The EPA Has No Credibility

The EPA Has No Credibility

By: Drew Allen

EPA administrator Michael Regan insists that air and water in East Palestine, Ohio is “safe” following the Norfolk Southern train derailment on February 3rd. But should anyone believe him?

In 2016, Christine Todd Whitman, who was the head of the EPA under President George W. Bush at the time of the 9/11 attacks, issued an apology for having falsely asserted the air quality in New York City was “safe” following those attacks.

In the days following the collapse of the Twin Towers — which sent dangerous plumes of debris and toxins into the air over Manhattan — Whitman issued a statement assuring New Yorkers that they had nothing to fear. “I am glad to reassure the people of New York … that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink,” the statement read.

Whitman’s assurances in 2001, of course, were based on the information that “government scientists” were telling her. “The good news continues to be that air samples we have taken have all been at levels that cause us no concern,” she professed.

Even while Whitman acknowledged that it was known that asbestos, lead, and other toxins had been released from the wreckage in 2001, she maintained that beyond the immediate vicinity the air did “not pose a public health hazard.”

Fifteen years later Whitman did a 180. From The Guardian:

I’m very sorry that people are sick,’ she said. ‘I’m very sorry that people are dying and if the EPA and I in any way contributed to that, I’m sorry. We did the very best we could at the time with the knowledge we had.’

Is that supposed to restore public trust? Does that soothe the pain of those thousands of families, whose loved ones either died or suffered from respiratory illnesses or cancer because they breathed in the toxic air in Manhattan under the false assumption that the air was “clean” — because the government told them so?

Since the EPA’s failure to accurately measure the air quality in 2001, another government organization has also been outed as lying to the American people. Prior to the latest ecological disaster in East Palestine, Ohio, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention got their entire COVID response wrong.

The CDC, which once issued guidelines demanding that Americans wear cloth masks indoors, now concedes that cloth masks offer no protection. The CDC, which once rejected natural immunity as a viable and scientific protection against COVID infection, now concedes that natural immunity offers strong protection.

But the CDC’s prior assertions that masks worked and natural immunity did not were not based on any prior scientific understanding, or even studies. In fact, both recommendations were counter intuitive, defied scientific acceptance, and were lies.

Just as the CDC’s COVID guidelines and the EPA’s claims that the air was safe following 9/11 both defied logic, so too does the latest EPA claim that the air and water are safe in East Palestine, Ohio defy logic; not only logic, but experience.

The streams and creeks in East Palestine are visibly contaminated. Residents have experienced illness and seen dead fish, pets, fowl, and livestock in the aftermath. But the EPA says everything is okay. Officials mock residents expressing hesitation about drinking the tap water. The government has minimized the tragedy.

Neither organization — the EPA nor the CDC — has a shred of credibility. How could these government agencies and scientists get it so wrong? And whose interests are they protecting? Certainly not the American people, who suffered needlessly because of their “mistakes.”

The confidence Whitman expressed back in 2001 is eerily similar to the confidence the current EPA administrator, Michael Regan, is expressing today, more than twenty years later.

I trust what the science is saying,” Regan recently said. Does he mean like how Whitman trusted the science in 2001?

What is this so-called science the EPA or even the CDC continues to trust? Is it science if that science is proven to be thoroughly inaccurate? The so-called science in 2001 said the air was fine in Manhattan. That science was wrong. How has the EPA’s science changed in the decades since?

The agency’s air quality measurements seem to be as sound as their climate science and predictions — which is to say it’s a bunch of hocus pocus. The same people telling us to have anxiety attacks over climate predictions, which fail to materialize, tell us not to be anxious about toxic chemicals in our air and water. Both their “scientific” climate predictions and their clean air and water assurances have been proven lies.

A comparison of the reality experienced and observed by residents of East Palestine, Ohio to that which is promoted by the EPA is as contradictory as the experience of those living in Manhattan in 2001; both times, the EPA said not to believe your lying eyes and body.

How can the same EPA, which got it so wrong in 2001, have the audacity to irresponsibly tell Ohioans to trust its science, as if it has a track record of success?

What’s frightening about East Palestine — and even areas beyond — is that these health impacts continue to rear their ugly head long after the immediate disaster. How can the EPA be certain there won’t be future risk? They can’t. But they lie anyway.

What will Michael Regan say in 2038 — fifteen years from now — if and when residents of East Palestine report reparatory illnesses and cancer? Will he, like his predecessor Christine Todd Whitman, say “I’m very sorry that people are sick. I’m very sorry that people are dying and if the EPA and I in any way contributed to that, I’m sorry. We did the very best we could at the time with the knowledge we had.”

The EPA’s very best is a history of lies — lies which have gotten Americans killed. And their knowledge isn’t knowledge at all; it’s ignorance. Why should anyone trust the EPA?


This article (The EPA Has No Credibility) is republished here on TLB under “Fair Use” (see the TLB disclaimer below article) with attribution to the author Drew Allen and

TLB recommends that you visit the American Thinker for more great articles and info. 

Read more articles by Drew Allen

About the Author: Drew Allen, the Millenial Minister of Truth, is the host of “The Drew Allen Show” podcast and a widely published columnist and political analyst. He is the Vice President of Client Development at Publius PR and also the Editor of the Publius National Post. Subscribe to read his work at

Image Credit: Photo in Featured Image (top) –  Public Domain


Related Article:

CDC Alters Webpage Days after Ohio Train Derailment

Trump Announcing Trip to East Palestine keys FEMA Reversal for Ohio Disaster Aid

Metal Factory Explosion in Ohio — State Becoming a Disaster Zone



Click Here to Visit the Site


Welcome to the TLB Project Neighborhood

TLBTalkRepublic Broadcasting NetworkThe Liberty BeaconThe Butcher Shop



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.