The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon



corn isolated on white background

Health Impact News Editor Comments

With more and more people waking up to the dangers and false claims being made for vaccines today, it is becoming more difficult for the pharmaceutical lobbyists to enact mandatory vaccination laws at the local level. A recent bill in Colorado was defeated when citizens turned out to oppose legislation that would have prohibited vaccine exemptions.

Are pharmaceutical companies now looking for new ways to market their vaccines that bypass the freedom to choose completely without the consumer even realizing they are consuming their products? The chemical industry, after all, has been successful for years in getting municipalities to put fluoride in public water supplies completely bypassing consumer choice.

Recently obtained information through a Freedom of Information Act request shows that pharmaceutical companies and biotech are teaming up to produce genetically modified corn that will contain vaccines like hepatitis B. If successful, “mandatory vaccines” could take on a whole new meaning in the United States.

Bill Lambrecht of the San Francisco Gate is reporting today that there are secret locations along California’s Central Coast where plots of experimental genetically engineered corn are producing proteins for industrial and pharmaceutical uses, including an experimental vaccine for hepatitis B.

The GMO test plots are part of a trial conducted by Applied Biotechnology. Lambrecht reports that details of Applied Biotechnology’s inspections and hundreds of other secret GMO field trials were obtained by Hearst Newspapers under Freedom of Information laws. The Hearst Family has several thousands of acres of land in central California, including the Hearst Castle, which is a museum today. Much of the land is used for grazing grass-fed beef, as central California is well-known for its sustainable organic agriculture.

Lambrecht’s report is quite concerning, as it shows the experimental GMO corn is growing with federal approval 100 feet from a steelhead stream in San Luis Obispo County, and in a designated critical habitat for wildlife such as the threatened California red-legged frog. He reports that the Agriculture Department inspectors have reported two “incidents” at the site, including conventional corn sprouting in a 50-foot fallow zone, but that the findings did not even result in a fine or warning for Applied Biotechnology Institute Inc.

The report also shows that the founder and president of Applied Biotechnology has had a troubled past in experimental GMO corn field trials:

The founder and president of Applied Biotechnology, John A. Howard, previously founded another company that was permanently banned from trials of genetically modified organisms – GMOs – after creating such contaminated messes in the Midwest that a half-million bushels of soybeans and more than 150 acres of corn had to be destroyed.

Before starting Applied Biotechnology Institute in California, Howard set up ProdiGene Inc. of College Station, Texas, in the late 1990s and carried the title of chief scientific officer.

But that company encountered such contamination problems with its APHIS-approved field trials that the Agriculture Department eventually forced it out of the business of growing pharmaceutical plants.

In 2002 – the year Howard says he parted ways with ProdiGene – APHIS disclosed that corn plants from ProdiGene’s field test a year earlier in Nebraska were sprouting in a field of soybeans planted at the site. But before the corn could be removed, the potentially contaminated soybeans were harvested. All 500,000 bushels had to be destroyed.

Also in 2002, ProdiGene was forced to burn 155 acres of corn near the site of a field trial in Iowa after pharmaceutical plants were found growing illegally. ProdiGene was fined $250,000.

In addition, the Agriculture Department purchased, hauled and destroyed the adulterated soybeans at a cost of $3.5 million, and gave ProdiGene two years interest-free to pay the government back.

ProdiGene’s problems persisted. In 2004, an inspector found that oats growing alongside one of the company’s test corn sites in Nebraska had been baled for animal feed. In addition, engineered corn was sprouting in a nearby sorghum field.

It took three years, but this time, APHIS came down hard. In 2007, ProdiGene received a modest $3,500 fine but agreed that neither it nor “its successors in interest” would ever again apply to the Agriculture Department for permission to introduce GMOs into the environment. (Source.)

So why is this guy allowed to continue to experiment with GMO corn? Apparently, he believes that because he is involved in vaccine research, it shields him from much of the current criticism surrounding GMO technology. Lambrecht writes:

He believes that his quest to produce a hepatitis B vaccine insulates him from some of the opposition to genetically modified foods.

“It’s harder to make up some Frankenstein scenario where this is terrible when the outcome of not doing it is that people die,” he said.

So once again, we see “science” replaced with blind faith, in this case faith in the religion of vaccines, trumping the freedom to choose: freedom to choose one’s own faith, one’s own health choices, and one’s own food choices.

Read the full article here, which contains quite a bit more information about how the federal government has very little oversight over these experimental GMO field trials.


TLB recommends you visit Health Impact News Daily for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:


Exactly one month ago I wrote about, and charted the alarming spread of the Ebola virus. As I explained in the article, the virus is behaving very strangely. It doesn’t become infectious until the person shows symptoms, it isn’t airborne and it’s extremely lethal; all conditions that would normally keep a virus from reaching an epidemic status. And yet it continues to spread like wildfire.

By the time I had the opportunity to write about it, 800 people had died in the span of over 5 months. Now one month later, the number of deaths has nearly doubled to over 1500 people. Extrapolating on that trend, it would not be surprising to see the virus infect over a hundred thousand people by December.

Despite the uncharacteristic spread of the virus, it isn’t the oddest thing to come out of the news lately. Recently it was found that the Ebola virus had spread to the Congo, and a total of 31 people have died of the infection. In a strange twist, however, that outbreak ended up being completely unrelated to the Ebola in Western Africa:

The World Health Organization has just confirmed that the newly-identified cases of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in the Democratic Republic of Congo is genetically unrelated to the strain currently circulating in Liberia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Nigeria.

A WHO collaborating research center in Franceville, Gabon, the Centre International de Recherches Médicales, had previously identified six Ebola positive samples sent to the laboratory. They report today that, “the virus in the Boende district is definitely not derived from the virus strain currently circulating in west Africa.”

What are the odds? I mean, Ebola outbreaks don’t just happen every day. While it could be completely coincidental, this Ebola strain happens to be spreading just as fast as the West African outbreak. The first confirmed death in Congo occurred on August 11th, from a woman who was supposedly infected from eating bushmeat. Now, just shy of a month later there have been 53 cases and 31 deaths.

To put that in perspective, the last Ebola outbreak in the DRC killed 36 people between June and November of 2012. Another Congo outbreak killed 14 people between December of 2008 and February of 2009. 31 deaths over the course of 3 weeks is completely out of the ordinary, especially in the rural isolated community where this outbreak first occurred.

I think now may be a good time to strap on our tinfoil hats, because this is downright creepy. The rapid infection rate of the West African virus leads me to believe that this is a mutated strain, with a greater capability of infecting humans. Researchers in the field have come to the same conclusion:

For starters, the data show that the virus is rapidly accumulating new mutations as it spreads through people. “We’ve found over 250 mutations that are changing in real time as we’re watching,” Sabeti says.

While moving through the human population in West Africa, she says, the virus has been collecting mutations about twice as quickly as it did while circulating among animals in the past decade or so.

“The more time you give a virus to mutate and the more human-to-human transmission you see,” she says, “the more opportunities you give it to fall upon some [mutation] that could make it more easily transmissible or more pathogenic.”

Meanwhile the Congo Virus is also infecting humans at a rate far above previous outbreaks. Mind you, this is a separate strain existing roughly 2000 miles away from the West African virus. And yet it’s behaving in a similar manner.

It may be safe to assume that this virus is also unique in its ability to mutate, adapt, and infect humans. Again, what are the odds? While I’m no scientist, I can only assume two possibilities. Perhaps there is a very broad and natural process at work that we have yet to witness with our own eyes, or there is something much darker behind this “anomaly”.

I think there’s only one thing that needs to be said here. Among the academics and the elite, Ebola is a pretty popular candidate for global depopulation. If this is an engineered virus, released with the intent of culling the human population, then the timing is perfect to introduce a new strain in a remote region. The West African outbreak is pushing local relief efforts to the brink. As for the global relief effort, another outbreak in a completely different region would divide their dwindling resources, ensuring the infection has no boundaries. The virus could quickly spiral out of control, allowing it to go global. For once, I pray that I’m only paranoid.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .


Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here:


Former Microsoft CEO and mega mogul Bill Gates has long utilized his vast fortune to push genetically modified organisms (GMOs) through his Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, but Gates’ efforts have been met with sharp criticism from millions of grassroots activists both home and abroad.

The debate around GMOs has become increasingly one-sided in recent years, with activists spreading the word about the health dangers of genetically modified foods as well as the environmental risks (see here and here) of the lab-created crops via social media.

Pro-GMO corporations have adjusted, attempting to fight back with their own PR campaigns (including this one where Monsanto offered money “mommy bloggers” to attend a presentation).

Now, in an effort to “depolarize” the GMO debate, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is making a multi-million dollar donation to one of America’s most prominent universities.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will donate almost 6 million to "depolarize" the GMO debate.

Cornell University to Lead New International GMO-Focused Effort

Cornell University, a private New York state-based Ivy League college, is expected to lead a new international effort that “will seek to add a stronger voice for science,” according to an article in the school’s Cornell Chronicle.

The program, made possible through the Gates Foundation’s $5.6 million grant, reportedly seeks to help inform decision-makers an consumers through an online information hub as well as training programs, with the goal of educating on “how (agricultural technology, presumably GMOs) works,” as well as the “potential impacts” of agricultural technology.

Multimedia resources including videos of farmers using the technology will be included as well.

Sarah Evanega, senior associate director of International Programs in Cornell’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS), who will lead the project according to the report, said that “pro-biotech activists share a lot of the same anti-pesticide, low-input, sustainable-agriculture vision as the organic movement.”

While that may be true, it remains to be seen whether or not the Biotech industry can come close to living up to its promises, and to quell widespread concerns regarding the health and environmental problems its crops are reputed to cause.

According to a report from the USDA, a notoriously pro-Biotech organization, for example, the amount of herbicide use on GM corn increased from around 1.5 pounds per ace in 2001 to more than 2 pounds per planted acre in 2010, in direct opposition to repeated statements to the contrary by GMO companies.

Herbicide use has been on the rise for the past 9 years according to one major recent study as Forbes noted, on the heels of another similar study.

The rise of herbicide-resistant “superweeds” has also been linked to GMO adoption, so much so that the state of Texas requested (and was denied) a banned chemical to stop an outbreak on a whopping three million acres of genetically modified cotton.

And while the Biotech industry often claims it’s helping to “feed the world,” a major UN report recently said that small-scale organic farming is actually the best way to do just that rather than using GMOs

Will Objectivity Be Included in New Program?

Considering Gates’ clear bias in favor of GMOs, can we reasonably expect to see any sort of objectivity in Cornell’s upcoming program?

Gates has long touted them as a world hunger solution despite evidence to the contrary, while ignoring the dramatic role that imperialism has played in African countries where he’s attempting to spread the GMOs he is so deeply invested in, as well as the promise of small-scale independent farming mentioned above.

The “GMO debate” is already firmly slanted in favor of non-GMO farming among the general populace of most countries and GMO crop cultivation is declining worldwide because of it.

While the stated aim of the program is to diffuse “controversy,” independent science, recent results and public opinion are already firmly in support of organic and non-GMO food.

Genetically modified foods have proliferated in the U.S. almost exclusively due to a lack of labeling and overall transparency.

Regardless of whether or not Cornell’s new program will be even remotely objective considering the funding behind it, one thing’s for sure: the consumer is becoming smart enough to make up their own mind on GMOs, and that development is likely to be a problem for the Biotech companies’ bottom lines going forward.

RELATED READING: What Hillary Said 40 Seconds Into This Video Should Put Everyone Who Cares About Organic on Notice

Organic Farmers Must Do These 11 Things Just to Prevent Being Contaminated


Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here:




By: Nancy Swanson

Over 10 years ago the Pacific Ecologist reported that a Japanese research team uncovered serious discrepancies in safety reports submitted by Monsanto to the Japanese Health and Welfare Ministry. The Safety Assessment Application Documents were submitted in order to obtain a safety certificate necessary for the import of genetically modified (GM) soy to Japan. Based on these reports, submitted by JAPAN- MONSANTO, their herbicide-tolerant soybean was approved as food by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and as animal feed by the Ministry of Agriculture in 1996. The research team reported their findings to Japan’s Agriculture and Fisheries Ministry but received no response.

The Japanese team, led by molecular biologist Masaharu Kawata, University of Nagoya, began with 40 people taking notes by hand over a period of 10 days. This was necessary because the documents, kept at the Food Safety Association, were only available for five hours per day three days per week. Photographing and photocopying were not allowed. The application submitted by Monsanto for Roundup Ready (RR) soybeans consisted of 10 volumes, which piled up to 1 meter high, with much of it in English.



Dr. Kawata claims that Monsanto deliberately misinterpreted and disregarded data in their quest to prove their RR soybean is “substantially equivalent” to conventionally grown soybeans.

“We found a highly intended misinterpretation ignoring obvious data difference between A5403 [conventional] and 40-3-2 [GM] hybrid in the documents.” Analysis of raw soybeans showed no differences, but the toasted soybeans showed a marked difference. After processing at 108℃ for 30 minutes, the concentration of protein and potassium were not changed but the concentration of urease and lectin were significantly higher in the GM soybeans. Urease (an enzyme) and lectin (a protein) are considered harmful, physiologically active substances. Urease enzymes aid in the conversion of urea to ammonia and carbonic acid, which can cause kidney stones and liver problems. Lectin binds to carbohydrates and can cause intestinal problems. These physiologically active substances remained active even after heat treatment in the GM soybean, though those of the conventional soybean were easily denatured and inactivated.

Monsanto decided that the GM soybeans were merely insufficiently heated. They returned the sample to Texas A & M and ordered re-toasting at 220℃ for 25 minutes. “However re-toasting further widened the difference in the activity between the two [soybean] strains. … [A] Scientist would usually conclude in such case that there is substantial difference between the two.” But instead Monsanto toasted the GM soybean sample two more times until they got the result they wanted: all proteins were denatured and inactivated. No protein can withstand repeated heat treatment and remain active. With this result, Monsanto concluded that genetically modified and non-modified soybeans are “substantially equivalent” and they finally had the lab tests to “prove” it.

“Monsanto based their argument on their presumption ‘they can’t be different’ and their need ‘there shouldn’t be difference.’ … The English data volume did not show analysis data of third and fourth heat treatment, but the Japanese summary volume, as if there were data, has a graph showing after loss of activity and described that ‘data from insufficient heat treatment is not adopted’ and ‘No substantial difference observed.’ If you review only Japanese summary volume and not look into English data volume, you would be ushered to the conclusion of ‘Safe’.”


Exchanging genes between bacteria and plants can sometimes result in the expression of unexpected or undesired proteins. The only way to determine if this has happened is to isolate the proteins and determine the amino acid sequence. The extra proteins that are expressed in the glyphosate-tolerant soybean as a result of the addition of bacteria and virus genes is known as the CP4EPSPS amino acid sequence. Kawata states, “Before inspection we presumed that [the] amino acid sequence of [the GM] soybean CP4EPSPS was determined. However, to my surprise, it was not.” Monsanto determined only 15 amino acids from the N-terminal of the protein, which is expressed in E-coli. They then assumed the rest of the sequence was the same as the known nucleotide sequence of the bacterial DNA, but “only 3.3% of expected total of 455 amino acids was decided, and the protein is not of soybean! ELISA test described in the documents is the only method [used] to verify antigenic equivalence of proteins. But antigenic similarity itself does not prove the amino acid sequences are the same. The true face of CP4EPSPS protein in the soybean that we are taking is still unknown.”


Having assumed the soy protein was the same as the E-coli, they used the E-coli protein in their acute toxicity test

“[The] CP4EPSPS protein used for acute toxicity test on rat also came from that produced by E-coli harboring CP4EPSPS plasmid.” Monsanto claimed that it is too difficult to extract the protein from the soybean and that using the protein from E-coli is equivalent. Monsanto does a lot of hand waving around the word equivalent. But according to Kawata, “This is unacceptable because there is a possibility that the inserted gene work differently in soybean than was in the original bacterium, and therefore the expression product may be different from that of soybean. Moreover, according to the application document, 0.238mg of CP4ESPS protein is detected in one gram of genetically modified 40-3-2 soybean, which is enough concentration to extract without problem. This again is the typical ‘All for the conclusion’ approach by Monsanto. This kind of problem could be resolved if all CP4ESPS amino acid sequence in soybean had been analyzed and confirmed equal as the bacterium. The experiment looks like conducted on the presumption that the other soybean proteins are the same as the non-GM soybean as long as the CP4EPSPS is not toxic. If so, this is too easy and one-sided approach. The core of this problem is whether the soybean gene gets affected from insertion of foreign gene or not. The series of experiments described is incoherent on the fundamentals.”

Similar slight-of-hand tactics were employed in toxicity tests for insect-resistant Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops, where only the Bt toxin itself was used in the feed and NOT the Bt as expressed in the GM product. This is based on the following faulty logic: a) a potato (or soy) is not toxic; b) if it can be shown that the Bt toxin (or E-coli protein) is non-toxic; then c) the Bt potato (GM soy) is safe. But the genetically engineered Bt potato is neither a regular potato nor is it the Bt toxin, just like salt (sodium chloride) is neither sodium nor chlorine. In fact, Arpad Pusztai published results showing that a GM potato (containing an insecticidal lectin known to be harmless to mammals by itself) does cause harm, for which he lost his funding and thus his job.

Why not just use the Bt potato or the GM soy in the animal experiments? Are they deliberately hiding something? And what’s up with the scientists over at the FDA & the EPA who reviewed these data?

Measured glyphosate levels higher than safety standard

Because the soybean is designed to withstand direct application of glyphosate (active ingredient in Roundup), the herbicide residues in the harvested bean will be higher than the conventionally grown soybean. “Monsanto studied in detail how will be the results by changing factors like spraying times, concentration of the active ingredient glyphosate, duration of harvest after spraying, and cultivation places. The data show clearly that the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA (a degraded substance of glyphosate) in forage and hay increase greatly by postemergence application of the herbicide compared to that of conventional preemergence application, although the residual concentration in the plant differed from place to place. The largest value of the combined glyphosate and AMPA was 40.187 ppm in forage which is higher than the US safety standard of 15 ppm in forage and hay in 1994 when FDA and USDA accepted the application documents. The maximum combined concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in soybean seed was 13.178 ppm, which is less than 20 ppm of the US standard at that time. … cultivating Roundup ready soybean may sometimes violates the US safety standard. We found a surprising description in the document to dissolve the problem.”

“In final conclusion, Monsanto say that ‘the maximum combined glyphosate and AMPA residue level of approximately 40 ppm in soybean forage resulting from these new uses exceeds the currently established tolerance of 15 ppm. Therefore, an increase in the combined glyphosate and AMPA tolerance for residues in soybean forage will be requested.’ They know very well that adoption of herbicide tolerance crop needs higher safety standards. In effect, the US tolerance standard of combined glyphosate and AMPA in soybean forage was changed to 100 ppm after they approved the genetically engineered soybean.”

Samples used in animal tests had not been sprayed with Roundup

The very reason for Monsanto to genetically modify the soybean is for tolerance to Roundup. “But surprisingly enough, our inspection revealed that both the gene modified soybean 40-3-2 strain and conventional strain A5403 were NOT sprayed with Roundup herbicide in their cultivation.” All of the the soybean used in the safety experiments was not sprayed with Roundup. “The reason is not stated in the documents.”

Spraying glyphosate on the soy would have caused biochemical compositional changes which include changes in fatty acid composition among other things. “The data obtained with such samples may be therefore not valid to guarantee safety of soybean that human and animals take in the real life, not just because of the residue glyphosate is a toxin to kill plants by inhibiting plant enzyme EPSPS. Effects on other metabolic pathway must be taken into account particularly when such artificial genes are inserted. For consumers, the test results using different sample than marketed soybean may be meaningless.”

Nevertheless, there were differences noted in the animals in the studies. Kawata reanalyzed Monsanto’s submitted data and found statistically significant differences. For the rat study there were no differences found in the groups fed raw soybean meal. But males in the group fed the toasted GM soybean had 6.7% less body weight than the group fed toasted conventional soybean and 13% less than the group fed a commercial feed mix at the end of 28 days. “Though this difference is described as statistically significant in the data sheet, the conclusion ignores these results and states that ‘no statistical significance is observed.’”

“The experiments are far from satisfactory in its sample size and the statistic method used. Our group transcribed all raw data and redid statistical analysis using Turkey multiple method. The result again showed the apparent growth obstacle for the body and kidney weight in male rats group fed with toasted [GM] 40-3-2 soybean. I wondered why there is no such difference in female rats group. The answer to this question seemed to be the amount of the feed intake where male took 25-30g/day, female rats took only 18-20g (approx. 70% of male)/day. It is highly possible that female rats also showed significant growth difference if experiment is conducted in much larger scale and with longer feeding period.”

To summarize:

  1. Monsanto knew that the toasted GM soybean contained extra, unhealthy enzymes and proteins so they subjected the samples to higher heat multiple times until the problem went away and then submitted those test results to prove substantial equivalence.

  2. Monsanto did not bother to determine the entire amino acid sequence in the modified soybean but only the first 15 amino acids. They then made the assumption that the remaining amino acids would be the same as the CP4EPSPS sequence in the bacteria. We still don’t know what the actual expression is in the transgenic soybean.

  3. Based on their assumption in (2), they then used the CP4EPSPS protein from E-coli in their acute toxicity tests for GM soy.

  4. Monsanto knew that the glyphosate residues in forage were higher than allowed so they simply asked the EPA to raise the allowed limit. And the EPA did.

  5. Monsanto knew that there are substantial glyphosate residues in the GM soy and that the glyphosate could cause compositional changes in the soy, yet they submitted samples for animal testing that were never sprayed with glyphosate.

  6. Their safety studies still showed statistically significant differences yet they reported that the differences were not significant.

Monsanto has deliberately manipulated the samples in (1) & (5) and falsified their report in (6). In scientific circles, (1) (5) & (6) would be known as fraud. The methods employed in (2) & (3) are, at best, extremely sloppy. Number 4 just shows how the US government accommodates the biotech industry.

Because Monsanto has invoked patent rights on their GM products, it is illegal for anyone to perform tests on GM crops without prior permission. A 2009 Scientific American article states, “agritech companies such as Monsanto, Pioneer and Syngenta … have explicitly forbidden the use of the seeds for any independent research. Under the threat of litigation, scientists cannot test a seed to explore the different conditions under which it thrives or fails. They cannot compare seeds from one company against those from another company. And perhaps most important, they cannot examine whether the genetically modified crops lead to unintended environmental side effects. … as a result of restricted access, no truly independent research can be legally conducted on many critical questions regarding the technology. … when scientists are prevented from examining the raw ingredients in our nation’s food supply or from testing the plant material that covers a large portion of the country’s agricultural land, the restrictions on free inquiry become dangerous.” The industry controls virtually every aspect of genetic engineering.

Monsanto provided the soybean samples to the Chinese Nutrition and Food Safety Research Institute for a 90-day feeding test required to obtain the safety certificate necessary for importing GM soy into China. “The samples were soybean cake, brown-yellow color, circular-disk shape.” The Chinese institute “did not test for chemical residues or glyphosate residues and they did not even carry out PCR tests on the external transgenic gene of the soybean cake samples provided by the Monsanto Beijing Office. Because the level of residues of glyphosate and its metabolites on the soybean samples are not specified, their contribution to the reported findings cannot be assessed!”

“Although the test found some anomalies, they were reported as being ‘within range of historical control data of this laboratory, thus such deviation has no biological significance.’ This is a pretext invented by Monsanto, which lacks [both] scientific [and legal] definition.”

Have all of the toxicology tests for the safety of GM soybeans been conducted in this manner? Has Monsanto provided all of the samples? Have any of them been tested? Is this same procedure used for other GM products?

Toxicology studies using Bt toxins alone, instead of Bt corn or potato, or E-coli proteins alone instead of GM soy protein would be like eating hops to determine the effects of beer. Safety studies on RR soybeans using samples subjected to high heat and never sprayed with Roundup would be like removing the percussion cap from a bullet, testing the bullet for safety and declaring all bullets are the same and therefore safe. Just don’t put them in a gun. Is it any wonder that the results of Monsanto’s safety studies differ from so many other published studies? GMOs are perfectly safe. Just don’t eat them.

TLB recommends you visit for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:


By: Roger Landry (TLB)

We who are in the know constantly rail against Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s). We are awake and aware, through our constant search for knowledge on this subject. We are also painfully aware that the science has no long term credibility. More research and studies are published daily proving the extreme and detrimental health affects these organisms have on humanity with the long term ramifications still unrealized, yet their proliferation continues and accelerates.

References and realted articles:

GMO Scandal – The Long-Term Effects of Genetically Modified Food on Humans

What is not so well know to the general public is the catastrophic influence these organisms have on our global biosphere. This is the mechanism that allows life to flourish on this planet and it is in grave danger of radical if not fatal modification. Genetically modified plants are now common across the globe in the guise of trees or crops modified to resist insects, pesticides and other invasive influences.


But once planted how do you stop the spread of this organism outside its realm (an issue Monsanto profits from)? Once released into the biosphere how do you prevent the same mechanism that was designed to kill root worms from killing another species of insect, one with a vital role in the maintenance of said biosphere? Through cross pollination alone it is impossible to prevent this eventuality. Scientist from across the planet are now sounding the alarm concerning the infiltration of GMO’s into the wild, with some saying we are quickly approaching the point of no return were the damage will be irreversible.

References and related articles:

The Evil of Monsanto and GMOs Explained: Bad Technology, Endless Greed and the Destruction of Humanity

But now the third part of this triad of evil is rearing its ugly head in the guise of Genetically modified Humanity. This is not a new concept and this research is underway in thousands of laboratories across the planet.


Producing human, animal hybrids is legal in the United Kingdom and parallel research has been taking place in America for well over a generation funded in most part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Soldiers that can see in the dark, run for miles without tiring or go for day without food and water.

And why stop there, what about parents who wish their child to have certain traits, say enhanced intelligence or added physical prowess. Again we run into the same issues of long term study. Are these GM humans susceptible to diseases or maladies not suffered by us mere mortals, if we interbreed will these genes be passed on to the rest of humanity, will this fatally contaminate the future gene pool leading to an extinction event? None of these questions have been answered by those who surge forward with this dangerous and irresponsible technology.

The debate over the Genetic Engineering of the humans species has been a heated debate since scientists initially wrote about the future, not as it will be, but as it could be … or should be. The Human race thrives in a large portion due to its ample diversity. We as humans generally find this attractive and liberating that we are each unique in our personage, with very few to none containing the same balance of intellect, appeal or physical prowess, which exemplifies that uniqueness.

Never before in the history of mankind have we released so many dangerous mechanisms, untried and untested on humanity and the world. None of this is fantasy or hype and the research showing the facts is readily available in vast quantities for those who wish to pursue it. Those who would perpetrate this madness do so at the possible (and by some scientists the guaranteed) peril of all humanity, but this does not hinder them.

References and related articles:

800 Scientists Demand Global GMO “Experiment” End

Related TLB RANT radio show:

Attached below you will find a great video containing more information of the third leg of this evil GMO triad …

See original video here:

Geo Engineering 2

By TLB Contributor: Dane Wigington


Many in the anti-geoengineering movement have focused almost exclusively on the horizon-to-horizon trails, but such obvious spraying is only a small fraction of the aerosol operations in our skies. As the public continues to wake up to the criminal climate engineering, the geoengineers appear to be going to considerable lengths in the attempt to make the spraying less obvious.

Skies should look like the picture below.

sky normal

The non-stop global aerosol spraying is so pervasive that it is becoming almost impossible to find photographs of completely untainted skies. Even when searching the internet for “blue sky images”, many of the pictures are of skies laced with sprayed climate engineering aerosol clouds. Again, as the public begins to awaken to the blatant horizon-to-horizon trails, the spraying is becoming much more covert.  Most of the population has no idea how to distinguish the difference between natural clouds and toxic aerosol clouds. Skies like those shown in the photograph below are now increasingly the norm. The meteorological community (now completely subjugated by the power structure) calls skies like this “mostly sunny”, are we really to believe such weather “professionals” don’t have a clue that this type of sky is completely engineered and totally unnatural?


The lies that have been perpetrated to hide the geoengineering elephant in the room are immense and growing. Even NASA and other “official” agencies now routinely name completely artificial aerosol clouds as if they are a natural phenomenon. The clouds in the photo below are cataloged as if they are a natural, unfortunately such clouds are the result of aircraft sprayed aerosols.

cirris clouds artificial

One more example below is from the UCLA atmospheric education program. UCLA officially terms this aerosol saturated sky “Cirrostratus”. The constant spraying that occurs in front of approaching storms has been going on for so long that most of the meteorological community literally does not know or will not admit to the artificial composition of the skies in the picture due to atmospheric aerosols (admission of the climate engineering nightmare is a bad career decision).

This definition below is straight from the UCLA atmospheric education program.

Cirrostratus (Cs)
The high, thin clouds that lack definition and give a hazy look to the sky are called cirrostratus clouds. These normally precede an approaching storm, and precipitation can be expected to occur within the next day or so. The thinness of these clouds veil the sun, which creates the appearance of a halo.

Latin Derivatives: cirrus - “curl of hair” and stratus - “layer”.

cirrostratus 1

The climate engineers do not leave anything alone, they taint all that they touch. The next picture was taken in Northern California as convective cumulus clouds were trying to form. The skies above the developing storm cells are saturated with aerosols which in effect blows the storms apart into a massive canopy of toxic aerosol haze that covers a much larger region than the original storm cells. This process greatly reduces the precipitation potential from these storms. In many areas, especially in the US west, such storms are almost never allowed to fully develop but are aerosolized into oblivion early on. If one is in close enough proximity to this type of event, jets can be heard overhead in these systems. Aircraft spraying can also be viewed from a distance actually spraying over the forming cumulus clouds. The process of aerosol spraying just described appears to be for the purpose of using the storm system and its moisture to create a much larger expanse of “cloud cover” for solar radiation management (SRM) purposes. Whatever the reason or reasons, the “blowing apart” of developing storms is business as usual for the geoengineers while they continue to decimate the biosphere.

illuminated cloud

Skies should be blue, natural clouds are white and more or less defined around the edges (with some exceptions). Silvery white hazy skies and wispy cob-web like clouds are the result of the constant climate engineering bombardment. Those that think geoengineering is only occurring when blatant horizon-to-horizon trails can be seen are missing the bigger picture. Massive and constant spraying is being done over the top of existing clouds and ever increasing haze already created by previous spraying. Much shorter trails of sprayed aerosols are now often the norm as mentioned earlier. It would seem the climate engineers know that the blatant spraying is being noticed more and more. The shorter spray trails eventually  dissipate and develop into the silvery white wispy haze-filled skies that have been described.  Earth is trying desperately to survive and to support life. The climate engineers are engaged in nothing less than an all-out assault against our planet and us. Join us in the fight to expose and stop climate engineering, join us in the fight for life. If not now, when?

TLB recommends you visit Dane at GeoEngineering Watch for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:



Very impressive Chinese cities, but where are the people?

By TLB Contributor: Dave Hodges

As ISIS is rampaging across Iraq and Syria, Ebola is on the loose and the flames of civil discontent are spreading across the United States, the country stands at a crossroads. There are many in the media who believe that America sits on the precipice of martial law followed by World War III. All signs certainly point to these fears coming to fruition. A question that very few seem to ask is what will society be like after World War III and the ushering in of the New World Order?

The United States has a canary in the mine from which to predict its future and it has to do with how China is implementing the United Nations based Agenda 21 policies. Agenda 21 certainly is impacting our daily lives, however, the big changes will not felt until after the United States collapses or is conquered. If one wants to know what life will be like when that time comes, we can look across the Pacific to China.

China has long led the world in repressive and inhuman enforcement of its population with repressive one child policies, mandatory sterilization and forced abortions. We also know that China permits corporate slave labor (e.g. Walmart) within its boundaries by globalist corporations. China is also becoming a model for the implementation of Agenda 21 and this implementation phase is taking a new and dramatic twist through the creation of a series of “ghost cities” in which monolithic cities are built, but there are only a few to no residents occupying these cities. Dateline Australia estimates that as many as 10 of these cities are being built every year. We, in the United States, should watch this Agenda 21 canary in the mine because it represents our future.

Agenda 21, the United Nations and You

The United Nations Agenda 21 policies are in the early stages of nudging the planet into a “more equitable and just new world order”. Although Agenda 21′s influence is seemingly everywhere and completely noticed by those who are in tune to the present globalization trends, the dramatic and full influence will not be fully realized until the United States has collapsed economically. In other words, Agenda 21 is a blueprint for a post-Constitutional America. This leads to the inevitable question as to when the economic collapse of the United States will take place? There is no definitive answer to this question. However, when we consider that the United States has a 17 trillion dollar deficit, an estimated 240 trillion dollar unfunded set of liabilities (e.g.Medicare, Social Security) and the estimated derivatives debt, that the American taxpayer was forced to assume in the “bailouts”, is estimated to be between one quadrillion to 1.5 quadrillion dollars. These three numbers represent the chest pains; the fatal American economic heart attack could come any day.

The Ecocity Builders is a non-profit non-governmental organization, affiliated with the United Nations, which is a collaboration of international networks of associates that influence and actively participate in local city planning projects all across the US. Through training courses they promote the ecocity approach as the future of human civilization. 

Ecocity is a major implementation arm of the United Nations Agenda 21 urbanization policies.

Through coercive conferences like the International Ecocity Conference series is an international movement toward building locally and globally. The ecocity advocates have created UN sustainable cities in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Brazil, South Africa, Turkey, a dozen countries in Europe, Korea, Australia and the focus of this article, in China.

An ecocity is often characterized in terms with Agenda 21 precepts including:

  • Human settlements modeled after sustainable development that functions with natural ecosystems and living organisms

  • Reduce the inhabitants ecological impact on the environment

  • Restoration of ecosystems after the recolonization of humans into dense cities

  • Sustainable living under Agenda 21 supports regional, national and global economic systems

The recolonization of humans into dense cities is the focus for the remainder of this article.

Agenda 21 Comes to China In Stealth

Agenda 21 is being implemented in China at breakneck speed and the latest phase is coming in under stealth and deception.

The Chinese government is in the process of relocating 250,000 people per week from rural farmlands to densely populated urban areas into what has been dubbed as the Chinese ghost towns. Many of us have heard about these Chinese ghost cities. However, until this year we didn’t really know the true purpose of why these ghost cities were being built. However, the veil is being lifted and now it is becoming very obvious as to what the Chinese are up to.

Is this landmark located in Paris, or somewhere else? The answer will surprise you>

In one of these ghost towns, the Chinese built a nearly deserted replica of Paris complete with its own Eiffel Tower and Champs Elysees. In the process, the Chinese even leveled a range of 700 mountains as even geography can’t stand in the way of another ghost city. 

Adrian Brown filed a very telling report with the Australian division of Dateline in 2011 on the topic of ghost cities. The 15 minute report received almost no attention in the United States but it received a stunning three million views in Australia.

China Is Now an Urban Country

China’s urban population has passed the 50% mark, according to China’s Bureau of Statistics. America reached this milestone in 1920, almost a full century before the Chinese and our urbanization was fueled by the demand for cheap labor to fill the new factory jobs. The Communist Chinese regime touts urbanization as the engine behind China’s future economic development. The Chinese propagandists are telling the masses that they must accept relocation from rural to urban because it will fuel the Chinese economy of the future. And what the Chinese propagandists are telling the people is a lie and as with many things in politics, there is the reason and there is the real reason.

Chinese Propaganda

Although the Chinese government and a select few globalist corporations claim that the Chinese urban population migration is fueled by the need for workers, other Chinese experts tell a different story.

In a Nov. 23, 2011 report, the Beijing Times, one of the most liberal of the Chinese newspapers, quoted the deputy inspector at China’s National Land Bureau, Gan Zangchun, said that the government land acquisition has created “fake urbanization.” In other words, the Chinese urbanization, based upon economic reasons, is a fraud. Then why is there such an urgency on the part of the Chinese government to move its population to urban areas at such a rapid pace and with such inhumanity?

The Real Reasons

For the past few years, people in the West were baffled as to why the Chinese were building massive ghost cities that can house over 1 million people each and yet, these ghost cities were dormant until just recently. The Chinese have over 65 million micro-apartments (i.e. apartments which are under 500 square feet) which lie vacant in these ghost cities.

The urbanization of America took place in proportion to the number of factory jobs which were available well into the industrial period of our history. The American factory jobs enticed future workers to leave the farm and relocate to cities. However, China is taking a “build it and they will come” approach. In other words, the more naive among us are supposed to believe that if the people move into the cities, factory jobs will follow. Stalin tried it as did Pol Pot, and it did not work and what we are really looking at here is a cover story.

More Chinese Experts Debunk the State Propaganda

Chinese political refugee and Princeton University professor, Cheng Xiaonong, stated that in several Chinese locations, farmers are being forcibly relocated at gun point and forced to relocate to urban areas. Cheng said, “[Party chief] Bo Xilai has been promoting a policy of moving farmers into towns, building apartments and moving forcibly relocated farmers into these stack and pack apartments and treating this as urbanization.” Cheng said urbanization isn’t about calculating how many farmers are relocated into cities, but about farmers being able to move into the city and gaining some measure of sustainable employment and adequate living conditions. These relocated farmers, without the prospect of jobs, is a recipe for economic and social disaster. Soon, there will be tens of millions of Chinese totally dependent on government handouts to survive. This is the power that governments strive to obtain because it gives them total control. This Chinese scene is reminiscent of the Agenda 21 inspired movie, Hunger Games.

Cheng makes the same observations as many other Chinese experts as he added that “urbanization is generally accompanied by economic growth as was the case in the US. In other countries, urbanization happens naturally, but in mainland China, urbanization is the result of the Chinese regime forcefully pushing farmers off of their land.”

Since the Chinese are not industrialized to the point which would justify the mass movement of 1 million people per month into its ghost towns, any reasonable person would be asking the question, why?

Who Is Behind Chinese Urbanization?

The Chinese government has held many conferences in which they have received consultation from some very disturbing sources, known to most of us as the global elite.

paulsonWho could forget Hank Paulson, the former Secretary of the Treasury and the former CEO of Goldman Sachs? Paulson is championing the strategy of forced relocation. In relation to Paulson’s observation and encouragement of Chinese urbanization he states, “The country’s economy is heading in the right direction. This is more important than achieving short-term growth.” Paulson went on to say that the economic growth in China has made urbanization a necessary and proper development. Are you kidding me? We have heard from Chinese experts, both inside and outside the country, who claim that economics is not fueling urban growth. Chinese urban growth is being fueled by bayonets and bullets. Hank Paulson is such a gem. I’m sure you remember “Mr. too-big-to-fail”, Hank Paulson, when he told Congress that if we, the American taxpayer, did not bail out Wall Street, there would be an economic collapse and we would have martial law and the rest as they say, is history. Bailout after bailout has come and gone and the net effect is that the American economy is in a tailspin. One has to legitimately have to wonder why the Chinese are taking economic advice from him? That’s like taking advice from Dr. Kevorkian on how to preserve life.

Another key globalist, Dominic Barton, the global managing director of McKinsey & CO., and he too sounds like a Paulson clone, as he recently stated, “The good news is that there is an underlying force of growth and that’s urbanization. What we’re basically seeing is more than 250,000 people moving from rural areas to cities every week.”  

Maurice Strong and George Soros are also players in this mass migration movement. If job demand is not fueling urbanization, then what is?

Getting Down to the Truth

It would seem that key globalists are trying to disguise the real reasons on why the Chinese government is forcibly relocating one million farmers per month to their ghost cities. Ask yourself America, where have we seen the philosophical belief that rural areas should be uninhabited and the population should be herded into densely populated stack and pack cities?

Make no mistake about it, the Chinese with the backing of globalist corporations like Goldman Sachs, are engaged in full-blown Agenda 21 relocation of its civilian population from rural areas to the stack and pack of their mega-cities. From the outside looking in, it looks like a beta test. And there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the same is preparing to happen in the United States.

The Chinese Are Behind a Barrel and They Have Pointed That Barrel At Their People

Why would the Chinese be taking marching orders from Paulson, Strong, Soros and company? The answer is simple, the Chinese government hopes to survive the coming bond collapse in the US which could happen in mere days, weeks or months. The Chinese hold much of our debt in bonds. The Chinese have undoubtedly come to the full realization that their economy will massively implode when American bonds crash and the best way to control the people’s backlash is to herd them together in what has become dubbed as “stack and pack” Agenda 21 cities.


By moving one million people per month to the ghost cities, the Chinese will find that subjugating their country will be much easier when a martial law crackdown is instituted as necessitated by the coming economic catastrophe. that is going to befall both China and the United States.

It is also not difficult to speculate that the Chinese have made an under the table deal with the global elite to be the beta test for Agenda 21 style population forced relocation in order to temporarily to stave off absolute financial ruin.

Many are probably wondering if there is anything going on inside the United States which parallels the forced relocation of the population to these “stack and pack” cities?” The short answer is, most definitely. The days are numbered for both American suburbs and rural areas.

Thanks to Mayor Bloomberg and the San Francisco City Council, the concept of transition towns, inner city developmental tax breaks for construction and much more, America is following suit with the Chinese style Agenda 21 policies on many fronts and this is the topic of Part two of this series.

 About the Author

Dave is the host of the popular radio talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.

© 2014. The Common Sense Show.  The Logo and Articles are protected by U.S. Copyright Laws, and are not to be downloaded or reproduced in any way without the written permission of Dave Hodges. Copyright 2014. Dave Hodges. All Rights Reserved.

TLB recommends you visit Dave here:


Click on image to visit site

See featured article and read comments here:

US Capitol building

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

As many more people wake up to the fraud of vaccine safety and efficacy or the mandates of environmental protection from bio-toxins, they start down their own path of research, many finding a total lack of faith in both. What they are also finding out is the total lack of responsibility and compassion that is supposed to be inherent in our government agencies whose mission is to protect the health of the public … actually being guilty of blatantly betraying their mandate!

We also find such agencies at odds with each other with respect to safety standards set on certain components found in vaccines or the local environment such as mercury, lead and aluminum. Whereas the EPA has set a specific standard for both Mercury or Aluminum, stating anything exceeding this is a toxic level, the CDC recommends vaccinations containing these very substances in magnitudes above these set levels … and not only recommends them to the general public but stops just short of mandating them to infants and pregnant mothers.

The ongoing awakening in the general public is facilitating a lack of trust in these agencies that is exploding across society, yet we see no moves via these agencies to amend their policies, to regain or shore up that lost trust … actually quite the opposite. At this point the mentioned government agencies move ever closer to full blown tyranny via a mechanism such as mandating a full vaccine schedule … regardless of all they are well aware of.

Additionally, over the past few years we have even discovered incidences of research proving the negative or harmful impact (in some cases by the governments own research scientists) of vaccines or environmental toxins on us, and especially on our most vulnerable, our children, hidden away from public eyes, thus facilitating many avoidable health disasters (including death). These heinous crimes of intention go unpunished, again leading to even less trust and faith in these agencies.

Today anyone with any vaccine research or environmental bio-toxin awareness under their belt cannot help but see agencies such as the CDC, EPA, FDA or USDA as their nemesis, bent on pushing, and quite possibly in the near future, forcing (mandating), such mechanisms as vaccination on a progressively more hostile public. We have come to realize something is disastrously wrong in this system that supports harmful government policy at the behest of pharmaceutical or chemical industry profit.

Try to imagine the pain, suffering and unnecessary death that could have been avoided if this vital information had been made available to the public, and these cited agencies had reacted to it in accordance with their mandate to protect the people! Thousands of lives, hundreds of thousands of lives, millions of lives … destroyed or lost?  This is blatantly unethical,  unconscionable, sinister, just plain evil … But where is the justice ??? … !!!

What we provide below is some documented proof of the allegations made in my above commentary. There is much more available, all one need do is take the time to look …


Proof the government is lying and hiding pertinent research

Dangers Associated With Vaccinations Have Been Withheld From Public For 30 Years. Here Are The Documents

Profit Over People: When Those We Trust To Protect Our Health … Can No Longer Be Trusted

Whistleblower: CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism Rate in African-American Boys Receiving MMR Shot Before 36 Months

Dr. David Lewis at AutismOne: An Insider’s View of Scientific Integrity in a State of Crisis


How the EPA Faked the Entire Science of Sewage Sludge Safety: A Whistleblower’s Story

Is the FDA Corrupt Too? Do Fish Swim In the Ocean


And lest we forget the price parents, loved ones, ethical researchers or those concerned with their fellow citizens, suffer for speaking out about this deception and blatant evil …

Least We Forget the Blatant Cruelty of the Vaccine Industry and Their Propagandized Trolls and Shills


All this leads to a very blatant comment … Our designated and trusted protectors are not dedicated to the protection of you, me or our children … Their motto should in fact read PROFIT OVER PEOPLE … or is it something much more sinister …

Below you will find an article written a while back by one of TLB’s star partners and contributors Christina England … it is so very apropos.


Hidden Government Papers on the Measles Vaccine Exposed

By: Christina England

How a mother is supposed to decide what vaccines are safe, when the governments change their minds so frequently, is anyone’s guess. One minute the government makes it categorically clear that the measles vaccine should never, under any circumstances, be given to a child under the age of nine months, the next minute they are saying the complete opposite and actually advising it. Take this circular that was issued to the government in 1968, entitled Notes on the use and storage of Measles vaccine (live attenuated) for routine vaccines for example.

Click here to see the government document on the measles vaccine.

It clearly states under Section 7 – Routine Vaccination that live measles vaccine should not be given to children below the age of nine months since it usually fails to immunise such children, owing to the presence of maternally transmitted antibodies. This was the advice from the good old JCVI who at the same time said that the vaccine should instead be given to children in their second year of life after the completion of the immunisation against diphtheria, tetanus whooping cough and polio.

However despite this advice, reports are now saying the complete and utter opposite.

Babies Aged 2 To 12 Months Insufficiently Protected Against Measles,

Study Finds Measles: Gap in protection for young infants

Babies aged 2-3 months to a year vulnerable to measles

Infants ‘at risk for measles in first year’

I do appreciate times move on and medical advances do as well but something as fundamental as ‘the presence of maternally transmitted antibodies’, does leave me to question this new research.

OK moving swiftly on. In the 1968 report in Section 6 – Reactions it says:-

“Mild febrile reactions and transient rashes may be expected to follow the administration of the vaccine in a substantial proportion of cases. The rise of body temperature which may occur from 5 to 10 days after vaccination – usually about the 8th day – is due to the multiplication of the attenuated virus. This febrile reaction, when it occurs, seldom lasts more than 24 to 48 hours. The Committee on Safety of Drugs has agreed that severe and unusual reactions to measles vaccine should be reported on the yellow card used for reporting adverse reactions to drugs. The Committee does not however, wish to receive reports of mild febrile reactions and rashes associated with the use of this vaccine.”

I bet it doesn’t as this may clog up the system. So what this actually says is, a mother lets her perfectly healthy baby have a vaccine that will give the baby a mild dose of measles ,while risking her child’s health with other adverse reactions to save her child from ultimately catching measles. Totally bizarre thinking if you ask me.

What this also proves is that the UK government as far back 1968 knew that the measles vaccine gave children adverse reactions, in fact, after reading the papers it is very clear that they seem quite happy to be offering babies a vaccine that they admit in a substantial proportion of cases gives them high fevers and rashes. Well I guess you could say it is all in a days work to them and on this score nothing has actually changed. Currently the measles vaccine is not being given as a single vaccine and is being given instead as part of the MMR. This now means that your baby can expect to enjoy a  few more side effects than he/she would have had from the single measles vaccine.

“How safe is the MMR vaccine?

“The drug company that makes the MMR vaccine publishes an extensive list of warnings, contraindications, and adverse reactions associated with this triple shot. These may be found in the vaccine package insert available from any doctor giving MMR, and in the Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) at the library.(8,9) The following afflictions affecting nearly every body system — blood, lymphatic, digestive, cardiovascular, immune, nervous, respiratory, and sensory — have been reported following receipt of the MMR shot: encephalitis, encephalopathy, neurological disorders, seizure disorders, convulsions, learning disabilities, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), demyelination of the nerve sheaths, Guillain-Barre’ syndrome (paralysis), muscle incoordination, deafness, panniculitis, vasculitis, optic neuritis (including partial or total blindness), retinitis, otitis media, bronchial spasms, fever, headache, joint pain, arthritis (acute and chronic), transverse myelitis, thrombocytopenia (blood clotting disorders and spontaneous bleeding), anaphylaxis (severe allergic reactions), lymphadenopathy, leukocytosis, pneumonitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme, urticaria, pancreatitis, parotitis, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, meningitis, diabetes, autism, immune system disorders, and death (Figure 49).(10,11)”

The most interesting fact given in the 1968 circular and something that needs a great deal of thinking about today is in Section 8 – Relation to other immunising procedures where it offers the following advice:-

“An interval of three to four weeks should normally be allowed to elapse between the administration of measles vaccine and any other vaccine, whichever is given first.”

My question is, if this is so, then why the hell did they dream up putting the measles vaccine into a multi vaccine just a few years later? It is obvious to me that their very clear advice seems to have gone completely out the window, as nowadays, not only is the measles vaccine part of a multi vaccine but now they are saying it is safe to give children many vaccines in one day. In fact Paul Offit is actively giving the advice to parents that multiple vaccines are quite safe saying that even as many as 100,000 are perfectly safe. I wonder how he would feel offering to be the pin cushion he wants our children to be.

Dr Offit

“Paul Offit, M.D., chief of infectious diseases at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the Henle Professor of Immunologic and Infectious Diseases at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, is the Chief US spokesman/liar for vaccination. The Voice of Sauron. On the board of Every Child By Two. Believes children can safely take 100,000 vaccines!”

Mind you in saying this according to some he does share the patent on the Rotavirus vaccine Rotateq, that looks to have made him millions. Honestly what some people will do to get rich is beyond me.

Christina’s article first appeared on Vactruth. TLB recommends you visit Vactruth for more great/pertinent vaccine related articles and information.

See Christina’s original article here:


by hellaD |

I’m really worried about the levels of radiation and the situation in Japan. The sad thing is there are already high levels of radiation in our world–higher than they were ten years ago at any rate. They come from increased use of cellphones, wireless networks, electrical equipment, medical equipment and other things. Over the past ten years or so, levels of radiation from the depleted uranium weapons used in massive amounts in Iraq and Afghanistan have dispersed into the atmosphere, into the earth and into our food. I finally clued into this when I was at the laundromat and heard the local TV station doing their best to ‘manage the panic’ the lady was poo-pooing the idea that anyone needed to be worried about the miniscule amounts of radiation from Fukushima and mentioned the amounts were about as much as a CT scan. That gave me no comfort since I had just read an article discussing how we were on the verge of a cancer epidemic (aren’t we already in one?) as a result of overuse of CT scans.

Unfortunately, the mass media has a bad track record with informing the public of what is really happening when it comes to nuclear disasters. We have already seen this happen with Three Mile Island, Cherynobl, and even how safe living near nuclear plants really isn’t. Not only that but low levels of toxins are often just as bad for you as high levels (think about dioxins), so the arguments that are being thrown around to ‘manage the public’s panic’ are no comfort. I have posted a video at the end of this article which is an interview with Leuren Moret who is whistleblower about the dangers of radiation–check it out–pretty horrific stuff….

After my post about which foods are good to detoxify our bodies from radiation with a focus on miso, I decided to follow my own advice and start eating miso. Unfortunately being on the GAPS diet, miso is one of the foods we can’t eat–being made with soybeans and some kind of grain, usually rice or barley. I was hoping the fermentation process would have made it digestible for us, but unfortunately that wasn’t the case and my digestive issues started acting up again, so I had to find some other options…

I had a rough week last week, I will admit, I was sick Wednesday and Thursday and again on Saturday and Sunday. It really sets me back–I’m hypersensitive in general and my gut issues have made me even more so. I have noticed that having a damaged intestinal tract has made me extremely sensitive to industrial chemicals as well as electro-magnetic frequencies and radiation. For example when I was in really poor health I would get ringing in my ears which I don’t usually have, I also couldn’t handle being on cordless phones or cellphones. As a craniosacral therapist, I have also learned to tune in to frequencies we generally don’t notice. As a result I can’t help but wonder if I was picking up some of the radiation from the nuclear plants in Japan. I was out in the rain on Friday afternoon when reports of radiation were being charted in California. I used to like the rain but lately I am scared to go out in it.
An interesting side note: I was just looking at research done on magnetites in human brains, these minerals are also found in animals and could explain why animals always know when an earthquake is coming as they are in tune with the earth’s magnetic fields. Perhaps we humans just learn to ignore unfamiliar frequencies and tune them out. Check out this article for more info. Magnetites are also found in bacteria … hummm … interesting stuff, right?

The most obvious things we can do is to limit the amount of toxins in our own environment, for example get rid of cleaning chemicals and use baking soda and vinegar. These two old-fashioned common household items can be used for your cosmetic needs as well. Any thing else you can do to remove unnecessary electro-magnetic frequencies from your environment will be very beneficial as well.

A Note on Radiation from
Radiation poisoning damages organ tissues by excessive exposure to ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation consists of particles or electromagnetic waves that are energetic enough to detach electrons from atoms or molecules, thus ionizing them. Direct ionization from the effects of single particles or single photons produces free radicals, which are atoms or molecules containing unpaired electrons, and which tend to be especially chemically reactive due to their electronic structure.

This means that they become chemically unstable and highly reactive ions as free radicals are formed. These unstable metabolic by-products strive to stabilize by ‘stealing’ a replacement electron from any neighboring molecule, leaving even more damaged molecules in their wake. This is how free radicals in our bodies are produced and cause inflammation, a process that is best known as oxidative stress, oxidative damage or lipid peroxidation. Oxidation can even cause debilitating changes to your DNA. This is why anti-oxidants are so important. Antioxidants help to counteract or neutralize the free radicals before they can damage our healthy cells by lending a hand (actually, an electron) when stabilization is needed. This is the reason why we are fond of so many antioxidants such as vitamin C, E, carotenoids, resveratrol, taurine, coenzyme Q10 and melatonin, to name but a few.

There is a lot we can do to protect our bodies from radiation. An added bonus of taking these steps is that they will remove all types of toxins from our bodies. Our world is currently overloaded with a wide variety of unhealthy substances, from car fumes, to pesticides to pharmaceutical drugs in the water systems. At this point most of us can’t handle an extra dose of anything toxic especially children, pregnant women and sickly people like me One thing NOT to do is to suddenly start taking iodine tablets, there are actually some other much more effective things you can do that have no side effects.
OK–let’s get down to business and discuss various ways to protect yourself and your family from all kinds of radiation. Since radiation causes extra free-radicals to form in your body as mentioned above, things to focus on are our body’s detoxification pathways and foods high in antioxidants. A good diet to be on right now is a grain-free diet such as the GAPS/SCD diet or the Paleo diet. Be sure not to eat any refined foods, sugar, flour and processed foods such as crackers and candies. Stay far away from soft-drinks, even avoid diet sodas. Doing qigong or tai chi is also a good way to open up your bodies detox pathways. I have found qigong in particular to be very helpful with removing EMFs from my body.

Become a Dirt-Eater:
Start to use edible clay, both internally and externally. I started using bentonite clay internally when I had cyclical vomiting syndrome which came from a build up of toxins in my blood-stream which my liver and kidneys were unable to remove due to their weak condition. There are various types of edible clays that have been used for millennia. People who eat clay have in our modern times been looked on as crazy and disgusting, but it turns out that clay was used in most ancient traditional cultures very effectively and anthropologists are now considering clay to be the original medicine. I don’t remember how or why I started using it, but it is the only thing that helps me when I get so toxic I can’t eat or drink anything–not even water–without it making me puke. Unfortunately I didn’t do more research on this amazing medicine when I started using it. I have just spent the whole day finding out how many things clay will treat! It can even be used topically for carpal tunnel. I use it in baths as well as internally. The type of clay that I use is bentonite clay. It is really good for your digestive system as well as removing parasites, fungus, other toxins and balancing your friendly micro-flora in your colon. It is especially effective in dealing with radiation, and it turns out that it was used to dump onto the Cherynobl plant when that terrible accident happened to try to contain it:

Zeolite clay is also very useful for removing heavy metals and radioactive substances from water. The way zeolite chelates out heavy metals is that within the structure of the zeolite molecule there are certain “structural cages” with positive ionic charges. The ionic charges within these cages attract heavy metals–such as cesium, strontium, uranium, mercury, etc. — and the caged structure of zeolite tightly binds them. Next, these caged and binded heavy metals are excreted from the body without getting deposited in other places. RadiationDetoxDraft.pdf

Other dietary clays are Kaolin, Red Clay, Fuller’s Earth, French Green Clay, Montmorillonite, Pascalite, Aulterra…and of course bentonite. There are over 200 different types of bentonite and some may have a high aluminum content so it is good to make sure your clay doesn’t have that in it. Activated charcoal can also be used to absorb toxins.

Baking soda:
Now who would think a common household ingredient could be so versatile? Go out and get yourself a 10 pound box of baking soda right away. In extreme exposure to radiation take a bath with 2-3 pounds of baking soda along with epsom salts and clay. Another recommended bath is sodium bicarbonate, magnesium chloride, and sodium thiosulfate. This is a gentle non-toxic bath that can be the difference between life and death for newborn babies. Baking soda can also be used internally, and has been found to be remarkably efficient at removing radiation from the body. Baking soda is particularly useful for assisting the kidneys. It is recommended for the people who have been exposed to the gulf oil spill and is remarkably effective in helping to detox and heal people damaged by all kinds of heavy chemicals. Baking soda is actually being used in cancer treatments, is highly effective against fungal infections and can also be used transdermally as a lotion. Please have a look here and here for more information.

It is recommended not to take iodine pills unless there is a nuclear meltdown in your backyard, but there are lots of other ways to get iodine into your body. The populations of most Western countries, in particular the US are very iodine deficient, so it is a good idea to start eating more kelp and other seaweeds so your body won’t uptake the radioactive iodine. Iodine tinctures can also be used externally without the side effects the pills have. Note do not take iodine tincture internally. You can also get kelp powder which you can add to your salt.

Concentrated brown seaweed extract is a potent radioactive elements chelator:
The healing qualities of seaweed had been known for centuries, so the Russian government instructed scientists to find an effective and powerful remedy for the radiation poisoning of that particular population. After trying out various forms of algae, one type yielded the best scientific data for this purpose. It was the brown seaweed known as Laminaria japonica (kelp), which grows wild in the northern Pacific Ocean off the coast of uninhabited islands far to the east of Russia, known as the Kurils.

Simply eating seaweeds such as kelp and bladderwrack is very helpful as well, they contain sodium alginate which binds radioactive compounds and remove them from the body:
Scientists at the Gastro-Intestinal Laboratory at McGill University in Montreal demonstrated that aliginates derived from Laminaria (kelp, kombu) could reduce by 50-80% the amount of radioactive strontium absorbed through the intestine. (Source)

Sea Salt:
Natural salt are full of minerals. Don’t use common table salt which is actually just an industrial bi-product. It is better to use celtic sea salt and other types of sea salt, real salt or Himalayan salt. When using Himalayan salt it is good to know your sources, as I have heard that there may be issues with fluoride contamination.

Epsom salts:
I mentioned this above with the discussion of baking soda. Any epsom salts are good but there is a recommendation that magnesium chloride is more helpful. The transdermal application of using it via a bath is recommended, although foot baths can also be helpful if the radiation poisoning isn’t extreme. Using sodium thiosulfate in your bath will help to neutralize the chlorine that is present in any cities tap water. Our modern population has a deficiency in magnesium as well as in iodine and recent studies have come out demonstrating how necessary the optimum levels of magnesium are for good health. This site has more information on the other benefits of magnesium as well as other ways to administer it. Epsom salts are very easy to use and not dangerous either.

DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide):
Dr. Gabriela Segura, a French heart surgeon has been using DMSO effectively and she say says:
“Sulfur has a long history of use as an antidote for acute exposure to radioactive material. DMSO is the classical sulfur compound. A Japanese study showed that even low concentrations of DMSO had radio-protective effects through the facilitation of DNA double-strand break repair, providing protection against radiation damage at all cellular levels in the whole body. Remember that boosting your body’s detox capabilities and overall antioxidant levels is a key to survive in these stressful times. Being on a detox diet is crucial to regaining health in a toxic environment. Our extensive experience and research shows that those on a no grain/low carb (no gluten) and non-dairy diet fare MUCH better.” (source)

There is a lot of information about the benefits of sulfur at this link, and for anyone with health issues or pain issues I recommend checking it out.

DMSO has radioprotective properties against lethal and mutagenic effects of X-rays in cells, cellular systems and whole animals….As a source of sulfur, DMSO aids in heavy metal detoxification. Sulfur binds with toxic heavy metals (mercury, lead, aluminum, cadmium, arsenic, nickel) and eliminates them via urination, defecation and sweating…..DMSO is a common chemical that can be manufactured cheaply. No drug company can get an exclusive patent since it is also a natural compound, therefore there is no significant financial return….DMSO is generally applied to the skin in a gel, cream, or liquid. It can be taken by mouth or as an intravenous injection, in many cases along with other drugs. It has also been administered subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intraperitoneally, intrathecally, by inhalation, instilled into the eye, on the mucous membranes, and into the urinary bladder. Strengths and dosages vary widely…..The garlic-like body odor and taste in the mouth that some experience is attributable to a specific DMSO metabolite: dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a component of natural onion and garlic flavors (McKim, Strub, 2008)….Remember also that DMSO increases the effects of drugs like blood thinners, steroids, heart medicines, sedatives, etc. In addition to that, acetone or acid contamination of DMSO can lead to serious medical consequences. Be aware of this problem when buying unreliable DMSO. A pure DMSO solution will turn solid (like ice) in the refigerator within 2 hours…..Women are discouraged from using DMSO during pregnancy or breastfeeding.

I recommend reading this article to find out how to use it and what other symptoms it very effectively treats. There is also a youtube video with more information posted on that page. One more quote from the above mentioned article:
Sulfur is an element of the earth and it is essential to life, it as among the most prevalent elements in the human body. Allergic reactions to sulfur are not possible because sulfur has no protein component.

When people are ‘allergic to sulfur’, what they really mean is that they are allergic or sensitive mainly to certain sulfur-containing drugs or proteins, most notably sulfa antibiotics (sulfonamides) or to sulfites (preservatives used in wines and some foods), or to foods with a high sulfur content (broccoli, cauliflower, garlic, onions, etc). Many individuals with allergies to sulfa drugs, sulfites, or high sulfur containing foods (like the author) do not experience problems taking DMSO, because apart from sulfur, DMSO bears no relation to these substances.

Spirulina and Chlorella:
These powerful superfoods are very effective for boosting your defences and have been called green gold. These blue-green algae aren’t particularly tasty but can be taken in tablets or used in smoothies and have been found to be effective in cases of radiation exposure as well as cancer. They are quite useful when used in a cleansing juice fast and will help to rid all of your cells of heavy metals and radiation, but can be used even without fasting. Spirulina is a concentrated source of GLA, is an immune booster, high in antioxidants and helps prevent DNA damage through protecting cells from lipid peroxidation.

“In Chernobyl … spirulina was used to help save many children from radiation poisoning. By taking 5 grams of spirulina a day for 45 days, the Institute of Radiation Medicine in Minsk even proved that children on this protocol experienced enhanced immune systems, T-cell counts and reduced radioactivity. Israeli scientists have since treated Chernobyl children with doses of natural beta carotene from Dunaliella algae and proved that it helped normalize their blood chemistry. Chlorella algae, a known immune system builder and heavy metal detoxifier, has also shown radioprotective effects. Because they bind heavy metals, algae should therefore be consumed after exposure to any type of radioactive contamination.” (from

More info on the benefits of spirulina can be found here.
Chlorella’s cell wall also has outstanding ability to eliminate toxins, pesticides and heavy metals from the body. The cell wall also has the ability to induce interferon production which helps with immune function. Chlorella’s cell’s nucleus contains “chlorella growth factor” (CGF) which possesses fantastic rejuvenating effects….Algae diets stimulate the regeneration of blood serum and liver proteins in rats, and Chlorella is extremely rich in the nucleic acids, RNA and DNA, and has a high content of nucleotides. (Source)

I mention this in this previous post on foods to detoxify radiation poisoning. Traditionally made hatcho miso is especially effective. Eat foods with lots of nucleotides–nucleotides are the building blocks that make up RNA and DNA and include foods such as juices, brewers yeast, liver, anchovies, algae, lentils, bee pollen. Also try this recipe for Anti-Radiation Soup.

For information about the types of fatty acids which are useful to eat or avoid check out the work of the famous cancer doctor Emanuel Revici, MD. In a lecture entitled “The Influence of Irradiation Upon Unsaturated Fatty Acids” he goes over the effects of severe radiation poisoning on fatty acids…according to his research abnormally conjugated trienic fatty acids (leukotrienes) induce radiation illness. With fatty acids a small amount of radiation damage will grow worse over time until the effects are unstoppable. Revici developed a oxalic acid index to measure the abnormal fatty acids in the body. He felt the best antidote was a fatty acid antagonist and he developed a product, n-butanol. He also developed Perse and Bionar, drugs that can detoxify drug addicts without any side-effects whatsoever. But there isn’t much research done on this topic. Cod liver oil were one of the fats he found that helped with preventing cancer and mice exposed to large doses of radiation lived 50-100% longer when fed cod liver oil. Also look up Dr. Johanna Budwig’s work on cold-pressed flaxseed oil and cottage cheese, also called the Budwig Protocol. Again, more information can be found in this Radiation Detox PDF.

Homeopathic Remedies:
Ginseng 6x, 30x, 200x and Ruta graveolens 30x and 200x have been tested on mice who showed significantly less chromosomal or cellular damage after radiation exposure. It is best to consult a homeopathic practitioner as doses vary depending on the individual–30c or 200c can usually be taken around 3 times a day as long as symptoms seem to improve. N-4 Radiation Antitox produced by Apex Energetics is used for radiation detoxing.

The homeopathic drainage formula made by Pekana, Renelix, is a very good kidney drainage formula and can be ordered from R-4 Kidney REGENRX is used to rebuild the kidneys afterwards. Other remedies used are Radium Bromatum, Uranium Nitricum–used for uranium miners and radiation workers, Plutonium Nitricum, Anacardium, X-ray, Phosphorus, Causticum, Plumbum, Belladona, Granite, or the Schuessler cell salts. More information about these remedies can be found in this RadiationDetox PDF

Vitamin C:
A very special vitamin for humans as we cannot manufacture it in our bodies so we need to get it from an outside source. I like to get my vitamin C from rosehips as they also have a good balance of bioflavnoids as well, but most berries have lots of vitamin C as well as homemade sauerkraut and kefir. Vitamin C is a great antioxidant and has been shown to be rather deficient in modern man. It also helps to protect the heart, the cells, and collagen tissue. I highly recommend taking this quick online health course to find out more about the benefits of vitamin C. It is a simple but incredibly powerful vitamin that we don’t get enough of.

There are many herbs and spices that are also powerful antioxidants and very helpful with detoxing. These are only some of them:
Ginger is the best thing for nausea and has been seen to protect mice against radiation in various studies.
A very powerful antioxidant even used in small amounts. It has also been shown to be effective in protecting the skin when exposed to radiation and I have used in mixed together with bentonite clay and applied externally to various organs of the body. It will assist in detoxifying them. It has been used as a blood purifier for millennia in India and Myanmar.

Siberian ginseng or Eleuthero is very good for all kind of health issues and was used for victims of the Chernobyl disaster to counter the effects of nuclear radiation. It also revives blood cells and minimizes cell damage to the bone marrow, skin and internal organs.
Thyme, Holy Basil, Rosemary, Mint, Green, black or red (rooibos) teas:
These herbs taken as teas are full of antioxidants and also can be helpful with removing radiation from the body. I also like to use the essential oil of rosemary in my baths which also helps to detoxify through the skin.

Burdock root:
Used as a blood purifier for centuries is said to remove radioactive isotopes from the body and is an ingredient in Essic tea. It also supports the bladder, kidney and liver, contains niacin and an abundance of minerals.

Reishi Mushrooms:
Recommended is from JHS Naturals

Enemas with organic cilantro are helpful for detoxing heavy metals and may be useful as well. Eating cilantro also detoxes heavy metals. Be sure the cilantro is homegrown or organic as conventionally grown cilantro may have pesticides and herbicides which are detrimental.

Various friendly gut flora have been found to be helpful in detoxing heavy metals from the body, so it is useful to have optimal micro-organisms in your intestines. There are also radiation resistant bacteria which are still being studied, but they may be able to help protect against radiation and help to heal radiation damaged individuals.

Oil Pulling
This is my own personal addition and I am not a scientist so I wouldn’t rely heavily on this method, but it doesn’t hurt. Oil pulling is a very ancient healing technique that in my experience helps to remove EMFs that have accumulated in the teeth from such things as sitting too near a monitor or from wireless networks. Oils traditionally used for this technique are cold pressed sesame and sunflower oils which are very high in the powerful antioxidant vitamin E as well as other antioxidants. The skin on the inside of the mouth and around the gums is very thin and has been used as a way to absorb various chemicals quickly into your system without having to wait for the digestive process which can also deteriorate various things you may want to absorb directly. I would like to see more research done in this area, but in the meantime please follow this link for information on how to oil pull and some of the benefits of oil pulling.

By the way, orgonite apparently prevents and even cures radiation poisoning. The reason I say that is that when Carol, Reno Richard and I were gifting the underground bases in and around Fallon, Nevada, three summers ago, the dust where we camped in the desert one night was obviously radioactive. Carol’s nose bled from breathing it all night but none of us had the telltale metallic taste in our mouths, perhaps because we were wearing our Harmonic Protectors.

Kombucha is full of antioxidants and is a very powerful detoxifier for the liver it has been used by people undergoing radiation treatment for cancer, it can be made at home with tea and sugar, it is best to let it ferment for longer or to use a continuous fermentation technique so that there will be less sugar and more beneficial micro-organisms that assist your body in removing heavy metals. Check out this article for more info: Kombucha Tea for Radiation Prevention and Cancer Treatments from KombuchKamp.

I need to do a bit more research in this area, so stay tuned. One of the things we will all be facing is the accumulation of radiation in the soil which will in turn get into our vegetables. In India they have discovered that growing sunflowers is one method of pulling the radiation from the soil:
Scientists have found that sunflowers can remove radionuclides from the soil as well as water, when grown hydroponically. These sunflowers can reduce the amount of uranium concentrations in the water by up to 95%. The sunflowers are then harvested and the radioactive material within the plant is disposed of properly. The tests used sunflower plants to pull radionuclides from a pond contaminated by the 1986 Chernobyl accident. According to scientists, these tests demonstrate that rhizofiltration is a practical way to treat radionuclides, including uranium, cesium, and strontium found in groundwater. The roots of the Sunflower cultivar (Helianthus annuus L.), when submerged in water, quickly accumulate heavy metals and radionuclides. Source

There are plenty of other things you can do that I haven’t mentioned here. Since there is such a variety just choose a few that you are comfortable with. I personally think the clay, baths, vitamin C and diet are good places to start, the rest is bonus. Some good websites currently providing excellent information on detoxing radiation are:
• Radiation Detox Draft PDF
• Health Maven
• Dr Sircus’ Blog
• Heavy Metal Detox
• Sign of the Times
• Low Level Radiation Campaign
Here’s the video I mentioned at the beginning of the post. As I said scary stuff….if she is right it is sickening to realize how despicable and disgusting people can be. But if she is right, these people really need to be brought to justice.

Scientist Leuren Moret – Japan earthquake and nuclear “accident” are tectonic nuclear warfare.

Independent scientist Leuren Moret, whose 2004 landmark article in the Japan Times unmasked lies and distortions by government and company officials that led to the construction of nuclear power plants in seismically dangerous areas, has declared in an exclusive 65-minute video interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre that the “Japan earthquake and “accidents” at the Fukushima’s 6 nuclear power plant units starting March 11, 2011 are in fact deliberate acts of tectonic nuclear warfare, carried out against the populations ecology of Japan and the nations of the Northern Hemisphere, including the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

This post is part of the Fight Back Friday’s Bloghop at Food Renagade


See more at:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here:





By: Roger Landry (TLB)

We live in a country that used to boast of having the most freedom, the highest average standard of living, the highest level of productivity, the highest level of scholastic achievement and one of the (if not the) healthiest societies on this planet… My how the mighty have fallen.

In The Liberty Beacon project we often discuss the dumbing down of America and point the proverbial finger at the failings of our system of education or the massive onslaught of propagandized (so called) entertainment and news shoveled down our throats by the mainstream media.

But is this the true mechanism of dumbing down a society or are there other more physical mechanisms in play. Are these mechanisms intentional and malicious, the result of corruption and complicity, or the result of an incompetent government and regulatory system?

We discuss often the dangers of such known mechanisms as vaccines, GMO’s and Geo-engineering, all proven to cause physical harm to the human physiology, but rarely do we hear much, or enough, about a huge and continuing blight on a vast portion of this population … Fluoride! This substance truly has the capability to dumb down America in a most efficient fashion as you will see in the following video series.

Sodium Fluoride is a known toxin, a deadly poison and a byproduct of the manufacture of aluminum and fertilizers (among other things). It is considered by our health agencies to be a hazardous waste far too deadly to just be dumped into landfills where it may eventually poison the local population … So instead let’s put it in their drinking water and toothpaste and tell them it is good for them … Now this sounds absolutely asinine … right, and it is … but it is also the scenario a vast majority of us live with every day.

What follows is a very thorough lesson in fluoride, its introduction to American society, the lies and disinformation perpetuated about it, and its deadly effect on a once intelligent, healthy and thriving society. The burning question here is … Have we been too dumbed down to absorb this information and push back on the absolute evil being perpetrated against us ???

Lets start this video series off with a classic representation of the true power of Fluoride to DUMB DOWN AMERICA …


ABSOLUTE PROOF FLUORIDE KILLS ! – Footage of fluoride damaging cells and stopping reproduction

Please share! Very rare video footage of cells being damaged by sodium fluoride.

The fluoride added to drinking water is industrial waste fluoride and most is imported from China.


The Hidden Agenda: The Fluoride Deception – Dr. Stanley Monteith

Stanley Monteith explains the history of fluoride, its use, its dangers and its promotion in the United States of America.


Bizarre USA Fluoride History – Full Documentary

A very informative documentary explaining the pros and cons of lying to the public about their forced fluoridation. I wonder how/why we have gotten to this point, the beautiful thing is people are waking up!

Things that should be avoided ALWAYS:

1) Fluoride
2) Aspartame
3) MSG
4) High Fructose Corn Syrup
5) GMO’s
6) Vaccines

A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.

  • Your support in the Liberty Beacon will be appreciated