Regarding China & Taiwan

Regarding China and Taiwan

By: Molly Slag

As of August 2, Nancy Pelosi’s Taiwan trifecta can be summarized as follows:

(1) Ignoring the wishes of President Biden, Speaker Pelosi lands in Taiwan and publicly states “Our visit reiterates that America stands with Taiwan: a robust, vibrant democracy and our important partner in the Indo-Pacific.”

(2) President Biden declares through a spokesman that “We do not support Taiwan independence.”

(3) China fumes, stamps its feet, and puts on a demonstration of military power, but otherwise does nothing, precisely as one would predict from the insight into Chinese behavior that Daniel Jia detailed; namely, that Chinese military decisions are made by carefully contemplating their effect on American public opinion, which would be outraged if China targeted an American woman.

All of this surely bodes ill for Taiwan, as the Chinese chairman has been humiliated and the American president has been confirmed a weakling. My heart grieves for Taiwan, but there can be little doubt now that China will seize Taiwan sometime during the Biden Presidency. Although world events do not necessarily follow the path of geopolitical logic, that is the way to bet.

From Chairman Xi’s point of view, the configuration of factors clearly confirms the feasibility of this course of action.

(1) The seizure of Taiwan will not involve combat with American forces unless the Americans initiate it.

(2) Chairman Xi sees President Biden as weak.

(3) Taiwan’s proximity to mainland China is highly advantageous to China.

(4) Chinese forces near Taiwan are stronger than American forces in the vicinity.

(5) Surface ships are highly vulnerable to modern missile technology. The US Navy knows well that the American plan to rescue Taiwan relies upon a Naval voyage across the western Pacific into the mouth of Chinese anti-ship missiles.

(6) It is public knowledge that the US has repeatedly war-gamed Taiwan’s rescue Taiwan and, in every game, the US has been defeated by China.

So, is Taiwan doomed? No. It still has two options: Deterrence and Diplomacy.

To pursue deterrence, though, it is necessary to understand what deterrence is. It is an enormous blunder to think that defense is deterrence. Thus, a February 12, 2022, editorial in the Taipei Times declared, “Deterrence needed to deal with China” and then called for more Patriot and drone-based air-to-air missiles.

The Times is correct, of course, that deterrence is needed but dead wrong in thinking that the ability to shoot down attacking aircraft is deterrence. That’s defense, not deterrence. Deterrence is the capacity for offense—that is, the capacity to strike hard at Beijing. For Taiwan to earnestly pursue deterrence, it must beef up its strike-at-Beijing capability, harden itself against EMP, give itself a hair trigger, and leak that information to Beijing.

But once Taiwan is empowered by deterrence, a diplomatic settlement is possible. China has long been wedded to the “one China” principle, to which the US has promised to adhere, and that China insists Taiwan repudiates.

But exactly how does Taiwan reject that principle? Consider the fact that Outer Mongolia and Tibet are sovereign states and yet are Chinese. They don’t offend China’s “one China” principle because China recognizes that one Chinese nation can be implemented in multiple Chinese states.

So, why can’t Taiwan be another of those Chinese states? The problem with this is that Taiwan calls itself the “Republic of China,” whereas the mainland calls itself the “People’s Republic of China.” Were Taiwan to rename itself the “Republic of Taiwan” (or whatever), and establish some deterrence to military attack, a diplomatic settlement might be reached.

Note from Andrea Widburg: Such a step would mean Taiwan would abandon its claim to be the true government of mainland China. However, if doing so meant mainland China abandoned its claim to Taiwan and backed off of a war footing, it could well be worth the change in Taiwan’s posture.


This article (Regarding China and Taiwan) originated on American Thinker and is republished on this TLB site under “Fair Use” (see project disclaimer below) with attribution to the articles author Molly Slag and the website

Read more articles by Molly Slag

TLB recommends you visit American Thinker for more great articles and information.

Image Credit: Photo in Featured Image (top) –


Related Article: Intentional Military Degradation


Click on the image below to visit site:



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.