U.S. states are outlawing Critical Race Theory in schools and public agencies
Bucking Biden’s push for ‘equity’
(RT-USA News) President Joe Biden may have revoked his predecessor’s ban on critical race theory and embraced its concept of “equity,” but several US states have adopted laws against the doctrine, setting up a showdown with the White House.
On Tuesday, Arkansas passed legislation banning critical race theory (CRT) “indoctrination” in public agencies and prohibiting the state from promoting collective guilt, segregation, racial stereotyping or scapegoating.
BREAKING: Arkansas passes legislation banning critical race theory indoctrination in public agencies. The bill will prohibit the state government from promoting race essentialism, collective guilt, and neo-segregation.
We are fearless; we are relentless; we are inevitable. pic.twitter.com/pj6Bu1Rvx7
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) May 4, 2021
Idaho was the first state to ban public schools from promoting CRT last month, followed by Oklahoma. Similar proposals are currently being considered by state lawmakers in Texas and Tennessee.
One of the activists campaigning for the new laws is Christopher Rufo, the researcher whose revelations about the spread of CRT in the federal government prompted President Donald Trump to ban it last year. Rufo called the Idaho law a “historic win” in the fight against CRT, which he dubbed “state-sanctioned racism.”
Russ Vought, Trump’s former director of Office of Management and Budget (OMB), is involved in getting Tennessee to ban CRT.
A ban on CRT in TN schools has been introduced and is expected to pass the legislature in the next week or so with Gov. Lee expected to sign it. Incredible work being done on the ground by concerned TN citizens.
— Russ Vought (@russvought) May 1, 2021
Soon after noticing Rufo’s research, Vought was able to convince Trump to issue an executive order banning “race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating” in the US government or the military back in September 2020, over the protests of diversity consultants and social justice activists.
The order was among the first rescinded by the incoming Biden government in January, with the Democrat committing his administration to “equity” in all things instead. Though often mistaken for equality, CRT defines equity as treating different groups differently in order to achieve an equality of outcomes.
Even as Biden mandated extra “sensitivity” and diversity training for federal employees, however, activists critical of CRT have taken the fight to the state and local level. In addition to state laws banning it as racist, parents in a number of school districts have raised complaints with CRT material being taught to their children.
Rockwood, a school district in Missouri, apologized last week after a teacher was caught urging colleagues to continue teaching the social justice curriculum without telling parents. This past weekend, opponents of CRT swept away the local leadership and school board in Southlake, Texas – a suburb of Dallas – that had championed the doctrine.
One of the under reported stories from last night in Texas. Conservatives ousted city councilmen and school board members that pushed Critical Race Theory https://t.co/oYqt2w90CA
— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) May 2, 2021
Insofar as they have noticed the conflict, US media outlets have framed it as a battle between progressives and conservatives. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, for example, reported on the Rockwood controversy as a matter of those who want to “counteract racism and build more equitable communities” clashing with people critical of “social justice and equity ideals” which they believe “amount to a Marxist takeover of schools.”
If you’re having trouble keeping up with the ever-shifting Orwellian language, “opponents of anti-racism education” are the people who actually oppose racism on principle; the “anti-racists” are the people who want to discriminate against others on the basis of skin color. https://t.co/Yv8yNgwXsx
— John Hayward (@Doc_0) May 3, 2021
NBC News, meanwhile, framed its story on the Southlake race as “Opponents of anti-racism education win big in a bitterly divided election,” saying the victorious conservatives “rejected the school diversity plan” which only wanted to “make all children feel safe and welcome.”
(TLB) published this article from RT-USA News with our appreciation for the coverage.
Header featured image (edited) credit: Protesters march for reforms to the justice system in Portland, Oregon. © Reuters / Caitlin Ochs
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.