The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon



burwel 1


Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell recently told a group of Latino bloggers in an online chat that the Obama administration wants to make Obamacare available for illegal aliens.

You may recall back in 2009 that Rep. Joe Wilson, a Republican from my home state of South Carolina, yelled out “You lie!” to Barack Obama. He was chided and maligned in the press and even by so-called “conservatives” for calling Obama what he is. But do you recall what he said Obama was lying about? Let me refresh your memory.

First, Obama said that the idea of “death panels” was completely false. Now, that claim has been proven to be true.

However, it was his second attempt at deceiving the people (and yes, that’s what it was according to Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber) was to claim, “There are also those who claim that our inform efforts would insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false. The reforms I’m proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.”

“You lie!” came the response from Wilson.

And just to be clear, Obama also claimed, “Under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions.” One must then ask why all the pressure to make employers provide for abortions and abortifacients if no money would be used to fund abortions under Obamacare.

However, to the point of illegal aliens and Obamacare. While Burwell said that illegal aliens would not be eligible for benefits, according to the Washington Examiner, “she left no doubt that she — along with officials at the highest levels of the Obama administration — wants that to change.”

“I think that everyone probably knows that this administration feels incredibly strongly about the fact we need to fix that,” Burwell said. “We need to reform the system and make the changes that we need that will lead to benefits in everything from healthcare to economics to so many things — a very important step that we need to take as a nation.”

She then went on to say that families with illegal alien members of their households may receive benefits through Obamacare. “Mixed families should come, they should seek and try, go on the site, they’ll find out they can get financial assistance. They may be eligible for different programs for their children or themselves.”

Then for the finale, Burwell said that no one in the federal government will ask whether applicants to Obamacare are here illegally or not.

“Everyone should come on, and folks should not be scared,” Burwell said. “No questions will be asked, and it is not about an immigration issue.”

It’s not an immigration issue? Surely, you jest Ms. Burwell! Of course, this is an immigration issue. It’s a moral issue. It’s a legal issue. It’s a constitutional issue.

Byron York writes:

Coming from the cabinet officer in charge of administering the Affordable Care Act, Burwell’s words left some Republicans convinced that it’s only a matter of time before the White House breaks Obama’s promise. “It’s reasonable to assume that the administration would have no compunction about issuing some sort of regulatory guidance to HHS to make [immigrants affected by Obama's action] eligible for subsidies,” says one well-connected GOP Hill aide. “The administration has sufficiently re-interpreted Obamacare and re-interpreted the immigration laws that it would not be at all surprising if they follow through on what Burwell said.”

Republican concerns have been intensified by Obama’s slippery language about other federal benefits. In announcing executive action, for example, the president said to those affected that if, among other requirements, “you’re willing to pay your fair share of taxes,” then “you can come out of the shadows and get right with the law.”

The phrase “pay your fair share of taxes” suggests to most ears that Obama meant immigrants involved would pay their fair share of taxes. But in fact Obama’s action will make many immigrants eligible to be paid by the government, and not the other way around; many will now be eligible for the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Additional Child Tax Credit, which could mean they receive thousands of taxpayer dollars each year.

As for Burwell, her confirmation came under a great deal of scrutiny, but alas, she was pushed right on through the Senate confirmation just like all of the other Obama appointees. She is merely following in the footsteps of her criminal predecessor, Kathleen Sebelius.

There is no doubt that this is exactly what this administration wants to do and at every turn, the words that have emanated from the mouth of Barack Hussein Obama have been nothing but lies and deceit. While many of us knew this in the past and have documented it, at least we are now vindicated in our claims that Barack Obama is the premier liar-in-chief and it is reason enough for his impeachment


TLB recommends you visit FREEDOM OUTPOST for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:

Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.


By: Rory Hall

This is an interview that should be listened to at least once.

Truth is an enemy of wealth and power. – Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Sometimes in life we are presented with an opportunity that shows us, without question, what greatness looks like, sounds like and acts like. There are other times in our lives when we realize just how inner-connected we are with the other people on this planet. Then, it happens. We are presented with a gift that we could never have imagined. We come face to face with honesty, integrity and true patriotism.

The character that makes a man is not necessarily his accomplishments. How many people do you remember that gave you an honest handshake? Kept their word when it mattered most? Stood by you during your darkest hour? These people are few and far between in most peoples lives. In other peoples lives, sadly, they are nonexistent. It seems there is a total disconnect developing between truth and lies. Lies have become truth and truth has become very, very dangerous; some may argue deadly. Just look at the rash of banker “siuicides” over the past three-four months. There have been so many, I can no longer keep count.

Friday, November 21, there was moment when it became crystal clear that sometimes the puzzle pieces are moved around without any of our assistance. Opportunities arise and we must strike while the iron is hot.

I had been preparing for almost two weeks, researching, developing questions and making an attempt to put together an interview worthy of the guest that I would be asking questions. The good news is, Dr. Roberts is well versed and answered my questions with the kind of depth that only comes from a lifetime of knowledge. The tapestry that is woven is light on the ear, dark in places and down right infuriating at times. The frustration comes from the reality of what our once great country has become–which is nothing more than giant ATM machine sucking the life blood out of the citizens of the world. The patient is getting close to either a) dying or b) unplugging altogether and developing a whole new system that is not under the control of American hegemony.

When the US Mint sells out of the worlds premier silver coin and the price of silver does not go to the moon, what does that say about how the system works?

When you have demand that outstrips supply and the price is falling you know the price is rigged. There’s no other explanation. – Dr. Roberts

What about when a handful, fewer than 100 people, have more wealth than 60% of a nation?

The United States now has one of the worst income and wealth distributions on the face of the earth; it’s worst than some of the third world gangster states. It’s extraordinary they completely have destroyed the United States as an opportunity society.

Dr. Roberts was gracious enough to share what he knows about the Swiss Gold Initiative and, hopefully, this article will make it’s way all around the Swiss countryside. It would be good for it circulate through Germany as well to let the people of Germany know we want them to succeed as well.

What the polls in Switzerland show is all the poor people are in favor of the Central Bank keeping 20% of their reserves in gold, while all the rich people are against it. The view in Switzerland is, if this passes it means a strong Franc, and therefore, it means the cost of living for the poor, falls. A strong Franc helps the poor people. It reduces their cost of living.

If the Germans had gold with which to back the Mark, a return to the Mark; it would be the end of the American hegemony over Europe. It would break up NATO, it would break up the EU and therefore, it could well be there is plenty of gold in Ft. Knox, but they’re not going to let the Germans have theirs back because it could be used for a strong Mark…which would then go hand-in-hand with a strong Ruble you know Russians have been buying gold and there’s a limit on how much the American authorities, financial banks and hedge funds can drive down the Ruble….when they (the Russians and Germans) are sitting on tons and tons of gold!!

Whatever it (gold) does, it reduces American power and, therefore, reduces the likelihood of nuclear war. Even if we have dislocations, financially, it kind of ends this view, this hubris, that the United States is indispensable, it’s an exceptional country, ordained to exercise hegemony over the world and any country that gets in the way, like Russia and China has to be dealt with in severe ways…

With the BRICS and the SCO continually moving in positive directions and making strides to take care of business, protect their country and do all they can to get away from the dollar, what is the reality of moving away from the dollar? We have seen what happened when Hussein and Gaddafi attempted to use another form of payment for their oil? Can you say TomHawk missiles? Sure you can. They reigned down on Libya like a hail storm before a tornado. Hussein, the media simply made into a monster and then the authorities tracked him down like an animal and made a circus of the whole situation. Then they killed him.

No country that participates in the dollar payment system is independent. No country that participates in the dollar payment system has sovereignty. They’re vassal states; they’re subject to Washington’s orders. And if they disobey they are over-thrown or they get sanctions.
–(Rory)or they get bombed

This is an interview that should be listened to at least once. If you don’t stick around till the very last word, you are going to miss the point of the first two paragraphs of this article along with one of the best stories you will hear anywhere.


Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here:


“I care that too much power gets in one place,” Paul said in a speech in Lexington at the Kentucky Association of Counties conference.

By: Dean Garrison

Yesterday Rand Paul was sounding off on Barack Obama’s Executive Amnesty when he suddenly went down a curious path. Soon his warning of too much power being in the hands of one individual became a sobering historical reminder, and possibly a future warning, of American Internment Camps.

Would Barack Obama put his political enemies in Internment Camps?

Does that question really need to be asked?

Steve Watson provides this partial transcript and commentary of Paul’s comments:

“Think of what happened in World War II where they made the decision. The president issued an executive order. He said to Japanese people ‘we’re going to put you in a camp. We’re going to take away all your rights and liberties and we’re going to intern you in a camp.’” Paul continued, citing then-President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s executive order authorizing the internments.

“We shouldn’t allow that much power to gravitate to one individual. We need to separate the power.”Paul urged.

The Senator, who has expressed support for a potential lawsuit against the immigration order, asked the audience to consider the bigger picture of Obama’s actions and the precedent he is now setting by so openly bypassing Congress and the political system put into place by the founders.

“The danger of what the president is doing on immigration isn’t necessarily the details of what he’s doing now,” Paul said. “The danger is allowing so much power to gravitate to one person.”

Is Rand Paul speaking hypothetically or does he know more than he cares to tell us?

Do you ever get the feeling that there are still some semi-good people in government that might be trying to warn us? They can’t or won’t come out and say things in plain words because they fear they would jeopardize everything they have worked for, and maybe even their lives, but they want to say something to speak to those who might be able to “decode” what they are saying, because deep down they still have some semblance of human decency.

Is there such an animal as a decent politician?

Am I crazy?


But I believe these subtle warnings are present for those who might be able to recognize them.

If you want a perfect example of that, watch Congressman Thomas Massie’s video about the secret 9/11 documents. He talks about the 28 redacted pages from the 9/11 report and calls for the truth to be told to America.

Most who follow the Truthful Media already know what those 28 pages likely contain.

Massie doesn’t really believe the government will tell the truth, but he can still, however, let the American people know that the government is lying.

Sometimes you have to interpret what these people say because saying too much can and will get them killed.

Is Rand Paul trying to do the same thing with his comments on Internment Camps?

Is it a warning?

Is he simply bound by how much he can actually tell us?

I would say the answer to all of the above questions is very likely “yes.”

Rand Paul is not the first key public figure to travel down this road. Earlier this year we received another warning about what may be coming in the form of a Supreme Court Justice.

Rand Paul isn’t the only one talking about Internment Camps

Back in February Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia issued statements quite similar to those of Rand Paul that might be considered a warning as well.

On Tuesday Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was quoted, in a Washington Examiner article, discussing the possible return of World War II style “internment camps”:

Justice Antonin Scalia predicts that the Supreme Court will eventually authorize another wartime abuse of civil rights such as the internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II.

“You are kidding yourself if you think the same thing will not happen again,” Scalia told the University of Hawaii law school while discussing Korematsu v. United States, the ruling in which the court gave its imprimatur to the internment camps.

So a respected Senator and Supreme Court Justice are talking about the possibility of Internment camps on U.S. soil…

Should that serve as a warning of what is coming?

Or is it simply reminding us that it could happen here?

Does it really matter?

Either way it is cause for concern and FEMA Camps are not a conspiracy. Any government worth its salt is going to have a contingency plan for a “just in case” scenario. Of course there are plans to incarcerate large numbers of people, should it be deemed necessary. A form of that plan likely exists, in some fashion, with every national government on Planet Earth.

In case you are ready to open your eyes, click here to learn about REX-84 and a plan for mass incarceration that was written 30 years ago by a very familiar American historical figure. Because, whether Paul and Scalia are trying to warn us, or just reminding us that things might someday get bad, FEMA Camps are real and every American needs to know that.


TLB recommends you visit D.C. Clothesline for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:

Follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter.

Health insurers, media and telecommunications, retailers, Big Pharma – no wonder Washington’s K Street is lobbying’s road to Paradise.


We’ve been watching Congress since the mid-term elections and reading Zephyr Teachout’s terrific history book, Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin’s Snuff Box to Citizens United. That snuff box was a gift from King Louis XVI of France. His Majesty was a good friend of the American Revolution but when he gave Benjamin Franklin the gold box, featuring the monarch’s portrait surrounded with diamonds, some of our Founding Fathers objected. They worried that the gift would corrupt his judgment and unduly bias Franklin in France’s favor.

The framers debated the meaning of corruption at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, and Americans have been arguing about it ever since. Today, gifts to politicians that were once called graft or bribes are called contributions. The Supreme Court has granted corporations the rights our founders reserved for people, and told those corporations they can give just about anything they want to elect politicians favorable to their interests. Diamond and gold snuff boxes are as outmoded as the king’s powdered wig. Now we’re talking cash — millions upon millions of dollars. Quadrupled, quintupled and then some – and it’s not considered corruption.

Consider the new report from the watchdog Sunlight Foundation: From 2007 to 2012, the two hundred most politically active corporations in the United States spent almost $6 billion for lobbying and campaign contributions. And they received more than $4 trillion in US government contracts and other forms of assistance. That’s $760 for every dollar spent on influence, a stunning return on investment.

Peter Overby at National Public Radio reported that “Military contractors lead the list of contract recipients, and they hover in the upper ranks of companies with the biggest campaign contributions.” Raytheon, BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin – all of them made hefty political donations to Republican campaigns. Not coincidentally, this year the Pentagon is due to spend $163 billion on research, development and procurement.

Then look at who’s expected to be the new Republican chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee – Thad Cochran of Mississippi. Breathlessly, The Washington Post writes, “This could mean additional funding for the Navy to modernize its fleet and potentially benefit contractors such as shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls.” Guess what company describes itself as “ the largest manufacturing employer in Mississippi and a major contributor to the economic growth of the state,” not to mention a major contributor this year to Thad Cochran’s re-election campaign? Why, shiver our timbers, it’s Huntington Ingalls.

“The other dominant corporate sector is finance,” Overby said. “Some of the country’s biggest financial institutions — Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and others — are the top recipients of federal aid. That’s because it cost so much to rescue the financial sector after the 2008 market crash.”

Throw in the health insurers, media and telecommunications, retailers, Big Pharma – no wonder Washington’s K Street is lobbying’s road to Paradise. But it runs in both directions. NPR’s Overby talked with political scientist David Primo, who thinks Congress may be spending more time studying The Godfather than Robert’s Rules of Order. Primo told him, “The conventional wisdom out there is that businesses are going to Washington, writing checks and expecting big returns. But the other side of the story is that members of Congress may implicitly threaten businesses that if they don’t change their policy, or if they are not heavily involved in the political process, that bad things might happen to them.”

It’s not personal, Sonny, it’s strictly business. Our government has become a clearing house for corporations and plutocrats whose dollars grease the wheels for lucrative contracts and easy regulation. It’s all pay for play, and look the other way. Partisans of the system say, hey, it’s just business as usual, but that, of course, is the problem. We were struck by this headline in The Washington Post after the November elections: “ Parties head back to Capitol to begin carving up spoils, remains from midterms.” Right: Not only leadership posts and committee chairmanships, but carving, dividing up the spoils also means divvying up the loot. And those contributions were not made for the sake of charity.

Once upon a time the GOP stood for Grand Old Party — now it stands for Guardians of Privilege, and this is payback time for everything from fracking to getting the big banks off the hook; from doing away with the minimum wage and coddling off-shore corporate tax avoiders to privatizing Medicare and Social Security; to gutting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Environmental Protection Agency, even the US Postal Service.

And that’s just for starters. House Speaker John Boehner, his majority now greater than ever, will govern as you might expect from the man who once handed out checks from the tobacco industry to members on the floor. And Mitch McConnell, finally in his ascendancy as Senate Majority Leader, will manipulate more powerfully than ever the Capitol Hill and K Street mechanisms that he has mastered – helped along by the clever placement of loyal former staff members in positions of influence. They assist him in the dispensation of favors to donors from on high. “We’re very excited,” one Republican lobbyist told the Post, the understatement of the century.

Democrats, meanwhile, are so compromised by their own addiction to Big Money they have forgotten their history as champion of the working stiff, the little folks down there at the bottom. The great problems facing everyday people in America – inequality, stagnant wages, children in poverty, our degraded infrastructure and stressed environment — are not being seriously addressed because the political class is afraid to offend the people who write the checks — the corporations and the rich. Everyone else can be safely ignored.

Watch this week’s show with Lawrence Lessig and Zephyr Teachout on “How Public Power Can Defeat Plutocrats”

Once upon a time the GOP stood for Grand Old Party — now it stands for Guardians of Privilege, and this is payback time for everything from fracking to getting the big banks off the hook; from doing away with the minimum wage and coddling off-shore corporate tax avoiders to privatizing Medicare and Social Security; to gutting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Environmental Protection Agency, even the US Postal Service.

And that’s just for starters. House Speaker John Boehner, his majority now greater than ever, will govern as you might expect from the man who once handed out checks from the tobacco industry to members on the floor. And Mitch McConnell, finally in his ascendancy as Senate Majority Leader, will manipulate more powerfully than ever the Capitol Hill and K Street mechanisms that he has mastered – helped along by the clever placement of loyal former staff members in positions of influence. They assist him in the dispensation of favors to donors from on high. “We’re very excited,” one Republican lobbyist told the Post, the understatement of the century.

Democrats, meanwhile, are so compromised by their own addiction to Big Money they have forgotten their history as champion of the working stiff, the little folks down there at the bottom. The great problems facing everyday people in America – inequality, stagnant wages, children in poverty, our degraded infrastructure and stressed environment — are not being seriously addressed because the political class is afraid to offend the people who write the checks — the corporations and the rich. Everyone else can be safely ignored.

Watch this week’s show with Lawrence Lessig and Zephyr Teachout on “How Public Power Can Defeat Plutocrats”

How Public Power Can Defeat Plutocrats from on Vimeo.


More info and links from article:

Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin’s Snuff Box to Citizens United

the new report from the watchdog Sunlight Foundation

Peter Overby at National Public Radio reported

The Washington Post writes

the largest manufacturing employer in Mississippi and a major contributor to the economic growth of the state

Parties head back to Capitol to begin carving up spoils, remains from midterms


Read the (2) page article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here:



common-core-indoctrination 1

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

The information presented here should shock you, rock you to your foundation and make you angry. So please read and watch all that is presented. You will find it well worth your time and effort, and an epiphany is all but guaranteed.

“Common core was never intended to make our children better or to encourage them to excel … it was designed solely to make them COMMON in a system of total control.”

What follows will prove the bold statement above unequivocally …

Let me start off with a statement I have put forth on several occasions “Our children are our most precious resource, our most prominent responsibility and the future of this society, if we fail them … We fail America and humanity itself”.

That said, consider that we have allowed, via our lack of involvement or apathy, Corporatist entities of all persuasions, as well as corrupt and complicit government officials to hijack the most vital aspect of said responsibility … their education.

Common Core is being instituted by corporations, not educators, and funded in the billions by elitists, eugenicist, and global mega-corporations. Their purpose is to educate our children into being obedient workers, who will then be good consumers of their products. Let there be no doubt that these globalists will employ any means necessary, no matter how deceitful or depraved to achieve their ends. Sounds a lot like the basic principals of Communism controlled by an elitist caste doesn’t it? If you doubt any of my last comments … read on.


Bill Gates, via the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, has spent over $2.5 BILLION so far on the institution and implementation of Common Core. The only thing be has spent more money on is abortion and population control (reduction) via a global vaccination program that is under serious legal fire in several countries, for sterilizing women in third world nations, without their knowledge or consent.

So what is the massive Gates investment and lobbying really hoping to accomplish? PLEASE WATCH THIS …

Did Bill Gates admit the real purpose of Common Core?

Read more here: Education Policies Led by Gates, Not States?

This is happening all across America, but not only in America!  The Gates influence on global education is happening everywhere.

If you think Mr. Gates is the only self proclaimed Elitist involved … you couldn’t be more wrong! Would you believe the very corrupt and greedy Bush (global puppets) family is also profiting handsomely via their influence in this program of  deceit and depredation? Read this …

Libertarian Adrian Wyllie calls out Jeb Bush, Neil Bush on profits from Common Core

And the list of Elitist involvement is actually the who’s who of elitists including such oligarchs as George Soros.

If you think the above comments are overstated, or that this influence in American education is fairly new in any fashion, let’s hearken back to a quote by the Oligarch, J.D. Rockefeller just after the dawning of the 20th century “I don’t want a nation of thinkers … I want a nation of workers”. This man funded the very first Board of Education in America solely to influence the minds of future American workers, again, NOT to challenge the hierarchy but to Conform to it. So how much of a stretch would it be for you to believe that Rockefeller Foundation monies can be tied into the implementation of Common Core as well?

So let me state the bottom line:  Regardless of whether the standards are horrible or phenomenal, the fact is – Whenever unelected Oligarchs or Philanthropists are permitted to facilitate and institute public policy, the voting public gets cut out of the process and self determination and governance by the people dies.

No longer is free thinking rewarded as a mechanism of success, now being vanilla, blending in, or being a part of the herd is promoted. The intent is to facilitate through Common Core a generation of followers not leaders who would in turn NOT challenge the system, but mindlessly conform to and perpetuate the system (Yup that surely sounds like Communism to me).


But there are many among us waking up to push back againt this caste that is absconding with our children’s future, educating and arming parents with what they need to understand in this fight against oligarchical domination. And make no mistake this IS A FIGHT!

I have provided you (below) with several additional videos I feel paramount in this vital push to educate and as stated above, arm you with the knowledge you need to carry this fight forward.




Brilliant anti-Common Core Speech by Dr. Duke Pesta


“Story-Killers: How the Common Core Destroys Minds and Souls”

Hillsdale College

AWC Family Foundation lecture:
“Story-Killers: How the Common Core Destroys Minds and Souls”

Terrence O. Moore
Professor of History, Hillsdale College

The Common Core Standards control the testing and curriculum of public schools and a large number of private schools in over forty states in the nation. Sold to the public as a needed reform, the Common Core nationalizes absurdity, superficiality, and political bias in the American classroom. As a result, the great stories of a great nation are at risk, along with the minds and souls of our children.

Terrence O Moore is an assistant professor of history at Hillsdale College. A former Marine with a Ph.D. from the University of Edinburgh, he served as the founding principal of a top K-12 classical school in Colorado and advises Hillsdale’s Charter School Initiative, providing assistance with the formation of classical charter schools across the country. Dr. Moore is the author of The Perfect Game and The Story-Killers: A Common Sense Case Against the Common Core.

TLB: When you can control the education (propagandization) of a nations children, within a generation you will control that nation. It is our children’s future, and America as we wish it to be, that is at stake … Your awareness and participation is VITAL !!!


By: Terri LaPoint

With the recent stories of children allegedly being medically kidnapped in Arizona, as well as reports that there are not enough foster homes to house all the children in DCS custody, some parents have asked if this is truly an increasing trend or if there are simply more of these stories being reported. The trends they are seeing are concerning.

An average of 32 children enter the foster care system in Arizona every single day. Kris Jacober, the executive director of the Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation, told KTAR, “There’s more kids in foster care than there has ever been before.”

She is correct. According to the latest DCS Semi-Annual Child Welfare Report, there has been close to a 50 percent increase in the number of Arizona children in out-of-home care over just the last four years, from 10,514 in the period from April 2010 to September 2010 up to 15,751 in the period from October 2013 to March 2014. “New removals” have increased at just about the same rate, from 4,010 in 2010 to 5,701 in the 6 month period ending in March 2014.

Besides having half again as many children living in foster care as were there four years ago, Arizona has the greatest increase in the nation of child removals from their home. While most of the nation has seen fewer CPS cases, only 11 out of 50 states have shown an increase in the past decade. Arizona leads the pack, by a large margin, according to a Data Brief by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services. Arizona’s own data confirms that increase.

Arizona CPS Crazy

Arizona leads the nation in the number of children taken by the state

The number of very young children in foster care has skyrocketed.

Despite a federal law that ties Title IV-E funding to a requirement that CPS/DCS seek to place a child with a relative first, many parents allege that this is not being done. They may be correct. According to the Child Welfare Report, only 42.7 percent of children removed from their homes in Arizona are placed with family members.

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of children whose parents’ rights have been terminated, who have been adopted out of foster care — again, it is a 50 percent increase over the past four years, from 991 over 6 months in 2010 to 1,518 in the 2014 period. Over half of those placements are finalized within one year of the child being taken from their parents’ custody. This could indicate that any parents who may be falsely accused are not given adequate time for a defense.

All of these numbers might be good if it meant that the government was getting better at protecting kids from abusive parents. But it is far from clear that this is the case. While the numbers have remained fairly steady for removals for physical, sexual, and emotional abuse over the four years between 2009 and 2013, it is neglect cases that make up the staggering increase in DCS cases, according to data from the DCS Oversight Committee.

Arizona CPS Neglect Cases


Also, the same report show that the number of children entering the DCS system has sharply increased, but the number of children exiting the system has remained steady.

Since the majority of the children removed from their homes are neglect cases, and since the greatest increase in DCS removals are based upon that charge, it is helpful to understand how neglect is defined by the Arizona DCS. According to the state code in Arizona, “neglect exists when parents, guardians or custodians place children at unreasonable risk of harm.”

“Neglect occurs when children are not given necessary care for illness or injury. Neglect also includes leaving young children unsupervised or alone, locked in or out of the house, or without adequate clothing, food, or shelter. Allowing children to live in a very dirty house which could be a health hazard may also be considered neglect.”

Further clarification states that neglect includes “a denial or deprivation of necessary medical treatment or surgical care or nourishment with the intent to cause or allow the death of an infant who is protected under A.R.S. § 36-2281.”

Herein lies the rub. Recently there have been a string of cases that have been taken up by Arizona’s DCF which have been termed “neglect.” Most of these allege medical neglect of the child(ren), when what is actually happening is that the parents challenge, debate, or disagree with a treatment plan or diagnosis by a doctor, or simply ask for a second opinion.


When parents in Arizona try to enlist the help of their elected representatives, or file a redress of grievances when they say they are falsely accused, they report that they get nowhere. Health Impact News recently reported why, and it is a reason that should alarm everyone who believes in representative government. Maria Hoffman is an unelected employee under contract to the Arizona Legislature who is the Director of the Arizona Legislative Office of Family Advocacy. She reports that she is the “the only person at the legislature who handles CPS constituent issues directly and with the Attorney General’s Office.” All complaints are routed through her. When concerned citizens ask questions or talk to the media, she has threatened them with contempt and jail time, citing an ambiguous federal law that removes the person’s first amendment freedom of speech.

Arizona CPS Deigels

The Deigel Sisters

The Inquisitr has reported on several of these stories in Arizona, and elsewhere, including the two Deigel sisters and Christopher Brown, who were taken by DCF based on accusations from doctors at Phoenix Children’s Hospital. Isaiah Rider in Chicago, Jaxon in Missouri, and Justina Pelletier in Boston are other cases that have made headlines recently. There are hundreds more whose stories have not been reported, often out of fear, and sometimes because of an unconstitutional gag order that has been placed upon the parents.

Arizona CPS Christopher Reign

Christopher Brown

The question is: How many of Arizona’s DCS/CPS cases are truly abuse cases, and how many of them are for alleged crimes by the parents, when the parents were simply doing what parents do, and fighting for answers and the best possible care for their children? When did disagreeing with the doctor become a crime punishable by having one’s child kidnapped?

Arizona has solid parental rights laws, laws that overzealous or corrupt social workers, judges, and doctors need to be reminded of, laws that are not being followed in many cases.

“The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health car and mental health of their children is a fundamental right.”

For the parents whose children were taken away because they questioned or disagreed with a doctor’s treatment plan, the law may as well not exist. There has been a huge increase in the number of children taken from their homes in recent years, more in Arizona than in any other place in the country. Parents and concerned citizens want to know why.

[image via Peaceful Parenting,Aranda MD, and Facebook]


Terry LaPointAbout the Author: Besides writing for The Inquisitr, Terri LaPoint is an inspirational speaker, and student of all things birth and breastfeeding related. Her degree is in Cultural Anthropology, with minors in counseling and theology. She is an occasional extra in movies, and a passionate defender of truth and freedom.


TLB recommends you visit INQUISITR for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:



Apparently this homework sheet given out to 2nd graders about “Being a Good Citizen” is teaching them that the government GIVES us our rights.

(click on graphic to enlarge)

And the government doesn’t just give us our rights, but the government specifically gives us “special privileges called rights.”

2. When you are a citizen you have rights. Rights are special privileges the government gives you. In our country, you have free speech. You are also given the right to chooes a religion. In America, the press is free to tell you what is happening in the world. The Bill of Rights lists the freedoms given to citizens. These rights are very important. Many people in the world do not have freedoms like we do.

A derivative of the word “give” is used no less than three times just in example number two. Number three begins with, “Because the government gives us rights, we have the duty to be good citizens.” Number four tells us being a good citizen means “you show your love for your country.” We are told to obey all laws. We are then told someday (in number seven) we will be given the right to vote, which will be an “honor.” It goes on to tell us to pay our taxes.

This is what eight-year-old kids are being taught in this country.

Wait, did I say taught? I meant being indoctrinated to blindly believe. They might as well exchange the word “citizen” in “being a good citizen” for “statist” or “fascist” or “communist.”

The only thing this sheet didn’t say was “Obey. Consume. Sleep.”

Not that it should even have to be said, but our rights are inalienable. Definition: unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor. Why? Because they are inherent. Definition: existing in something as a permanent, essential, or characteristic attribute. The government is not in a position (although it is trying as hard as it’s tyrannical centralized little heart can) to grant or give rights which we already have. By the same token, those rights cannot be taken away by the government either.

You wouldn’t know it from this worksheet however. That’s the real message these kids are getting here. Because if the kids can be taught to believe the government gives them their rights, then would that same government not also be able to condition them that it can take their rights away as well?

Some lies are so big, it takes a sock puppet to set things straight…watch the video above. Next time, I break out the googly eyes.

In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.
~Thomas Jefferson

(H/T Eddie Parrino)


About the author:

is a co-founder of She is an experienced researcher, graphic artist and investigative journalist with a passion for liberty and a dedication to truth. Her aim is to expose the New World Order for what it is — a prison for the human soul from which we must break free.

TLB recommends you visit Truthstream Media for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:

American politicians 1

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

Anyone who has not been hiding under a rock knows that Washington is corrupt, complicit … bought, and that if not held accountable, those we send to represent us will only accomplish what suits them or their parties collective interests.

In a Republic

In a Republic it is the people who are supposed to hold the power NOT the government, so it is the responsibility of We The People … our JOB, to hold our elected representatives accountable for their actions, accomplishments, or their failures.

In any republic throughout history it has been proven over and over again that any government who is not held accountable through the ignorance or apathy of its people, will gather and concentrate power, influence and wealth unto themselves in-spite and irrespective of their mandate to serve those who elect them.

I will not tell you that there are none (especially newly elected representatives) who go to Washington pure of heart and motive, intent on fulfilling their promises and mandates (although this is a very rare bird) … What I will tell you though is that they don’t stand a snowballs chance in hell of accomplishing this if left to their own devices.

Power and Influence

The power structure in our capitol is set up to ensure loyalty to the party. NOT the people. All that they will need and are offered in the way of indoctrination and support, is geared to bringing and keeping them in line with the firmly entrenched power structure. This structure has developed over the last two centuries plus into a system that has a stranglehold on our elected servants. If they wish to accomplish anything albeit their own agenda or that of the parties, they must prove their loyalty and usefulness to said party.

If you wish to have a voice in Congress, you need the help and favor of the party. If you wish to participate in, or chair a committee, you need the help and favor of the party. If you wish to sponsor a bill, you need the help and favor of the party and on and on … The party power structure holds the purse strings, the power of appointment and to a large degree the effectiveness or obscurity of its congressional members even to the point of reelection!

It’s Your Job

The ball is now in our (We The People) court. So make it a point to know your elected representatives actions, their voting record. Stay in touch with them and hold them to their promises and mandates. Keep them on the path we, the people they serve, have plotted …

Or go back to sleep and stop complaining because one of the biggest reasons for the failures in this country today IS the failure of We The People to participate in the governing of this country, or simply put, to hold our servants accountable. This is a fatal flaw that has seen the ruination of every republic throughout history.

What you will see here is a video presenting a well stated explanation of the trials, pitfalls and influences a newly elected Congressional Representative or Senator must endure and overcome, proving unequivocally that without the participation of We The People … our wants and needs will be cast aside, ignored or perverted by the agenda and overwhelming influence of the party and Washington power structure. Please watch and take note because …



Contact Your Newly Elected Officials Now

See featured video here:


November 9, 2014
Source: John W. Whitehead

We want no Gestapo or secret police. The is tending in that direction. They are dabbling in sex-life scandals and plain blackmail. J. Edgar Hoover would give his right eye to take over, and all congressmen and senators are afraid of him. – President Harry S. Truman

Secret police. Secret courts. Secret government agencies. Surveillance. Intimidation tactics. Harassment. Torture. Brutality. Widespread corruption. Entrapment schemes.

These are the hallmarks of every authoritarian regime from the Roman Empire to modern-day America, yet it’s the secret police – tasked with silencing dissidents, ensuring compliance, and maintaining a climate of fear – who sound the death knell for freedom in every age.

Every regime has its own name for its secret police: Mussolini’s OVRA carried out phone surveillance on government officials. Stalin’s NKVD carried out large-scale purges, terror and depopulation. Hitler’s Gestapo went door to door ferreting out dissidents and other political “enemies” of the state. And in the U.S., it’s the Federal Bureau of Investigation that does the dirty work of ensuring compliance, keeping tabs on potential dissidents, and punishing those who dare to challenge the status quo.

Whether the FBI is planting undercover agents in churches, synagogues and mosques; issuing fake emergency letters to gain access to Americans’ phone records; using intimidation tactics to silence Americans who are critical of the government, or persuading impressionable individuals to plot acts of terror and then entrapping them, the overall impression of the nation’s secret police force is that of a well-dressed thug, flexing its muscles and doing the boss’ dirty work.

Indeed, a far cry from the glamorized G-men depicted in Hollywood film noirs and spy thrillers, the government’s henchmen have become the embodiment of how power, once acquired, can be so easily corrupted and abused.

Case in point: the FBI is being sued after its agents, lacking sufficient evidence to acquire a search warrant, disabled a hotel’s Internet and then impersonated Internet repair technicians in order to gain access to a hotel suite and record the activities of the room’s occupants. Justifying the warrantless search as part of a sting on Internet gambling, FBI officials insisted that citizens should not expect the same right to privacy in the common room of a hotel suite as they would at home in their bedroom.

Far from being tough on crime, FBI agents are also among the nation’s most notorious lawbreakers. In fact, in addition to creating certain crimes in order to then “solve” them, the FBI also gives certain informants permission to break the law, “including everything from buying and selling illegal drugs to bribing government officials and plotting robberies,” in exchange for their cooperation on other fronts. USA Today estimates that agents have authorized criminals to engage in as many as 15 crimes a day. Some of these informants are getting paid astronomical sums: one particularly unsavory fellow, later arrested for attempting to run over a police officer, was actually paid $85,000 for his help laying the trap for an entrapment scheme.

In a stunning development reported by The Washington Post, a probe into misconduct by an FBI agent has resulted in the release of at least a dozen convicted drug dealers from prison. Several suspects awaiting trial have also been freed, and more could be released as the unnamed agent’s caseload comes under scrutiny. As the Post reports: “The scope and type of alleged misconduct by the agent have not been revealed, but defense lawyers involved in the cases described the mass freeing of felons as virtually unprecedented – and an indication that convictions could be in jeopardy. Prosecutors are periodically faced with having to drop cases over police misconduct, but it is unusual to free those who have been found guilty.”

In addition to procedural misconduct, trespassing, enabling criminal activity, and damaging private property, the FBI’s laundry list of crimes against the American people includes surveillance, disinformation, blackmail, entrapment, intimidation tactics, and harassment.

For example, the Associated Press recently lodged a complaint with the Dept. of Justice after learning that FBI agents created a fake AP news story and emailed it, along with a clickable link, to a bomb threat suspect in order to implant tracking technology onto his computer and identify his location. Lambasting the agency, AP attorney Karen Kaiser railed, “The FBI may have intended this false story as a trap for only one person. However, the individual could easily have reposted this story to social networks, distributing to thousands of people, under our name, what was essentially a piece of government disinformation.”

Then again, to those familiar with COINTELPRO, an FBI program created to “disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and neutralize” groups and individuals the government considers politically objectionable, it should come as no surprise that the agency has mastered the art of government disinformation.

The FBI has been particularly criticized in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks for targeting vulnerable individuals and not only luring them into fake terror plots but actually equipping them with the organization, money, weapons and motivation to carry out the plots – entrapment – and then jailing them for their so-called terrorist plotting. This is what the FBI characterizes as “forward leaning – preventative – prosecutions.”

Another fallout from 9/11, National Security Letters, one of the many illicit powers authorized by the USA PATRIOT Act, allows the FBI to secretly demand that banks, phone companies, and other businesses provide them with customer information and not disclose the demands. An internal audit of the agency found that the FBI practice of issuing tens of thousands of NSLs every year for sensitive information such as phone and financial records, often in non-emergency cases, is riddled with widespread violations.

The FBI’s surveillance capabilities, on a par with the National Security Agency, boast a nasty collection of spy tools ranging from Stingray devices that can track the location of cell phones to Triggerfish devices which allow agents to eavesdrop on phone calls. In one case, the FBI actually managed to remotely reprogram a “suspect’s” wireless Internet card so that it would send “real-time cell-site location data to Verizon, which forwarded the data to the FBI.”

Now the FBI is seeking to expand its already invasive hacking powers to allow agents to hack into any computer, anywhere in the world. As journalist Brett Wilkins warns:

If the proposed rule change is approved, the FBI would have the power to unleash “network investigative techniques” against computers anywhere in the world, allowing the agency to secretly install malware and spyware on any computer, effectively allowing it to control that computer and all its stored information. The FBI could download all the computer’s digital contents, switch its camera or microphone on or off and even control other computers in its network.

And then there’s James Comey, current director of the FBI, who knows enough to say all the right things about the need to abide by the Constitution, all the while his agency routinely discards it. Comey has this idea that the government’s powers shouldn’t be limited, especially when it comes to carrying out surveillance on American citizens. Responding to reports that Apple and Google are creating smart phones that will be more difficult to hack into, Comey has been lobbying Congress and the White House to force technology companies to keep providing the government with backdoor access to Americans’ cell phones.

It’s not all Comey’s fault, though. This transformation of the FBI into a secret police force can be traced back to the days of J. Edgar Hoover. As author Anthony S. Summers points out, it was Hoover who “built the first federal fingerprint bank, and his Identification Division would eventually offer instant access to the prints of 159 million people. His Crime Laboratory became the most advanced in the world.”

Eighty years after Hoover instituted the FBI’s first “database” – catalogued on index cards, no less – the agency’s biometric database has grown to massive proportions, the largest in the world, encompassing everything from fingerprints, palm, face and iris scans to DNA, and is being increasingly shared between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies in an effort to target potential criminals long before they ever commit a crime. This is what’s known as pre-crime.

If it were just about fighting the “bad guys,” that would be one thing. But as countless documents make clear, the FBI has a long track record of abusing its extensive powers in order to blackmail politicians, spy on celebrities and high-ranking government officials, and intimidate dissidents of all stripes. It’s an old tactic, used effectively by former authoritarian regimes.

In fact, as historian Robert Gellately documents, the Nazi police state was repeatedly touted as a model for other nations to follow, so much so that Hoover actually sent one of his right-hand men, Edmund Patrick Coffey, to Berlin in January 1938 at the invitation of Germany’s secret police. As Gellately noted, “[A]fter five years of Hitler’s dictatorship, the Nazi police had won the FBI’s seal of approval.”

Indeed, so impressed was the FBI with the Nazi order that, as the New York Times recently revealed, in the decades after World War II, the FBI, along with other government agencies, aggressively recruited at least a thousand Nazis, including some of Hitler’s highest henchmen, brought them to America, hired them on as spies and informants, and then carried out a massive cover-up campaign to ensure that their true identities and ties to Hitler’s holocaust machine would remain unknown. Moreover, anyone who dared to blow the whistle on the FBI’s illicit Nazi ties found himself spied upon, intimidated, harassed and labeled a threat to national security.

So not only have American taxpayers have been paying to keep ex-Nazis on the government payroll for decades but we’ve been subjected to the very same tactics used by the Third Reich: surveillance, militarized police, overcriminalization, and a government mindset that views itself as operating outside the bounds of the law.

Yet as I point out in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, it’s no coincidence that the similarities between the American police state and past totalitarian regimes such as Nazi Germany grow more pronounced with each passing day. This is how freedom falls, and tyrants come to power.

Suffice it to say that when and if a true history of the FBI is ever written, it will not only track the rise of the American police state but it will also chart the decline of freedom in America: how a nation that once abided by the rule of law and held the government accountable for its actions has steadily devolved into a police state where justice is one-sided, a corporate elite runs the show, representative government is a mockery, police are extensions of the military, surveillance is rampant, privacy is extinct, and the law is little more than a tool for the government to browbeat the people into compliance.

Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here:


(Click on image to enlarge)

Jewish Criminal Protection Bill – STOP IT IN THE SENATE NOW! H.Res.707 protects Jewish Criminals while repealing American’s First Amendment rights!

By TLB Contributor: Nicky Nelson

On July 31, 2014 during Israel’s attack on Gaza (Operation Protective Edge) and at the height of Jewish crimes against humanity and the slaughter of hundreds of innocent children and thousands of Palestinian men and women, the Jewish and Zionist controlled U.S. Representatives were busy making it illegal to report the crimes of these people.

The Bill specifically states it is not acceptable to talk about the Jews when expressing disapproval or frustration over political events in the Middle East or elsewhere.

Considering all of the wars in the Middle East are caused by Israel, the Jews/AIPAC and Israeli False Flag attacks, including 9/11, if passed, this would make it impossible to report accurately on the illegal wars, war crimes and basically all of the Jew’s nefarious crimes against the world.

Not surprisingly, the ADL has made passing this bill one of their ACTION ITEMS. The ADL was created to protect the Jewish Bankers that took over the United State’s money and banking system in 1913; the same year of the “Federal” Reserve and their criminal collection agency, the IRS. 1913 was a bad year for America, it was literally the year the Jews officially hijacked our country.

“The Anti-Defamation League was founded in 1913 “to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all.” Now the nation’s premier civil rights/human relations agency, ADL fights anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry, defends democratic ideals and protects civil rights for all.”

Now this information from the ADL surprised me. It shows that people are waking up to the disease of Zionism and the Jewish takeover of our Country/Congress, the Media, Banking, Medical Care and all of the Jewish illegal wars based on lies. There is hope when you look at these numbers and they are running scared as evidenced by this new bill.

“Survey by the Anti-Defamation League of attitudes towards Jews in more than 100 countries around the world, released in May 2014 found that over a quarter of the people surveyed (26 percent), and nearly three quarters of those surveyed in the Middle East (74 percent) hold anti- Semitic views, a stunning indicator of the stubborn resilience of anti- Semitic beliefs, even in countries where few Jews reside;”

Please contact your Senator now and let them know that it is illegal to repeal the 1st Amendment to protect Jewish criminals. And keep speaking truth!

Senators of the 113th Congress

H.Res.707 – Condemning all forms of anti-Semitism and rejecting attempts to justify anti-Jewish hatred or violent attacks as an acceptable expression of disapproval or frustration over political events in the Middle East or elsewhere.113th Congress (2013-2014)

Here are the treasonous traitors that are listed as co-sponsors of this unconstitutional bill”

Rep. Roskam, Peter J. [R-IL-6]* 07/31/2014
Rep. Lowey, Nita M. [D-NY-17]* 07/31/2014
Rep. Granger, Kay [R-TX-12] 08/01/2014
Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12] 08/01/2014
Rep. Gallego, Pete P. [D-TX-23] 09/08/2014
Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18] 09/08/2014
Rep. Schweikert, David [R-AZ-6] 09/08/2014
Rep. Pearce, Stevan [R-NM-2] 09/08/2014
Rep. Thompson, Glenn [R-PA-5] 09/08/2014
Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10] 09/08/2014
Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5] 09/08/2014
Rep. Frankel, Lois [D-FL-22] 09/08/2014
Rep. Cardenas, Tony [D-CA-29] 09/08/2014
Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6] 09/08/2014
Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1] 09/08/2014
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41] 09/08/2014
Rep. Rokita, Todd [R-IN-4] 09/08/2014
Rep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-3] 09/08/2014
Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24] 09/08/2014
Rep. Schneider, Bradley S. [D-IL-10] 09/08/2014
Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1] 09/08/2014
Rep. Larsen, Rick [D-WA-2] 09/08/2014
Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12] 09/08/2014
Rep. Marino, Tom [R-PA-10] 09/08/2014
Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13] 09/08/2014
Rep. Bustos, Cheri [D-IL-17] 09/08/2014
Rep. Tierney, John F. [D-MA-6] 09/08/2014
Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-25] 09/08/2014
Rep. Paulsen, Erik [R-MN-3] 09/08/2014
Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] 09/08/2014
Rep. Gutierrez, Luis V. [D-IL-4] 09/08/2014
Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9] 09/08/2014
Rep. Bishop, Timothy H. [D-NY-1] 09/08/2014
Rep. Joyce, David P. [R-OH-14] 09/08/2014
Rep. Green, Gene [D-TX-29] 09/08/2014
Rep. Foster, Bill [D-IL-11] 09/08/2014
Rep. Culberson, John Abney [R-TX-7] 09/08/2014
Rep. Levin, Sander M. [D-MI-9] 09/08/2014
Rep. Sinema, Kyrsten [D-AZ-9] 09/08/2014
Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-35] 09/08/2014
Rep. Fitzpatrick, Michael G. [R-PA-8] 09/08/2014
Rep. Tiberi, Patrick J. [R-OH-12] 09/08/2014
Rep. Brady, Robert A. [D-PA-1] 09/08/2014
Rep. Brown, Corrine [D-FL-5] 09/08/2014
Rep. Deutch, Theodore E. [D-FL-21] 09/08/2014
Rep. Israel, Steve [D-NY-3] 09/08/2014
Rep. Hahn, Janice [D-CA-44] 09/08/2014
Rep. Engel, Eliot L. [D-NY-16] 09/08/2014
Rep. Esty, Elizabeth H. [D-CT-5] 09/08/2014
Rep. Crowley, Joseph [D-NY-14] 09/08/2014
Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9] 09/08/2014
Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-30] 09/08/2014
Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-23] 09/08/2014
Rep. Murphy, Patrick [D-FL-18] 09/08/2014
Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-13] 09/08/2014
Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3] 09/08/2014
Rep. McCarthy, Carolyn [D-NY-4] 09/08/2014
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9] 09/08/2014
Rep. Ryan, Tim [D-OH-13] 09/08/2014
Rep. Wolf, Frank R. [R-VA-10] 09/08/2014
Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6] 09/08/2014
Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14] 09/08/2014
Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-6] 09/08/2014
Rep. Barrow, John [D-GA-12] 09/08/2014
Rep. Grayson, Alan [D-FL-9] 09/08/2014
Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11] 09/08/2014
Rep. Kilmer, Derek [D-WA-6] 09/08/2014
Rep. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI-14] 09/08/2014
Rep. Horsford, Steven A. [D-NV-4] 09/08/2014
Rep. Ellison, Keith [D-MN-5] 09/08/2014
Rep. Waxman, Henry A. [D-CA-33] 09/08/2014
Rep. Higgins, Brian [D-NY-26] 09/08/2014
Rep. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD-8] 09/08/2014
Rep. Honda, Michael M. [D-CA-17] 09/08/2014
Rep. Griffin, Tim [R-AR-2] 09/08/2014
Rep. Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana [R-FL-27] 09/08/2014
Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20] 09/08/2014
Rep. Yarmuth, John A. [D-KY-3] 09/08/2014
Rep. Capuano, Michael E. [D-MA-7] 09/08/2014
Rep. Lowenthal, Alan S. [D-CA-47] 09/08/2014
Rep. Guthrie, Brett [R-KY-2] 09/08/2014
Rep. Lance, Leonard [R-NJ-7] 09/08/2014
Rep. Stivers, Steve [R-OH-15] 09/08/2014
Rep. Johnson, Henry C. “Hank,” Jr. [D-GA-4] 09/08/2014
Rep. Vargas, Juan [D-CA-51] 09/08/2014
Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2] 09/08/2014
Rep. Davis, Susan A. [D-CA-53] 09/08/2014
Rep. Schwartz, Allyson Y. [D-PA-13] 09/08/2014
Rep. Schock, Aaron [R-IL-18] 09/08/2014
Rep. Royce, Edward R. [R-CA-39] 09/08/2014
Rep. DeSantis, Ron [R-FL-6] 09/09/2014
Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5] 09/09/2014
Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4] 09/09/2014
Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-7] 09/09/2014
Rep. Sires, Albio [D-NJ-8] 09/09/2014
Rep. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA-28] 09/09/2014
Rep. Sarbanes, John P. [D-MD-3] 09/09/2014
Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27] 09/09/2014
Rep. Franks, Trent [R-AZ-8] 09/09/2014
Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1] 09/09/2014
Rep. Lamborn, Doug [R-CO-5] 09/09/2014
Rep. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV-2] 09/09/2014
Rep. Cartwright, Matt [D-PA-17] 09/09/2014
Rep. Runyan, Jon [R-NJ-3] 09/09/2014
Rep. Ribble, Reid J. [R-WI-8] 09/09/2014
Rep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33] 09/11/2014
Rep. Flores, Bill [R-TX-17] 09/11/2014
Rep. King, Peter T. [R-NY-2] 09/11/2014
Rep. Edwards, Donna F. [D-MD-4] 09/11/2014
Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4] 09/11/2014
Rep. Langevin, James R. [D-RI-2] 09/11/2014
Rep. Himes, James A. [D-CT-4] 09/11/2014
Rep. Poe, Ted [R-TX-2] 09/11/2014
Rep. Kennedy, Joseph P. III [D-MA-4] 09/11/2014
Rep. Delaney, John K. [D-MD-6] 09/11/2014
Rep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1] 09/11/2014
Rep. Davis, Rodney [R-IL-13] 09/11/2014
Rep. Kinzinger, Adam [R-IL-16] 09/11/2014
Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-15] 09/11/2014
Rep. Johnson, Bill [R-OH-6] 09/11/2014
Rep. Holt, Rush [D-NJ-12] 09/11/2014
Rep. Lipinski, Daniel [D-IL-3] 09/15/2014
Rep. Hultgren, Randy [R-IL-14] 09/15/2014
Rep. Kind, Ron [D-WI-3] 09/15/2014
Rep. Garcia, Joe [D-FL-26] 09/15/2014
Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9] 09/15/2014
Rep. Pitts, Joseph R. [R-PA-16] 09/15/2014
Rep. Dent, Charles W. [R-PA-15] 09/15/2014
Rep. Price, David E. [D-NC-4] 09/15/2014
Rep. Cleaver, Emanuel [D-MO-5] 09/15/2014
Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2] 09/15/2014
Rep. Rigell, E. Scott [R-VA-2] 09/15/2014
Rep. O’Rourke, Beto [D-TX-16] 09/15/2014
Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20] 09/15/2014
Rep. Kline, John [R-MN-2] 09/15/2014
Rep. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL-8] 09/17/2014
Rep. Heck, Joseph J. [R-NV-3] 09/17/2014
Rep. Garrett, Scott [R-NJ-5] 09/17/2014
Rep. Yoder, Kevin [R-KS-3] 09/18/2014
Rep. Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [D-NJ-9] 09/18/2014
Rep. Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. [D-GA-2] 09/18/2014
Rep. Terry, Lee [R-NE-2] 09/18/2014
Rep. Lewis, John [D-GA-5] 09/18/2014
Rep. Fudge, Marcia L. [D-OH-11] 09/18/2014
Rep. Clay, Wm. Lacy [D-MO-1] 09/18/2014
Rep. Bachmann, Michele [R-MN-6] 09/18/2014
Rep. Larson, John B. [D-CT-1] 09/18/2014
Rep. Nunnelee, Alan [R-MS-1] 09/18/2014
Rep. Jenkins, Lynn [R-KS-2] 09/18/2014
Rep. Messer, Luke [R-IN-6] 09/18/2014
Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] 09/18/2014
Rep. Bridenstine, Jim [R-OK-1] 09/18/2014
Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8] 09/18/2014
Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-7] 09/18/2014
Rep. Frelinghuysen, Rodney P. [R-NJ-11] 09/18/2014
Rep. Byrne, Bradley [R-AL-1] 09/18/2014
Rep. Hensarling, Jeb [R-TX-5] 09/18/2014
Rep. McMorris Rodgers, Cathy [R-WA-5] 09/18/2014
Rep. Pompeo, Mike [R-KS-4] 09/18/2014
Rep. Bachus, Spencer [R-AL-6] 09/18/2014
Rep. Roybal-Allard, Lucille [D-CA-40] 09/18/2014
Rep. Duncan, Jeff [R-SC-3] 09/18/2014
Rep. Scott, Robert C. “Bobby” [D-VA-3] 09/18/2014
Rep. Scott, Austin [R-GA-8] 09/18/2014
Rep. Clark, Katherine M. [D-MA-5] 09/18/2014
Rep. Roe, David P. [R-TN-1] 09/18/2014
Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-32] 09/18/2014
Rep. Murphy, Tim [R-PA-18] 09/18/2014
Rep. Barber, Ron [D-AZ-2] 09/18/2014
Rep. Upton, Fred [R-MI-6] 09/18/2014
Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4] 09/18/2014
Rep. Jeffries, Hakeem S. [D-NY-8] 09/18/2014


