ER Editor: You have to be living under a rock not to know the degree of condemnation Israel deserves just for its actions since October 7, 2023. (We would actually say they are ALLEGED actions.) Not to mention during the many decades before. European Conservative is thoroughly Zionist and takes that stance in reporting the outrage among the German right to Merz’s decision to halt arms to Israel. We wonder: globalist lackey and former BlackRock CEO Merz is likely a 2.0 by now. Is this a ploy by go-it-alone ‘Merz’ to out the Zionists (i.e. deep state lackeys) among the German right, who are always up Israel’s you-know-what in many countries?
From eugyppius —
Friedrich Merz finds his chancellorship in crisis following his announcement of an arms embargo on Israel
The German left are increasingly critical of Israel, while support remains high within the centre-right Union parties. …
Hours after the Israeli cabinet made their plans known (ER: plans to take over Gaza City), Merz suddenly announced a partial arms embargo on Israel, affecting all military equipment “that may be utilised in the Gaza Strip.” It was a sudden turnabout for a Chancellor who had made support for Israel a talking point in his campaign and who in June weathered sharp cricitism for defending Israel’s attack on Iran as necessary “dirty work” undertaken on behalf of the entire West.
The reaction from within the Union parties, and particularly the Bavarian CSU, was immediate and unlike anything I’ve ever seen before. Internal disputes within the CDU and the CSU are generally kept quiet; the party strives to present a uniform public facade. Not in this case. The backlash has been an order of magnitude greater than the rumblings of the Merkelian left-leaning Unioners in January, when Merz flirted with tearing down the firewall against Alternative für Deutschland.
Apparently, Merz had consulted basically nobody within his own party in advance of announcing the embargo. This particularly outraged the Bavarian CSU. …
At this point, it’s no longer useful to ask who is criticising Merz, but who is still on his side. …
Noting that ‘Merz’ has acted entirely alone in this matter, eugyppius notes
All of this is to say that Merz is in serious trouble – probably as much trouble as a Chancellor can be in, short of a hostile no-confidence vote.
********
Merz’s Own Ranks Erupt Over Israel Arms Embargo
The chancellor’s decision is not only an abandonment of party policy but also a betrayal of his campaign promise to defend Israel.
ZOLTAN KOTTASZ for EUROPEAN CONSERVATIVE
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s decision to partially halt arms exports to Israel has sparked condemnation from members of his own party.
Merz’s decision on July 8th to halt the supply of weapons potentially usable in Gaza strikes marked the first time it effectively imposed sanctions on Israel during the current war.
By Monday, it was clear that many members of the centre-right CDU/CSU alliance were outraged.
“The CSU was not involved in the decision; we consider it to be questionable,” said Alexander Hoffmann, leader of the CSU parliamentary group.
Boris Rhein (CDU), prime minister of the state of Hesse, said:
The position of the CDU Hesse is crystal clear: We stand unreservedly on the side of Israel. Israel’s security is and remains Germany’s raison d’être. We therefore support Israel’s right to self-defence against terror. For me, this also means very clearly supporting Israel militarily.
Other members also voiced their dissatisfaction, with CDU MP Roderich Kiesewetter calling it a “serious political and strategic mistake.”
The embargo has not only caused internal divisions but also led to accusations that Merz is abandoning Israel at a critical moment. Kiesewetter warned that “this will not free a single hostage,” but it breaks “a long-standing friendship and trust.”
The internal party fallout has been significant, with many members accusing Merz of failing to communicate the decision properly. “I have not made this decision alone, but it is ultimately a decision that I am solely responsible for,” Merz stated.
The decision also contrasts with the chancellor’s own rhetoric: earlier this year, he criticised the previous left-wing German government for implementing a “de facto arms embargo against Israel,” adding: “In the future, what Israel needs to exercise its right of self-defence, Israel will get.”
It now looks as though Merz has broken yet another campaign promise—like his vow to be tough on migration—in order to appease his coalition partners, the Social Democrats.
Matthias Hauer, a CDU state secretary, added that the move sends a “disastrous signal” to Israel.
The tension within the CDU prompted Merz to send his head of cabinet, Thorsten Frei, to reassure critics that the basic principles of German policy toward Israel remained unchanged.
Despite these assurances, the underlying concern within the party is the break with past policy, particularly with the concept of Staatsräson (the principle of defending Israel as a key national interest) that had been established by Merz’s predecessor, Angela Merkel.
Merz, in an interview with ARD, defended his decision, stating that it was a response to a “surprising decision” by Israel’s security cabinet to escalate the military conflict in Gaza.
We cannot supply weapons to a conflict that is trying to be resolved exclusively by military means, which could lead to hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties. [sic]
He also emphasized that the decision did not signal a fundamental shift in Germany’s relationship with Israel, stressing that the country would continue to assist Israel in its defence efforts.
Merz’s decision on Israel has also attracted attention from outside the CDU, and put the co-leader of the opposition right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party into a spot of bother.
Tino Chrupalla, whose party has been critical of weapons exports to conflict zones, expressed support for the government policy, claiming that “our position on arms exports to crisis and war zones has always been clear.”
However, some party members criticised his outspoken remarks, arguing that his comments about “crimes” in Gaza and the potential alignment with Merz’s decision could alienate voters who see Israel as a strategic ally.
Source
Zoltán Kottász is a journalist for europeanconservative.com, based in Budapest. He worked for many years as a journalist and as the editor of the foreign desk at the Hungarian daily, Magyar Nemzet. He focuses primarily on European politics.
.
Featured image source: https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-halts-gaza-related-arms-exports-to-israel-over-expanded-offensive/
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply