Mexico Threatens To Sue Google Over ‘Gulf Of America’ Naming Dispute

Mexico Threatens To Sue Google Over ‘Gulf Of America’ Naming Dispute

Mexico had formally asked Google to fully restore “Gulf of Mexico” as the primary name for the entire body of water, arguing that Trump’s renaming applied only to the U.S. continental shelf.

By Tom Ozimek | The Epoch Times

Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum threatened to sue Google over its decision to display the name “Gulf of America” across the entire body of water rather than just the portion of the Gulf that lies within U.S. jurisdiction, arguing that the expansive naming violates Mexican sovereignty.

Sheinbaum’s announcement comes after weeks of escalating tensions between the Mexican government and the U.S. tech giant over its labeling of the Gulf on Google Maps. While people using the app in Mexico see “Gulf of Mexico,” those based in the United States now see “Gulf of America,” following a Jan. 20 decree issued by U.S. President Donald Trump to revise certain names of geographical features so that they “honor American greatness.”

At a press conference on Feb. 17, Sheinbaum said Mexico had formally asked Google to fully restore “Gulf of Mexico” as the primary name for the entire body of water, arguing that Trump’s renaming applied only to the U.S. continental shelf.

“We do not agree with this,“ Sheinbaum said of Google’s naming policy for the Gulf, adding that Mexico ”will wait for Google’s response and if not, we will proceed to court.”

The United States directly controls the waters of the Gulf approximately 12 nautical miles from its shores, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. It also maintains what is known as an exclusive economic zone stretching 200 miles offshore, where it can extract natural resources like oil. Mexico is arguing that the mapping policy violates Mexican sovereignty and that the United States only has jurisdiction over roughly half of the Gulf.

Mexican authorities previously asked Google to change its naming policy for the Gulf and, during the press conference, Sheinbaum shared a written response to the request from Cris Turner, Google’s vice president of government affairs and public policy.

Turner wrote in the Feb. 10 letter that Google’s decision to display the name Gulf of America to U.S.-based users is based on an impartial and consistent application of its maps policies across all regions, which involves using names that are prescribed by authoritative sources.

“As we first announced two weeks ago, and consistent with our product policies, we’ve begun rolling out changes in Google Maps. We would like to confirm that people using Maps in Mexico will continue to see ‘Gulf of Mexico,’“ Turner wrote.

”The United States Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) has officially updated ‘Gulf of Mexico’ to ‘Gulf of America.’ To reflect the update made by the GNIS, beginning today, people in the US will see ‘Gulf of America.’ Everyone else will see both names.”

Turner added that Google representatives are willing to meet in person with the Mexican government to engage in “constructive dialogue” on the matter.

Google did not respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times by publication time.

The renaming has also drawn controversy within the United States, where news outlet The Associated Press (AP) has opted to continue using “Gulf of Mexico,” while acknowledging Trump’s renaming. 

The AP’s editorial stance led to the White House barring its reporters from several events and limiting their access to the Oval Office and Air Force One.

“The Associated Press continues to ignore the lawful geographic name change of the Gulf of America,” White House Deputy Chief of Staff Taylor Budowich said in a Feb. 14 statement on social media.

“This decision is not just divisive, but it also exposes the Associated Press’ commitment to misinformation,“ Budowich continued. ”While their right to irresponsible and dishonest reporting is protected by the First Amendment, it does not ensure their privilege of unfettered access to limited spaces, like the Oval Office and Air Force One.”

The White House moves prompted criticism from the AP and concerns about press freedom from the White House Correspondents’ Association. AP Senior Vice President and Executive Editor Julie Pace condemned the restrictions.

“It is alarming that the Trump administration would punish AP for its independent journalism,” Pace said in a statement. “Limiting our access to the Oval Office based on the content of AP’s speech not only severely impedes the public’s access to independent news, it plainly violates the First Amendment.”

Eugene Daniels, president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, issued a statement accusing the White House of “seeking to curtail the press freedoms enshrined in our Constitution“ and of looking ”to punish a news outlet for not advancing the government’s preferred language.”

The White House has defended its decision to limit Oval Office and Air Force One access to AP reporters, while noting that AP journalists and photographers will continue to enjoy access to the broader White House complex.

_________

SOURCE

Header featured image (edited) credit: EXPLORE WONDERS YouTube screen shot. Emphasis added by (TLB)

••••

••••

Stay tuned tuned…

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.