The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon

 
» MEDIA
 
 

MEDIA

Ben Swann

Contributed to TLB By: Ben Swann

For those who believe in marijuana and cannabis freedom, the future has never been brighter. Right now there is an awakening to the benefits of cannabis for medicinal purposes, specifically something called CBD oil. But is the new CBD craze being manipulated by media and politicians? If it weren’t we wouldn’t need to do a show about it.

The first step toward truth is to be informed.

Ben Swann travels to Colorado to learn the truth about cannabis as medicine and what government isn’t telling you (Full episode)

If you would like to help us create more Truth in Media episodes like this one please Click here to Contribute.

Activate: Click here for 10 Steps You Can Take To Change and Confront the Culture on This Issue

CBD Oil… you’ve probably heard of it by now. Thanks to CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and his special report “Weed” millions are now aware of the cannabinoid rich oil being used to help children in colorado with epilepsy. Especially this one little girl Charlotte Figi after whom the Charlotte’s Web strain of cannabis has been named.

I wanted to learn what CBD oil and the push behind it is all about so I traveled to Denver, Colorado. Home to legalized marijuana and the Stanley brothers, the family behind the charlottes web strain of cannabis oil.

The Stanley’s were the ones to prove in Charlotte Figi’s case that CBD rich cannabis oil can prevent seizures in children.

“We have this strain that we were going to use for cancer patients because studies have shown that CBD helps stop the metastasizing of cancer. We went ahead and tried it and after she (Charlotte Figi) had it a week she went a week seizure free” says Jesse Stanley.

Charlotte Figi’s life was transformed by CBD oil. Now to understand what is unique about CBD oil, you have to understand what a cannabinoid is.

In marijuana there are multiple cannabinoids including THC, CBD, CBN, CBA, THCA, THCB and over 160 other compounds in the plant including terpenes from the plant that create the most effective medicine.

To be clear, in order to get a high from cannabis you need a high level of one cannabinoid, THC. Again, just one particular cannabinoid. In the Stanley’s case they began growing cannabis with lower THC and higher CBD.

“CBD is known to be a neuro-protectant, it is also one of the few things that causes neuro-genesis. So its not just seizures that this helps in epileptics, it is auto-immune disorders whether that’s cancer, crohn’s, lupus, there are so many different types of things” says Stanley.

Today, in the stunningly short time since Charlotte Figi’s story became famous, the Stanley’s have thousands of patients on a waiting list for their CBD oil. In fact there are thousands of families who have already traveled to Colorado for this CBD oil and thousands more on the way. They are called cannabis refugees.

All of that has led to other states wanting to legalize CBD oil. The governor of Utah signed a CBD bill into law legalizing possession of the oil. A bill in Alabama has passed the legislature and is awaiting the governors signature. Lawmakers in Kentucky, Florida, South Carolina, Wisconsin and other states have or will consider CBD bills this year.

“We’re at 20 states right now, so you already have twenty laws on the books that the people wanted or the people’s representatives wanted” says Mark Slaugh of iComply, a Denver based company which is fighting to keep small growers compliant with state regulation on marijuana. There are eight strict guidelines that must be followed. Mark says states are jumping on board with CBD but not with marijuana.

“I think what most politicians don’t realize when they start trying to play where the puck was and not where the puck is going to be is that regulating just one compound greatly underserves most of the patients who really need this medicine. So along the lines of medical efficacy it isn’t reasonable” says Slaugh.

The reality that Mark addresses is how media and politicians are jumping on the CBD train because it doesn’t get you high, but they are ignoring some very important medical facts about cannabinoids.

I talked with Shona Bonda about this very issue.

“I was diagnosed with crohn’s disease. In my first year I had my first bowl resection and i went downhill after that. My immune system recognized that there was something wrong and it essentially attacked itself.” “You’re in pain constantly and you can’t think straight. It’s hard to go through your day to day life when all you can do is think about pain. It is a terrible disease” says Bonda.

Shona’s condition was so bad that her teeth literally became soft and the roof of her mouth had turned black. She couldn’t stand and says she parented her children from the couch. Described a like having a stomach flu every day for years, despite all the medications and doctors, Shona was rotting from the inside out.

Her break came when she saw the YouTube documentary “Run From The Cure” by Rick Simpson which explained how to extract CBD and THC oil from marijuana. Shona had started smoking marijuana just to be able to function but she wasn’t getting better. Shona’s husband at the time wanted to get her a vaporizer… but that vaporizer became the road to so much more.

“He went and got me a very old fashioned vaporizer from the 1970’s. I was reading a book and I pinched off the tube for way too long and oil started forming on the dome. So he went and got a rubber spatula and I started scraping off the oil three times a day and I started putting whatever I could get into a gel cap. Within three days I didn’t need my cane anymore to walk and I started healing quite rapidly. So rapidly that I started to write in a journal” says Bonda.

That journal would become the book, “Live Free or Die”, Shona’s mantra for her own life and the lives of the people she continues to educate across the country on the benefits of cannabis oil.

But politicians and media are making CBD oil into the good kind of cannabis while arguing that THC is the bad kind of cannabis. While that is not how any of this works, that is the case that is subtly being made.

As that happens, two forces will likely come into play. One, in order to push the market away from small sellers and harvesters of CBD oil, states and the feds will likely create a regulatory climate that is so difficult to manage, they will, through cronyism force CBD oil into the hands of a few, which in turn limits supply and forces the price to rise considerably.

Two, big pharmaceutical companies will being putting out a “safe”, “legitimate” form of CBD oil. That is already starting to happen.

“GWB pharmaceuticals out of Great Britain has been producing Evaz which is a 50/50 blend of CBD and THC. They have no real research behind whether or not 50/50 is even the right ratio and they certainly don’t include the other terpenes and other chemical compounds from the cannabis plant. So we could see the bone tossed to the pharmaceutical dog, its certainly a possibility but i think that if more people would take a stand for de-scheduling marijuana, regulating it in a manner similar to alcohol is really the best model to move forward with” says Mark Slaugh.

What you need to know, is where the U.S. government actually stands on this issue. Cannabis, marijuana, is today still a Schedule 1 Drug. That means, according to our government it has no medicinal use and has a high potential for abuse. Does our government really believe that? No. In 1999, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services filed for a patent for the use of cannabinoids for medicinal purposes.

Also in 1999, HHS filed for a second patent, specifically for cannabis oil for the treatment of disease. That’s right, our government through the taxpayer funded Department of Health and Human Services holds two patents on cannabinoids and cannabis oil to treat certain diseases like alzheimer’s and auto-immune diseases like crohn’s.

Meanwhile, our government through taxpayer funded agencies like the Department of Justice pursue, arrest and in prison Americans who would attempt to access or use cannabis oil to heal their own bodies. Because in public they claim cannabis oil is not medicine and in private they seek to own the rights to that medicine.

Truth means that Humanity is Greater than Politics.

TLB recommends you visit Ben’s website for more great/pertinent articles, videos, shows and information. (click on logo below to visit site)

benswann-logo

See featured article and read comments here: http://benswann.com/truth-in-media-feds-says-cannabis-is-not-medicine-while-holding-the-patent-on-cannabis-as-medicine/

“Shortly, the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves. They’ll only be able to parrot the information they’ve been given on the previous night’s news”.

Zbigniew Brzezinski

By TLB Contributor: Dave Hodges

As the title indicates, all American sheeple own two washing machines. One of them looks like this:

television washing machine

The other washing machine, a brain-washing machine, looks like this:

television and sheep

Television Viewing Is Unhealthy

TV has been demonstrated to increase cravings for junk food, and increase the likelihood of becoming overweight, being bullied, under-performing at school, being inactive, and becoming prone to misbehavior.

Japanese researchers, from Tohoku University, found that when children spend a lot of time viewing TV, there can be some very profound the brain defects. The study examined 276 children aged between five and 18, who watched between zero and four hours of TV per day. The average viewing time for the study’s participants was about two hours. The study conducted MRI brain scans and it showed children who spent the most hours in front of TV had greater amounts of gray matter in regions around the frontopolar cortex. This could account why there is a correlation between the amount of time children watch TV and children possessing substandard verbal skills. The amount of gray matter in the brain needs to be pruned in childhood and TV exacerbates this challenge in developing brains.

Researchers have found that TV produces long-term attention disorders among the young beginning around the age of two to three month old. Some researchers are speculating that disorders, such as ADHD, may actually be developed through TV watching in very early childhood. Since 11% of the nation’s children are now diagnosed with ADHD, this is a financial goldmine for Big Pharma.

Television is addicting, particularly for young brains.  Researcher Herbert Krugman found that endorphins are released while watching TV. This means that TV viewers get a burst of “runners high” when watching their favorite programs.

Jerry Mander, The author of Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television, describes how the brainwaves of viewers’ slow down while watching TV. The study determined that program content made difference to this process.

TV, the Great Brain-Washing Device

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the public believes is false.”  

William Casey, former CIA Director

Television has a filtering impact on the perception of reality. This may be television’s most dramatic and dangerous impact . The psychological concept of confirmation bias means that when we hear a message often enough, we come to unquestionably accept the message as authentic and real. And the message is amazingly consistent because only six globalist corporate entities control over 90% of the media.

Television is accused of promoting feelings of inadequacy and enhances a personal belief system based upon an external locus of control. Simply put, this means that the viewer is taught from an early age to not believe in their personal ability to modify their life’s circumstances and that most of what happens in life is a matter of luck and these factors are always outside of our control.

It has long been known that one of the best behavioral control methods, designed to enhance feelings of docility, is to have patients in mental wards or prisoners, view large amounts of television. When we combine these three factors, it is easy to see that the television viewing public is being trained to become the hopeless slaves of the existing power structure and, of course, “Resistance is futile”.

Television Inoculates People from Being Repulsed By Violence

Television is a vaccine that actually works. By the time the average person reaches the age of 18 they seen over 200,000 violent acts on TV including 40,000 murders. It is also estimated that  more than 50% of students in secondary school have witnessed their peers imitating violent acts they’ve seen on TV.

We are not only conditioned to be a more violent by television through the process of habituation and desensitization (Bandura, 1964), we are also conditioned to embrace violence. This has profound implications when we consider such questions as whether, or not, American soldiers will fire on American citizens.

Television Robs Viewers of Spiritual and Moral Development

Perhaps the greatest danger we face from television lies in the fact that our children are separated from us philosophically, morally and spiritually by the liberal values being imparted every minute of the day by television programming. Most American families do not embrace the notion of gay marriage, yet the media would have one believe that the practice is all the rage amongst the American middle class.

One would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to the fact that Jesus is not an invited guest on almost all network programming. This would help to explain our severe moral decline as television programming promotes every anti-family value that the globalists can think up. The portrayal of deviant lifestyles is common place on TV, even though most of the viewers are not of the same mindset.

Amber Lyon

Television promotes a false sense of reality. Let’s not forget that the pseudoscience of climate change is presented to the public as if it is well-established fact and it is not! However, TV watchers are never exposed to the contrary view in the mainstream media. We should remember former CNN reporter, Amber Lyon and her revelations that CNN is paid by the government and agencies like the CIA to run certain stories while ignoring other stories that do not promote the globalist agenda.

Television robs people of an internal sense of happiness.  In fact, researchers have found that happy people do not watch television.

In an interview I conducted with Jim Marrs, I remember Jim saying that if we wanted to free our minds from the control of the globalists, we should turn our TV’s off.  Jim is right, because as the influence and listenership of the alternative media continues to grow, the ratings for the dinosaur media continues to plummet. The message is clear, turn off the TV.

Americans should only own one washing machine, and that would be the one that only washes dirty clothes.

About the Author

Dave Hodges is the host of the popular radio talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.

© 2014. The Common Sense Show. The Logo and Articles are protected by U.S. Copyright Laws, and are not to be downloaded or reproduced in any way without the written permission of Dave Hodges. Copyright 2014. Dave Hodges. All Rights Reserved

TLB recommends you visit Dave here:

CSS-Offical-New-Logo

Click on image to visit site

See featured article and read comments HERE

baby-and-herd-immunity

By TLB Contributor: Lori

Greetings from chilly Iowa,

Its not even mid September & we are under a frost advisory for tonight.  This is something we don’t usually see until the end of October or November.  I have a feeling its going to be a long cold winter.

But onto our topic -

Herd immunity, we hear about this when the CDC and Dr. Paul Offit are worried about herd immunity rates going down because of so many parents opting to take advantage of their right to not vaccinate their kids.

Is herd immunity a fact or is it a myth?

A peer reviewed journal – the New England Journal of Medicine has said that herd immunity is a myth.

Lets start by taking a look at 2 different types of herds -

feedlot2

Which set of herds is healthier,  the ones in the feedlot or the ones in a tree lined pasture?  I lived out in the country for almost 5 years on a farm & across the driveway was a small lot filled with cows that were wading around in mud & feces up to their hocks that were constantly being shot up with antibiotics, I would say the cows in the tree lined pasture are healthier.

According to the CDC, you have to have 95% of the population up to date on their vaccines to have herd immunity.  Now think back, have you had 30 vaccines in the last 10 years?   How about 20 years?  If not, you are not up to date. More than 50% of the population has been unprotected for decades.  So, to start off most of the adult population is not up to date on their vaccines so that is a big bite in the “herd” immunity theory.

The concept of herd immunity originated when people would contract a disease naturally and it would provide lifelong protection.  This concept was then erroneously applied towards the vaccine induced immunity.  If vaccines do give a person immunity, it is usually only for two to ten years.  Not a lifelong immunity that getting, and overcoming,  a disease naturally would provide.

Hol.pasture.fallSM
When we examine scientific literature vaccines only provide 30-40% immunity.  This means that more than 60% of the population had no protection.   This falls well below the required 95% that the CDC says is needed for “herd immunity.”

According to the CDC, only 1% of U.S. kid haven’t been immunized.  So, how is herd immunity being compromised supposedly among kids?

Without the herd immunity theory to fear monger parents into getting their kids vaccinated the vaccination program would implode.

The myth of herd immunity is pressuring many to be vaccinated against their will. But is there another reason why parents are being told that they have to get their kids up to date on their vaccines before entering school?   How about a financial incentive?

In the State of Illinois unless a school system has a 90% vaccination rate among their students they will receive 10% less per student until the student population is brought into compliance.

How about the vaccines that shed?   There is no herd immunity there.  Vaccines that shed for at least 28 days are the MMR, Varicella (chicken pox), Rotateq, FluMist & the oral polio vaccine.  They can shed thru the air, thru saliva & thru a persons elimination process.

We hear that vaccines have saved more lives than they have taken.  The benefit-risk ratio is always acceptable until it happens to your child.  If your child becomes autistic after a vaccine you have to care for that child physically & financially not the person that gave the vaccine.  If your child dies after a vaccine you are the one who will be grieving not the person who gave the vaccine.

Quoting Dr. Wakefield from the 2014 Autism One conference – The benefits do NOT outweigh the risks of vaccines as the risks will vary from person to person.

Will you bow to the peer pressure or stand up & say No More …

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

References and links for additional topic investigation:

http://www.vaccinetruth.org/page_28.htm

http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/herd-immunity-myth-or-reality

http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/life/cellular-microscopic/herd-immunity2.htm

http://intellectualinsurgent.blogspot.com/2010/05/myth-of-herd-immunity.html

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/herdimmunity.htm

http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/the-herd-immunity-myth-and-how-it-pits-parent-against-parent/

http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/the-herd-immunity-myth-treating-our-children-like-cattle-2/

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/vaccines_exposed.html

http://www.whale.to/a/herd.html

http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/the-herd-immunity-myth-treating-our-children-like-cattle-2/

TLB recommends you visit Lori at her BLOG for more great/pertinent articles and information on vaccine and vaccination dangers.

stewart

Photo Credit: via Comedy Central

“This can’t be fixed by waving a magic bomb.”

Commentary by:Janet Allon

Jon Stewart put together a brilliant extended piece last night on President Obama’s shift from measured military action to pretty much declaring war on ISIS. The late-night comedian noted that Obama once said ‘we can’t play Muslim extremist whack-a-mole,” which is Stewart’s least favorite version of that game.

But seriously, polls say that 65 percent of America supports bombing Syria, which is “a full 15 percent more than those who can find Syria on a map,” Stewart pointed out.

That’s how it so often goes, isn’t it? Hey, if Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and John McCain are saying we should just bomb them to smithereens, then of course, we should.

Stewart’s analysis of Obama’s speech and strategy was hilarious and spot-on. When Obama cited the successful strategy of containing terrorists in Yemen and Somalia that’s been going on for years, Stewart quipped: “That’s like Pepe Le Pew citing his successful seduction strategy of relentless, unconsummated cat-stalking.”

He noted that the coalition of countries that has signed on to fight ISIS with the U.S., “looks a bit Christianny,” and wondered why countries in the Muslim world were not joining the fight. Take Saudi Arabia. “While America fights an enemy that wants to take the Saudi’s down,” Stewart said, only half joking, “Saudi Arabia is letting us . . . crash on the couch. It’s like AirstrikeBnB.”

Just a sampling. There’s lots more serious and funny stuff. Watch it here:

FOLLOW JON:

https://WWW.DAILYMOTION.COM/STEWAAART

https://WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/STEWAAART

https://WWW.TWITTER.COM/STEWAAARTT

The Daily Show Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Indecision Political Humor,The Daily Show on Facebook

TLB recommends you visit AlterNet for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here: http://www.alternet.org/video/must-watch-video-jon-stewarts-hilarious-and-definitive-rant-about-obamas-new-isis-strategy

Ben Swann

Once again our government pulls an End Run around We The People! Is this another display of Corruption & Complicity?

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

Many of us are very aware of the healing power associated with cannabinoids … and as it would seem so is our government. Yet their official position is

According to U.S. federal law, Marijuana is defined as having “No Medical Use.”

So why does the government own one of the only patents on marijuana as a medicine?

The patent (US6630507) is titled “Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants” and was awarded to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in October 2003.

The application for patent was filed in 1999, by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Patent No. 6630507?

us-marijuana-patent-2

Who stands to gain in a huge fashion from this patent? Could the answer be the  Big Pharmaceutical and Bio-tech industries? These favored cabals display major inroads into this government defined by corrupt and malignant mechanisms such as vaccines and GMO’s, something many Americans are rapidly losing faith in as massive complicity is uncovered emanating from the applicable government health and regulatory agencies.

This government is so infiltrated, corrupted and influenced by these corporate mega entities, that to think for even one moment this maneuver around We The People was done for benevolent reasons, is a mistake and a farce. The ends to this means can only be more massive profits for the Bio-tech and Big Pharmaceutical industries, and a strangle hold on an effective remedy to many health issues that is cheap and readily available to us if legalized (as some states have already done).

We must never release the pressure we are steadily building on the conscience of this government and all its participants or masters. Any sign of complacency is a sign of weakness we may not recover from. The CDC and FDA have recently been shown again, via major scandals, for the corrupt and complicit entities they in fact are. Although it be but a small chink in their overall armor it needs to be exploited.

Shows like Ben’s on this coming Tuesday are exactly what it needed to sustain the forward momentum and gain new ground. The timing could not be more perfect! Once we force them to take even one step back, the entire Paradigm shifts … in our favor.

Share this event, talk to your friends. This is not about pot, it is about our freedom to maintain our health and our bodies as we see fit because when a government controls our access to every mechanism of health sustainability and  maintenance … they in fact control us … completely!

And nobody can put that truth in you face in a more blatant and credible fashion than The Liberty Beacon projects Friend and Contributor …

Ben Swann

Thanks for this show Ben … Knock em dead my friend !!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This coming Tuesday, September 16th, Ben Swann will release a ground breaking “Truth In Media” episode regarding the health benefits of Medical Marijuana and how our government is working behind the scenes to OWN the industry while claiming it’s use ILLEGAL. This is a must see show!

View the trailer here:

Will you join us on Tuesday the 16th and share this piece that EVERYONE should see?

TLB highly recommends you join and share Ben’s event on FaceBook at: https://www.facebook.com/events/760039847394248/?notif_t=plan_user_joined

Invite your friends and let’s show this to the world.

TLB also recommends you Visit Ben’s website for more great/pertinent articles, shows and information (click logo below to visit site)

benswann-logo

media

(NaturalNews) There’s something really fishy going on with the mainstream media right now. Multiple outlets such as Reuters and CBS News are reporting a story which they would normally dismiss as a “conspiracy theory.” According to these news outlets, rogue cell phone towers known as “interceptors” have been discovered across America, and they don’t belong to communications companies, the NSA or the U.S. military. They reportedly snoop on your private phone calls by intercepting cell phone signals, then relaying them to other towers.

“Rogue cell phone towers, the type that can intercept your mobile calls and data, are cropping up all over the United States, including here in Chicago,” reports CBS News. (1)

“Seventeen fake cellphone towers were discovered across the U.S. last week,” reports Reuters in an article on Yahoo Finance. (2) “Rather than offering you cellphone service, the towers appear to be connecting to nearby phones, bypassing their encryption, and either tapping calls or reading texts.”

Even Computerworld got in on the story, writing that “CryptoPhone users found and mapped 17 fake cell towers in the U.S. during the month of July.” (3)

The one conspiracy theory the media instantly believes?

What’s fishy here is that this is precisely the kind of story the mainstream media would normally attack and disregard as a “conspiracy theory.” Remember, this is the same mainstream media that has utterly censored and “memory holed” the recent confession of a CDC scientist who admitted to committing scientific fraud to hide links between MMR vaccines and autism. That story has been completely blacked out by the media as if it didn’t exist.

This is also the same mainstream media that, for years, called people tin foil hat-wearing lunatics if they said the U.S. government was listening to our phone calls and monitoring our emails. Thanks to whistleblower Edward Snowden, of course, this is all out in the open now, but just five years ago anyone who dared suggest such a thing was labeled a “wing nut.”

I remember Alex Jones being ridiculed over his breaking story that cities were installing street lamps that could listen to the verbal conversations of people passing by. That story once again turned out to be entirely true, yet it was widely disparaged by the mainstream media which seems to default to the phrase “conspiracy theory” any time they want to dismiss a true story without actually having to investigate it.

Never forget that the media is in the business of censoring the truth, not printing it

The mainstream media, you see, has always been stupidly slow to recognize reality. Anything that doesn’t fall in line with barking orders from Washington D.C. or corporate sponsors has been ridiculed as a conspiracy theory or censored entirely. To this day, the media still ridicules all the architects and engineers who question the lunacy of the official 9/11 story. That official story still claims that the third building which collapsed that day — WTC 7 — magically lost all structural column support and collapsed in a perfect demolition footprint even though it was never struck by any airplane. The official story defies the laws of physics, yet the media has never had any problem with repeating it as if it were fact.

Yet now, this “interceptor cell tower” story is suddenly and instantly embraced across the mainstream media as true. All the media outlets that normally scream “conspiracy theory!” are reporting these secret cell towers as fact. Something’s fishy here.

Remember: The mainstream media isn’t in the “truth business.” It’s in the business of telling you what it wants you to know while ignoring anything it doesn’t want you to know. If mainstream media stories are coming out about secret cell phone towers listening to your conversations, then there’s a deliberate reason behind it.

It could be that this entire story is a hoax and they’re watching to see who picks up on it. Later, they might run a new headline, “How we hoaxed the gullible internet with a goofy story about fake cell phone towers” or something similar.

Or, on the positive side of this, perhaps the mainstream media has finally realized it needs to start covering the truth from time to time in order to stop losing so many readers. While the alternative media has been exploding in popularity, the mainstream media has been bleeding out in terms of readership. The public craves the truth, and there is zero loyalty to mainstream news sources in the minds of content consumers.

Bottom line: Any story the mainstream media jumps on must be immediately questioned. This doesn’t automatically mean the story isn’t true, but we must always keep the real agenda of the media in mind as we analyze these developments.

Are secret cell towers really intercepting your phone calls? Probably. But far worse is the fact that the mainstream media is secretly censoring all the really important news you need to know, such as the fact that the CDC’s own top scientist has openly admitted that MMR vaccines are linked to autism (and that the CDC knew this ten years ago but covered it up).

Sources for this article include:
(1) http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/09/03/rouge…

(2) http://finance.yahoo.com/news/mysterious-fak…

(3) http://www.computerworld.com/article/2600348…

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/046735_cell_phone_towers_covert_surveillance_conspiracy_theories.html#ixzz3CaCEYY6a

Read article here: http://www.naturalnews.com/046735_cell_phone_towers_covert_surveillance_conspiracy_theories.html

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here: http://www.naturalnews.com/index.html

Dangers-Of-Vaccines

Preface by: Roger Landry (TLB)

We who believe through scientific research and peer reviewed studies, in the lack of efficacy and the real and proven harm associated with vaccines, have made serious headway recently in the awakening of others to this false promise of protection … and this cannot be allowed!

Those who stand to gain billions of dollars annually from the distribution and applications of these poisons are also those who have all the resources money can buy. What Christina details below is but one example of the lengths these corporations will go to, to facilitate and perpetuate this LIE for profit.

Please read this and make it viral!

We have all worked so hard to bring the truth to bear … to stall now in the face of pure propaganda of this magnitude, is not in our nature. So let us meet the challenge and continue to move forward in our justified mission of education … if for nothing else but the lives of our children !!!

Boycott This Film If You Have Any Sense Of Truth

By TLB Staff Writer: Christina England

The definition of the word science, according to the online Etymology Dictionary, is the following:

“What is known, knowledge (of something) acquired by study; information;” also “assurance of knowledge, certitude, certainty,” from Old French science “knowledge, learning, application; corpus of human knowledge” (12c.), from Latin scientia “knowledge, a knowing; expertness,” from sciens (genitive scientis) “intelligent, skilled,” present participle of scire “to know,” probably originally “to separate one thing from another, to distinguish,” related to scindere “to cut, divide,” from PIE root *skei- “to cut, to split” (cognates: Greek skhizein “to split, rend, cleave,” Gothic skaidan, Old English sceadan “to divide, separate;”

With this in mind, I was shocked and somewhat horrified when I was passed an advertisement for a biased and somewhat misleading pro-vaccination film that is being released tonight 10th September 2014, at 9pm/8c on PBS, titled Vaccines – Calling the Shots.
https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/aim.site-ym.com/resource/collection/C51290B5-3749-4FC1-8F88-330CF4266E05/NOVA_Vaccination_Episode_Press_Release_8-28-14.pdf

The advertisement for the film is titled:

AMID THE RETURN OF VACCINE-PREVENTABLE DISEASES, NOVA EXAMINES THE SCIENCE OF IMMUNIZATION, TRACKS OUTBREAKS, AND SHEDS LIGHT ON THE RISKS OF OPTING OUT NOVA: VACCINES—CALLING THE SHOTS

However, science is certainly not what is advertised.

The advert states:

“This documentary travels the globe to provide the latest evidence and answers. Featuring scientists, pediatricians, psychologists, anthropologists, and parents wrestling with vaccine-related questions, the hour-long film explores the history and science behind vaccinations, tracks outbreaks, and sheds light on the risks of opting out.”
What exactly is scientific about purchasing a fake medical degree and vaccinating an eight year old boy with infected matter extracted from cow-pox lesions?

According to Dr. Walter Hadwen J.P., M.D., L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S., L.S.A., (Gold Medalist in Medicine and in Surgery), who wrote a full account of the truth about the history of Edward Jenner’s smallpox vaccine, when the boy did not develop cow-pox, Jenner decided to use the innocent child in an experiment and proceeded to vaccinate the child with infected matter from smallpox lesions. When the smallpox did not infect the child, Jenner decided to announce his so called “grand discovery” to the Royal Society. To read the full story click http://www.docstoc.com/docs/80447666/Walter-Hadwen-was-one-of-the-most-eminent-British-MDs-in-the-first

The advert for the film states:

“The film illustrates how vaccines not only protect individuals, but also safeguard entire communities. The higher the overall vaccination rate is, the more protection for everyone. For highly infectious diseases like measles, 95% of the community must be vaccinated to shield the larger population, a concept known as “herd immunity.” If the rate drops below that 95% threshold, even by just a few percentage points, this layer of protection can collapse, sometimes leading to the kinds of outbreaks reported in recent news headlines.”

This is totally untrue. In February 2012, Dr. Russell Blaylock wrote:
“In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the population at large occurred only if people contracted the infections naturally. The reason for this is that naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one major problem – vaccine-induced immunity lasted for only a relatively short period, from 2 to 10 years at most, and then this applies only to humoral immunity. This is why they began, silently, to suggest boosters for most vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella.

Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were lasting for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those which they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.” http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/#sthash.7jLclohz.dpuf

The advert states:

“Measles was declared eliminated in the U.S. in 2000; however, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report 566 confirmed cases in 2014, as of July 11. In 2012, there were nearly 50,000 cases of pertussis, also known as whooping cough, and 20 deaths, in the U.S.”

And then continues by adding:

“Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician and infectious disease expert at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, offers the physician’s perspective on the vulnerable immune systems of young children, the history of vaccines, and how diseases re-emerge when immunization rates decrease.”

In recent weeks we have witnessed how the CDC has lied to the public for thirteen years regarding autism and other crucial information regarding the safety of vaccines. Therefore, is it safe to assume that the CDC is an organization that can be trusted?
http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2014/08/27/is-the-cdc-guilty-of-crimes-against-humanity/

As for Dr. Paul Offit, he owns the patent for Mercks rotavirus vaccine, which is known to earn him millions of dollars. I would hardly call him impartial. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/06/25/vaccine-doctor-given-at-least-30-million-dollars-to-push-vaccines.aspx

Stephen Jay Gould puts it in a nutshell, when he stated:

“The most creative theories are often imaginative visions imposed upon facts; the source of imagination is also strongly cultural.” [Introduction to "The Mismeasure of Man," 1981]

All things considered, if you want to be lied to for approximately one hour, then this film is for you, however if you want to learn the truth I should the trusted research papers and videos published on reliable websites such as the CMSRI, Vactruth and A Shot Of Truth (there are many more).

Screenshot-7

TLB Preface: Is this real? Are we supposed to believe it is real? Is this another case of an ignorant FOX employee posting something that was not supposed to be released for several more days. Is this the foreshadowing of another premeditated and elaborately planned false flag event that will ultimately claim the lives of thousands more Americans? Is tyranny that rife in America?

Look at the date stamp on the article (address bar) … it is 09/11 … days in the future! It does not state the US is under threat of an attack … it clearly states the US “IS” attacked … well that has not happened yet. So does FOX have clairvoyants on their news staff? And almost as soon as the information is posted, it disappears.

TLB presents this information for your consideration, it is your decision whether to believe and peruse additional information on the subject, but if this information is in fact credible … intentional or by mistake, this is very bad news! And if it is in fact a hoax … someone needs to be in jail!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We all knew it was coming…we just didn’t know what or when. Here is a leak by Fox News saying that ISIS has planned to attack the USA on none other than… 9/11/2014. That day is historical to us all. That day led us to where we stand now. Where will it lead us if another attack happens on that day again? There are a lot of worries being voiced across the board from Chuck Hagel to Rick Perry saying that the next 9/11 is imminent! Did they actually mean the exact date of 9/11? Well according to this Fox News leak they did! This seems like perfect timing as Obama has finally authorized attacks on ISIS (ISIL). Video proof below

 
Here are the links to the articles:

www.foxnews.com/world/2014/09/11/us-under-attack-isis-militant-forces-retaliate/
foxweekly.com/1899/09/11/national/isis-militants-launches-attack-on-the-us.html

This report is released only hours after my previous report today that the elites are going to drag our attention everywhere else around the world to distract us from the homeland according to Dan Page

Here are some pictures of the websites:

Screenshot-7

1111

With the type of evil that ISIS is, everything is planned. They operate through fear. The global elites that control ISIS could “accidentally” leak the plan of attack before the actual event. So there is a real possibility that an event could take place on that day. Everyone should stay aware.

Source: 2127news.net

EddieEddie (2791 Posts)

Eddie L. is the founder and owner of WorldTruth.TV. This website is dedicated to educating and informing people with articles on powerful and concealed information from around the world. I have spent the last 30+ years researching Bible, History, Secret Societies, Symbolism

TLB recommends you visit WORLD TRUTH TV for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here: http://worldtruth.tv/isis-to-attack-on-9112014-fox-puts-out-an-article-then-deletes-it-from-the-website/

 

By TLB Contributor: Ken LaRive

“The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.” ― Thomas Jefferson

Hidden

I remember my time writing for newspapers. What a rush of ego to see my thoughts in print. I carefully cut out each one, and over the years filled several scrapbooks. All went well when I talked about travel experiences, pot holes in the streets, or trying to motivate voter turnout. But when it got to an inconvenient truth, I saw an insurmountable wall. I found that it is 18 times more likely that a black man will commit a violent act toward a white man, as given by a well-respected FBI extrapolation method (the Jena six comes to mind), but it could not, would not be published. Anything negative about Zionism (Israel comes to mind) or positive about the UN, or the breaking of international law, can not be published. Or, Lord forbid, to say something positive about a specific candidate not in favor, and it just could not, or would not be published. It wasn’t that my other work wasn’t appreciated, it seemed, and I did get praise for them… but I felt a cold slap in the face when truth was not presentedand I wondered at my association with them, my many contributions over the years, and my overt participation in their bias and the many taboo of their own design…

Once, in 2007, I submitted an essay about what I heard coming from the Ron Paul camp to Baton Rouge, and my twenty paragraphs were cut to 14, with the last two paragraphs, a punch-line summery, deleted. It made the Liberty movement sound ridiculous, inconsequential, and that was just the intent. They did not like Ron Paul, most likely because they feared he was not a part of their corporate power structure, and could not be bought….And that intent, more than likely, and in most cases, comes from the top down. It is the mindset of the owners who set the precedence for a newspaper. and it has little to do with truth. But there is something more to this story, and in all fairness, it must be said.

“Educate and inform the whole mass of people… They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our Liberty,” -Thomas Jefferson

From the inception of Mass Communication throughout history, it was primarily designed to promote an idea to the literate, from the printed word to word of mouth. A mandate was posted on a church or government wall and was ingested and interpreted by just a small faction of people, and though today we have far more literates in our society, the question remains: Is truth viable in our society? Or perhaps a better question might be, “Can truth actually be understood?”

In an old textbook of mine, “The Process and Effects of Mass Communication,” I searched to find an essay that would reflect this concern, that newspaper truth is not their primary reason for being. that it is profit…But as I studied and researched, I found something I had not anticipated, and far more apropos. . on page 302.

Written by Albert H. Hastorf and Hadley Cantrel, it was entitled They saw a Game: A Case Study. Dr. Cantrel, who died over thirty years ago, was chairman of the psychology department at Princeton, and Dr. Hastorf , the dean of humanities and sciences at Stanford University, came together for a common cause. By the use of scientific methods of observations they published this noteworthy work in The Journal of Abnormal and Social Phycology 49 (1954);129-34.

My bias towards newspapers stopped me from seeing the total picture

Their annotations of a football game, and the perceptions of that game as proposed by the school newspapers of Princeton and Dartmouth, indicated, so I thought, that each side’s reality was manifested in their minds by the bias of their respective newspapers. “It seems clear,” the two psychologists wrote, that “there is no such thing as a ‘game’ existing ‘out there’ in its own right which people observe.’ The ‘game’ exists for a person and is experienced by him only insofar as certain happenings have significance in terms of his purpose.”

It wasn’t what I expected. There was another element to this equation I had not considered…

It was an important game for both sides, and feelings escalated in what was then called a “considerable” amount of rough play, and several highly respected and loved players were hurt in the frey, and also, that some of the calls were in question. And for months this game was the topic of conversation and argument on the campus of both schools… and even when the film of the game were shown long after, there were very conflicting perceptions of what the psychologists called “objective stimulus.”

After compiling information from interviews from both Universities, interpretations of an extensive questionnaire, and gathering newspaper articles written soon after the game, an assessment of this phenomena was formulated.

The Daily Princetonian published this four days after the game:

“This observer has never seen quite such a disgusting exhibition of so-called “sport.” Both teams were guilty but the blame must be laid primarily on Dartmouth’s doorstep. Princeton, obviously the better team, had no reason to rough up Dartmouth. Looking at the situation rationally, we don’t see why the Indians should make a deliberate attempt to cripple Dick Kazmaier or any other Princeton player. The Dartmouth psychology, however, is not rational itself.”

A few days later the Princeton Alumni published this:

But certain memories of what occurred will not be easily erased. Into the record books will go in indelible fashion the fact that the last game of Dick Kazmaier’s career was cut short by more than half when he was forced out with a broken nose and mild concussion, sustained from a tackle that came well after he had thrown the pass.

The second-period development was followed by a third quarter outbreak of roughness that was climaxed when a Dartmouth player deliberately kicked Brad Glass in the ribs while the latter was on his back. Throughout the often unpleasant afternoon, there was undeniable evidence that the losers’ tactics were the result of an actual style of play, and reports on other games they have played this season substantiate this.”

But on the Dartmouth side, students saw the game in a very different light. The Dartmouth undergraduate newspaper, the Dartmouth, had this to say:

“However the Dartmouth-Princeton game set the stage for another type of dirty football. A type which may be termed as an unjustifiable accusation.

Dick Kazmaier was injured early in the game. Kazmaier was the star, an All-American. Other stars have been injured before, but Kasmaier had been built to represent a Princeton idol. When an idol is hurt there is only one recourse- the tag of dirty football. So what did the Tiger Coach Charley Caldwell do? He announced to the world that the Big Green had been out to extinguish the Princeton star. His purpose was achieved.

After this incident, Caldwell instilled the old see-what-they-did-to-get-them attitude into his players. His talk got results, Gene Howard and Jim Miller were both injured. Both had dropped back to pass, had passed, and were standing unprotected in the backfield. Result: one bad leg and one broken leg.

The game was rough and did get a bit out of hand in the third quarter. Yet most of the roughing penalties were called against Princeton while Dartmouth received more of the ille-gal-use-of-the hands variety.”

