Daniel Andrews’ Plan for Indefinite Detention – And More

ER Editor: We remind readers of the state of Victoria’s unique position within Australia, unique for Daniel Andrews being the only Australian state premier to sign onto China’s Belt and Road Initiative, against a background of criticism within Australia, not least of which is that he’s singlehandedly engaging in foreign policy, which as a mere state premier he’s not authorized to do. Moreover, the details of the non-binding deal with China, contained in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), seem to be hidden from public view. See Victoria’s Daniel Andrews slammed over China deal: ‘Belt and Road’ scheme explained and Victoria back in spotlight for going with Chinese Belt & Road.

How does Andrews manage to go it alone within the nation state of Australia? From whence comes this ‘permission’ to do so?

We also remind readers that the entire state of Victoria under Andrews’ leadership belongs to the globalist, Soros-backed Strong Cities Network, which is busily creating a regional structure of governance on a global scale above and beyond the nation state. See Australia’s State of Victoria Sold Out to the Soros-Backed Strong Cities Network (SCN) with PRIVATISED POLICE.

Andrews’ new Omnibus bill, still to be passed, seeks to create an extended type of police force by having the authority to recruit non-police personnel on whom police powers are then conferred, and who are also able to enlist other citizens to perform their enforcement duties.

Notice in the Spectator.au article below, by journalist Ian Hanke, that the Charter of Human Rights is non-binding on the state government.

This Daily Mail report from September 1, 2020, titled Victoria’s State of Emergency is extended by six months as ‘Dictator Dan’s’ controversial bill passes by just ONE vote cast by a Greens MP who returned from maternity leave for marathon parliament session, shows that Andrews is defying not only opposition and civil liberties groups within the state over his draconian emergency measures, but also the federal government:

The six-month extension was a compromise by Mr Andrews, who initially proposed a 12-month extension which was met with furious backlash from the public, civil rights groups and both sides of politics.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison directly asked Mr Andrews last week to reconsider his proposal and urged him to seek monthly or quarterly prolongments instead.

The State Opposition were unsuccessful in their push to have the State of Emergency powers extended on a month to month basis.


Daniel Andrews’ plan for indefinite detention – and more


The Victorian Labor government has introduced a bill to parliament that, coupled with other measures, is one of the most egregious attacks on civil liberties seen in war or peacetime. 

The Bill would allow people to be detained indefinitely and give sweeping powers to untrained people to become “authorised officers” with sweeping powers to arrest and detain fellow Victorians.  

Called the COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) Amendment Bill, it overrides all other laws and legislation with the exception of the Charter of Human Rights (which the government ignores as it is not binding), the State Constitution Act 1975 and the laws created by the Bill itself.  

The Bill confers an extraordinary power to the Secretary of the Department of Health to appoint public servants as “authorised officers” with the same powers as police. 

However, worse than that is a provision which allows the secretary to appoint any of the following as an “authorised officer”: 

[A] person the Secretary considers appropriate for appointment based on the person’s skills, attributes, experience or otherwise… 

This will expand the persons who may be appointed as authorised officers.  It is intended to include additional public sector employees from Victoria as well as such employees from other Australian jurisdictions, and individuals with a connection to particular communities to ensure that certain activities, such as contact tracing, can be conducted in a culturally safe manner.

This sweeping power means the Secretary could appoint anyone as an “authorised office”; a member of the ADF who already patrols Melbourne streets with police or even a member of the Hell’s Angels.  

The Bill is mute on the specifics of who could be appointed. The Secretary has been given carte blanche to appoint anyone who has the “skills, attributes, experience or otherwise”. 

The word “otherwise” so broad and non-specific it gives rise to real concerns about who the Secretary could or would appoint.  

Critically, there is no mention in the Bill of what sort of training these “authorised officers” would be given or the equipment they would be issued with. 

If you thought the hotel quarantine scheme was a fiasco, image the damage and drama that could be wrought by this proposal. 

The Bill also “provides that an authorised officer may be assisted by any person in exercising a public health risk power under an authorisation given by the Chief Health Officer.” 

That’s right. An untrained “authorised officer”, be they a public servant, a member of the ADF, or a Hells Angel would be able to co-opt any unsworn citizen in their duties. 

The Bill outlines some of the roles and powers these “authorised officers” may able to exercise under the State of Emergency powers. 

They include being able: to detain any person or group of persons in an emergency area for the period reasonably necessary to eliminate or reduce a serious risk to public health; to restrict the movement of any person or group of persons within an emergency area; to prevent any person or group of persons from entering an emergency area; and, to give any other direction that the authorised officer considers is reasonably necessary to protect public health. 

These powers given to untrained “authorised officers” could lead to shocking outcomes, particularly if citizens can be co-opted to assist.  

We have already seen examples of police heavy handiness in Victoria with police raids on housewives, the busting down of doors and so on simply because people have promoted on social media protests against the current health regime. 

Under the Bill, designated authorised officers may be able to detain if “a direction has been given in the exercise of an emergency power” or if the officer reasonably believes that a person who is required to comply with the direction is a high-risk person and is likely to refuse or fail to comply with the direction. 

A high-risk person is someone who has been diagnosed with COVID-19 and has not been given clearance from self-isolation or they have been notified that they are in close contact with a person diagnosed with COVID-19.   

The Bill provides an emergency power to detain any person or group of persons in an emergency area for the period reasonably necessary to eliminate or reduce a serious risk to public health.  

Once detained, you have no rights under law and can be detained for an indefinite period:  

Section 200(6) of the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 requires an authorised officer to review, at least once every 24 hours during the period that a person is subject to detention under section 200(1)(a), whether the continued detention of the person is reasonably necessary to eliminate or reduce a serious risk to public health.

Put simply, this means you can be locked up and detained indefinitely at the whim of a designated officer. 

There is no provision whatsoever for a review of the detention. Ultimately a person may have to apply to the Supreme Court to grant an order of Habeas Corpus for release. 

These extraordinary powers are arbitrary and extreme. 

They are a draconian attack on civil liberties the like of which Australia has never seen before.  

Further, because all laws are overridden, there would appear to be little recourse to any excesses by an authorised officer or their civilians coopted by them. These laws are so broad and ill-defined that you could be detained for almost anything. 

Remember the emergency powers give “authorised officers” power to “detain any person or group” or “restrict the movement of people” or “prevent a person or group from entering an emergency area” or “give any other direction”. 

Nowhere in the Bill or its Explanatory Memorandum is a reason or justification given for the introduction of these extraordinary sweeping and ill-defined laws. 

These laws will operate side by side with the powers that already have Melburnians locked in their own homes for 22 hours a day…



Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.