JD Vance Approaches Kamala Harris at Wisconsin Airport
Harris has not held a press conference or answered questions from reporters since she overtook the top slot on the Democrat ticket.
BREITBART
Republican vice presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance (OH), unlike establishment media reporters, is unafraid to question Democrat presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris about her radical record and coup-turned-campaign.
Vance approached Air Force Two, which Harris was onboard, during a tense standoff on Tuesday in which the current and perhaps future vice president occupied the same Wisconsin runway.
Vance just got off of his plane and is walking over to Air Force Two, which touched down just a few minutes ago at the same airport here in Wisconsin pic.twitter.com/FEVEVhuowW
— Kate Sullivan (@KateSullivanDC) August 7, 2024
“I just wanted to check out my future plane,” Vance said, Semafor reported.
Vance did not speak to Harris but said he “wanted to go say hello to the vice president and ask her why does she refuse to answer questions.”
“I just wanted to check out my future plane,” Vance tells us.
He didn’t speak to Harris, but added that he “wanted to go say hello to the vice president and ask her why does she refuse to answer questions.” https://t.co/g8ZoqYRt9i
— Shelby Talcott (@ShelbyTalcott) August 7, 2024
It is not immediately clear if Harris remained on her jet or exited and escaped Vance.
Vance tweeted after the standoff, “I thought the reporters traveling with Kamala might be a little lonely given that she never answers questions from them, so I figured I’d come say hello and check out my new plane while I was at it.”
I thought the reporters traveling with Kamala might be a little lonely given that she never answers questions from them, so I figured I’d come say hello and check out my new plane while I was at it. https://t.co/OPEh0UKBDc
— JD Vance (@JDVance) August 7, 2024
CONTINUE ORGINAL ARTICLE
Header featured image (edited) credit: Vance/Harris/Gage Skidmore/Flickr, Lawrence Jackson/White House
Emphasis added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned tuned…
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Biden, Harris Nor Obama’s appointment was Constitutional, nor have/had they the authority to Do ANYTHING IN WE, THE PEOPLES NAME – NOTHING they did or signed in Our NAME IS LEGAL OR BINDING – ‘they’ ARE USURPERS/”ENEMIES WITHIN” WITH THE AIDING & ABETTING OF ALL OTHER Public servants & agencies at EVERY Level “WITHIN” OUR GOVERNMENT That Have Done NOTHING TO REMEDY THIS USURPATION/NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT:
July 4, 2022
By Its Silence in Court, Congress Has Legally Admitted Mr. Biden Did Not Win the Presidency
On December 17, 2020, and again on January 4, 2021, every member of Congress was served with a Petition for Redress of specific violations of the Electors Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article II, Section 1) that took place in 31 States throughout 2020. One thousand fifty-eight (1058) citizens residing in all fifty States signed the Petition. Congress was asked to refute the facts or direct the 31 States to re-do their elections in keeping with the mandate of the Electors Clause.
Congress did not respond to either Petition for Redress of the Grievance. Instead, on January 6, 2021, Congress certified the electoral votes of those 31 States, without any investigation, knowing the 401 electors from those 31 States were not Constitutionally chosen and thus no candidate for President and Vice President received a majority of the 538 available electoral votes.
On February 14, 2021, Robert Schulz, Anthony Futia Jr. and all others similarly situated filed a Complaint in the D.C. District Court against the Congress of the United States. For relief, the Court was asked to direct the House to choose the President, and direct the Senate to choose the Vice President, all in accordance with the terms of the 12th Amendment.
Congress did not respond to the lawsuit or the Court Summons and made no appearance in either the District Court or the Court of Appeals.
The lower courts dismissed the case for lack of standing.
The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court. On June 27, 2022 it was assigned Case No. 21-1593.
American Jurisprudence 2d (Am Jur 2d) is the legal profession’s leading legal reference.
According to 32 AMJUR POF 2d 253:
Silence constitutes admission in civil proceedings when circumstances are such that one ought to speak and does not.
A party’s silence may be construed for evidentiary purposes as a tacit admission of the facts stated where a statement is made in its presence in regard to facts affecting its rights, and it makes no reply.
NOTE: Here, a statement in the form of a Complaint with a detailed statement of the facts proving that 63 violations of the Electors Clause occurred in 31 States was served on every member of Congress.
It is frequently held that evidence of a party’s silence can be introduced as proof of an admission if the following conditions are shown to have existed:
the statement in question was made in the party’s presence and hearing. NOTE: Every member of the Senate and every member of the House of Representatives along with the Senate Legal Counsel and the Office of General Counsel of the House of Representatives were served with a complete copy of the Complaint, and
the party was capable of understanding the meaning of the statement, and
the party had sufficient knowledge of the facts embraced in the statement to reply thereto, and
the party was at liberty to deny the statement or otherwise respond to it, and
the statement was made under such circumstances as would naturally call for a reply, and
the statement was made by a person normally entitled to a reply.
Here, each of the listed conditions existed. Congress had a duty as a defendant in a court of law to respond to Petitioners’ claims, and it was fully capable of responding to the two principal claims:
1) that no candidate for President and no candidate for Vice President received a majority (270) of the available 538 electoral votes because 401 votes were cast by Electors from 31 States who were UN-Constitutionally chosen and thus whose votes had no legal force, binding power or validity, leaving only 137 Constitutionally valid electoral votes to be cast, and
2) that by knowingly certifying the electoral votes cast by Electors who were UN-Constitutionally chosen Congress displaced the power committed by the Constitution to the State Legislatures to determine how votes of presidential Electors are to be obtained.
There are no issues of fact. Congress’ silence equates to admission.
ALSO: In January 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court Committed Treason by abdicating its Duty to hear an Appeal and letting stand an erroneous decision from the USDC in DC claiming the U.S. Government has NO obligation to respond to the People or their First Amendment Petitions for Redress of Grievances – The Accountability Clause.
Which brings us to the next presidential mock elections. The choice is to vote for Zionist puppet Trump or Zionist puppet Harris/Biden.
What if RFK Jr. who is the only candidate who could change things stopped once and for all to suicide himself by supporting tthe Zionists and the genocidal state of Israel and decided to expose them and take side with the victims as he has done all his life?
What would happen?
He will lose Jewish/Zionist funding
Take the risk of them trying to kill him
BUT
He will win millions of votes from both sides, especially from the youth.
And he could rock the system.
He hasn’t spoken what people want to hear from him yet, why?
Is he afraid of losing his Jewish donors?
Is he a coward?
Is he that naive regarding Israel?
Is he controlled opposition?
Do they have Epstein style file son him?
Why having defended children all his life and then defending now children mass murderers who most likely were part of his father and uncle assassinations?
Should he make the right move, it could change everything and America’s history too.
At 70, isn’t that a risk worth to take?