the vaccines?] (Source: CDC, Parents take greater role in childhood vaccines, MICHAEL RESCHKE Go to Vaccine Compensation to file a claim:
    The downstream harm of vaccines is enormous. The reporting system is weak and voluntary in the US and is generally acknowledged to capture between 1-10% of all adverse events, but if you give even that weak reporting data set a cursory glance you will see clearly that vaccines cause enormous harm to large numbers of people. Oh yes, did I mention the US government has paid out Billions to US families of vaccine injured or killed people. And most people never even make it to the vaccine court because of the high barriers set for entry and success in the system, which is, by the way, a US national scandal. Vaccine makers in the US are virtually totally free of any liability and are free to profit with whatever unclean and unsafe products they choose to. And they are free to profit from the downstream gain as well. Like, for example, childhood leukemia.
    1) History shows us that vaccines did NOT eradicate the diseases that plagued humanity. That is a common misconception — in actual fact, it was better sanitation and hygiene in the cities that prevented the spread of diseases. These charts, from official sources, show us that vaccines (1) were not responsible, and are not necessary, for eliminating infectious diseases, (2) are not effective, and (3) are dangerous. .
    2) Dr. Oz’s only concern about the flu vaccine appears to be that it contains thimerosal. He went on to advise pregnant women to ask for thimerosal-free vaccines. What he didn’t tell his audience is that The CDC’s own advisory committee, the ACIP, advised NO flu vaccine for pregnant women, with or without thimerosal.
    3) Class Says Merck Lied About Mumps Vaccine
    4) Whilstleblower Thompson’s Call to Congress:
    5) *There are 2 other MMR vaccine Whistleblowers
    6) CDC Epidemiologist Whistleblower Confirms New Review Showing Vaccine Autism Link:
    7) Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data.Hooker BS
    8) CDC Whistleblower Dr. Thompson on Thimerosal and Pregnant Women
    9) 100 million people were given the polio vaccine contaminated with monkey virus SV-40. The biggest cover-up in history. This was an on the air radio broadcast 1 month before the CDC cover-up was exposed:
    10) 48,000 paralyzed in India by the polio shot funded by the Gates Foundation. Bill Gates Confronted by Reporter: Bill & Melinda Gates on Trial in India:
    11) Listen to blog talk radio broadcast with Journalist Susanne Posel 10,000 DEAD from Vaccine in Pakistan: :
    12) Ebola & AIDS Manufactured By Western Pharma & US DoD
    13) Medical Nuremberg for CDC NOW
    14) American parents awarded £600,000 in compensation after their son developed autism as a result of MMR vaccine Read more: :
    15) Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population. Chains of transmissions and the role of vaccine failures
    16) 86 Research Papers Supporting the Vaccine-Autism Link

  2. Steven this could easily be the most ignorant and un-researched comment ever published on this website. Literally NOTHING you have stated in your comment is true. Please get YOUR head out of your anal orifice, quit parroting your big pharma Gods, and do your own research … Or at least please tell us how much they are paying you to make such ignorant comments ??

  3. tgis movie has been debunked, proven to be full of lies and deceit. Andrew Wakefield is a charlatan. Free speech is one thing. Presenting outright lies as fact needs a warning label at the beginning of it at minimum. This film is irresponsible and dangerous and the anti vaccination conspiracy theorists are spreading disease and causing death in children in the modern age. It is as disgusting as it is ignorant. Do your research like a scientist, not alike a zealot.

  4. Clearly another overreach by the government! It’s time for less government and more freedom. Let people make their own choices.

  5. There is no clearer violation to the first amendment than this. However, this law could easily pass if it exposes left wing lies and the agenda of liberal policy as California does not recognize the U.S. Constitution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.