UK police accused of covering up complaints over Covid jab

ER Editor: UPDATE – This is Mark Sexton‘s reaction to why some of the major influencers and heavy hitters aren’t picking up on this incredible story, probably applicable EVERYWHERE. Mark explains it all carefully, as per usual —

An update following our evidence reveal yesterday – and a huge thank you to members of the public who have already come forward to provide us with additional information and relevant intel.

The truth about the scale of what has been going on behind the backs of us all is… pic.twitter.com/79tANlMoK5

— ETHICAL APPROACH UK (@EthicalApproach) December 2, 2025

See Mark Attwood on this, too —

“This is Absolutely Fucking Huge”

***

Here is Mark Sexton’s tweet from yesterday via Ethical Approach UK showing the first tranche of evidence of collusion and cover-up by police of evidence of criminality over Covid policy and the so-called ‘vaccines’. That’s down below. First, is the take on this by News Uncut, with Sexton’s Youtube video address.

Deputy Chief Constable Alan Speirs, who confirmed in Sexton’s documents that there was an order not to report Covid crimes, actually made it into the King’s New Year’s Honours List according to this Dec. 31st, 2024 report —

Ex-police chief honoured in King’s list for Inverclyde work

We are taking everything with a large pinch of salt right now. 

********

A NEW tranche of documents alleges that UK police forces were operating under a nationally coordinated practice to block, downgrade, or avoid recording criminal complaints relating to Covid jabs.

The material – published by Ian Clayton and former police officer Mark Sexton as Phase 1 of what they describe as a growing evidence archive – includes a key disclosure from Police Scotland confirming that vaccine-related allegations were not to be accepted by officers.

At the centre of the release is a 25 January 2022 directive issued by Assistant Chief Constable Alan Speirs. The instruction explicitly told officers not to accept public reports concerning Covid “vaccines” – and states it was issued “on the advice of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and UK Gold Command”.

If accurate, this directly contradicts repeated public claims that no national instruction ever existed.

The documents also include:

• evidence of multiple police forces refusing to issue crime numbers for vaccine-related allegations
• national-level communications that appear to shape and standardise local recording practices
• discrepancies between what the NPCC told the Covid Inquiry and what internal documents now suggest
• the non-investigation of a major Metropolitan Police complaint (CRN 6029679/21) despite what Sexton describes as “substantial volumes of evidence”

Ethical Approach UK has now issued formal constitutional correspondence to senior judicial and UK Government figures, placing the documents on public record and demanding answers.

Further phases are promised, with Clayton and Sexton signalling that wider systemic failures – including potential breaches of statutory duties – will follow.

With public scrutiny intensifying and trust in national institutions still fragile post-pandemic, these disclosures raise serious questions about transparency, accountability and the true extent of top-down influence over frontline policing during the Covid era.

Documentation: https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/evidence_file_supplemental_to_correspondence_18112025.pdf
Related video (LINK):

---

Source

Featured image source, Speirs: https://www.greenocktelegraph.co.uk/news/24824110.ex-police-chief-honoured-kings-list-inverclyde-work/

*********

Evidence Release:
Phase 1

Today, we release Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025.

This supplemental file demonstrates, by the provision of police-authored material, that:

• A UK-wide blanket instruction… pic.twitter.com/ZtJiJr8kHn

— ETHICAL APPROACH UK (@EthicalApproach) December 1, 2025

TEXT

Evidence Release: Phase 1 Today, we release Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025.

This supplemental file demonstrates, by the provision of police-authored material, that:

• A UK-wide blanket instruction existed to block the recording and investigation of vaccine-related criminal allegations, confirmed by Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive and corroborated by NPCC internal communications.

• Frontline officers were prevented from accepting evidence, as shown in recorded public interactions and contemporaneous operational materials. • CRN 6029679/21 was never “without foundation” – a still-active evidence portal, hundreds of submitted statements and multiple police assurances confirm that a functioning investigation existed before it was subsequently shut down.

• Judicial findings were made without key material facts, because police did not disclose the full investigative footprint, relevant national guidance or the provenance of the nationwide rejection policy.

This evidence fully supports and substantiates every assertion made in the 18 November correspondence. Importantly, this is only Phase 1. Further releases will follow, each addressing additional strands of the evidential picture. We remain grateful for the extraordinary public support shown so far. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency will continue to guide every step.

PDF download Evidence Release: Phase 1 https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/evidence_file_supplemental_to_correspondence_18112025.pdf The video presentation by @xpcbirmingham, which accompanies this post, can also be seen on YouTube, using the following link: https://youtu.be/rEBkLzH2e_E?si=ibX1Ue5dcGeWmdzV Please take the time to read and share this evidential material, so that everyone has the opportunity to understand what has taken place and what continues to take place.

Source

************

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.