Farm Groups Denounce Dannon’s Anti-GMO ‘Marketing Flimflam’

Commentary by Cathy Geibel TLB writer/reporter and Activist 

Dannon has struck a nerve with mainstream farming by announcing they are going to transition to less GMO ingredients in light of consumer demand for more non-GMO products.   I encourage you to read the following article as it truly shows how much farmers have been brainwashed by the disinformation I can only think comes from their “suppliers” such as Monsanto-Bayer, Syngenta or whatever other genetically modified seed or chemical company they are supplied by.   They claim Dannon is “taking a major step backward” and “abandoning safe, sustainable farming practices that have enhanced farm productivity”…  Safe?  Glyphosate soaked crops that are linked with cancer and increasing auto immune disease and gluten intolerance, in the case of wheat?  These are NOT safe.   And good for Dannon by calling these accusations “divisive and misinformed”.  Because they ARE completely misinformed.  Evidence shows Organic and non-GMO farming practices are statistically as productive as the chemical soaked variety.  And we consider them healthier too.  

So you go Dannon!!  We support your decision.  Now how about you take the fluoride out of your bottled water.  (CG) 


By Megan Durisin

Several major U.S. farm organizations said they are “troubled” by The Dannon Co.’s shift to using fewer genetically-modified ingredients, a move the company included as part of a pledge to offer more products from a sustainable food system.


A letter signed by groups including the National Corn Growers Association, American Farm Bureau Federation and American Soybean Association said the company’s move requires farmers to “abandon safe, sustainable farming practices that have enhanced farm productivity over the last 20 years” and represents a “major step backward” in a sustainable crop supply.

White Plains, New York-based Dannon, owned by Danone SA, announced in April a pledge toward creating products from “more sustainable agriculture” and said it would label GMO ingredients on products by December 2017. Items from the Dannon, Oikos and Danimals brand will use more natural and non-GMO ingredients, including in the feed of dairy cows. The company in July unveiled its first GMO-free yogurts and said Danone’s acquisition this year of WhiteWave Foods Co. may accelerate the push toward ridding its products of the organisms.

 The accusations in the letter are “divisive and misinformed,” Dannon said in an e-mailed statement. The company believes its shift will increase choices for consumers and said it is working with farmers to improve soil health and water quality, among other practices.

Safe GMOs

“Regarding GMO crops, we believe the currently approved GMOs are safe,” Dannon said. “Furthermore, we believe that sustainable agricultural practices can be achieved with or without the use of GMOS. However, we believe there is growing consumer preference for non-GMO ingredients and food in the U.S. and we want to use the strong relationships we have with our farmer partners to provide products that address this consumer demand.”

The agriculture groups sent the letter partly to refute the nature of Dannon’s claim that eliminating GMOs in food production makes products more sustainable, said Chris Galen, a spokesman for the Arlington, Virginia-based National Milk Producers Federation, one of the signers. Crops grown without biotechnology require more insecticides and water, according to the letter.

Runaway Engine

“In our view, your pledge amounts to marketing flimflam, pure and simple,” the agriculture groups said in the letter, which was addressed to Dannon’s Chief Executive Officer Mariano Lozano. “Though touted with great fanfare as a corporate commitment to sustainability and environmental improvement, in reality the Dannon Pledge amounts to a major step backward in truly sustainable food production. We doubt that you would discard years of productivity improvements by returning to 1990s computer technology to run your business, or revert to 20-year-old transportation, processing or packaging tools.”

While Dannon’s pledge reflects a growing consumer interest toward transparency in what’s in their food and how it’s made, it is unsurprising that farm groups are reacting strongly, Andy Novakovic, professor of agricultural economics at Cornell University, said in a telephone interview. According to government data, 94 percent of U.S. soybeans and 92 percent of corn grown this season used genetically-engineered seed.

“This hits them very close to home and it’s beginning to feel almost like a runaway engine that they need to address very strongly,” Novakovic said. “GMO is probably the poster child for this sort of consumer rejection of things that science has said is safe.”

Foods produced from genetically engineered crops don’t pose additional health risks to humans, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, said in a report earlier this year.


About Megan Durisin 

Original article 

Other articles of interest can be found at Bloomberg 


Membership meme 3

Click on the link to find out about our great (WOW) TLB Project Membership package and benefits. 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.