[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[H. Res. 707 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 707

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

September 18, 2014.
Whereas there is clear evidence of increasing incidents and expressions of anti-
Semitism throughout the world;

Whereas on April 30, 2014, the United States Department of State released the
International Religious Freedom Report for 2013 and noted that,
“Throughout Europe, the historical stain of anti-Semitism continued to
be a fact of life on Internet fora, in soccer stadiums, and through
Nazi-like salutes, leading many individuals who are Jewish to conceal
their religious identity.”;

Whereas anti-Semitic acts committed and recorded in 2014 around the world,
including countries in the Middle East, Latin America, Europe, and North
America, include incidents of murder at Jewish sites, violent attacks
and death threats against Jews, as well as gun violence, arson,
graffiti, anti-Semitic cartoons, and other property desecration at
Jewish cemeteries, places of worship, and communal activity;

Whereas a survey by the Anti-Defamation League of attitudes towards Jews in more than 100 countries around the world, released in May 2014 found that
over a quarter of the people surveyed (26 percent), and nearly three
quarters of those surveyed in the Middle East (74 percent) hold anti-
Semitic views, a stunning indicator of the stubborn resilience of anti-
Semitic beliefs, even in countries where few Jews reside;

Whereas the Anti-Defamation League survey also found that a majority of people
surveyed overall have either not heard of the Holocaust or do not
believe it happened as has been documented by factual accounts and
recorded by history;

Whereas President Barack Obama said in his remarks at the USC Shoah Foundation Dinner on May 7, 2014, “. . . if the memories of the Shoah survivors
teach us anything, it is that silence is evil’s greatest co-conspirator.
And it’s up to us–each of us, every one of us–to forcefully condemn
any denial of the Holocaust. It’s up to us to combat not only anti-
Semitism, but racism and bigotry and intolerance in all their forms,
here and around the world. It’s up to us to speak out against rhetoric
that threatens the existence of a Jewish homeland and to sustain
America’s unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security”;

Whereas in 2004, Congress passed the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act, which
established an Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, headed by a
Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism;

Whereas the United States Government has consistently supported efforts to
address the rise in anti-Semitism through its bilateral relationships
and through engagement in international organizations such as the United
Nations (UN), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE), and the Organization of American States (OAS);

Whereas in recent decades there has been a clear and troubling pattern of
increased violence against Jewish persons and their property,
purportedly in connection with increased opposition to policies enacted
by the Government of Israel;

Whereas during Israel’s 2014 Operation Protective Edge aiming to stem the rocket
fire and terrorist infiltrations by Hamas, Jews and Jewish institutions
and property were attacked in Europe and elsewhere, including attempts
to invade a synagogue in Paris, fire-bombings of synagogues in France
and Germany, assaults on Jewish individuals, and swastikas spray-painted
in a heavily Jewish area of London and also in Rome’s historic Jewish

Whereas anti-Semitic imagery and comparisons of Jews and Israel to Nazis have
been on display at demonstrations against Israel’s actions in Gaza
throughout the United States, Europe, the Middle East and Latin America,

(1) placards comparing Israeli leaders to Nazis, accusing Israel of
carrying out a “Holocaust” against Palestinians, and equating the Jewish
Star of David with the Nazi swastika, and

(2) demonstrations that have included chants of “Death to Jews”,
“Death to Israel”, or expressions of support for suicide terrorism
against Israeli or Jewish civilians;

Whereas the Governments in France, Germany, and Italy, the three countries where
the majority of incidents have occurred, have strongly condemned anti-
Semitism as unacceptable in European society and have all made clear
statements that such attacks on their Jewish communities are
intolerable, and they have matched those words with strong law

Whereas some civil society leaders have set strong examples, including the
condemnation by the Union of Mosques of France, on behalf of their 500
mosques, called the attacks “morally unjust and unacceptable”, and
stated, “nothing can justify any act that could harm our Jewish
compatriots, their institutions or their places of worship”;

Whereas the largest newspaper in circulation in Germany, Bild, featured
statements against anti-Semitism from politicians, business leaders,
civic leaders, media personalities and celebrities with “Never Again
Jew Hatred” on the front page;

Whereas Congress has played an essential role in illustrating and counteracting
the resurgence of anti-Semitism worldwide: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives–

(1) unequivocally condemns all forms of anti-Semitism and rejects
attempts to justify anti-Jewish hatred or violent attacks as an
acceptable expression of disapproval or frustration over political
events in the Middle East or elsewhere;

(2) decries and condemns the comparison of Israel to Nazis as an
insult to the memory of those who perished in the Holocaust and an
affront to those who survived and their children and grandchildren, the
righteous gentiles who saved Jewish lives at peril to their own lives
and to those who bravely fought to defeat the Nazis;

(3) applauds those foreign leaders who have condemned anti-Semitic
acts and calls on those who have yet to take firm action against anti-
Semitism in their countries, to do so;

(4) reaffirms its support for the mandate of the United States
Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism as part of the broader
policy priority of fostering international religious freedom;

(5) supports expanded Holocaust educational programs that increase
awareness, counter prejudice, and enhance efforts to teach the universal
lessons of the Holocaust; and

(6) urges the Secretary of State to–

(A) maintain combating anti-Semitism as a United States
foreign policy priority;

(B) ensure that the instruments of United States public
diplomacy, including the United States Representative to the
Organization of Islamic Conference, are utilized to effectively
combat anti-Semitism;

(C) ensure high-level United States participation in the
2014 Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)
high level event marking the 10th anniversary of the 2004 OSCE
Berlin Declaration against anti-Semitism;

(D) urge governments to ensure that adequate laws are in
place to punish anti-Semitic violence against persons and

(E) continue robust United States reporting on anti-Semitism
by the Department of State and the Special Envoy to Combat and
Monitor Anti-Semitism;

(F) provide necessary training and instruction for personnel
posted in United States embassies and missions to analyze and
report on anti-Semitic violence against persons and property as
well as the response of governments to those incidents;

(G) ensure that United States Government efforts to train
law enforcement personnel and prosecutors abroad incorporate
tools to address anti-Semitic violence against persons and
property; and

(H) strongly support the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe’s specialized efforts to monitor and
address anti-Semitism, including through support for its law
enforcement and civil society training programs.

United States or Israel Fist

About the author / Nicky Nelson

NickyAmerican Freedom Fighter, Prepper, Writer, Political/Peace Activist, HAM, Alternative Medicine/Vaccine Safety Researcher. Permission granted to re-publish in part or whole any of Nicky’s articles with proper citation and link back to the original article… “Let it not be said that we did nothing.” – Ron Paul


TLB recommends you read more on this topic at Falastin News

See featured article and read comments here: