BLOODLINES OF ALL US PRESIDENTS

Guide to American Presidents burkes peerage

PictureCrownJewels22-460

US Presidents are descendant from the British & French Royal

The books Burke’s Peerage & Baronetage and Burke’s Landed Gentry have, for 175 years, recorded the genealogies of the UK and Ireland’s titled and landed families. Often referred to as ‘the aristocracy bible’, these are without comparison as a genealogical reference to the influential figures and families of Great Britain and Ireland.

Burke’s publishing director, Harold Brooks-Baker says Bush’s royal connections are startling. “[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne,” says Brooks-Baker. Some of the governor’s royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Duchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana. His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II, who shared the governor’s vision of a strong military. Going back nearly 1000 years, Brooks-Baker points out both the Bush and Pierce families [Barbara Bush’s maiden name is Pierce] were high society. “Not one member of his family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class,” he notes.

Gore’s family members weren’t exactly peasants. The vice president’s family tree includes Charlemagne and three Holy Roman emperors. And a good fight wouldn’t frighten the vice president’s most famous ancestor, England’s Edward I – best known today as the king who defeated, then executed Braveheart. Gore is running a bit behind Bush in the European royal count, his blood-line runs close to some American home-grown nobility, including Thomas Jefferson.

As for John Kerry, “the 60-year-old can trace his roots back to the first Massachusetts governor, John Winthrop, to every great family in Boston and to a host of royals in Europe. Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I and to the bloodlines straight through the Windsor and Hanover families,” Brooks-Baker said. “But both candidates have a remarkable number of royal connections and both are related to Queen Elizabeth.”

What about Bill Cinton ? In an Associated Press article published in The Daily Oklahoman, October 28, 1996, Harold Brooks-Baker said: “Bill Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe, but took his stepfather’s name as a teenager. Clinton’s ancestry can be traced back, on his mother’s side, to King Henry III who ruled England from 1227 to 1272. He is descended from King Robert I of France.

Furthermore, he is related to every Scottish monarch to the current British royal family. Clinton’s royal roots include several medieval monarchs and Simon de Montford, a statesman and soldier under King Henry III. Through de Montford, Clinton is related to every ancient aristocratic family in Britain today.”

In the same article, the journalist revealed that “Bill Clinton’s family goes back to William Henry Harrison and Benjamin Harrison, making him related to Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. His kinship to Ford makes him ‘near kin’ to Richard Nixon and George Bush.”

Small world, isn’t it? And this seems to be a jealous guarded secret as over the past years, efforts to uncover Clinton’s personal history have been nigh unto impossible to confirm. The President had all records of his family history, school records, medical history, etc. sealed.

And if you think it’s just a probability game, then check your own genealogy and those of all the people you know. Do you have such great chance to be even far cousin with Bush, Nixon, Kerry, Clinton ?

Still think that the Democratic Revolution has changed the Aristocratic Governments ? Now think twice

ANYONE CAN BECOME PRESIDENT?! CHENEY AND OBAMA ARE COUSINS!

cheney_obama-460

Lynn Cheney, the wife of Dick Cheney, had discovered in research for an upcoming book, that her husband and Barack Obama are actually cousins!

Anyone can become President, huh?! Apparently ONLY if you are already related to a former or current President or Vice President …

ANYONE CAN BECOME PRESIDENT?! CHENEY AND OBAMA ARE COUSINS!
by Kentroversy

Lynn Cheney, wife of Dick Cheney, while doing an interview with Houston, Texas talk radio station KTRH 740 AM — dropped quite a bombshell. While talking about her forthcoming book, she just happened to let it slip out that Barack Obama and her husband are eighth cousins!

The journalist with the Houston, TX USA radio station with whom she was speaking yelled out a surprised “What?!” at the revelation, as if she had never heard of the Presidents being related. And with the amount of energy these people spend hiding these facts from the general public — there is a great likelihood that she hasn’t heard of any of this before because of this program of concealment.

Lynn Cheney was quoted as saying:

“One of the things I discovered [in doing research for my forthcoming book] is that Dick and Barack Obama are eighth cousins. Isn’t that an amazing thing?! If you go back eight generations, they have a common ancestor.”

This common ancestor has been identified as Mareen Devall — a 17th century immigrant from France.

Of the 43 Presidents thus far, 34 of them have connections all the way back to Charlemagne (742-814), the most famous of all French monarchs. Even though America has been referred to as a melting-pot of immigration, this genetic diversity has NOT been fairly represented among White House occupants. There have been no Presidents other than wealthy aristocratic white men — no women, no minorities, and certainly no one from the working middle class. Thus, it must be said that America is governed ONLY by members of an oligarchic aristocracy. Bill Clinton was represented as a so-called ‘common man,’ however, his ties to the Rockefeller family have long been rumored, and he would have to possess that type of familial connection in order to have successfully commandeered the White House for two terms.

According to the Burke’s Peerage website, 26 of the first 42 Presidents are cousins to the seventh degree, at most. 28 of these men are cousins to the sixth or seventh degree at most. George Bush Sr. shares with Franklin Roosevelt, 15 cousins who were President. Gerald Ford and William Taft are related to 14, and Barbara Bush is a member of the Pierce family, and is herself related to Franklin Pierce, our 14th President.

36 of the first 42 Presidential families can be traced back to royalty from England, Scotland, or Wales. In both the 2000 and the 2004 Presidential elections, George W. Bush and both Al Gore and John Kerry are cousins. In addition to being related family members, Bush and Kerry are both members of Yale University’s Skull & Bones occult fraternity. The hidden danger of Skull & Bones is that the oath that is taken when one has been selected to join the cabal, supercedes all subsequent oaths, including the Presidential oath!

David Icke wrote the following in his book THE BIGGEST SECRET [pgs. 191-192]:

“At least 33 of the first 42 Presidents of the United States have been related to England’s King Alfred The Great (849-899) and Charlemagne (742-814), the famous monarch of France, and 19 Presidents are related to England’s King Edward III (1312-1377), who has a thousand blood connections to Prince Charles. George Bush and Barbara Bush are both from the same aristocratic line, among others I have noted. They come from the Pierce bloodline, which changed its’ name from Percy after fleeing England in the wake of the Gunpowder Plot to blow up the English parliament. The Bushes married for genetics, as the Eastern Establishment families in the States have always done in line with their fellow royal and aristocratic blood relatives in Europe.

Even Bill Clinton and Bob Dole, who ‘opposed’ each other at the 1996 election, are distant cousins. They can trace their ancestry to England’s King Henry III, who reigned from 1227 to 1273, and US Presidents William Henry and Benjamin Harrison. This information comes from the publication, Burke’s Peerage, which traces the lineage of royal and aristocratic families. Clinton has far more royal blood than Dole and is directly descended from the same bloodline as the House of Windsor, every Scottish monarch, and King Robert I of France. This is why he was the Brotherhood’s choice.”

Harold Brooks-Baker, the late Publishing Director of Burke’s Peerage and Gentry said the following during the 2000 American Presidential campaign:

“The Presidential candidate with the greatest number of royal genes has always been the victor, without exception, since George Washington.”

Here is a chart that shows how 25 of our Presidents have all been related to one another:

25Prez-460

There is this AmeriKan myth that anyone can become President of the United States. At least 34 of 43 Presidents come from the same family line, and the chart above traces 25 of them, whom all come from the same family tree. [click to enlarge the graphic.]

But, that’s not all! Obama is also related to the Bush family, as recently reported by the Chicago Sun-Times:

“That’s because they share the same great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents — Samuel Hinckley and Sarah Soole Hinckley of 17th century Massachusetts. That means Obama and former President George Herbert Walker Bush are 10th cousins once removed. Obama is related to Cheney through Mareen Duvall, a 17th century immigrant from France.

Mareen and Susannah Duvall were Obama’s great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents and Cheney’s great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.

That makes Obama and Cheney ninth cousins once removed.

Cheney and Bush are related to one another by a completely different common ancestor.”

NOTE: I would like to comment upon those who try to say that these are distant relationships. Of course they are, because we are talking about the 17th century here. The thing to keep in mind here, is that ALL our Presidents are members of an aristocratic oligarchy that has run this nation since day one — and continue to do so to this very day.

So, anyone can become President?!

Or, are we merely choosing between two predetermined selections — on the RIGHT and on the LEFT — when in fact they are merely two arms on the same monster?!

