Same “So-Called Judge” USURPS TRUMP AGAIN On Latest Travel Ban

Same “So-Called Judge” USURPS TRUMP AGAIN On Latest Travel Ban

by Rick Wells

President Trump has once again been overruled by a bow-tied libtard in the liberal cesspool of Seattle. The same “so-called” judge, James Robart, who ignored the Constitution…

How many times are the American people and our President going to have to be endangered by judicial agitators before the offenders are replaced as being unfit for their offices?

It seems like every month or two one of the cabal of crooked libtard “so-called” judges oversteps their authority and pretends they are the President of the United States and that they represent the would-be terrorists of the world and foreigners in general,  not the American people.

Once again the Seattle libtard, US District Judge James Robart, has blocked a Trump immigration executive order. He was one of those who blocked the initial travel bans. The latest ban has resulted in a significant reduction in “refugee” admissions from the “everybody gets in” policies of Hussein Obama.

As a result, those foreigners sought out and found a “judge” who represents them in their efforts to force their way into the country, regardless of the potential threat they pose. They argued that restricting who enters the country somehow violates the Constitution. The libtard anti-American Robart agreed.

On October 24th the Trump administration suspended “refugee” admission from 11 terrorist nations primarily located in the Middle East and Africa for a 90 day security review. That review was set to conclude in late January but now they’ll be forced to come to conclusions earlier, and perhaps revise them at a later date.

More than 40 percent of the US admissions over the past three years were from eleven countries with dubious records on the terrorism front. Those nations include Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Mali, North Korea, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Robart ruled that the administration could continue review as long as they wanted, but that they can’t restrict the rights of terrorists or those who might be sympathetic to terrorists, provided they have a “bona fide” connection to the United States. Bona fide has been interpreted by these legal geniuses to mean a family member in the US or a refugee agency.

That’s an idiotic position for the Seattle  egghead to take, as if terrorists never have families or they could never evade the “everybody welcome” scrutiny of the for-profit refugee processing businesses.

Robart is also now the de facto head of Homeland Security, ruling that “follow-to-join,” a family reunification program for “refugees” that had been paused during the period must be restarted. If any terrorists happen to be admitted as a result that’s just the price we pay for Robart’s recklessness. We couldn’t expect the terrorists to be inconvenienced by having to wait or to move to a secondary target within their own countries.

Robart was appointed by the globalist George W. Bush, no friend of border security, American sovereignty or of President Trump. He’s clearly demonstrating his loathing for patriotic Americans once again. We need to find a way to replace him, Derrick Watson and the rest of the radical globalist judicial agitators, and quickly.

*********

[Pictorial content edited by TLB]

TLB published this original article from Rick Wells.US with our thanks for the commentary.

Rick says… Thank you for reading and sharing my work –  Please look for me, Rick Wells athttps://www.facebook.com/RickRWells/, https://gab.ai/RickRWells, https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RickwellsUs and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US, (not dot com), and also follow me on Twitter @RickRWells.


Follow TLB on Twitter @thetlbproject

2 Comments on Same “So-Called Judge” USURPS TRUMP AGAIN On Latest Travel Ban

  1. Carolyn, the whole judicial system of Federal judges is made up of political appointments made by a setting President. Depending on vacancies the whole system can be stacked in favor of the left or right agenda. These issues end up at the Supreme Court, which again is appointed.”Article III federal judges” (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve “during good behavior” (often paraphrased as appointed “for life”). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.

  2. I don’t understand how these liberal judges get away with this nonsense. Why can’t they just be ignored?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*