Leftists Meltdown After New York Times Loses Its Twitter Blue Tick

Leftists Meltdown After New York Times Loses Its Twitter Blue Tick

Oh no, how awful!

Paul Joseph Watson

Summit News

After the New York Times lost its blue checkmark on Twitter, some leftists proceeded to have meltdowns, while others coped by suggesting the NYT looked ‘better’ without it.

Twitter announced last month that legacy checkmarks would no longer be maintained unless companies and individuals signed up for Twitter Blue.

While the fee is $8 a month for individuals, news outlets have to pay $1,000 a month, something the NYT refused to do.

The New York Times’ @nytimes account duly lost its checkmark on Saturday, with Elon Musk declaring that its feed had become “unreadable propaganda” anyway.

The NY Times losing its blue tick means tweets will no longer show up in the “for you” tab, meaning its followers will have to go direct to the account to read tweets.

This apparent war crime has enraged leftists on Twitter, who are acting like Musk personally shut down the newspaper.

“Elon Musk should step down and sell this app,” tweeted PoliticsVerse. “Today, he stripped New York Times, an account with nearly 55M followers of its verified badge, and decided to boost Catturd2 by giving him a legacy check mark.”

“The bias is unreal and we are living in dangerous times where the owner of this platform controls a social media app with political bias.”

Yes, after everything that’s happened with social media bias up until Elon Musk purchased Twitter last year, only now does it become important because some pixels next to the words ‘New York Times’ disappeared.

Others were mad that a Twitter user called CatTurd was verified and the NY Times wasn’t.

Other leftists invented the cope that the NY Times looked ‘better’ without the blue checkmark anyway.

Some claimed the whole thing was a conspiracy to prevent the NY Times’ reporting on Trump’s ‘arrest’ from reaching a wider audience.

Apparently, some mainstream journos are planning to commit blue checkmark hari-kari in solidarity.

Others made fun of the whole situation, with some pretending to be the NY Times (perhaps in an effort to create a new controversy around ‘impersonation’, which could mean the newspaper gets it blue tick back again).

One Twitter user expressed the sentiment of many by simply suggesting the NY Times cough up and pay the subscription fee like everyone else.

**********

(TLB) pubished this article from Summit News

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Twitter screen/STEFANI REYNOLDS via Getty Images

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*