Keir Starmer’s darkest grooming gangs secret exposed

ER Editor:  Here is the Daily Express video, which is part of this article. As this information has been known for some time, the question is why this, why now?

There is talk about Jimmy Savile in connection to Keir Starmer as a child. We wonder if Starmer wasn’t one of Savile’s victims, who then later protected Savile and many others (the Royal Family? would Starmer have been one of their victims, too?) in his role as director of the CPS.

To our mind, Starmer looks like a victim-turned-protector (open to see full photos) —

********

Keir Starmer’s darkest grooming gangs secret exposed

EXCLUSIVE: An explosive Express investigation reveals Sir Keir Starmer’s CPS committed a ‘betrayal’ of a grooming gang victim so horrific that an independent reviewer labelled it ‘deplorable further abuse’

ZAK GARNER-PURKIS for DAILY EXPRESS

A Rochdale grooming survivor has branded Sir Keir Starmer’s account of her case “vile” and accused him of lying to help his political career.

Survivor Ruby, not her real name, was raped five days a week from the age of 12 to 15 by a Pakistani gang, who forced her to get “blackout drunk” and threatened her with a gun when she said no.

Impregnated aged 13 by gang member Adil Khan, Ruby, who has special needs, had her aborted foetus taken and frozen by Greater Manchester Police without her knowledge or consent.

She was appalled to learn that when Sir Keir’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) belatedly took action, they only pursued conspiracy charges against her chief abuser Khan, who was released after just three years.

She branded Sir Keir’s repeated use of his role as director of public prosecutions at the CPS during the Rochdale case to bolster his reputation “disgusting”.

“It’s absolutely vile,“ she told the Express. “How can he stand there and say he did a good job? They had DNA, concrete evidence, and still didn’t get [the offender] charged with rape.”

The survivor added that the British public could have “no way” of trusting the Prime Minister.

Ruby is joined by police whistleblower and ex-Detective Constable Maggie Oliver in calling for the Prime Minister to step away from any involvement in the upcoming national inquiry into grooming gangs, citing a conflict of interest in how the CPS treated victims at the time of the offending.

Ms Oliver, who resigned as a detective over the police’s handling of the Rochdale case, told the Express that Sir Keir’s CPS had made “horrific” decisions that must not be replicated.

She highlighted the “betrayal” of Amber, a key witness whom the former detective was instructed to befriend as police sought to put the Pakistani rape gang behind bars.

Confirmed as a victim by senior members of the CPS, the teenager provided hours of interviews to Oliver detailing the sickening sexual abuse she and other children had suffered.

However, for “tactical reasons”, the CPS decided to portray the girl as a teenage pimp who was procuring children on behalf of the gang. Amber was not informed that she would be named in court and was unable to defend herself against these allegations at any stage.

“That tactic against a vulnerable victim of horrendous abuse was inhumane, unlawful and should never be used,” Oliver said.

“The only way to get Amber’s evidence into court was to add her to the indictment as one of the gang of paedophiles.

“But they didn’t arrest Amber, they never cautioned her, she didn’t even know that she was being portrayed in that trial as an older madame who was procuring children for the gang and it was a complete lie.”

In the aftermath of the trial, Amber faced death threats and had her address shared on social media in posts that accused her of being a “paedo”. Oliver also claims social services attempted to take the teenage victim’s infant child as a result of her being named on the Rochdale grooming gangs indictment.

The majority of Ruby and Oliver’s claims are backed up by publicly available sources.

The most damming is an independent review commissioned in 2017 by Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, which found the CPS’s actions towards Amber showed an unacceptable lack of concern for the impact on a vulnerable survivor.

CONTINUE READING HERE

Featured image source: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2189822/keir-starmers-darkest-grooming-gangs

*************

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*