Biden team waged Info War using Unverified Intel
‘Major housecleaning’ needed
Fred Fleitz, former chief of staff at the National Security Council, made his comments following a report that the U.S. released unverified information in order to stop Russia from invading Ukraine
In the wake of a report that the U.S. released unverified intelligence reports as a way to stop Russia from invading Ukraine, a former U.S. intelligence official said that the Biden administration needs to “clean house” at the National Security Council and other agencies.
“We have to have a major housecleaning of these agencies,” said Fred Fleitz, former chief of staff at the National Security Council and a longtime intelligence expert. “I mean, the whole top floor of some of these agencies has to be fired.”
Fleitz (pictured left/Wikipedia) made his comments in response to a Wednesday report from NBC News that three senior U.S. intelligence officials admitted they released unverified intelligence in order to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin to stand down from invading Ukraine.
Three U.S. officials said this week there is no evidence that Moscow has sent chemical weapons to Ukraine, the outlet reported. “They said the U.S. released the information to deter Russia from using the banned munitions,” the authors wrote.
The tactic is among many the Biden administration has used as part of an information war against Russia, the outlet noted.
“Coordinated by the White House National Security Council, the unprecedented intelligence releases have been so frequent and voluminous, officials said, that intelligence agencies had to devote more staff members to work on the declassification process, scrubbing the information so it wouldn’t betray sources and methods,” the outlet reported.
The revelation, if true, reflects poorly on advisers serving the administration, Fleitz said Thursday on the John Solomon Reports podcast.
“I don’t think this is just the intelligence agencies,” Fleitz said. “I think this was the National Security Council. This is the White House deciding that they could use this intelligence to make outrageous claims and things that Biden says were true that weren’t true.”
On a number of occasions, the press asked to see the declassified reports on the alleged plan to use chemical weapons, Fleitz said, but the White House wouldn’t release them, “which I thought was very suspicious.”
Information warfare has been used to Western advantage against Putin in the past, one U.S. intelligence official told Just the News, and has helped “level the playing field.” The method “works when it works,” the official said. But using it also brings risks.
“If you get something wrong, you lose credibility,” the official said. “And you lose in a big way when you lie to the American people. Intelligence agencies must tread carefully.”
“I’m not prepared to say that the intelligence agencies did this,” Fleitz said. “For example, there might have been a report that they wrote that said, ‘We have a low probability report that Putin might do this.’ And then the NSC said, ‘Aha, let’s run out and say the Russians are going to do this.'”
The report calls into question other seemingly damning indictments from the intelligence community, one congressman said.
Big tech media platforms previously helped suppress news about Hunter Biden’s laptop, falsely claiming that the infamous device was Russian disinformation, according to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).
“That’s frightening stuff when you have this kind of thing happening from former intel officials and the example” from NBC, Jordan told the John Solomon Reports podcast.
Moscow, meanwhile, has claimed that Ukraine plans to launch a false flag poison gas attack that will be blamed on Russia, according to the Russian language Ria Novosti.
The outlet quoted Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov as saying the attack will be “a major provocation using poisonous substances” in Kharkiv.
Keeping track of charges and counter-charges is “a massive undertaking,” the U.S. intelligence official said.
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News. Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)
Header featured image (edited) credit: Fleitz/archivalinstitute.com/2019/05/11/ iran-oral-history-interview-with-fred-fleitz
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Accurate enough, so long as “propaganda” is considered to be “information.”