HOW DOES ONE GO ABOUT TAKING OVER THE WORLD?
by Michael Aydinian | TLB Contributing Writer
Every so often the phrase ‘most powerful man in the world’ is bandied about, invariably referring to the American President. Such falsehoods typify the media’s appalling standards but then misleading the public is what it’s all about. The mere notion the President can do as he pleases is naive to say the least. Of course we know where the real problem lies – who controls him & all the high ranking Western politicians. But then, see what happens when you say, ‘the most powerful man is the one who can print money’, 9 times out of 10 there’s an adverse reaction. People will look at you thinking, ‘here we go again. Another conspiracy nut!’
Okay. Let’s say your goal is for your family to one day rule the world. The long & the short of it is, if you’re not the one printing money then someone else is more powerful than you….. a lot more! So you can forget everything else – media control, politicians, religious leaders, royalty in your pocket – it isn’t worth a bar of soap! It stands to reason because when it comes to knocking out ‘the green’, the guy who ultimately flicks the switch has the capability to buy you or anyone out, any time, any day!
I am certain UKs immigration policy was all part of a plan to crush the last bastions of socialism in Britain, notably the national health service and the welfare state.
It doesn’t seem possible successive British Governments, along with other EU states, were not aware that open borders would lead to untold pressure being placed on the NHS, the welfare state & the general infrastructure. They damn well had to know this.
Absolutely right V. Mass immigration WAS part of the plan. Why? Because in the final analysis, the banksters aim is to establish a New World Order. Now only blithering idiots aren’t aware of this. Believe it or not, this is all one actually needs to know. It’s just a case of working back from this one undeniable fact. So, let’s do that by asking this question –
HOW DOES ONE GO ABOUT TAKING OVER THE WORLD?
I believe this is more or less the correct order in terms of objectives –
1) Seize control of all central banks so that only you can print money.
2) Start lending money & charging interest, that is, just so long as plenty of collateral is provided.
3) Buy up all forms of media outlets so that you control the flow of information, effectively rendering the news to soap opera status. This allows you to –
a. report only what you want.
b. conceal truth that may be damaging.
c. make it up as you go along.
4) Commence a process of incorporating the most powerful, influential officials all over the world into secret societies like the Freemasons while nurturing new recruits into positions of power.
5) This is done through bribery, coercion & granting sexual favours. Needless to say, child molesters & perverts are given preferential treatment. After all, anyone with such filth in the closet will surely do all that’s asked of them. Small wonder, the most able vermin ie the most convincing liars, breeze through the corridors of power. This is precisely why there are an inordinate number of sexual deviants in Westminster & indeed Capitol Hill & most Western parliaments.
NOW ONE IS ABLE TO…..
6) MANUFACTURE WARS BETWEEN MAJOR NATIONS USING THE MEDIA TO PEDDLE LIES, CREATE DIVISION & FABRICATE FEAR!
7) Provide both sides with finance so that they continue to purchase machinery, weapons & ammunition from Armament companies that you & your fellow conspirators control. The more bombs dropped, the better, destruction being the byword.
The formula is a simple one – while war inflicts incalculable harm to nations, the power-brokers reap enormous profits, thus expanding their power-base at an exponential rate.
8) Create organisations like the UN, NATO & the EU in order to amalgamate power.
9) Instruct politicians to sell off state owned assets.
I feel I have to go off in a tangent & elaborate on this. The unsuspecting public have no idea they’re about to be taken to the cleaners. This is because, once again, the media neglects to highlight any of the glaring downsides & instead feeds the public a pack of lies in order to fool them into believing, ‘this wholesale sell-off of public assets is a good thing. It’s something that should have been done long ago!’
Here’s the actual truth: What we owned through years of investment of our taxes – British Oil, British Gas, British Electric, the Post Office, our water supply, not to mention the colossal sum we invested setting up the infrastructure for British Rail & British Telecom – SUDDENLY IT ALL BECAME THE PROPERTY OF MULTI-MILLIONAIRES & BILLIONAIRES!
At one time we owned all this. What we got now? More importantly, what did we get out of it? 30 odd years have passed & I’ve yet to hear anything remotely resembling an adequate answer. Where’s all the wonga gone? I guarantee, I never got a Mars bar out of it! The media kept saying privatisation is the way forward. So tell me. How did we benefit? Last I heard the UK is around a trillion in debt & public services are still being cut.
So we got well & truly shafted while the super wealthy filled their boots. Then to add insult to injury, the cost of energy went through the roof even though there’s never been a shortage of petroleum. If anything, for years, OPEC has had to set limits in order to curtail oil production. Guess what? Profits went through the roof too. In fact, profits are so enormous, actually obscene, the media had to stop reporting how many billions BP or SHELL make. So….all good. Now…. believe it or not, here’s the bad news…..
Even though untold billions are involved here, money is hardly the reason the Rothschilds directed their puppets to privatise public assets. This family is worth between 3-500 trillion, the later being half the world’s wealth. No other family possesses one trillion, not even the Saudi Royal family. So what difference another billion or two? It’s chicken feed to them. No. The only conclusion I can draw is what they wanted was control of our essential services – gas, electricity, telecommunications & crucially our water supply.
Now I don’t know about you but I do not like the idea of this one little bit. Like I said at the start of this piece, once you’re cognisant of the plan for a New World Order, then isn’t it reasonable to assume a natural extrapolation for these people is the necessity of controlling water & energy? Isn’t this as good as any state-of-the-art weapon? Better I’d say! You know, I’m not sure if people ever ponder the prospect of life without electricity & water. Ask the Palestinians. They know what it’s like & the very same people are involved here. Think about this for a while & then ask, how in the blazes did we get conned into relinquishing control of our essential services to a bunch of billionaires psychopaths?
And finally the reason for this post –
10) Instruct politicians to open borders. Why? Because as well as providing cheap labour & thus maximising profits, mass immigration serves to create divisions within nations, weakening them further still. Here we have the Zionist prime directive –
DIVIDE & CONQUER!
But before I go any further I feel a need to say I am not against asylum seekers or those who wish to make a better life for themselves. In fact I applaud them. Immigration is not a question of racism or nationalistic pride. However, I feel it is also important to say human beings do not prefer to integrate. It is a fact – we tend to stick with our own. Now I don’t, but isn’t it common to see communities of different nationalities & cultures clumping together? This is not to say we can’t all live as one. We can but there’s another major factor involved here – THE MEDIA!
And here we have it again – we know about the plan for the NWO & we should therefore also know the same people own the media. This means they will use the media for their own nefarious objectives. Sure enough, the media constantly drives wedges between various cultures & groups so that there’s always an underlying tone of mistrust & hatred. This is all deliberate. I know from my own experiences. I’ve never trusted the media & as a result I get on with everybody. I couldn’t give two hoots if you’re black, pink, yellow or white. As Hendrix once said, ‘we’re all families far apart.’ I guarantee – if the media wasn’t there to stir the pot, we’d all be living together in harmony. Instead we have – Divide & Conquer.
So let’s quickly examine the media’s actions whenever anyone questions immigration. It goes something like this – HOW EVIL CAN YOU BE! SHUT UP YOU RACIST! In short, the media plonks its moral high-hat on at light speed!
Rather like the Holocaust, anyone exercising what is an unalienable right to question, is immediately ambushed. Whenever a gargantuan lie has to be protected or a hidden agenda pursued, it’s essential never to allow serious debate to ever take place. YET ANOTHER ZIONIST MODUS OPERANDI!
Of course, if one bothers to apply simple logic, one quickly discovers just how we’re being taken for the almightiest of rides. And I exaggerate not when I say this, for it literally beggars belief….
i) We have a Zionist banking hierarchy which is responsible for creating Israel, a country that proudly declares – ONLY JEWS OR SHOULD I REALLY SAY, ZIONISTS CAN LIVE! No one else. How can any nation be more racist than this? Oh but hang on….
ii) THESE ARE THE VERY PEOPLE WHO INSISTED WE OPEN OUR BORDERS!
iii) And to cap it all, the same people control the media. In other words –
WE HAVE THE GREATEST RACISTS ON EARTH BRIBING OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES TO OPEN OUR BORDERS. ANYONE DARING TO SAY, ‘CAN WE PLEASE DISCUSS THIS’ IS IMMEDIATELY BRANDED A RACIST!
Wow! You know, I used to have a lot of Jewish friends. I realise now, most are not real Jews but that’s another story. However, what I did notice is they possessed an uncanny knack of erroneously accusing others, OF THINGS THEY DID! Talk about sending hypocrisy to another level. Like I tried explaining with immigration – the Chutzpah is off the Richter scale!
So a few points worth mentioning, not only was the British public conned but this was the case in almost all of Europe’s wealthiest nations. How could such a major policy decision occur & remarkably apply for so many nations? Suddenly, Europe opened its doors to mass immigration yet there was no debate regarding whether this should be so. It was as if on this issue, democracy was swept under the carpet. However, someone somewhere had to want this bad. So once again we arrive at a point where questions abound –
Who had the power to push through such a thing? The answer lies in the fact the media never raised any of these points. In fact, they went along with the whole coup as if nothing untoward was occurring. How could the mass-media fail us so miserably? When these immigration policies were announced, the media never once said –
‘hold the goddamn phone. This decision, right or wrong, will radically alter life in Britain. Therefore, the British people have to have a say. Even contemplating such a move behind closed doors is tantamount to treason. At the very least, it makes a mockery of our democracy.’
What on earth is the point of having election manifestos & political parties if politicians on both sides of the fence ignore the public? Ask yourself: Am I being unreasonable here? What possible reason would politicians have to not put this before the British public? This is an entirely relevant question yet it’s never been answered.
And here’s the coup-de-gras. For over 50 years in the UK, a cast-iron guarantee for the party in opposition to win the next election was to adopt one pledge – TO END MASS IMMIGRATION! Now this applied for the Conservative AND Labour party. The saying, ‘they’ll do anything to get into power,’ is fair enough….. yet did any party ever try to win the election this way? NEVER! Moreover, whenever any party threatened to seriously do something about this, the media kicked into overdrive with accusations of racism & hatred.
What people have to grasp is damning evidence stares us squarely in the face. What’s critical here is in every European nation that opened its borders, were people ever given the opportunity to vote on it? They weren’t! You know why? THEY WOULD ALL HAVE SAID – NO. WE DON’T WANT THIS! THAT’S WHY WE WEREN’T GIVEN THE CHOICE!
About TLB Contributing Writer Michael Aydinian
You could call me a freelance writer/activist, a media & political analyst specializing in world affairs. However, I feel I’m merely a free thinker.
Visit my Website: http://gmmuk.com/
Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheGmmUkMichaelAydinian,
Check out YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheGMMuk?feature=watch
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our main websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … TLB
Follow TLB on Twitter @thetlbproject
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
TLB has other above the fold articles, videos and stories available by clicking on “HOME” at the top of this post. Never miss a new post, sign up for E-Mail alerts at the bottom of the Home page and get a link dropped right to your in-box.
TheLibertyBeacon.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.