ER Editor: We’re not too sure of ourselves here, but long-standing incumbent PM Orban (with Hungary generally being important to a non-deep state realignment of our world) is facing an April 12 election. Signs we’ve seen over the past few months show a slightly worrying trend toward Orban being in a precarious position.
As we believe everything is a show right now, we wonder if this EU Court decision, real or fake, isn’t timed to positively influence the Hungarian public AWAY from voting for pro-EU, he-seemed-to-come-out-of-nowhere Peter Magyar. It certainly gives Orban ammunition to castigate the EU once again. Reading through the details below, the situation sounds so utterly contrived.
Politico.eu is running this —
‘Absurd!’ Orbán slams idea of returning EU’s €10B
********
EU Court Says Hungary Funds Were Unlawfully Released in 2023
Hungary may lose €10 billion as the EU heaps political pressure on the Orbán government ahead of the April 12th elections.
ZOLTAN KOTTASZ
A fresh legal opinion from the EU’s top court has intensified accusations that Brussels is using financial and legal instruments to exert political pressure on Hungary, just weeks before the country heads to the polls.
On Thursday, February 12th, Advocate General Tamara Ćapeta advised the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to annul the European Commission’s 2023 decision to release around €10 billion in EU funds to Hungary, arguing that the move lacked sufficient justification and that reforms were not yet “effectively being applied.”
While the opinion is non-binding, it sets the tone for the court’s ruling, which is due in coming months.
The case was brought by the European Parliament, which accuses the Commission of unlawfully releasing funds in December 2023, allegedly in exchange for Prime Minister Viktor Orbán lifting his veto on opening EU accession talks with Ukraine.
However, then-Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders acknowledged that Hungary had implemented all the required judicial reforms, and the Commission had no other options but to hold up its end of the bargain.
Sources close to the EU executive noted that Hungary had created an independent integrity authority, reformed judicial procedures, and strengthened internal control mechanisms.
Despite this, the European Parliament (EP) launched legal action against the Commission in March 2024, a move that many in Budapest interpret as an attempt to keep funds away from Hungary regardless of compliance—using EU funds as a political weapon against a member state that does not comply with the Brussels elite’s progressive ‘values.’
“The script never changes in Brussels,” said Balázs Orbán, the Hungarian prime minister’s political director, reacting to Thursday’s announcement.
ER: Tweet link
The moment a Member State steps off the European elite script, the legal machinery whirs into action. Hungary rejects the political rush to admit Ukraine, and legal pressure follows. Let’s not forget—this is the same Court that fined Hungary €1 million per day for protecting the EU’s external borders against illegal migration. Hungary will not be pressured into decisions that harm Hungarian families. A Brussels-aligned government might fall in line. We won’t. Sovereignty means the right—and the resolve—to say no.
Brussels continues to withhold more than €18 billion in additional funds, citing concerns over corruption, migration policy, academic freedom, and LGBT legislation. Hungarian officials maintain that these issues reflect ideological demands rather than legal deficiencies.
Critics also point to double standards. After Donald Tusk’s liberal government took power in Poland in 2023 and replaced the conservative PiS cabinet, more than €100 billion in previously frozen EU funds were swiftly released, despite Warsaw implementing few concrete reforms.
The timing of the CJEU’s case is also curious (ER: indeed): Hungary will hold parliamentary elections on April 12th, and establishment forces in Brussels and in Western Europe are clearly rooting for Viktor Orbán’s main rival, Péter Magyar’s Tisza Party, which belongs to the Europhile European People’s Party in the EP.
In April last year, Tisza MEP Kinga Kollár said that withholding funds had “strengthened the opposition” by worsening living standards—comments that sparked outrage in Hungary. (ER: Was this Tisza MEP scoring an own goal, therefore?)
Prime Minister Viktor ? Orbán has accused Brussels on several occasions of attempting to engineer a change of government, most recently on the Patrióta podcast.
The advocate general’s opinion has deepened scepticism in Hungary and beyond about whether the EU’s rule-of-law regime is still applied consistently—or has become a tool for enforcing political conformity within the bloc.
Source
Zoltán Kottász is a journalist for europeanconservative.com, based in Budapest. He worked for many years as a journalist and as the editor of the foreign desk at the Hungarian daily, Magyar Nemzet. He focuses primarily on European politics.
.
Featured image source: https://www.nin.rs/svet/vesti/100700/orban-o-pomoci-ukrajini-madarska-ne-prihvata-planove-koji-pogadaju-gradane
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply