ER Editor: First the Dutch election was too close to call. Now it’s been declared a victory for the Netherland’s youngest-ever leader, 38 year old Rob Jetten, of the left-liberal-globalist D’66 party given the mathematics around vote-counting. (See NL Times for this)
This sounds to us like a playbook. Seb Kurz, Sanna Marin, Trudeau, Macron and some of Macron’s henchmen – all ‘youngest ever’ WEF types.
As Dutch colleague Michel van der Kemp sagely observed this morning,
‘PVV won the last elections. People who are voting for them are thought to be either anti-immigration or fed up with the system. They used to be #Nexit, but they dropped that around the time Brexit happened. D’66 is the most globalist party we have. So if we see this growth [of D’66 via] a lot of people who were fed up with the system, which person goes from being fed up with the system to voting pro-globalist, pro-immigration?’
Ninefornews.nl notes this weird phenomenon in the curious change in voting patterns —
Voting behavior during the elections showed bizarre fluctuations. Entire municipalities are switching from PVV to D66, headlines De Telegraaf.
The previous elections were only two years ago, but voting behavior has changed extremely in a short time. In some municipalities, preference has even gone entirely from one side of the political spectrum to the other.
In the north of the Netherlands, many municipalities are said to have switched from Geert Wilders’ PVV to Rob Jetten’s D66. For example, D66 won a significant part of the votes in Heerenveen, Meppel and municipalities around Groningen and Assen. That was not the case in 2023.
D66 won in all municipalities, the PVV lost in all municipalities.
The massive switch is a great surprise. “There is a malodorous smell to this,” notes former diplomat and columnist Johannes Verlood. “A person can change his mind, but a 180 degree turn is rare. And not on a large scale at all.”
This is not normal
When asked whether he suggests election fraud, Verlood answers: “A recount does indeed seem necessary. This is not normal.”
Below is Michel van der Kemp with Geert Wilder’s legitimate reaction, to do with voter fraud.
***
In view of what is reported below, this sounds to us like a card being ready to be played since 2021, given the Rutte government’s selection of its own buddies to validate the country’s election software back then. Readers of this site know that we go with the white-hat theory of our current political/media situation. It’s all a wake-up call. We repeatedly stand by this.
RECAP
-
The Dutch election takes place with an unusually large vote swing to the opposite ideological camp, that of globalism (D’66), contrary to the popular will of the last election (PVV).
-
The initial result is curiously neck and neck, until it tips slightly in favour of the globalists.
-
There’s reasonable doubt cast over the reliability of the election software, a situation that dates back to 2021.
********
MICHEL VAN DER KEMP
It is official: D66 has won the Dutch elections. But Geert Wilders, the big loser compared to previous elections, does not seem to be accepting it.
https://x.com/geertwilderspvv/status/1984273941402411428
Klopt dit bericht? pic.twitter.com/ej92QviOnR
— Geert Wilders (@geertwilderspvv) October 31, 2025
The tweet reads:
“I would like to inform you of the following: The Electoral Council has had the security of the election software OSV2020 — used in determining election results and seat allocation — examined by Hackdefense B.V. The individual linked to this company is a confidential adviser working for D66 (see the D66 website), named Mark Koek. This raises questions for me regarding impartiality and independence in relation to the election results.”
Geert Wilders wonders about the entanglements of D66 with the software company that in 2021 received the assignment from the Ministry of the Interior to investigate the security of the election software.
In 2021, Forum for Democracy had already asked questions about the main author of that report, Mark Koek, because Koek was also party leader for D66 in the municipality of Leiden from 2012-2014, and he was also a member of the city council from 2005-2014. A salient detail is that in 2021 the then-minister was Kajsa Ollongren. She is also from D66. Ollongren awarded the assignment to Hackdefense and then had to answer the questions from FvD about Koek.
ER: Ollongren was a deputy PM and minister in the Mark Rutte III and IV governments between 2017 and 2024 (Wikipedia).
Hackdefense B.V. received the assignment; this company is managed by QCSEC B.V., of which Mark Koek is the founder and director. Koek is also one of the 6 authors of the final report, and the last three versions are solely from his hand.
In response to Geert Wilders’ tweet, the Electoral Council has reacted, and they say that: “the software has been checked by another company.” This turns out to be correct indeed. In 2023, Expleo conducted research on the software. However, Expleo did not perform a “penetration test” but simply checked whether the software met the legal requirements.
LINKS
https://fvd.nl/nieuws/ollongren-liet-verkiezingssoftware-onderzoeken-door-anti-fvd-d66er
https://sleutelstad.nl/2012/06/25/mark-koek-nieuwe-fractievoorzitter-d66-leiden/
Featured image source, Rob Jetten: https://www.theleader.com.au/story/9101012/dutch-centrist-jetten-confident-after-far-right-setback/
Featured image source, Wilders: https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/06/03/the-hard-rights-champion-blows-up-the-dutch-government
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply