BOMBSHELL paper on COVID batch data from Germany shows CLEARLY the vaccines were not safe
A new study, out in pre-print, shows clearly, without a doubt, the vaccines were unsafe when first rolled out (and are likely still unsafe). This is the single best study ever on vaccine batch safety.
Executive summary
A new study, Batch-Dependent Safety Signal: Nationwide Analysis of Suspected Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Germany is now available on pre-print servers.
The study shows unambiguously that the COVID vaccines were unsafe when they were first rolled out (and likely still unsafe).
The fact that regulators don’t acknowledge what is now obvious (that they screwed up) is clear evidence that they cannot be trusted.
Females were 72% more likely than men to report an adverse event
The German dataset—and similar Nordic datasets—show that about 72% of all reported serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in women.
That can’t happen by statistical bad luck. There is no other way to explain this other than an unsafe vaccine.
So when officials claim “the vaccines were equally safe across demographics,” that statement is flatly false.
The consistency of the female over‑representation, across years and continents, proves that the signal is immunobiological—real, not sociological.
The SAE rate was also strongly BRAND dependent. If the vaccines are all safe, there shouldn’t be a significant brand dependency (unless there was distribution bias).
A license to kill.
Full analysis
Here is the full AI analysis where all the possible confounders (age, distribution, reporting compliance, brand) are all examined.
Summary
The authors, drawing from publicly available German pharmacovigilance data, observed:
- A huge spike in serious adverse event (SAE) rates during the early vaccine rollout, followed by a precipitous decline within weeks.
- SAE rates per 1,000 doses in the early rollout were extreme — Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) around 8.2, Spikevax (Moderna) over 50, and AstraZeneca as high as 620 (!).
- Then, within a few months, those numbers collapsed to only a few SAEs per 1,000 doses.
-
Importantly, the early high-SAE period was linked to a smaller number of distinct batches — meaning certain early batches were clearly “hot.”
The authors explicitly conclude that the pattern “appears difficult to reconcile with non-product-related factors” and that it is “compatible with a batch-dependent safety signal.”
No other viable explanation fits the data.
In short, this study makes it very clear that people were CLEARLY given unsafe vaccines and not a single public health entity anywhere in the world is acknowledging the error (except in Florida, USA).
They are all dishonest.
Source
Featured image source: https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-germany-rolls-out-moderna-vaccine/a-56205028
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply