The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon

» ENVIRONMENT
 
 

ENVIRONMENT

yellowstone-volcano-explosion

America’s Extinction Level Event

By TLB Contributor: Dave Hodges

Forget Fukushima and the ecological and climatic damage caused by the Gulf Oil Explosion. These events are child’s play compared to what is coming from Yellowstone super volcano. The problem is that it is impossible to predict when the massive explosion will occur. This event will end life as we know it, but will it happen next week or in 10,000 years? Nobody knows, and for certain, nobody can do anything about it.

I have been ignoring the hysteria and hype surrounding the claims that Yellowstone is a massive super volcano ready to blow its enormous top. Sensationalist journalists have been claiming for years that if there is a volcanic explosion at Yellowstone, it could constitute an extinction level event (ELE). Yeah right! At least, that is what I believed until several months ago

Scientific Justification of the Yellowstone Threat

For years, I have followed the work of New York University theoretical physics professor, Michio Kaku, and his Superstring Theory related to the fact that we live in a multi-dimensional Universe. Since the passing of Carl Sagan, Dr. Kaku is wearing the hat of America’s most prominent scientist.It is safe to say that when Kaku speaks, scientists listen. And lately, he has been speaking about the threat that is the Yellowstone super volcano.

Much to my chagrin, Kaku is on the record of having stated that the super volcano event at Yellowstone would be an extinction level event (ELE).

In the following video, Kaku states that the volcano could erupt at anytime and the earth would no longer support life. Kaku went on to say that the United States would be covered in several feet of volcanic ash. The aerial debris would block out the sun, thus creating nuclear winter and all plant life would die. When all plant life dies, all mammals will soon die as well, mostly from starvation.

Yellowstone erupts every 600,000 years and we are 40,000 years overdue. Kaku goes on to say that the Yellowstone explosion will undoubtedly be an ELE and it is not a matter of if, but a matter of when. In the accompanying video, Kaku speaks to the fact that the ground at Yellowstone has risen dramatically in the past few years, thus increasing the danger of a massive explosion.

 Others Are Beginning to Notice

My friend, Roger Landry, from The Liberty Beacon project, forwarded some very disturbing images that he obtained from the Turner Radio Network. As I discovered, the images are publicly available, and what they demonstrate are very concerning. These images clearly show that Dr. Kaku might want to take a more recent and closer look at the most recent data regarding seismic activity in and around the Caldera at Yellowstone. There is data which demonstrates decidedly more seismic activity in the past week. However, what we do not know, will this increase be enough to trigger a cataclysmic event? Nobody can be sure.

The following is seismic data obtained on February 1, 2014. The time is stamped on the extreme of the column. You will notice that the seismic data exponentially increases toward the end of the graph. How long is the incubation period between greatly increased seismic activity and a volcanic eruption? It has been one year since this report and things are only getting worse!

yellowstone earthquake pre

Click on image to enlarge

How – Here is the second image, with the follow up data which shows that the seismic activity is so great, that the instrument begins to run out of blue/green/red ink which indicates extreme seismic activity.

yellows stone eartch quake post 2

Click on image to enlarge

Please keep in mind that this data shift took place only this week. As Kaku said in his video, we should be watching this very carefully. As it turns out, some people are watching this event. The BBC ran a projection of disaster scenario in the following depiction. Warning: This is a very disturbing image.

SUPERVOLCANO

Take a look at the initial projected ash cloud dispersion, immediately after the volcanic explosion.

Yellowstone Ash mapMore Recently …

Bison fleeing Yellowstone. What do they know that we do not?

 

Yellowstone Volcano: 98 Earthquakes Revealed In Latest Report By USGS

USGS, November 4, 2014

Do We Really Think the Media Would Ever Tell Us the Truth?

yellowstone media

The corporate media would never likely tell the public the truth and even if they did, I am not sure what good it would do. At present, there are some media outlets that are expressing concern, but with great uncertainty.

There are other events which might possibly correlate with these developments and may strongly indicate that some people, the global elite (e.g. Bill Gates), are actually making plans to survive this potential cataclysm.

Connecting the Dots

Because of the volatility of this event, there are going to be people who are going to seek out circumstantial evidence. It is a natural tendency to do so.

Perhaps, William Engdahl was on to something when he published the fact that the elite had buried a seed vault in the Arctic and that the elite are planning for some unidentified disaster. An underground seed vault is exactly what humans would need to survive the resulting nuclear winter arising from any potential Yellowstone massive explosion. Yet, the existence of a seed vault does not necessarily have any relationship to a super volcanic explosion.

Does this potential ELE explain the massive underground tunnels throughout Colorado (the new de facto capital)? We know about these tunnels under Denver International Airport which stretch to Cheyenne Mountain nearly 90 miles away from Denver International Airport. Again, this could be a spurious relationship at best.

FEMA was at one time advertising for contractors who are able to supply medical biohazard disposal capabilities, along with 40 yard dumpsters, to go with 1,000 tent hospitals across the United States. The resultant volcanic ash would fit this paradigm because the air would be unfit to breathe. The emergency rollout of these services must be able to be completed within 24-48 hours. Don’t be fooled by the rapid rollout of resources. As I have previously pointed out, before the authorities realized they had a potential disaster on their hands, it would be too late. FEMA has also obtained 200,000 doctors’ scrubs to be delivered to the 1,000 tent hospitals. That adds up to 20 extra hospitals per state. Aren’t these numbers a tantamount admission that whatever is coming will quickly overwhelm the existing medical services? An ELE would certainly fit into these parameters. However, I still think it is reach to actually come to the conclusion that the elite knows whats coming and that they are preparing for it..

yellowstone magma

There is no intent in this article to spread fear for an event which might not happen in our lifetime. However, given the gravity of this event, we should pay attention to the possibilities.

****************

TLB: Additional reading:

YELLOWSTONE ANIMALS FLEEING PARK. SUPERVOLCANO ERUPTION IMMINENT?

*** FLASH *** INDICATIONS OF SEVERE EARTHQUAKE / ERUPTION AT YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK

World Goes On “High Alert” After Arizona Quake Confirms Worst Fears

*****************

TLB Recommends you visit Dave at The Common Sense Show for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments HERE

Monsanto-Launches-Damage-Control-Over-GMO-Cancer-Study

By Colin Todhunter

When rich companies with politically-connected lobbyists and seats on public bodies bend policies for their own ends, we are in serious trouble. It is then that public institutions become hijacked and our choices, freedoms and rights are destroyed. Corporate interests have too often used their dubious ‘science’, lobbyists, political connections and presence within the heart of governments to subvert institutions set up to supposedly protect the public interest for their own commercial benefit. Once their power has been established, anyone who questions them or who stands in their way can expect a very bumpy ride.

The revolving door between the private sector and government bodies has been well established. In the US, many senior figures from the Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) industry, especially Monsanto, have moved with ease to take up positions with the Food and Drug Administration and Environmental  Protection Agency and within the government. Writer and researcher William F Engdahl writes about a similar influence in Europe, noting the links between the GMO sector within the European Food Safety Authority. He states that over half of the scientists involved in the GMO panel which positively reviewed the Monsanto’s study for GMO maize in 2009, leading to its EU-wide authorization, had links with the biotech industry.

“Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job” – Phil Angell, Monsanto’s director of corporate communications. “Playing God in the Garden” New York Times Magazine,October 25, 1998.

Phil Angell’s statement begs the question: then who should vouchsafe for it, especially when the public bodies have been severely comprised? Monsanto has all angles covered.

When corporate interests are able to gain access to such positions of power, little wonder they have some heavy-duty tools at their disposal to try to fend off criticism by all means necessary.

A well-worn tactic of the pro-GMO lobby is to slur and attack figures that have challenged the ‘science’ and claims of the industry. With threats of lawsuits and UK government pressure, some years ago top research scientist Dr Arpad Pusztai was effectively silenced over his research concerning the dangers of GM food. A campaign was set in motion to destroy his reputation. Professor Seralini and his team’s research was also met with intense industry pressure, with Monsanto effectively targeting the heart of science to secure its commercial interests. There are numerous examples of scientists being targeted like this. A WikiLeaks cable highlighted how GMOs were being forced into European nations by the US ambassador to France who plotted with other US officials to create a ‘retaliatory target list’ of anyone who tried to regulate GMOs. That clearly indicates the power of the industry.

What the GMO sector fails to grasp is that the onus is on it to prove that its products are safe. And it has patently failed to do this. No independent testing was done before Bush senior allowed GMOs onto the US market. The onus should not be on others to prove they are safe (or unsafe) after they are on the market, especially as public attorney Steven Druker‘s book ‘Altered Genes, Twisted Truth’ shows that GMOs are on the US market due to fraudulent practices and the bypassing of scientific evidence pointing to potential health hazards.

We therefore have the right to ask whether we should trust studies carried out by the sector itself that claims GM crops are safe? Let us turn to Tiruvadi Jagadisan for an answer.

He worked with Monsanto for nearly two decades, including eight years as the managing director of India operations. A few years ago, he stated that Monsanto “used to fake scientific data” submitted to government regulatory agencies to get commercial approvals for its products in India. The former Monsanto boss said government regulatory agencies with which the company used to deal with in the 1980s simply depended on data supplied by the company while giving approvals to herbicides. As reported in India Today, he is on record as saying that India’s Central Insecticide Board simply accepted foreign data supplied by Monsanto and did not even have a test tube to validate the data which at times was faked.

Now that scientists such as Professor Seralini are in a sense playing catch-up by testing previously independently untested GMOs, he is attacked. However, the attacks on Seralini and his study have been found to be based on little more than unscientific polemics and industry pressure. In fact, in new study, Seralini highlights the serious flaws of industry-backed studies that were apparently slanted to distort results. It remains to be seen whether he and his team are in for another bout of smears and attacks.

But this is symptomatic of the industry: it says a product is safe, therefore it is – regardless that science is being used as little more than an ideological smokescreen. We are expected to take its claims at face value. The revolving door between top figures at Monsanto and positions at the FDA makes it difficult to see where the line between lobbying and regulation is actually drawn. People are rightly suspicious of the links between the FDA and GMO industry in the US and the links between it and the regulatory body within the EU.

GM represents the so-called “Green Revolution’s” second coming. Agriculture has changed more over the last two generations than it did in the previous 12,000 years. Environmentalist Vandana Shiva (right) notes that, after 1945, chemical manufacturers who had been involved in the weapons industry turned their attention to applying their chemical know-how to farming. As a result ‘dwarf seeds’ were purposively created to specifically respond to their chemicals. Agriculture became transformed into a chemical-dependent industry that has destroyed much biodiversity. What we are left with is crop monocultures, which negatively impact food security and nutrition. In effect, modern agriculture is part of the paradigm of control based on mass standardization and a dependency on corporate products.

The implications have been vast. Chemical-industrial agriculture has proved extremely lucrative for the oil and chemicals industry, courtesy of oil-rich Rockefeller interests which were instrumental in pushing for the green revolution throughout the world, and has served to maintain and promote Western hegemony, not least via ‘structural adjustment’ and the consequent uprooting of traditional farming practices in favour of single-crop export-oriented policies, dam building to cater for what became a highly water intensive industry, loans and indebtedness, boosting demand for the US dollar, etc.

Agriculture has been a major tool of US foreign policy since 1945 and has helped to secure its global hegemony. One must look no further than current events in Ukraine, where the strings attached to financial loans are resulting in the opening up of (GM) agriculture to Monsanto. From Africa to India and across Asia, the hijack of indigenous agriculture and food production by big corporations is a major political issue as farmers struggle for their rights to remain on the land, retain ownership of seeds, grow healthy food and protect their livelihoods.

Apart from tying poorer countries into an unequal system of global trade and reinforcing global inequalities, the corporate hijacking of food and agriculture has had many other implications, not least where health is concerned.

Dr Meryl Hammond, founder of the Campaign for Alternatives to Pesticides, told a Canadian parliament committee in 2009 that a raft of studies published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals point to strong associations between chemical pesticides and a vast range of serious life-threatening health consequences. Shiv Chopra, a top food advisor to the Canadian government, has documented how all kinds of food products that were known to be dangerous were passed by the regulatory authority and put on the market there due to the power of the food industry.

Severe anemia, permanent brain damage, Alzheimer’s, dementia, neurological disorders, reproductive problems, diminished intelligence, impaired immune system, behavioural disorders, cancers, hyperactivity and learning disability are just some of the diseases that numerous studies have linked to our food.

Of course, just like cigarettes and the tobacco industry before, trying to ‘prove’ the glaringly obvious link will take decades as deceit is passed off as ‘science’ or becomes institutionalized due to the hijacking of government bodies by the corporations involved in food production.

But anyone who questions the need for GMOs in the first place and the risks they bring and devastating impacts they have is painted as clueless and indulging in scare mongering and falsehoods, while standing in the way of human progress. But can we expect much better from an industry that has a record of smearing and attempting to ruin people who criticize it? Are those of us who question the political links of big agritech and the nature of its products ready to take lessons on ethics and high-minded notions of ‘human progress’ from anyone involved with it?

This is an industry that has contaminated crops and bullied farmers with lawsuits in North America, an industry whose companies have been charged with and most often found guilty of contaminating the environment and seriously damaging health with PCBs and dioxins, an industry complicit in concealing the deadly impact of GM corn on animals, an industry where bribery seems to be second nature (Monsanto in Indonesia), an industry associated with human rights violations in Brazil and an industry that will not label its foods in the US.

A great myth forwarded by the pro-GMO lobby is that governments are freely choosing to adopt GMOs. Any brief analysis of the politics of GM highlights that this is nonsense. Various pressures are applied and agritech companies have captured policy bodies and have a strategic hold over the WTO and trade deals like the TTIP.

For instance, take the 2005 US-India nuclear deal (allowing India to develop its nuclear sector despite it not being a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and allegedly pushed through with a cash for votes tactic in the Indian parliament). It was linked to the Knowledge Initiative on Agriculture, which was aimed at widening access to India’s agricultural and retail sectors. This initiative was drawn up with the full and direct participation of representatives from various companies, including Monsanto, Cargill and Walmart.

When the most powerful country comes knocking at your door seeking to gain access to your markets, there’s good chance that once its corporate-tipped jackboot is in, you won’t be able to get it out.

And it seems you can’t. So far, Bt cotton has been the only GM crop allowed in India, but the open field trials of many GM crops are now taking place around the country despite an overwhelming consensus of official reports warning against this. The work of numerous public bodies and research institutes is now compromised as a result of Monsanto’s strategic influence within India (see this and this).

If global victory cannot be achieved by the GMO biotech sector via the hijack of public bodies and trade deals or intimidation, then the politics of another form of contamination may eventually suffice:

“The hope of the industry is that over time the market is so flooded [with GMOs] that there’s nothing you can do about it. You just sort of surrender” – Don Westfall, biotech industry consultant and vice-president of Promar International, in the Toronto Star, January 9 2001.

Open field planting is but one way of achieving what Westfall states. Of course, there are numerous other ways too (see this).

As powerful agribusiness concerns seek to ‘consolidate the entire food chain’ with their seed monopolies, patents and GMOs, it is clear that it’s not just the health of the nation (any nation) that is at stake but the global control of food and by implication nations.

“What you are seeing is not just a consolidation of seed companies, it’s really a consolidation of the entire food chain” – Robert Fraley, co-president of Monsanto’s agricultural sector 1996, in the Farm Journal. Quoted in: Flint J. (1998) Agricultural industry giants moving towards genetic monopolism. Telepolis, Heise.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

See featured article here

TLB recommends you visit Global Research for more great articles and pertinent information.

Heavy-Metals

By TLB Contributor: Anna Rodgers

Yes. You have read correctly, but this statement sure as heck didn’t come from me. I know that the opposite is true, that heavy metals and other toxins are incredibly dangerous and natural chemicals are far safer than synthetics. But there are many people and organizations out there, (with history proving time and time again) that just don’t want you to think this way.

They want you to ignore the truth and to live a life where you don’t take any control over your health, where you continue to buy all of the toxic products, dangerous medications and most importantly, do not take a stand about what the annual 3 trillion dollar chemical industry has done to all of us.

Let me tell you the back ground story of who is behind this ridiculous and very dangerous statement. Back in May of this year, one of the most popular newspapers in the UK, The Sun, wrote about my newly released, controversial book Toxic World, Toxic People.  On page 6, there was a full page dedicated to one of the chapters, Common Deadly Environmental Toxins from my book.

The article, What’s Your Poison by  journalist Helen Glibert, discussed 4 common toxins that we are all surrounded by daily. These 4 are, aluminum, mercury, lead and cadmium. Surprisingly, Helen wrote a credible piece, highlighting that aluminum exposure (and accumulation) can trigger cancer and lead to Alzheimer’s. [1] She also pointed out how mercury from fillings can leak, and prove to be toxic to the body. [2]

For me personally, to see the truth exposed in a mainstream media outlet was very exciting. Would people finally take notice and realize we are all being bombarded with heavy metals and chemicals in our daily lives?

Within a few days, the article and I had been targeted by a group called ‘Sense About Science’, who wrote a truly ridiculous response to the article. Their article titled The Moon – Tackling Misconceptions About Chemicals’  [3] was to tell the public that I was scaring people, there’s nothing to worry about when it comes to proven deadly neurotoxins such as mercury, aluminum, and lead.

Now, I’m assuming those that read Collective Evolution are a pretty cluey bunch of people – you don’t take crap, you know when someone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes, and you mostly likely are aware of things that most others are not. You also probably know that there’s a serious amount of people out there who want the truth about our health concealed, mainly in the name of corporate profit.

After I saw Sense About Science take a little hit at me, I decided to do some digging to see who these nancy naysayers actually were. Did they have credibility, who and what else do they ridicule and where the heck did they get their funding from?

The Bullies Of All Things ‘Alternative’

Well, it sure didn’t take me long to realize my suspicions were absolutely right on the money.

This organization is known to target anything and everything ‘alternative’. They rubbish homeopathy, are pro-vaccine, have very strong ties to GMO’s, are connected to political groups and have been behind some pretty nasty bullying campaigns targeting authors such as Patrick Holdford who wrote the groundbreaking book Food Is Better Medicine Than Drugs. I’ve since read a lot about this group and boy, they are certainly very dirty players.

And take a guess where Sense About Science get their funding from…a whole bunch of Cancer organizations, Alzheimer Societies, Drug Companies AND Chemical companies.  Yep, you can see it for yourself, right here.

When I discovered this, I suddenly became very aware that what I have written about in my book has made me a target by the chemical industry. They see this, along with all the other authors out there like me, trying to bring awareness to what the chemical industry has done to us, as a threat – we are exposing stuff they want people to ignore. Perhaps because they’ve got trillions of dollars at stake.

Imagine that the world suddenly all came to the realization that chemicals are causing most of the cancers, or that aluminum exposure (which we all come into contact with on a daily basis from our foods, beauty products, the air we breathe, the water we drink and medications we take) is the main reason behind the monstrous rise in Alzheimer’s and that we just finally realized collectively we have been, and still are, being lied to on a daily basis.  What would we say to the people and organizations that have been perpetuating these lies and hurting us and our children for decades?

anna-4570 copy

When we know that childhood cancers are the highest they have ever been in all of history, and that if all of this is possibly linked to chemicals, then god damn those companies who put these chemicals out into the world without doing the proper safety testing. They are responsible for destroying the lives of our friends, our family and our children.

‘They’ lied to us about DDT, and said it was safe. We now know undeniably it’s not, because after much pressure, they banned it. They lied to us about lead, a fatally toxic substance. It lowers children’s IQ, harms bone density and causes both concentration problems and behavioural issues such as is commonly seen in autistic children. Lead was also finally banned.

We all know ‘they’ tried to keep the truth about smoking hidden as long as they could. They tried dirty tactics, paid people off, used doctors and scientists to say it was safe until the people rose up and finally sued the tobacco industry.

The question begs, how many other lies are we being told on a daily basis about what is toxic or not?

I wrote the book Toxic World Toxic People to help answer questions like these, and to provide people with solutions as to how to try and beat this chemical epidemic. I’m a mother and I want my daughter  (as well as you and your kids) to have a fighting chance at being healthy. Our kids, and everyone else for that matter, deserve better and we’ve got to fight for it.

For more information check out my highly regarded book, Toxic World Toxic People – The Essential Guide To Health, Happiness, Parenting & Conscious Living, available on Amazon and for free on Kindle.

References:

1) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24779346
2) http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/04/07/dangers-of-mercury-contamination.aspx
3) http://www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/Project_Being_responsive/The_Moon_-_Tackling_Misconceptions_About_Chemicals.pdf

About The Author:

anna

Anna Rodgers is an Australian born blogger, founder of Missecoglam.com and travel writer for Yoga magazine. She is an ex ‘eco’ model and was the face of St Erasmus Ethical Jewelery for three seasons. Anna is also the author of the recipe book Simply The Best – 100 Living Food Recipes by 22 of The Worlds Most Talented Raw Chefs.  Her health and well-being book aimed at teens is due for release for the end 2015.  Anna lives in East Sussex with her husband Nathan and daughter Lola.

****************

TLB recommends you visit Collective Evolution for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article HERE

Geoengineering

Commentary by TLB Contributor: Bruce Robinson

One thing I have learned about this game which is played out on us, particularly in our skies, is that our chess opponents not only changed the rules without our knowledge but that they are always several moves ahead. As history has shown we are consistently trailing in the game on the table. We have learned more than we knew in the beginning of the game but the gap between us and our opponents always remains the same.

Our opponents are skilled in games of deceit and deception. They’ve easily predicted at what point we would recognize the strategy of their previous moves and they laugh at us. They mock us for not knowing that which they have taken much effort in concealing from us, and then somehow believe they have superior skills and abilities. That is a mistake which will cost them in the long run. They incorrectly interpret their slight-of-hand, and their rearranging of the board when we leave the room, as skill when in fact is only a testament of their desire to win no matter how corrupt and scandalous their actions prove to be.

From watching us at a distance, and long before we accepted the challenge, they were rigging the game. They have come to learn we would focus upon the last move of theirs that we were aware of and count on us to dwell on the most resent observations and argue among ourselves. They know they will have the opportunity to adjust any of the boards pieces to their liking while some of us think in one direction and others of us think in a different direction. They are calculating and ruthless, not naive or ignorant.

chemtrails 2

We are just beginning to know for certain that which we have always expected. We know the depth of the lies and deceit used to draw us into the game. A game we never wanted to play at all, yet are forced to for the good of all. Absolute moral corruption has been the catalyst that allows for their unfair advantage. We know of their illicit actions culminating in their ill gotten gains. We recognize their ugly yet shrewd methods in predicting our responses to their actions. This is not catching up in any degree, we remain far behind. The reason for this is they have already known from experience, precisely where… and why… we would be where we are now, and they knew it from the beginning. When an opponent is devoid of morals and bankrupt in principles and character, the sinister plans they make as they sacrifice their own should be telling that this is not just a game; It’s endgame.

To me, it makes perfect sense that perhaps what we know, is precisely what they wanted us to know. They have fed us all along. To remain ahead in the game, it would be to their advantage to try and send us spinning off in some other direction far from where the game and truth is really being played out. Providing us with enough (dis)information about their game to keep us from guessing the true nature of the board that sits between us. They have known all along where we would be at any given time so we must assume they know exactly where we are at now…They have already determined our next moves. That needs to change.

I don’t pretend to have the answers which might resemble some form of truth, but from watching the game from the sidelines, and sometimes on the field, I find it is reasonable to conclude that our search for understanding of what is going on in the sky’s above us might not include any of the conclusions we have come to up thus far. There may be multiple purposes. There may be red herrings. Rest assured it is not what we think.

chemtrails 1

Our disadvantage in following the movement of their board pieces is what they rely upon to win. They require staying far enough ahead of us for them to count that “checkmate” if left playing the game as usual, will be upon us before we could even have imagined. Given the practices in this peculiar game, regular strategies will be played out to demise; figuratively and quite possibly literally. We are at the point where the clock is simply running out. Any of our anticipated moves will be countered with checkmate… with utter and complete predictability.

So if we play by the rules and counter each of their moves with a consistent predictability, then we have already lost. And they know that. What they don’t know is our ability to be unpredictable, to change the board, the pieces, and even give the game a new name. They can’t compete with the imagination we are capable of. We need to tap that resource. There is no thinking inside or outside of the box because boxes imply there are limitations.

We can imagine, and we will have to zone in on what might be worth their magnanimous efforts to steer us wrong. What will be the result they seek? It must be as large as their diversion techniques. It can’t be those of which we have deliberately been caused to believe. Remember, they began this game knowing each play and how it would end. Instead of logical and rational conclusions, we need to sidestep what appears obvious. We need to think worthy of biblical and global proportions.

Let’s take the lead by discovering “what” instead of why, “when” rather than how, and “where” instead of whom. They will be no match for us, our collective imagination, or any degree of predictability when it becomes out turn to determine the rules.

Video added by TLB: This is one of those videos that is a shock to the system. Hats off to a great TLB partner, Dane Wigington, for this outstanding presentation.

Dane Wigington presents (above video) hard data which reveals what these catastrophic programs have done to our planet to date and what they will do if they are allowed to continue. Please take the time to watch this video, follow up with some investigation of his website … GeoEngineering Watch

 

red-dot-fukushima-fallout

Preface by: Roger Landry (TLB)

I get so tired of research that constantly leads me to facts or promises of ultimate or inevitable doom. Geo-engineering methane release, GMO horizontal gene transfer, Perpetual or Nuclear war, Fukushima etc… Today humanity is confronted by so many catastrophic issues and so few reliable … workable solutions!

I have been following the Fukushima catastrophe since its inception, tracking the radiation onslaught, as well as its migration across the ocean and by now across the globe. This never ending scenario has already wreaked havoc to the Pacific oceans biosphere killing or exterminating most life in its path, with no sign of relief.

I seriously needed someone to say they had a viable solution to what may just very well be the most catastrophic industrial incident (nuclear or not) in history, with some saying it may be the equivalent of Chernobyl x 4,000. It was a long and not very hopeful search … but eventually I found the attached article. Yes there is hope …

This discussion below took place over a year ago, so why is it not being heralded by the mainstream media? Why is is not common knowledge? Why has this not been implemented to stem the tide of radiation induced destruction rampaging across the Pacific ocean? If we could only get our respective governments to listen and become involved in the process.

Unless they don’t wish an end to this disaster … Hmmm ???

TLB will follow this article up with information as to the progress of the Keshe foundation over the past 11 months in the next article in this 2 part series.

Please read and watch more …

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Fukushima-Fallout

Keshe Foundation, Plasma Physics May Hold Key to Decontaminating Fukushima

By: Jefferey Jaxen

On January 6th, 2013 Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot hosted four essential minds to discuss the continued debacle in Fukushima, as well as the recent bold public statements made by Mehran Keshe and his Keshe foundation. What ensued is sure to set minds in motion with of a new wave of ideas. Among the all-star cast included Merhan Keshe, Dr. Richard Alan Miller, Mike Harris and Matthew Stein. The broadcast had all the excitement, anticipation, and horror of the 1986 Challenger disaster. The good news: technologies very well may exist to “slow or curtail” the Fukushima disaster today. The bad news: there has been and continues to be a complete media blackout of all important Fukushima information and humanity finds itself late to the party currently.

SOME FACTS AS THEY STAND TODAY

Keshe kicked off the live stream with a major info dump that would have kept Tesla’s attention. As he has watched the Fukushima disaster unfold with the rest of us, he stated his concern that “there are many truths that have not been told. There has been a huge amount of radioactivity released and now the situation is critical. It has went from bad to worse to ridiculous.” Dr. Richard Alan Miller echoed the thoughts of surely 99.9% of all biologists and physicists living in realty by stating “I don’t have an answer, I have concerns”. He wisely stated that in addition to talking about clean-up, every single reactor needs to be turned off. They are all 20 years old and leaking.” This statement is backed up by many prominent voices in the anti-nuclear movement, among them Arnie Gunderson, Dr. Helen Caldicott, and Dr. Christopher Busby. Mike Harris agreed by stating “I think it’s time for criminal prosecutions for the boards of directors and to power down reactors worldwide.” Regarding North America, Dr. Richard Alan Miller stated, “We have enough indicators that the radiation is already here”, citing findings of plutonium particles in Arizona & Colorado.

POSSIBLE FUKUSHIMA SOLUTIONS: KESHE FOUNDATION

In addition to his library of past public  research and findings, Keshe’s publically released statements have effectively put his foundation and his name on the line. From those points alone, he, his foundation, and their discoveries carry strong integrity and promise. Keshe’s technologies focus heavily on plasma state physics. More directly, the plasma has a core that creates its own gravitational field and atmosphere. This natural process releases magnetic energy creating an environment that can attract various radioactive particles. He claims this can be done with solid and liquid matter. If that is the case, this would translate into soil and water having the radioactive particles ripped from them, essentially restoring the matter to its original state. The question would still remain of what to do with the radioactive material once it has become separated.

Keshe’s goes on to say that “this process would only take a couple of days” and estimates that in five years, 80% of Fukushima could be decontaminated. This thinking is certainly moving in the right direction. Keshe and his foundation have received no communication from the Japanese government, Tepco, or IAEA despite repeated attempts to reach out. With this in mind, he has put a deadline of January 30th, 2014 on their dishonorable silence. After which time, he states that he will go forward with “teaching workshops to the Japanese people” given the fact this the “technology and materials are available now”. Meanwhile, Tepco remains hard at work using duct tape, Yakuza members, and the homeless in what continues to amount to a radioactive Rubik’s cube of problems in Fukushima Prefecture. This latest broadcast provides a much needed glimmer of hope for the seemingly dire situation.

Jefferey Jaxen:Facebook | Twitter
Alternative/Holistic Health Director Flower of Life Center &
The AwakeandEmpoweredExpo.com, Published Researcher, Writer

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TLB recommends you visit Awake and Empowered Expo for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured (attached) article here

 

Monsanto deception

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

We are very aware of the ultimate dangers inherent in GMOs and their associated bio-toxins, just as we are becoming more aware of the inherent dangers associated with weather modification or Geo-engineering.

We also know Monsanto (along with the rest of the biotech cabal) via the courts, congress, trade agreements and patents is facilitating a takeover of the global food supply. But what about their ties to Geo-engineering?

Why is Monsanto developing and patenting seeds that can grow and thrive in soil afflicted by Geo-engineering?

YES Monsanto DOES own patents that appear to mitigate the effects of Geo-engineering, that can be applied to a whole host of fruits, trees, grains and veggies. A quick patent search brings up 3,981 hits for Monsanto and Stress Tolerance. Mendel Biotechnology is partners with Monsanto in several of these patents. This is taken from one of the joint patents:

The claimed invention, in the field of functional genomics and the characterization of plant genes for the improvement of plants, was made by or on behalf of Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. and Monsanto Corporation as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement in effect on or before the date the claimed invention was made.

Here is a patent titled “Stress tolerant plants and methods thereof,” that is owned by Monsanto, and seems to address all forms of abiotic stress that weather manipulation and chemtrails can cause:

Read more here: Monsanto Patents and Chemtrails

What better way to grab absolute control of said food supply, than to have a patent on the only seeds that can and will grow in this afflicted soil?

So when see that, and ask WHY Monsanto purchased a Climate Company, or how deeply are they involved in artificial weather modification … the answers should be obvious and connecting the dots a slam dunk.

Please read on …

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Monsanto Has Purchased “Climate Corporation” For Nearly A Billion Dollars, Why?

By TLB Contributor: Dane Wigington

Monsanto purchased “The Climate Corporation” in 2013, why? Because those who are connected to the climate engineering insanity (and the decimation it is causing) need to control the flow of information in order to better capitalize from the ever increasing engineered disasters.

Controlling the message makes for better manipulation of the farmers struggling from the geoengineered destruction. The post below was sent to me from activist Melody Meachum, my gratitude to her for this. It is a summary of statements made by Monsanto and the Climate Corporation just prior to the purchase being completed, the message is sickening for those that know the truth of the matter. Monsanto and Climate Corporation state how much they will be able to help the agriculture communities when in reality their goals have long since been clear to any who investigate, to capitalize off the engineered decimation being carried out on our planet.

DaneSFMonsantoI spoke in front of “The Climate Corporation” headquarters in San Francisco at the request of the “March Against Monsanto” group. At this event I made clear the connection between Monsanto, The Climate Corporation, and climate engineering (the photo was taken at this event).  Below is a short comment from Melody Meachum followed by the carefully crafted public propaganda message from the Monsanto/Climate Corporation merger group.

geoengineeringwatch.org

****************

The Monsanto/Climate Corporation Machine Of Deception

So now Monsanto brings us not only GMO, but weather control!

This was taken from the Michigan Farm News website, but the Farm Bureau organization nationally and within states are huge advertisers/sellers of Crop Insurance.

Seems that everything on this planet has boiled down to money. Period!

Continue reading here

****************

TLB recommends you visit GeoEngineering Watch for more pertinent articles and information.

 

Earth 1a

Listen to this asinine backwards thinking from a group of professional climatologists, pleading justification for a continuance, to reign its geoenineering assault upon our earth; demanding that it is a necessary evil to mitigate solar radiation impacting the surface, which, on the other hand, has such abysmal side effects that would make our planet uninhabitable.

The Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that, despite global side effects and long-term consequences, geoengineering techniques involving solar radiation management (SRM) should be maintained:

Solar radiation management comprises various techniques aimed at reflecting or diverting solar radiation back into space, essentially increasing the planet’s albedo (reflectivity). Many geoengineers, along with the IPCC, prefer solar radiation management methods to carbon dioxide removal as a climate fix, given the planet’s complex carbon feedback loops, and the much cheaper and quicker method of spraying our skies with albedo-enhancing particles.

Contained within these albedo-enhancing particles is a toxic blend of elements hazardous to all organic life on the surface of the earth.

“Block the sun but continue to spew billions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere,” is how Eli Kintisch characterizes SRM in his 2010 book, Hack the Planet. [3] In a world run by sanity, we would forego fossil fuels for free and abundant solar energy, coupled with Tesla’s development of free electricity, to meet the world’s energy needs, without destroying our nest by extracting and burning fossil fuels.

As long as carbon aspirating dinosaurs populate the growing, wealthy phallic symbols that pierce the sky, where the enchantment from fat bottom-lines is more alluring than a concern for life, you can kiss our host, Gaia, Mother Earth goodbye.

Solar radiation management has “three essential characteristics,” notes the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). “It is cheap, fast and imperfect,” [4] Citing geoengineering activist, David Keith, the IRGC explains that by injecting 13,000 tons of sulphate aerosol into the stratosphere on a daily basis, they would offset the radiative effects of a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This compares to having to remove “225 million tons per day of CO2 from the atmosphere for 25 years.”

Were reason to prevail, we would capture solar energy, not block it; we would shun fossil fuels, not wage ecocidal wars to seize remaining supplies. In today’s world, however, policymakers have diverted billions of dollars into blocking the sun.  Efficient systems cost around $10 billion a year, “well within the budgets of most countries,” notes the IRGC.

Meanwhile, On November 21st, 2014, another, diverse group of concerned professionals assembled in Northern California to discuss the profound environmental and human health dangers posed by the ongoing global climate engineering programs. This very important panel was completely ignored by the Public Relations Firms of Mainstream News organizations.

sun earth HARRP ionosphere

In other posts, Dane Wigington has made it perfectly clear that once the ‘science’ of Geo-engineering has pushed our planet beyond the point of any comfortable return to a natural semblance of balance, there won’t be any other options but to continue the application of this reckless ‘science.’ In other words, like a rubber band, violently stretched to its limits–the new normal–any sudden release would invite a catastrophic, re-percussive whiplash, as the envelope of Earth’s ecosystem snaps back to its own determined equilibrium.

Article source: amunaor.com

health_dangers_gmo2

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

80-90% of everything you buy to feed your family or loved ones is genetically modified (GMO)  or genetically engineered (GE) in one fashion or another making them almost impossible to avoid … unless you know what to look for. Scientists from across the planet have been heralding their dangers to the human physiology and the biosphere for well over a decade, to no avail.

But the bio-toxins approved for use on these frankenfoods being Glyphosate, or the main active ingredient in Agent Orange, 2,4-D, and now Enlist Duo (a combination of both ), present an even more “clear and present danger” of an increased magnitude over the foods they are designed to protect. These frankentoxins are linked to the promotion of sterility, cancer, kidney disease and a myriad of other maladies, the list being too lengthy to mention here. These are three of the most evil Genetically Engineered Bio-toxins ever developed, and peer reviewed studies and historical data prove this out with more information to this effect being published almost daily.

The problem is you are not made aware of what is and is not genetically modified, or sprayed with genetically engineered bio-toxins in the form of toxic herbicides or pesticides, because labeling is not required by our government (and if they have their way, it never will be).

There are thousands of highly respected scientists and researchers globally screaming at the top of their lungs “STOP GMO’s & these Biotoxins” for the sake of humanity and the biosphere. The great GMO experiment is a colossal failure by any scientific peer reviewed research … unless you consider the actual intention was and is to cull the herd. None of this is a guess, it is a peer reviewed fact that anyone can research from readily available information.

Please click on the above active links (blue text) for additional information and watch the attached video …

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GMO Food — It’s Worse Than We Thought

Russell Blaylock M.D

Editor’s Note: This video blows the lid off the GMO controversy and exposes little-known dangers. Plus, you’ll see exactly how to avoid GMOs in their many hidden forms, in grocery stores and in restaurants.

Newsmax editor: Travis Davis, health publisher at Newsmax, previewed Dr. Blaylock’s presentation for our readers and reports: “GMOs enter your body through thousands of packaged and canned food products, through fresh produce, and through the meat, chicken, and fish you eat. The expert help Dr. Blaylock offers in this video reveals everything you need to know to avoid GMOs at the grocery store as well as restaurants.”

Since the introduction of GMO foods, many cancers and other diseases have skyrocketed in humans. Can this really be a coincidence? Please use the information available in this online educational presentation, Cracking the GMO Code to help protect your own health — and the health of your family.

Renowned former neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., left conventional medicine after decades of practice to concentrate on nutrition and disease prevention. He is the author of several health books and medical editor of The Blaylock Wellness Report.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

See original video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wA2GhOCtmBE

 

http://www.newsmax.com/

Argentina GMO suit 1

Class action lawsuit attacks GMOs for environmental damage and health impacts

A federal judge in Argentina has ruled that an unprecedented class action lawsuit, demanding a ban on the release of GMOs and their associated pesticides, can proceed.

The lawsuit asks the government to provisionally suspend the uncontrolled open release of GMOs – for example, the sale of RR2 Pro/Liberty soybeans – on the grounds that they violate seed laws. The lawsuit also demands labeling of GMOs.

The lawsuit further argues for “a ban on the application of pesticides used for farming until their safety for the environment, ecosystems, biodiversity, the health of living beings, the cultural heritage of the Argentine people, and the sustainability of the production model is scientifically proven”.

The lawsuit primarily attacks GMOs for their contribution to the trend towards monoculture, direct seeding with consequent reduction of rural labor, economic concentration in the hands of few producers, and impacts on the health of rural populations and the environment.

The lawsuit demands that the commercialization of new GMOs is not permitted in the country. It is titled, “Gimenez Alicia Fanny and others against the national government, Monsanto and others, over environmental damage“.

The defendants are the Argentine national government, the Federal Council for the Environment, and a group of companies, including Monsanto, Syngenta, DuPont, Novartis, Nidera, Dow Agrosciences, Pioneer, Agrevo, Ciba Geigy, Argenbio, and Bayer, that produce and sell GMOs and the agrochemicals tied to their use.

The lawsuit also urges the Legislature to pass a biosafety law, set minimum standards for use of soil resources, and order the defendants to “rebuild” or “repair” environmental damage caused by the GMO farming model. This would be achieved through the reintroduction of non-GMO cultivars and wild species, and the rebuilding of soil. If these measures are not possible, the lawsuit demands that the companies be ordered to pay compensation.

Sources:

(Spanish, 2015): http://www.lacapital.com.ar/economia/La-Justicia-federal-admitio-una-demanda-colectiva-ambiental-contra-los-OGM-20150620-0020.html

(Spanish, 2013): http://www.lacapital.com.ar/la-region/Presentaron-una-demanda-colectiva-por-el-uso-de-transgenicos-20130217-0027.html

****************

TLB recommends you visit GM WATCH for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article here

chemtrails

By TLB Contributor: Mona Lidji Fishman

Mona“LOOK UP! The Sky Is Falling!” Geo-Engineering, aka : Chemtrail activists earlier looked on as “Conspiracy Theorists” are now being more widely accepted as “Conspiracy Fact- Tellers”. You can’t go shopping without noticing the streaks being sprayed in the sky as you unload the groceries into your car. Mention “Chemtrails” and the young employee in the parking lot is aware of them and chimes right in! More and more scientific proof that Chemtrails are real, including a quote by Dennis Kucinich when referring to the weather warfare bill in 2001 legislation HR2977, are being presented to the public via internet, and even some on tv on the History Channel discussing Weather Warfare.

Movies and award-winning documentaries with scientists and scientific proof; such as ” What In The World Are They Spraying?” and “Why In The World Are They Spraying?” are offered for free viewing on YouTube, and have been viewed by millions…..but not millions enough, as the problem is becoming more ferocious as the aerosol spraying has increased in not only volume of spray, but also in the frequency in which they spray. It’s definitely not just for sky-writing any more!

These days, we are so conditioned to seeing the streaks in the sky that many don’t even notice them. Burning eyes, allergies, always blamed on something else. “Contrails ” are vapor trails which dissipate within 5 minutes. “Chemtrails” stay up there and spread into fake metal blobs in the sky. Doctors argue, if they are vapors, then “Why do some planes discharge and others flying next to them do not? Are the ones who are not discharging supposedly flying with their engines off?” This is a global problem, not only the United States, but these trails made of barium and aluminum metals are being sprayed around the world and are effecting every living being on our planet.

Anyway, I had written a fun song describing Chemtrails, and had originally titled it” Ignorance Is Bliss”, and then re-recorded it with the talented Dale Bozzio of the band Missing Persons.I had been searching for a famous artist to record the Chemtrails song, and Dale fit the bill perfectly. Even though the subject is serious, the song is light-hearted , so enjoy.

I have included my Chemtrails song here, as well as some useful videos should you decide to explore the possibility that man IS effecting the weather with Chemtrails, yet NO MENTION OF CHEMTRAILS AT THE CLIMATE SUMMIT WHATSOEVER?! They know we are too busy looking DOWN at our iPhones to notice. Well, it’s time to ” Look UP!

By the way, one of my favorite artists, Prince, has spoken out about Chemtrails in the past. Bravo to you Prince, and fun-trivia : Prince had worked with Dale Bozzio in the past! I’m including the link of Prince’s discussion about Chemtrails, as well. I am also including a video by ex-FBI Chief Ted Gunderson, which should be official enough to satisfy the skeptics.

I don’t put anything past our government since I learned of the massive cure-blocking achieved by our FDA ( See my War On Drugs article on this site in my archives for more info on that). EDTA Chelation is the only thing that can remove toxic heavy metals from your body, and a Chelation song was going to be the subject of my first song. Then I discovered Ron Paul, and knew I could do more good by helping him and his ideals take hold, therefore ending the reign of cure-blocking and lies that we have experienced since cable tv and the media took charge.

Two full length presentation/documentaries containing a plethora of information. Watch and learn because … It is what you don’t know that will harm you and your children most!

As always, I am a grass roots supporter and do not speak on behalf of Ron or Rand Paul. All of my Liberty music is available for free uploads at my soundcloud channel www.soundcloud.com/Mona-Lidji-Fishman

To find our more about Mona, please visit her HERE




  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 766 other subscribers