© 2007 Kentroversy Papers
All rights reserved. Used with permission.

Sources:

The following sources were used in the creation of this Kentroversy Paper . . .

Family Reunion: Cheney, Obama Related (October 18, 2007)

Burke’s Peerage and Gentry – Guide To The American Presidents [Washington to Bill Clinton] (2005-2007)

Icke, David – The Biggest Secret: The Book That Will Change The World [2nd updated edition]; Bridge of Love Books (1999, 2000)

Burke’s Peerage and Gentry

Dick Cheney

Lynn Cheney

David Icke

Kentroversy

Kentroversy Papers

Kentroversy Tapes

Kentspiracy Kronicles Newsletter

Barack Obama
Bush, They Say, Is Indeed a Connecticut Yankee From King Henry’s Court
By STEVE LOHR, Special to the New York Times
Published: July 05, 1988
SIGN IN TO E-MAIL
PRINT

Vice President Bush may be narrowly trailing Gov. Michael S. Dukakis in the opinion polls, but he is far ahead according to another indicator of Presidential prospects: the ”royalty factor.”

”Going by the statistics of the past, Mr. Bush will be the next President of the United States,” said Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke’s Peerage Ltd., the 162-year-old directory of British nobility.

Burke’s Peerage today released a report tracing the Vice President’s family tree to the 1400’s. The study by Burke’s senior genealogist, Roger Powell, and an American colleague, William Ward, found that Mr. Bush has more connections to British and European royalty than any President of the United States. Queen’s 13th Cousin

For example, Mr. Bush is a 13th cousin of Queen Elizabeth II and is related to all members of the British royal family, according to Burke’s genealogists. Moreover, he is related to all those who have married into the British royal family, like the Queen Mother, the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of York. Mr. Bush is also related to all current European monarchs on or off the throne, including the King of Albania.

ROYAL PRESIDENTS:

Davidic Covenant Fulfilled in the

UNITED STATES

______________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________

For some time now I’ve been on the trail of a prophecy to David. In Psalm 89 Nathan’s Davidic Covenant is sung to us by a son of Zarah. This covenant includes David having a descendent perpetually on the throne of Israel. There are no less than five other mentions of this promise to David. It was first given to David in II Samuel 7:16. “And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever. I Kings 8:25 confirms with, “….There shall not fail thee a man in my sight to sit on the throne of Israel;…” Also, I Chronicles 17:12. “He shall build me an house, and I will stablish his throne for ever.” Again in II Chronicles 13:5 we find, “Ought ye not to know that the LORD God of Israel gave the kingdom over Israel to David for ever, even to him and to his sons by a covenant of salt?” Finally Jeremiah states in chapter 33, verse 17, “For thus saith the LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel;”

And it’s interesting that Jeremiah specifies the “house” of Israel. This term always refers to the northern ten tribed kingdom, to whom Jesus said he sent, and sent his disciples.

There is overwhelming evidence that the monarchs of the British Isles and northwest Europe are all descended from the marriage of the Zarah-Judah-Milesian high king of Ireland and his bride the Pharez-Judah daughter of king Zedekiah, Tea Tephi. A more detailed account is on my Royalty and Jeremiah and Tea Tephi pages. For a better understanding of the whole subject area, I invite you to see all the Lost Tribes pages.

I always wondered if that same promise to David would hold true for other large groups of Israelites even though they weren’t ruled by a monarch. If this was the case, then our US presidents should be found to be tied to the royalty of the Old World.

I came across some very tentative evidence. I found this to be true for a couple our presidents, but hadn’t done any real research into the matter. I found that George Washington was of royal blood. I’d read that John F. Kennedy was tied to the Kings of Ireland, and even Ronald Reagan.

I asked about this on one of my mail lists and got a few additional bits of confirmation. But just the other day I found an amazing post in my In box. It seems that there is a group called Burke’s Peerage – researchers of royal bloodlines since 1826. The whole thrust of the article in the post was concerning the predicted outcome of our 2000 election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. They picked Bush. Burke’s Peerage hasn’t guessed wrong for almost two centuries!

Just for perspective, I’m including several emails that occurred during the past year.

Don’t miss the large Presidents genealogy chart at the bottom of the page.

__________________________________________________
June 03, 2000:
Does anyone have any good theories about the image of the beast of Rev:13:14 that the people of the earth are to make and worship? Yes, I do.

He’s already here, he’s in the White House, and already bidding for the top job in the U.N; secretary-general.
__________________________________________________
08/01/2000, you wrote:
NOT! Duh – how stupid do you think we Jews are – no Jew will believe Clinton is the Messiah. [It appears that this person was confused and used Messiah instead of Anti-Christ. Regardless, the fact stays the same. Clinton is of the tribe of Judah] The most basic of information the Word provides us about the Messiah is that he is from the tribe of Judah – a son of David. Clinton is about as Jewish as Yassar Arafat (who he supports way too much to get any Jewish popular vote!) Get rid of your replacement theology mindset before you try to interpret the Word of HaSehm please.
__________________________________________________
11-15-2000 (this post is from me to the group)
On the other hand, I know of at least two US presidents who could trace their lineage back to English or Irish royalty. Both of these lines are of Judah.

We know with certainty that a bloodline descendent of King David has and will rule over some portion of the Israelites. This is being fulfilled by Queen Elizabeth today in England (Ephraim). But what about America? I have always theorized that if proper genealogical studies were done on all the US presidents that we would find Judah in their background.

Oh, and beside Washington and Kennedy, I remember that Reagan also had royal ties back to Ireland.

Clinton may not practice Judaism, but he may very well be a “generic” Jew; a descendent of Judah.

Interesting, huh? Jack
__________________________________________________
Aug 2000
Dear Jack,
There is a President who has Irish connections. In fact there is a Cottage in Cullybackey, Co. Antrim, Ulster which belonged to his family. His name was Chester Arthur, 21st President of the USA. If you want to look at the Family History I can give you an URL.
Blessings
Fr.Dmitri+
__________________________________________________
Aug 2000
When mentioning the names of former US presidents who are listed on the “Kane Ancestral Map” as being of Milesian descent, I neglected to mention that the name Ford also appears. If the research is accurate, it indicates former President Ford is also of Zarah/Judahite lineage. This is a good day to remember him in prayer as he struggles to recover from two strokes suffered earlier.
__________________________________________________
Aug 2000
The name “Clinton” appears on a list of 750 ancient Gaelic surnames which are descendants of the Milesian kings of Spain invaded and settled Ireland hundreds of years before the birth of Christ. The list also contains the names of many U.S. presidents. The Milesian kings were Zarah Judahites who originated in Egypt and left prior to the Exodus in ships owned by the Tuatha de Danaan (Tribe of Dan). This would indicate the blood of Judah does indeed flow through the veins of President Clinton!

This really should not come as a surprise to us. After all, did God not promise to make the descendants of the early patriarchs “kings and a nation of kings”? My parents surnames are also of this sacred genealogy. God has indeed scattered the seed of Abraham over the face of the earth. Praise His name!!!

Now we have more reason than ever to pray for President Clinton. He is not in office by accident or the manipulation of any “secret society”. He is in power by the will and purpose of God, the fulfillment of the patriarchal promise. Many of his predecessors, the ancient kings of Judah and Israel, also brought disgrace to their kingdoms. There is nothing new under the sun or should I say there is nothing new under the SON.
__________________________________________________
Aug 2000
Hi Tommy, I was unaware that King is the birth name of President Ford. King is a typical Irish name, particularily common in the west of Ireland around Connemara, Co. Galway which is primarily a Gaelic speaking region. The name King does appear on The Kane Ancestral Map of Ireland. How interesting that both of President Ford’s names are of the same origin. I am glad you pointed this out to me. Ford happens to be my mother’s maiden name also.
__________________________________________________
Feb 1999 Subject: Clinton’s Family Tree

Clinton’s Family Tree William F. Dankenbring

In a recent issue of “Prophecy in the News” magazine, author J. R. Church informs us of a most striking genealogy. He writes:

“In an Associated Press article published in The Daily Oklahoman, October 28, 1996, Harold Brooks-Baker, director of Burke’s Peerage, a London-based publishing house that traces the lineage of royal and noble families, said that Bill Clinton and Bob Dole have more in common than wanting to be president. They are distant cousins! However, Clinton has bluer blood, giving him an election edge.

“Bill Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe, but took his stepfather’s name as a teenager. Clinton’s ancestry can be traced back, on his mother’s side, to King Henry III who ruled England from 1227 to 1272. He is descended from King Robert I of France.

“Furthermore, he is related to every Scottish monarch to the current British royal family. Clinton’s royal roots include several medieval monarchs and Simon de Montford, a statesman and soldier under King Henry III. Through de Montford, Clinton is related to every ancient aristocratic family in Britain today.”

J. R. Church continues the incredible story:

“Over the past six years, efforts to uncover Clinton’s personal history have been nigh unto impossible to confirm. The President had all records of his family history, school records, medical history, etc. sealed.

“In 1992, we called Burke’s Peerage and asked if they had done any research into Clinton’s lineage. We were told that they had not done a genealogical search on his ancestry. It seemed strange to us at the time that they denied knowing anything about Clinton. Shortly afterward, we came across an AP story that linked Clinton to a Gypsy king–citing Burke’s Peerage as a source. We again called Burke’s Peerage and repeated our request. Again, they told us that no work had been done. That’s when we read the article to the person on the phone, naming Harold Brooks-Baker as a source. She then admitted that they had done some work on the genealogy. She said that we should talk with Harold Brooks-Baker, himself. She requested that we fax a letter and request a reply.

“We did as she asked. Two days later, having received no reply, we called again. This time, we were able to get Mr. Harold Brooks-Baker on the phone. He asked why we wanted the information, and said he would have to clear our request with Washington. He said, ‘It’s a very touchy subject.’ He talked like there might be something to hide.”

Indeed! What might that closely-guarded secret be? J. R. Church continues his riveting story:

“Bill Clinton’s family goes back to William Henry Harrison and Benjamin Harrison, making him related to Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. His kinship to Ford makes him ‘near kin’ to Richard Nixon and George Bush. Small world, isn’t it?

“Royal Boy Chosen”

“There is no official documentation for what I am about to relate. I talked with a man in the summer of 1996 who claimed to be a descendant of the Rothschild banking family. He informed me that Bill Clinton used to attend their family functions as a boy.

“This man grew up in the same town with Clinton. They attended the same schools. He would see Bill at family get-togethers wearing a Jewish skullcap. According to him, Bill Clinton is a descendant of the Rothschild family.

“He said the rabbis would kiss his hand and refer to him as the Segulah Yeled Eklatosh–the ‘royal-boy-chosen.’ He said that according to private family records, the original Meyer Amschel (Bauer) Rothschild claimed to have had a heavenly visitor in 1773, who informed him that Jesus was not the Messiah. He told Meyer Amschel that the family from which he descended would produce the Messiah in the last half of the twentieth century.

“A few weeks later I read in ‘The Jewish Festivals’ by Hayyim Schauss (published in 1938) that the Roman Emperor Nero had faked his death, escaped and married a Jewish woman. The famous thirteenth century Rabbi Meir (also spelled Meyer) of Rothenberg, Germany, claimed direct descent from Nero. I called my Rothschild family friend and asked if there was a family connection. Two days later he called me back, and said ‘Yes! The Rothschilds are descended from Nero!’…” (“Roots of the Presidents,” by J. R. Church, Prophecy in the News, July 1998, pages 18-19).

[This article goes on to describe Nero’s character and ends by saying Nero’s Aramaic name (Nron Ksr) equals 666. They also show William Jefferson Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton as both adding up to 666 but the numbers are off as published.]

Prophecy Flash! Jan-Feb 1999 Triumph Prophetic Ministries

__________________________________________________

And now for the last straw that has cemented this subject for me. This is Burke’s Peerage writing for itself on the subject of the Bush-Gore election.

Dear Brother Jack,
I was sent this and reading your article thought you might be interested, your brother in Yah.

L O N D O N, October 25, 2000
Political Blue Blood – Bush and Gore’s Bloodline Battle

Do presidential candidates Al Gore and George W. Bush have royal connections? Buckingham Palace politely declined to comment.

When it comes to picking the winner in the American presidential race, Britain’s leading chroniclers of royal ancestors say they’ve never been wrong – not once in almost 200 years. Based on facts gleaned from the old scrolls and dusty archives of Burke’s Peerage – researchers of royal bloodlines since 1826 – the Brits wager it will be Texas Gov. George W. Bush. “The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and chromosomes has, up to now, always won the White House,” say the researchers at Burke’s Peerage. They say Bush’s blue blood runs thicker than Vice President Al Gore’s. In fact it trumps the royal ties of every other President to date, including his father’s. It seems George W. has inherited his mother’s deep blue blood-line.

His Royal Highness, King Dubya

Burke’s publishing director, Harold Brooks-Baker says Bush’s royal connections are startling. “[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne,” says Brooks-Baker. Some of the governor’s royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Duchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana. His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II, who shared the governor’s vision of a strong military. Going back nearly 1000 years, Brooks-Baker points out both the Bush and Pierce families [Barbara Bush’s maiden name is Pierce] were high society. “Not one member of his family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class,” he notes.

Al’s Family Hardly Peasants

Gore’s family members weren’t exactly peasants. The vice president’s family tree includes Charlemagne and three Holy Roman emperors. And a good fight wouldn’t frighten the vice president’s most famous ancestor, England’s Edward I – best known today as the king who defeated, then executed Braveheart. Edward was also said to be very popular with the ladies. His descendent, Al Gore certainly won the hearts of many American ladies with “that kiss” he publicly planted on wife Tipper. Although Gore is running a bit behind Bush in the European royal count, his blood-line runs close to some American home-grown nobility, including Thomas Jefferson, Daniel Boone, and “Buffalo Bill” Cody.

Trump Card

Buckingham Palace politely declined to comment on the recorded royal connections of either candidate. “This sort of thing happens every time there’s an American Presidential Election,” scoffed one palace official. But if the Burke’s Peerage prediction has its doubters, the company doesn’t hesitate to defend its crowning legacy. “You can’t just write off 200 years of accurate predictions,” says Brooks-Baker pointing out Mike Dukakis learned about the “royal factor” the hard way. The 1988 Democratic nominee and son of Greek immigrants had no connections to any European thrones, and he lost in a landslide.

October Surprise?

Although Bush maintains a clear royal advantage, Burke’s Peerage claims to know why the race is so close. “Never in the history of the United States have two presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances.” However the royal researchers are hedging their bets saying their dig through the documents continues. Brooks-Baker says Gore still has a chance to prove he’s “royal enough” for the top job. “Like Jimmy Carter, it is possible that he is the product of several royal love children of the past,” Brooks-Baker says. “Those connections are harder to trace.” Thus Burke’s Peerage leaves open the possibility for an October surprise – and either a Bush, or a Gore, coronation Nov. 7.

If They Were Alive Today

Bush’s most famous relative, England’s King Charles II built a strong military, but at record spending levels. His health care plan proved to be a disaster during his reign – as 70,000 perished from the plague in London alone. If Charles were alive today, he might have been useful to Bush with his strong Catholic ties, and a proven victory in New York. (Charles walloped what was then the Dutch colony “New Amsterdam.”) Gore’s most famous relative fought back considerable uprisings from Scotland’s William Wallace and the Welsh. But England’s King Edward also faced public scrutiny for his (military) campaign fundraising. Though generally regarded as a successful lawmaker and administrator, record tax increases he imposed to fight Scotland and Wales made the king highly unpopular with his key
constituents.

THE TIES THAT BIND
The following is a genealogy chart that appears in “Bloodlines of the Illuminati”, by Fritz Springmeier. At least 25 American Presidents are related to each other. Please pay particular attention to the prominence of the Cheney family. If this is the Cheney that we know, then he and GW Bush are relatives. And the antiquity of the Cheney line explains why they pulled Dick out of retirement to help Dubya run things.
Who says the Elite don’t run this country, and have run this country from the beginning?

25Pa-460

(Click on graph to enlarge)

Now, tell me that God isn’t three things: Real, In Control and Faithful to His word of Promise.

Just amazing, Lord!

The Crimson ran a story by the Associated Press regarding the royal lineages of the two presidential candidates (Oct. 28). The story explained that, according to Burke’s Peerage, President Clinton was more likely to win the election than Senator Dole because Clinton had more royal blood in him. Harold Brooks-Baker, the editor at Burke’s, is completely mistaken about this.

Burke’s Presidential Families is a work of low scholarship and has been since its first edition in 1975, which Harvard owns. It does not cite its sources nor give a complete ancestry of each president. A work of genealogical scholarship does exist: Ancestors of American Presidents,edited by Gary B. Roberts. Harvard owns this as well; and I admit to being mentioned in the acknowledgements of this work. Using that book as a reference, Mr. Brooks-Baker’s claims are nonsense.

President Clinton is of no known royal ancestry. Even if his claim of a descent from Robert I of France were true, in 1992 he beat George Bush, whose known royal ancestry is much more prominent than Mr. Clinton’s. In fact, in this century, only Theodore Roosevelt, Class of 1888, William H. Taft, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt ’04 and Bush were of royal ancestry and elected to the presidency. That means 10 presidents of the 20th century were not of royal ancestry including Presidents Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy ’40 and Ronald W. Reagan. It should be pointed out that Woodrow Wilson best both TR and Taft in 1912, and Jimmy Carter beat Gerald R. Ford in 1976, despite the fact that Wilson and Carter had no known royal ancestry, although their opponents did.

Clearly this is a case of genealogy at its ugliest–the “we’re more exclusive than you” mentality that Burke’s inspires and promotes. Many genealogists have abandoned that attitude and search for the identities of their forebears. I find it more interesting to note that Richard M. Nixon and Carter are sixth cousins through common Quaker forebears than from what medieval monarch they may or may not be descended.

The only point to studying royal ancestry is that it is the only provable ancestry is that it is the only provable ancestry to be studied before 1400. The average person did not leave records; indeed the average person did not have a surname before that point in history. It is also commonly thought that most people have a royal ancestor since the children of that class has a better chance of survival than other children. I would contend that more than half of all Americans have such an ancestor. Whether one can prove it or not is a matter of chance and research–and it certainly has nothing to do with winning or losing presidential elections. –Martin E. Hollick, Reference Librarian for Widener and Lamont Libraries
Royal U.S. Presidential Bloodlines — Why Voting in America Doesn’t Matter

The Atlantean Conspiracy
By Eric Dubay
[email protected]
www.myspace.com/sheeplerevolt

Chapter 1: Presidential Bloodlines

Did you know all 43 U.S. presidents have carried European royal bloodlines into office? 34 have been genetic descendants from just one person, Charlemagne, the brutal eighth century King of the Franks. 19 of them directly descended from King Edward III of England. In fact, the presidential candidate with the most royal genes has won every single American election.

“This information comes from Burke’s Peerage, which is the Bible of aristocratic genealogy, based in London. Every presidential election in America, since and including George Washington in 1789 to Bill Clinton, has been won by the candidate with the most British and French royal genes. Of the 42 presidents to Clinton, 33 have been related to two people: Alfred the Great, King of England, and Charlemagne, the most famous monarch of France. So it goes on: 19 of them are related to England’s Edward III, who has 2000 blood connections to Prince Charles. The same goes with the banking families in America. George Bush and Barbara Bush are from the same bloodline

Download a free copy of “The Atlantean Conspiracy”:

(.pdf format) [link to www.linktoit.com]

Royal Red Carpet is Path to White House

L O N D O N, Oct. 25

When it comes to picking the winner in the American presidential race, Britain’s leading chroniclers of royal ancestors say they’ve never been wrong — not once in almost 200 years.

Based on facts gleaned from the old scrolls and dusty archives of Burke’s Peerage — researchers of royal bloodlines since 1826 — the Brits wager it will be Texas Gov. George W. Bush.

“The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and chromosomes has, up to now, always won the White House,” say the researchers at Burke’s Peerage.

They say Bush’s blue blood runs thicker than Vice President Al Gore’s. In fact it trumps the royal ties of every other president to date, including his father’s. It seems George W. has inherited his mother’s deep blue blood-line.

His Royal Highness, King Dubya

Burke’s publishing director, Harold Brooks-Baker says Bush’s royal connections are startling.

“[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne,” says Brooks-Baker.

Some of the governor’s royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Dutchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana.

His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II, who shared the governor’s vision of a strong military.

Going back nearly 1000 years, Brooks-Baker points out both the Bush and Pierce families [Barbara Bush’s maiden name is Pierce] were high society.

