Has Medical Tyranny arrived in Canada? [Video]

Has Medical Tyranny arrived in Canada?

by (TLB) Staff
 
For the past 15 years or more, David Stephan has been actively involved in the field of natural medicine through the organization of “Truehope”. This company largely focuses on nutritional supplements aimed at helping mental health. As part of his involvement with Truehope, David has found himself at the forefront of many activist movements that have prevented Health Canada and the Pharmaceutical Industry from stripping Canadians rights to effective and scientifically validated natural treatments which fall outside of the mainstream allopathic drug model.
.
After the tragic passing of his son, Ezekiel, in early 2012, David and his wife Collet found themselves engaged in a battle for freedom. After a well orchestrated hospital coverup took place to shift the cause of Ezekiel’s death from being a “medical misadventure” to a “parent negligence” charge, they were accused of “failing to provide the necessities of life”, which carried a penalty of up to 5 years in jail.
.
As part of the court proceedings, the crown prosecution attempted to set a new precedent in law surrounding criminal liability being established for parents choosing not to vaccinate their children against “vaccine-preventable diseases”. As such, David and Collet found themselves overnight becoming an active part of the vaccine choice movement.
.
In 2016, during his own trial which was the first of its kind in Canada, David became aware of another family undergoing criminal proceedings that originated out of a visit to the same hospital and with some of the same doctors he encountered with his deceased son’s visit. The details appeared to be similar in nature to his own horrible experience.
.
For this family’s case, David took the opportunity to cover the court proceedings in its entirety and report on them via live streaming. What was further identified in the Jeromie and Jennifer Clark trial was that there is an emerging pattern of profiling and engaging in criminal charges against parents with holistic beliefs for the sole purpose of maintaining and increasing overall medical system compliance but also approved vaccine schedule compliance.
.

Are the courts being weaponized to push through a vaccine mandate in Canada?

.
Ultimately what came out in the court proceedings was crystal clear evidence that the hospital error killed 14-month-old John Wyatt Clark.
.
Former Alberta Chief Medical Examiner Anny Sauvageau, (whose contract was not renewed for having been a whistleblower in regard to the corruption within the Medical Examiner’s office) testified that the child died because the hospital aggressively administered 70 times too much sodium for the chronic hyponatremia he presented with, when he was admitted. Also, a CT scan showed he had a thrombosis which would account for the blackness on a few toes as oxygen was not getting down to his feet. When he was first admitted he was noted to have been alert and crying.
A 15-point neurological assessment was performed and it was unremarkable. A blood culture was taken and it was negative and little John was still interactive and alert at this time. Nearly 2 hours after being in the hospital environment, another blood culture was drawn which showed Staphylococcus Aureus. Fifteen minutes after the overly aggressive sodium resuscitation commenced, John went into a seizure and later died.
Over 9 months later, the cause of death was pronounced as an “overwhelming staph infection complicated by malnutrition”.
The current Chief Medical Examiner, at the same medical examiners office from which Dr. Anny Sauvageau was terminated, drew blood 3 days after John’s death and made the determination that he was malnourished based on the fact his vitamin D and A levels were low.
The Canadian main stream media fueled the fire with their untruthful and biased reporting during the court hearings, even suggesting the child had been “starved”.
Five years ago, when the event first happened, the police found only healthy organic foods in the Clark’s house. To make things worse, the Clarks other two children 7 and 3 were taken away from them and placed in custody of Alberta Child and Family Services.
.
One has to wonder if there is collusion going on between the media and the government agenda to make sure parents are in medical compliance and are vaccinated? Unbelievably the parents were found guilty and now face up to 30 years in prison. This is quite likely the most ground-breaking case in the history of Canada for establishing medical tyranny.
.

David Stephan shares his thoughts…

*********

This article may be freely republished with attribution to The Liberty Beacon and a working link back to this article and this statement included.

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our main websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Follow TLB on Twitter @thetlbproject

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

TLB has other above the fold articles, videos and stories available by clicking on “HOME” at the top of this post. Never miss a new post, sign up for E-Mail alerts at the bottom of the Home page and get a link dropped right to your in-box.

TheLibertyBeacon.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*