The real climate emergency is the storm of pretended expertise

Intro by Steve Cook

I thought the following article might be of interest as it goes some way towards explaining why the over simplistic “carbon dioxide traps the Earth’s heat and makes the planet warm up like a greenhouse” contention always leads to vey wrong predictions about “global warming”.

Put simply: if your theory is right you can make accurate predictions. If your theory is wrong,  your predictions will tend to be wrong. The corollary of that is that if you keep on and on getting your predictions wrong, your theory is wrong and your “expertise” in the area is fake.

I’ve followed the article with a video that at least gives you some insight into the reality of the planet’s climate: an interplay of factors so complex it is not yet fully understood. The point here is that honest scientists will admit that this area is not understood whilst the charlatans’ pretended understanding and disingenuous claims  that “we’ve got it all  taped” leads to gross errors, a misled citizenry and catastrophic policies by dimwit politicians who buy the charlatans’ puerile nonsense. And you get the hijacking of the fake science by vested interests hell bent on the oppression of the citizenry, for whom the “climate emergency” is a useful justification.

The other dangers of this fake expertise  is that  the conviction that “we’ve got it all sewn up with no need for further inquiry” tends to inhibit any further looking for answers, especially when the aforesaid vested interests get in the act and are milking the stupidity for personal advantage.

Anyway, take a look at the article and video and see  what you think.

Top Study: Carbon Emissions CANNOT Cause ‘Global Warming’

A bombshell new peer-reviewed study has provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.”

Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures.

However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise.

Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide.

This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise.

Kubicki et al. summarize their evidence by noting that as a result of saturation, “emitted CO2 does not directly cause an increase in global temperature.”

Current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are around 418 parts per million (ppm) but the scientists state that past 400 ppm, “the CO2 concentration can no longer cause any increase in temperature.”

The saturation of CO2 in the atmosphere is the hypothesis that dares not speak its name in mainstream media, politics, and across much of climate science.

The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” collectivism agenda is doomed without the constant fearmongering of a so-called “climate crisis.”

One of the key propaganda messages behind this “green agenda” is that humans are responsible for the ever-warming climate by burning hydrocarbons and releasing CO2 into the atmosphere.

The saturation hypothesis is complex, but in simple terms, it can be described by the example of loft insulation in a house.

After a certain point, doubling the lagging will have little effect since most of the heat trying to escape through the roof has already been trapped.

Carbon dioxide traps heat only within narrow bands of the infrared spectrum.

Levels of the gas have been up to 20 times higher in the past without any sign of runaway “global warming.”

At current levels, the Polish scientists suggest that there is “currently multiple exceedances of the saturation mass for carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere.”

The latest study is published in the prestigious Elsevier’s Science Direct peer-reviewed journal.

Many other scientists are attracted to the saturation hypothesis because it provides more plausible explanations to fit past changes in the climate.

“Transmission in the CO2 band center is unchanged by increased CO2 as the absorption is already saturated.”

Despite over 50 years of trying, climate modelers and scientists in the anthropogenic camp are no nearer putting a temperature rise on a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Estimates from 0.5°C up to around 6°C, with some outliers as high as 10°C, are little more than guesses, yet they form the “scientific” bedrock for promoting global fear of human-caused climate change.

The figures are too wild and imprecise to make any reasonable scientific predictions, yet the claim is constantly repeated that the science is “settled,” the “consensus” proof is in and it is all beyond debate.

The Polish scientists quote the author of Idso 1998 that “currently used models do not yet provide a suitable basis for the development of rational policies related to potential climate changes.”

Science outlet No Tricks Zone notes that the Polish authors are concerned about the recent push to rely on modeling and assumptions about CO2’s capacity to drive changes in global temperatures rather than observational evidence.

“This unequivocally suggests that the officially presented impact of anthropogenic CO2 increase on Earth’s climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a substantiated fact.”

The online science site also reports on other recent scientific work that backs up the saturation hypothesis.

In Chen et al. 2023 it was reported that CO2 had severely reduced warming effect past pre-industrial concentrations.

It was also noted that water vapor and cloud influences overlap, thus dominating absorption in the CO2 infrared band.

In 2022, German Physics Professor Dieter Schildknecht set the saturation level of CO2 at just 300 ppm and concluded that beyond this, further increases cannot affect the Earth’s climate.

At this low level, absorption is said to reach levels close to 100%, so further human-caused CO2 emissions cannot lead to appreciable stronger absorption of radiation.

Emeritus Professor William Happer of Princeton is another leading proponent of the saturation hypothesis.

Happer was recently featured in Martin Durkin’s Climate: The Movie.

In the film, he responds to the current “science” enforcing the WEF’s “Net Zero” agenda.

He said he could live with the descriptive suggestion “hoax,” although he preferred the word “scam.”

Several other world-renowned scientists have also blasted the globalist “climate crisis” narrative as a “scam” and a “hoax.”

As Slay News reported, 2022 Nobel physics laureate Dr. John Clauser blasted the climate narrative in no uncertain terms:

“I assert there is no connection whatsoever between climate change and CO– it’s all a crock of crap, in my opinion.”

Clauser, a modern science giant, has also signed a declaration asserting as much, as Slay News reported.

He joined over 1600 scientists from around the world, including another Nobel Prize winner, by signing a declaration stating that claims of a “climate emergency” threatening the Earth are a hoax.

The massive group of scientists signed the World Climate Declaration (WCD).

The WCD dismisses the existence of a “climate crisis” and insists that carbon dioxide is beneficial to Earth.

The WCD was created by the Global Climate Intelligence Group (CLINTEL) and was first published in early August, as Slay News reported at the time.

Since it was published, hundreds of scientists have signed the WCD.

“There is no climate emergency,” the WCD declares.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific.

“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.”

The coalition points out that Earth’s climate has varied as long as it has existed.

They stress that there is “no statistical evidence” to support these claims.

“There is no climate emergency,” the scientists assert.

“Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm.

“We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic Net Zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

During a separate speech, Clauser warned the public that the “climate crisis” narrative being pushed by the global elite and their allies in the corporate media is a hoax.

Clauser, who was also awarded the 2010 Wolf Prize in Physics, the second most prestigious physics award after the Nobel, warns that fearmongering climate science is nothing more than “massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.”

“The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people,” Clauser said in a May 5, 2023 statement.

“Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.

“In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills.

“It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists.

“In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis.”


Visit Steve Cook now

The above was featured on UK Reloaded

Visit UK Reloaded now



The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.