New Twitter CEO’s First Decision: Ban Mean Memes
‘Not Bound by the First Amendment”
One day after brand new Twitter CEO Parag ‘Not Bound by the First Amendment” Agrawal took the helm, the company announced that it will no longer allow people to share ‘images or videos of private individuals without their consent’ due to “growing concerns about the misuse of media and information” to “harass, intimidate, and reveal the identities of individuals.”
We assume this includes photos of
protesters rioters, people looting a Louis Vuitton store, the driver of an SUV plowing into a crowd of people, and viral memes which include non-public figures.
Here we go …I wonder if “private “is including posting videos of protests ,violation of human rights ..may be it is time to move to a brand new social media like telegram or others migration will start soon ..Twitter on the steps of Facebook …🙄 https://t.co/UN3iLzczvh
— Layla Bensassi (@LaylaBe4) November 30, 2021
One week after Waukesha👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.co/I6NUn5w1sw
— Jack Posobiec ✝️ (@JackPosobiec) November 30, 2021
In a Tuesday blog post, the company wrote:
“There are growing concerns about the misuse of media and information that is not available elsewhere online as a tool to harass, intimidate, and reveal the identities of individuals. Sharing personal media, such as images or videos, can potentially violate a person’s privacy, and may lead to emotional or physical harm. The misuse of private media can affect everyone, but can have a disproportionate effect on women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities. When we receive a report that a Tweet contains unauthorized private media, we will now take action in line with our range of enforcement options.”
What is in violation of this policy?
Under our private information policy, you can’t share the following types of private information or media, without the permission of the person who it belongs to:
- home address or physical location information, including street addresses, GPS coordinates or other identifying information related to locations that are considered private;
- identity documents, including government-issued IDs and social security or other national identity numbers – note: we may make limited exceptions in regions where this information is not considered to be private;
- contact information, including non-public personal phone numbers or email addresses;
- financial account information, including bank account and credit card details; and
- other private information, including biometric data or medical records.
- NEW: media of private individuals without the permission of the person(s) depicted.
Twitter does provide themselves an ‘out’ – writing that “there are instances where account holders may share images or videos of private individuals in an effort to help someone involved in a crisis situation, such as in the aftermath of a violent event, or as part of a newsworthy event due to public interest value, and this might outweigh the safety risks to a person. ”
Who makes that decision, and will the race of the suspect be a factor?
Hahahahaha how the fuck can this even be enforced? Memes that feature people or any image you take that has people in the background could be taken down.
This is like 90% of images and videos that get posted on twitter. https://t.co/Vvvs79ihaL
— A Large Naked Scottish Man🏴߷ (@CountDankulaTV) November 30, 2021
The move comes two days after CNN‘s Brian Stelter called for the censorship of memes.
— Nookie 🇺🇸 (@EJames9029) November 28, 2021
According to the blog post, “When we are notified by individuals depicted, or by an authorized representative, that they did not consent to having their private image or video shared, we will remove it. This policy is not applicable to media featuring public figures or individuals when media and accompanying Tweet text are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse.”
“However, if the purpose of the dissemination of private images of public figures or individuals who are part of public conversations is to harass, intimidate, or use fear to silence them, we may remove the content in line with our policy against abusive behavior.”
Rather than prevent doxxing, which they’ll continue to selectively allow, this will be used to prevent the public seeing what happened at a protest, or a crime scene, etc. wherein who is public and what can be shown is a determination of media/tech entities. pic.twitter.com/rpLrzMeeU1
— indianbronson.substack.com (@lndian_Bronson) November 30, 2021
A Large Naked Scottish Man߷@CountDankulaTV
Took a nice picture of the Eiffel Tower. But you see other tourists in it, can’t upload it. Here is a video of a guy who broke into my car. But he is a private individual can’t upload it. Here is a funny meme, but shit I never asked the guy if I could post it so can’t upload it
Someone pointed out that this could also include media articles talking about some average Joe. The media never gave a fuck about putting private individuals on blast, but it seems they now can’t post these articles on twitter.
Earlier today we shared Matt Taibbi’s “Will Twitter become an ocean of suck?”
Looks like it’s starting…
(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and written by Tyler Durden
Header featured image (edited) credit: (Free Speech/Getty) (Bird/Twitter.com)
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply