2020: A Battle of Two Futures, Will Liberty Prevail?

2020: A Battle of Two Futures, Will Liberty Prevail?

By: Daniel Taylor

“…we will establish a foundation for an eventual mission to Mars and perhaps, someday, to many worlds beyond”. President Trump

Two potential futures face humanity; An anti-human world dominated by high tech tyranny, or a pro-human future that could see mankind reach for the stars.

A massive cultural and informational war is dividing the planet. The real political debates that should be happening regarding the technological revolution (as currently directed by its anti-human orchestrators) are not taking place.

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said Tuesday that the world is splitting between the United States on one side, and the communist Chinese on the other.

Potential future #1: The Asian World Order

Parag Khanna, globalist and spokesman for the plan for the Asian world order, is very open as to what the world will look like under the Chinese model.

In a recent interview with the Mumbai Mirror, Khanna said that “Technocratic governance”, “caution about free speech” and “self-censorship” will be part of the new value system of the Asian world order.

Khanna told the Mirror that after seeing what happened with Trump and Brexit, Asians are “being very strict with Twitter and Instagram”, adding that “Australia’s new media laws look exactly like Singapore’s”.

Under this order, value systems that uphold western ideals of freedom will be crushed. The communist party in China rightly believes that Christianity holds western values dangerous to the establishment. Seeds of resistance cannot be allowed to take hold.

Tech giants become governments, constitution replaced by algorithms and artificial intelligence.

In 2011, Parag Khanna and Ayesha Khanna wrote in Foreign Policy magazine,

As we move into the Hybrid Age, whoever has the capacity to mange the intersection of technology, capital, and identity can become a pole of power.”

In anticipation of this Asian world order, Facebook, Google, and apple have made moves to China. Their platforms are being used to ensnare the globe in a grid of surveillance that will enforce a social credit system to keep the masses in line.

A Penn State law professor has warned that the “cultural management machinery” could push western society to accept these social scores, in turn changing,

“…the focus of public law from constitution and rule of law to analytics and algorithm…”

Potential future #2: Humanity reaches for the stars

Another future is also possible. A pro-human, freedom embracing future. President Trump outlined these ideas in a historic speech delivered to the United Nations:

Trump proclaimed that the future belonged to patriots, not globalists.

Greta Thunberg and her globalist backers have many convinced that the planet is doomed because of human activity. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says that we should not have children. They have us convinced that we have reached the end of the “wilderness road”, that there is nothing left for humans to achieve, and should in fact scale back our development.

The artificial habitat that we live in has seduced us into a sate of complacency. We aren’t exercising the strength that we have as human beings. We are convinced that we are at the end of the road; We don’t need to strive for anything else in our collective state of depression.

In reality, we have untapped potential to use our technology to expand to other worlds.

In March of this year, Trump announced a plan to return to the moon by 2024. Trump said:

“This time, we will not only plant our flag and leave our footprint, we will establish a foundation for an eventual mission to Mars and perhaps, someday, to many worlds beyond.”

Mankind faces a difficult road ahead. As the deep state continually shifts the debates from one contrived scandal after another, we are losing sight of the bigger picture.

••••

This above article (2020: A Battle of Two Futures, Will Liberty Prevail?) was originally created and published by oldthinkernews.com and is republished here under “Fair Use” (see disclaimer below) with attribution to author Daniel Taylor and oldthinkernews.com.

••••

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*