The Supreme Court just handed Donald Trump an important legal victory: Emoluments lawsuits are now dropped
by Kyle Becker
It was a story that loomed over the Trump presidency throughout his four years, due to breathless reporting about every possible way that the billionaire real estate mogul might profit while in office.
The Supreme Court just put an end to such endless speculation by dropping the emoluments clause cases. The Associated Press reported:
The Supreme Court on Monday brought an end to lawsuits over whether Donald Trump illegally profited off his presidency.
The justices threw out Trump’s challenge to lower court rulings that had allowed lawsuits to go forward alleging that he violated the Constitution’s emoluments clause by accepting payments from foreign and domestic officials who stay at the Trump International Hotel and patronize other businesses owned by the former president and his family.
This part is absolutely key:
The high court also ordered the lower court rulings thrown out as well and directed appeals courts in New York and Richmond, Virginia, to dismiss the suits as moot now that Trump is no longer in office.
An overview of the lawsuits against Trump involving the emoluments clause, briefly explained:
Until recently, there had been no substantial litigation concerning the Emoluments Clauses. However, since 2016, a number of private parties, state attorneys general, and Members of Congress have filed lawsuits against President Trump, alleging that his retention of certain business and financial interests during his presidency—and his failure to seek congressional approval of interests relating to foreign governments—violate the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses. Three major federal lawsuits concerning the Emoluments Clauses have been filed.
These lawsuits were Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) v. Trump; District of Columbia v. Trump; and Blumenthal, et al. v. Trump. They all pertain to Donald Trump purportedly receiving ill-gotten gains from his Trump Organization real estate properties.
The topic fueled late night cable news fury for the last four years. But now it is yet another in a long line of debunked attacks on the Trump presidency. Rachel Maddow is hardest hit.
(TLB) ed: Watch as Donald Trump talks money and clears the air… while defending his original intent to host the G7 summit at his Florida Doral resort, President Trump refers to the emoluments clause as “phony.”
(TLB) published this article from Becker News.com with our appreciation for the coverage.
Header picture credit/Trump/Getty Images
Author Kyle Becker
Read more articles from Kyle Becker
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.