“Not one member of his family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class,” he notes.

Al’s Family Hardly Peasants

Gore’s family members weren’t exactly peasants. The vice president’s family tree includes Charlemagne and three Holy Roman emperors.

And a good fight wouldn’t frighten the vice president’s most famous ancestor, England’s Edward I — best known today as the king who defeated, then executed Braveheart.

Edward was also said to be very popular with the ladies. His descendent, Al Gore certainly won the hearts of many American ladies with “that kiss” he publicly planted on wife Tipper.

Although Gore is running a bit behind Bush in the European royal count, his blood-line runs close to some American home-grown nobility, including Thomas Jefferson, Daniel Boone, and “Buffalo Bill” Cody.

Trump Card

Buckingham Palace politely declined to comment on the recorded royal connections of either candidate.

“This sort of thing happens every time there’s an American Presidential Election,” scoffed one palace official.

But if the Burke’s Peerage prediction has its doubters, the company doesn’t hesitate to defend its crowning legacy.

“You can’t just write off 200 years of accurate predictions,” says Brooks-Baker pointing out Mike Dukakis learned about the “royal factor” the hard way. The 1988 Democratic nominee and son of Greek immigrants had no connections to any European thrones, and he lost in a landslide.

October Surpise?

Although Bush maintains a clear royal advantage, Burke’s Peerage claims to know why the race is so close.

“Never in the history of the United States have two presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances.”

However the royal researchers are hedging their bets saying their dig through the documents continues.

Brooks-Baker says Gore still has a chance to prove he’s “royal enough” for the top job.

“Like Jimmy Carter, it is possible that he is the product of several royal love children of the past,” Brooks-Baker says. “Those connections are harder to trace.”

Thus Burke’s Peerage leaves open the possibility for an October surprise — and either a Bush, or a Gore, coronation Nov. 7.

No. President Preview family record Free sample essays
1 George Washington View Family Essay Personal Essay
2 John Adams View

Essays are available exclusively
to online subscribers.

Click here to login
or
subscribe now!
3 Thomas Jefferson View
4 James Madison View
5 James Monroe View
6 John Quincy Adams View
7 Andrew Jackson View
8 Martin Van Buren View
9 William H. Harrison View
10 John Tyler View
11 James Knox Polk View
12 Zachary Taylor View
13 Millard Fillmore View
14 Franklin Pierce View
15 James Buchanan View
16 Abraham Lincoln View
17 Andrew Johnson View
18 Ulysses S. Grant View
19 Rutherford B. Hayes View
20 James A. Garfield View
21 Chester A. Arthur View
22 and 24 Grover Cleveland View
23 Benjamin Harrison View
25 William McKinley View
26 Theodore Roosevelt View
27 William H. Taft View
28 Woodrow Wilson View
29 Warren G. Harding View
30 Calvin Coolidge View
31 Herbert Hoover View
32 Franklin D. Roosevelt View
33 Harry S. Truman View
34 Dwight David Eisenhower View
35 John F. Kennedy View
36 Lyndon B. Johnson View
37 Richard M. Nixon View
38 Gerald Ford View
39 Jimmy Carter View
40 Ronald Reagan View
41 George H. W. Bush View
42 William Jefferson Clinton View
43 George W. Bush
44 Barack Hussein Obama

Read Original Article Here

TLB recommends you visit News Just For You for more great/pertinent articles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 Comments on BLOODLINES OF ALL US PRESIDENTS

  1. Now connect the royal to the industrial and banking giants to see a bigger picture. For example Colgate Palmolive, traced back to relationships of kings of countries and the church (pope). To help the masses, a soap making procedure and rights to it’s profitability transferred between church and territorial king of Spain (?) I think Spain anyway, because the soap was and is still known as Castile.

  2. It doesn’t matter who is who or what family tree they came from…NONE of that matters because when Jesus comes again to rule the world, EVERYONE will be judged by God equally – from kings all the way down to servants. It’s not going to matter who you were related to…because the only way to reach heaven and the Almighty God, our Lord, and Savior, is through Jesus.

  3. the world is a stage humans are slaves this is a prison planet.
    Just ask the billions of cows pigs chickens murdered everyday for humans taste buds and traditions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*