Explosive Study Published in Nature Shakes the Core of mRNA Technology!

ER Editor: An important reminder that a % of Covid vaccines have been found to have ZERO biological ingredients in them, which includes mRNA and the possibility of having any spike proteins in the body. Instead, they have plastics and metals that interact with EMF technology. However, this finding, as Aussie17 points out, relates to ALL mRNA technology, and all that they had planned for us using this technology going forward.

Aussie17 is a pharma insider.


Explosive Study Published in Nature Shakes the Core of mRNA Technology!

Cambridge and Oxford University Hospital study found 1 in 4 with Pfizer mRNA jabs experienced “unintended” immune response

Well, a bombshell study has just been published in Nature with what might be the most complex title ever. The study’s name, “N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting,” was written by 20 authors, mainly from the University of Cambridge and Oxford University Hospital, and it’s creating a buzz in the scientific world.

Let me say that this study is damning to the mRNA platform—not only vaccines but also everything related to mRNA.

This study highlights a process known as “ribosomal frameshifting.” Try to memorize this term because if my suspicions are correct, these words will keep appearing in various commentaries in the coming months.

Let me break it down in layman’s terms:

Most of us now know that mRNA is used to send instructions to our cells to manufacture Spike Protein. Well, mRNA occurs naturally in our body, but the problem with natural mRNA is that it breaks down really fast. To “extend” the lifespan of mRNA to make vaccines, the scientists at Pfizer and Moderna swapped out a small component of the mRNA and replaced it with “N1-methylpseudouridine” (or simply pseudouridine if you have followed the scientific discussions). This is why calling it “mRNA” is erroneous; we should call it modRNA (modified RNA).

This new study discovered that adding in pseudouridine in the vaccine can disrupt the usual process of protein production in our cells.

To put it simply, consider the process like building a model with LEGO bricks by following the instruction manual. Now, picture that one of the instruction steps has a misprint and tells you to add a brick where it doesn’t belong, but you don’t realize the mistake and continue building. Instead of ending up with the intended model — in the case of the vaccine, the “Spike Protein” — you end up with a model that doesn’t look or function as it should, essentially a jumble of misplaced pieces.

Using the illustration below, rather than producing the “intended” spike protein, what results is a garbled protein with unknown consequences.

I used a Darth Vader mask because the Spike Protein was dodgy from the beginning.

Anyway, the study found that 1 in 4 people injected with the Pfizer’s mRNA experienced this “unintended immune response” as Telegraph reported.

I can’t help but crack up and seethe at the same time! The Telegraph has the cheek to chuck in a little “no adverse effects were created” as if it’s a blooming afterthought! What a joke! So here we go, now we know that 1 in 4 people jabbed with Pfizer’s mRNA are cobbling together these rubbish proteins in their cells, maybe till the cows come home, while these folks are dropping dead, getting cancer and autoimmune diseases. And the Telegraph is telling us it’s all sweet, no worries?

The drama with these mRNA “vaccines” just keeps on mounting. This new mess isn’t even scratching the surface of the crap we already knew about — talking about that igG4 class switch shenanigans, sneaky undeclared SV40 promoters, and the DNA plasmid contaminations!

No wonder people are dropping dead all over, cancer rates, autoimmune diseases and even neurological problems are skyrocketing!

Another Preview of Drug Sales

Anyway, let me give you another preview of another cancer drug, this time Zoladex.

Zoladex is a brand name for the drug goserelin, which is a type of hormone therapy used primarily in the treatment of breast cancer, prostate cancer, and certain benign gynecological disorders. Zoladex is a medication with quite some history, having been developed back in the 1980s. From my two decades in the pharmaceutical industry, I can assert that it’s not common for an established cancer drug like Zoladex to experience a sudden 15% increase in use from one year to the next. This sales data is from Singapore (80% boosted with Pfizer and Moderna mRNA).

If you’re keen to understand which medications are flying off the shelves – which could hint at which health issues are on the rise post-vaccination – consider signing up. We’ll be unpacking the sales trends of blood thinners, heart medications, neurological drugs, and other cancer treatments!

I also previewed the sales of Tasigna here.

Signing off for now!



Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.