ER Editor: A Macronist, one Richard Ferrand, was recently appointed president of France’s Constitutional Council, ostensibly for 9 years. Marine Le Pen’s party (RN) did not vote against this. Ferrand got in by a margin of a single vote. Does she have a personal interest in this given that she’s facing charges?
We’re wondering what the theatrical element is here. Macron and many in the French ‘elite’ are now 2.0’s, which is evident in photo comparisons, due to the application of EO 13818. We have no word that Le Pen is 2.0, however. Is Le Pen betraying her voter base of around 11 million? (She should have been elected last summer but curiously wasn’t.) What is really going on?
Translation: And here it is right now, BECAUSE OF THE RN, Richard #Ferrand, by 1 vote, has just been appointed President of the Constitutional Council! (see video) For 9 years! 9 years! To Macron’s great delight! RN members, you can tear up your card and send it to the party headquarters: this is one of the greatest betrayals of France and the French that the party has just committed! Join a real sovereignist, patriotic, resistance and action movement: The Patriots!
Et voilà à l’instant, À CAUSE DU RN,
Richard #Ferrand, à 1 voix près, vient d’être nommé président du Conseil constitutionnel ! (cf vidéo ⤵️)
Pour 9 ans ! 9 ans !
Au grand bonheur de Macron !Adhérents RN, vous pouvez déchirer votre carte et l’envoyer au siège du parti : c’est… pic.twitter.com/XshU4V91gG
— Florian Philippot (@f_philippot) February 19, 2025
In this tweet, Florian Philippot considers Le Pen’s party to have lost its true opposition status to Macron, having betrayed France.
You don’t have to understand French to appreciate the visuals in this tweets —
Montez le son !🔊👍
Superbe clip !🎯💯
Merci @leeloolaeti🙏 pic.twitter.com/9j5mbIIFLd— LE 62 DES PATRIOTES AVEC FLORIAN PHILIPPOT (@62PATRIOTES) February 19, 2025
This is a very accessible read (browsers will translate) from Qactus.fr site. Alas, we can only link to it without being able to copy a section —
France: Le Pen’s Party accused of treason after Richard Ferrand’s appointment to the Constitutional Council. Was there a plan? Explanation
Essentially, Marine Le Pen faces legal judgement on March 31, 2025 and risks being ineligible to hold office for a 5 year term. But Ferrand is in a position to dismiss this judgement.
Somewhere this is all too obvious and improbable. If it’s a 5D chess move, we’re not sure how this will play out.
********
ER: Overall, this post (machine-translated) tells us that the French Constitution, going forward, is under the control of some shady people connected to Macron.
Richard Ferrand elected to the Constitutional Council thanks to Marine Le Pen
Is Macron aiming for a third term? With Richard Ferrand president of the Constitutional Council, he would have nothing to fear from article 6 of the Constitution : « No one can exercise more than two consecutive mandates ».
LE MEDIA EN 4-4-2
The committees of the National Assembly and the Senate voted together. They were overwhelmingly against the appointment of Richard Ferrand to the Constitutional Council. There were 58 votes against, but for it to be rejected, a majority of the 3/5th of the votes cast was needed, or 59 votes against. So he was elected in a close vote.
It would seem that Marine Le Pen would have traded the abstention of the RN for her future eligibility, which has been called into question by her run-ins with the law.
Emmanuel Macron proposed Richard Ferrand, the man of the Mutuelles de Brittany
On February 12, 2019, to demonstrate their unity in the face of the attempted fire at Richard Ferrand’s second home, the eight group presidents had formed a guard of honor for him between the Hôtel de Lassay and the National Assemblee. A gesture of solidarity that must have comforted the man who has had many misfortunes with the law.
Fortunately (irony), neither breach of trust nor fraud were brought against him. The only remaining charge was that of illegal interest-taking in the Mutuelles de Bretagne affair (ER: Mutuelles are non-profits in the private sector offering healthcare and social services in the Brittany region), which was quickly dismissed in 2017, then time-barred. A touch of fictitious employment for his son’s parliamentary attaché, a tiny real estate deal paid for via his mandate expenses, not much compared to the contaminated blood affair of Laurent Fabius, the former President of the Constitutional Council.
Philippe Bas, proposed by Gerard Larcher, is the man of Big Pharma
Philippe Bas, also elected, is a man of secret meetings for the pharmaceutical industry.
With the non-integration of unvaccinated nurses and firefighters that he voted for, it’s to some extent to him that municipalities owe their staff shortages in these two sectors. McKinsey’s management of the health crisis also owes something to him. After the National Assembly voted to relax traffic restrictions, it was he who reinstated the mandatory vaccination passport. It was also he who proposed adding the possibility of using water unfit for human consumption to the Public Health Code (proposed law of March 3, 2023 (Art. L. 1321-1).
It was he, the fox, who proposed the amendment reformulating the “right” to resort to an abortion into “freedom of the woman to terminate her pregnancy”. And there you have it, a freedom enshrined in the marble of the French Constitution.
Laurence Vishnievsky, proposed by Yael Braun-Pivet, is in command
Nine days after taking up her post as examining magistrate in Paris, she dismissed the case of Robert Boulin’s death, drowned in 20 cms of water.
After stints in the EELV (Greens), PS (Socialist) and Republican (globalist right) parties, she joined the MoDem (globalist alternative under Bayrou) and, having been nominated by LREM (Macron’s party) in a constituency where the EELV deputy was not standing for re-election, was elected in 2022. In 2024, she was not re-elected. She needs to keep busy, as her record of her duties at the Assemblée testifies. Yaël Braun-Pivet has proposed her for the Constitutional Council.
The Constitution is in the hands of Macron, Larcher and Braun-Pivet
In addition to the 9 appointed members, there are ex officio members (former Presidents of the Republic). They serve non-renewable nine-year terms. The Constitutional Council is renewed by thirds every three years. Three members are appointed by the President of the Republic, who also appoints the President of the Council. Three members are appointed by the President of the National Assembly and three others by the President of the Senate. They may not at the same time be deputies, ministers, be promoted as civil servants, have responsibilities in a political party, be employees or lawyers.
Source
Featured image source: https://qactus.fr/2025/02/19/france-le-rassemblement-national-accuse-de-trahison-apres-la-nomination-de-richard-ferrand-au-conseil-constitutionnel-il-y-avait-il-un-plan-explication/
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply