Poland opposes EU migration pact but majority of member states approve measures


“In the opinion of the government of Poland, the solutions provided for in the Pact on Migration and Asylum do not sufficiently address the specific situation of countries bordering Belarus and Russia and which are thus under constant and strong pressure within artificially generated migration routes,” it added.

“Moreover, it was noted that the pact does not strike an appropriate balance between responsibility and solidarity and may therefore potentially constitute an area of ​​dispute between the EU institutions and member states in the future,” concluded the statement.

The new rules would allow more effective checks on migrants and a faster system for returning failed asylum seekers to their countries of origin. They would also require member states to show “solidarity” with countries on the frontline of migration through financial support or by accepting some migrants.

Whereas the pact has been criticised internationally by some human rights groups for being too harsh on migrants and asylum seekers, in Poland the concern has been over the potential relocation of migrants from frontline member states to elsewhere in the bloc.

The former national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS) government last year declared strong opposition to such relocations, and claimed that if the more liberal opposition came to power at October’s elections, they would allow them to take place. (ER: This is a logical supposition. So Tusk’s stance, if it is him, is odd.)

However, following a change in government after those elections, the head of the new ruling coalition, Donald Tusk, declared that his administration would refuse to accept any relocated asylum seekers under the pact.

In its statement yesterday, the interior ministry in Tusk’s government accused PiS of acquiescing to the pact in contradiction to its public stance.

“Contrary to [its] declarations, the previous government, at earlier stages of the negotiations, supported the positions of the Council of the European Union on some legislative acts falling within the scope of the pact or abstained from voting on them,” wrote the ministry.

However, despite Poland’s opposition yesterday, the provisions of the pact were approved by a qualified majority of member states. The EU did not reveal how each representative voted, but the Czech government announced yesterday that it had abstained.

In order to be finally adopted, the measures must now be approved by the European Parliament and by the European Council.


Featured image, Donald Tusk: MATTHEW MIRABELLI / AFP


Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.