And then, a day later, Dartmouth published this:

“Dick Kazmaier of Princeton admittedly is an unusually able football player. Many Dartmouth men traveled to Princeton not expecting a win- only hoping to see an All-American in action. Dick Kazmaier was hurt in the second period, and played only a token part in the remainder of the game. For this, spectators were sorry. Medical authorities have confirmed that as a relatively unprotected passing and running star in a contact sport, he is quite liable to injury. Also, his particular injuries- a broken nose and slight concussion- were no more serious than is expected almost every day in any football practice, where there is no more serious stake than playing the following Saturday. Up to the Princeton Game, Dartmouth players suffered about ten known nose fractures and face injuries, not to mention several slight concussions.

Did Princeton players feel so badly about losing their star? They shouldn’t have. During the past undefeated campaign they stopped several individuals stars by a concentrated effort, including such mainstays as Frank Hauff of Navy, Glenn Adams of Pennsylvania and Rocco Calvo of Cornell.

In other word, the same brand of football condemned by the Prince- that of stopping the big man- is practiced quite successfully by the Tigers.”

To find out how and why there were two emphatically different takes on the perceptual reality of this game, two steps of data gathering were involved. Firstly, a questionnaire was submitted to both Universities, designed to not only formulate individual reactions, but to gleam a climate of opinion from each institution. This was administered one week after the game, and given to undergraduate students who were taking introductory and intermediate psychology courses.

Secondly, they were shown the same motion picture of the game to undergraduates from both schools, and to fill out a questionnaire that would indicate to them any noted infraction of the rules, both considered “mild” or “flagrant.” All questionnaires were carefully coded and transferred to punch cards professionally.

The Results: A marked contrast between the two groups.

Nearly all Princeton students viewed the game to be “rough and dirty” and not one though it “clean and fair.” Nine tenths of them thought that Dartmouth started the rough play.

The majority of Dartmouth students thought both sides were to blame, and that the reason for these charges against them was Princeton’s concern for their star player. They saw too, only half of the infraction that the Princeton students had noted, with about two to one flagrant to mild, to about one to two for the Dartmouth students.

As a side note. A copy of the movie was sent to a member of a Dartmouth alumni group in the Midwest. He viewed the film, the same film that was sent to Princeton, where they noted nine severe infractions by the Dartmouth players, but he could find none. He wired back to Princeton: “ Preview of Princeton movies indicates considerable cutting of important part please wire explanation and possible air mail missing parts before showing scheduled for January 25 we have splicing equipment.”

Page 308-309

“Like any other complex social occurrence, a “football game” consists of a whole host of happenings. Many different events are occurring simultaneously. Furthermore, each happening is a link in a chain of happenings, so that one follows another in sequence. The “football game,”as well as other complex social situations, consists of a whole matrix of events. In the game situation, this matrix of events consists of the actions of all the players, together with the behavior of the referees and linesmen, the action on the sidelines, in the grandstands, over the loudspeaker, etc.

Also…

“…a happening generally has significance only if it reactivates learned significances already registered in what we have called a person’s assumptive form-world.”

Authors note: Perhaps it may be a bit too strong to suggest that newspaper bias is the primary fault. It seems that each individual carries with them a mix of preconceived notions, and this taints their ability to have objective observations. However flawed and biased are these observations, they are nevertheless considered truthful realities to each individual, and that is the rub. Of course these preconceived notions come from a wide variety of places both past and present in the form of cultural and societal norms, systems of education, to a wide fan of subconscious advertizement and propaganda accumulated over a lifetime, and these make up our reality, in spite of the ideal of truth.

Truth, is indeed truth, and universal, but our linear minds, at times, seem unable to grasp it. Emotions such as hope, love, and what is called blind faith are indeed powerful motivators for us human beings, but they are not the vehicles we can readily use to grasp a meaning of truth. If anything, they can taint truth, just as great ideals such as honor and allegiance can also have, and sometimes we will sacrifice our very lives, without the least bit of consideration for actual truth. We will even trust others to direct our immortal souls, giving our individual responsibility and God-given intellect to them in blind faith.

In the world we now face, one thing seems evident and very poignant… we are being played, and the method is scientifically sound. There is a veritable discipline involved in what can only be described as mind control, and we have been groomed, it seems from as far back from mother’s knee, to view the world in a particular way, and to justify it by any means possible, or necessary. So much does the ego play a part of this convolution, that some may consider the complete destruction of a billion souls instead of trying, for just one moment, to contemplate if their idealism is based on an actual truth. What capabilities we hold inside, of amazing good and object evil, are as two sides of our human aspect, and what nature we propose for ourselves is as fragile as a lucid thought.

In spite of the many elements that will create a mindset to action, a newspaper should be held responsible. If a newspaper is found negligent, fraudulent, purposely incites violence and hatred by the promotion of half truths, omits relevant information created entirely for the personal gain of sensationalism, they should be held liable and responsible for the outcome. The best way, it seems, other than litigation, is to withdraw advertisement. Truth must be considered profitable, in a world without a moral compass.

And any person interviewed who knowingly lies, should also be held accountable. When a city is razed because of a lie, in spite of an already broken society, those responsible should be brought up on charges of obstruction of justice, mayhem, and murder. We should all be held by the same standard and responsibility for self. Burning and looting should never be tolerated, under any circumstances. They should be photographed in the act, and after the smoke clears, arrested under due process, for crimes against humanity.

See featured article and read comments here: http://www.examiner.com/article/a-study-of-newspaper-bias-the-princeton-dartmouth-game-of-1951

megacities-map2

By TLB Contributor: Dave Hodges

The plan is called America 2050 and the concept is based upon the creation of megacities. In order for the megacities concept, which is well underway, to come to fruition, American suburbs and rural areas must be completely depopulated. This process is underway and the Obama administration is accelerating the process.

This will come as a shock to many reading this article because they did not learn of these events from FOX or CNN. However, in actuality, the process of moving the United States towards a complete Agenda 21 style of total urbanization has already commenced and it began nearly 20 years ago. In the case of total urbanization, the United States is in the process of dividing the country into 11 large densely populated urban centers. The concept, which will be the subject of a future investigation, will  explore this “end-game” strategy of the globalists which will depopulate the America’s suburbs and and rural areas. The concept is called megacities and the framework was laid in 1994,  when the United States became official participants in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was a ‘liberalized’ trade agreement between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. Under NAFTA, farmers’ income in all three countries has plummeted and millions of small farmers have lost their land, while agribusiness corporations (i.e. large government subsidized corporate farms) have reaped huge profits. Subsequently, NAFTA has had three dramatic effects on farmers in North America and all three effects further the cause dense urbanization as outlined in Agenda 21 documents.

NAFTA Was the Beginning of Rural Flight In the United States

The first notable effect of NAFTA is that it it is credited with greatly accelerating illegal immigration and almost immediately bankrupted over three million farmers in northern Mexico and this group became the vanguard of millions of Mexicans illegally entering the US in search for subsistence work of any type.

The second dramatic impact of NAFTA lies in the fact that it has had catastrophic consequences for U.S. farmers as a record number of small farmers have lost their farms and have gone through foreclosure while the government subsidized corporate farms have thrived. Since NAFTAthe average annual growth of the US trade deficit has been 45% higher. Also since NAFTA took effect, about 170,000 small family farms have gone bankrupt which represents a decline of 21% of family farms in the U.S. The 21% of American small farmers who have been bankrupted since the advent of NAFTA, represents a higher percentage of displaced American farmers than what is happening with the forced relocation of Chinese farmers to the ghost cities as covered in the first part of this series. And what happens to American small farmers who have lost their livelihood? They either work on their former competitors corporate farms as hired hands, or they relocate to urban areas in search of employment.

In a case of “death by a thousand cuts”, the American farmer is rapidly moving towards extinction. If it is not the EPA enforcing its Agenda 21 wetlands regulations with devastating consequences on farmers, it is the FDA harassing farmers for pursuing time-honored farm related industries such as the raw milk industry. Congress is plotting new attacks on the U.S. farmer as I write these words. Even Amish farmers have felt the “swat-team wrath of the federal government. Average, everyday Americans are being arrested for merely growing their own food. The relationship between the federal government and the independent American farmer has become so strained that a 17 county region in northern California and southern Oregon have come together to try and form a 51st state dubbed the State of Jefferson.

state of jefferson banner

Whether it is China or the U.S., the United Nations Agenda 21 urbanization policies are designed for the purpose of herding people into dense urban areas for reasons of control and the primary method of control has to do with dominating food production.

The US Government Is Gaining Control Over All Food

Through the collectivization of the food production, the Chinese government is working towards gaining complete control over all food in order to control the people. On an ever increasing basis, NAFTA is providing the U.S. government with the exact same ability. Therefore, the third draconian impact of NAFTA is that it has led to even more nefarious free trade agreements and executive orders which led to the loss of control for local communities over their own food supply.

Underlying the World Trade Organization, the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA which has now morphed into the Organization of American States), and the Central American Free Trade Agreement is the philosophy that all food (i.e. from basic grains, meat, fruits and vegetables) should be exclusively produced for international export. This is a drastic departure from the time honored practice where each country produced the majority of food its citizens needed on local, small farms and only traded in certain products that could not be successfully grown locally. If anyone wonders where this is headed, we only have to look to Africa for the answer. The very first great wave of a NAFTA style of globalization in agriculture took place in Africa, Asia, and Latin America as global corporations forced local farmers to give up local food production, and shifted production to plantations using enslaved Indigenous and African labor to grow the luxury crops of coffee, sugar, bananas, and cocoa for export to the colonizing countries.

If the changing nature of food production in Africa are not enough to raise the level of concern for most, perhaps a quick history lesson will jolt the more complacent among you into a state of full awareness.

Josef Stalin engaged in his own Soviet style Holocaust when, in 1932 and 1933, and estimated six to 20 million people in the Ukraine died from starvation when Stalin implemented his prescription of “hope and change” policies in order to eliminate the Ukrainian’s desire for becoming their own nation-state.

Upon assuming power, the Stalinist Communist regime rapidly nationalized the food industry and forced all of the region’s farms into collectives. Thus, Stalin’s version of the Holocaust came to fruition in what history has dubbed, the “Holdomor,” in which millions perished in only a two year period when the Soviet government began to exterminate the Ukrainian population by taking control of food and food production. The large corporate collectivization of food is precisely the same thing that is presently happening in the United States under Obama.

The lesson here is, if the government controls the food, the government controls the people.

Starvation Will Be Used to Enforce the Agenda 21 Depopulation of Rural Areas

The use of food by the U.S. government has been a matter of official U.S. governmental covert policy since 1974-1975.

In December, 1974, the National Security Council directed by Henry Kissinger completed a classified study entitled, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study was based upon the unproven claims that population growth in Lesser Developed Countries (LDC) constituted a serious risk to America’s national security.

In November 1975, President Ford, based upon the tenets of NSSM 200, outlined a classified plan to forcibly reduce population growth in LDC countries through birth control, war and famine. Ford’s new national security adviser, Brent Scowcroft, in conjunction with CIA  Director, George H. W. Bush, were tasked with implementing the plan and the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture assisted in the implementation of these insane genocidal plans.

Kissinger’s quote is important because he was tasked with implementing the insane genocidal policies contained in NSSM 200.

Kissinger’s quote is important because he was tasked with implementing the insane genocidal policies contained in NSSM 200.

NSSM 200 formally raised the question, “Would food be considered an instrument of national power? … Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth”? Kissinger has answered these questions when he stated that he was predicting a series of contrived famines, created by mandatory programs and this would make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary in this modern day application of eugenics in a scheme that would allow Henry to have his cake and eat it too in that the world would finally be rid of the “useless eaters!”

Third world population control, using food as one of the primary weapons, has long been a matter of official covert national policy and a portion of President Obama’s Executive Order (EO 13603), National Defense Resources Preparedness is a continuation of that policy. Only now, the intended target are not the LDC’s but, instead, the American people.

With the stroke of his pen, Obama has total and absolute control over all food where his EO 13603 states:

e)  “Food resources” means all commodities and products, (simple, mixed, or compound), or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption.  “Food resources” also means potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers, all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, seed, cotton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product.

(f)  “Food resource facilities” means plants, machinery, vehicles (including on farm), and other facilities required for the production, processing, distribution, and storage (including cold storage) of food resources, and for the domestic distribution of farm equipment and fertilizer…”

NAFTA was merely the opening artillery bombardment against the American farmer and the ultimate depopulation of rural areas. The death of the American farmer will ultimately come at the hands of EO 13603 and I believe this will be fully implemented when Obama declares martial law.

“Thank God That I Do Not Live On a Farm”

Put this map into your GPS, it will tell where you soon cannot go. The UN's manifestation of forcing people into stack and pack cities.

Do you think that you and your family are actually safe from the ravages of depopulating the rural areas through economic blackmail and ultimate starvation? Think again! Unless you presently live in the core inner city and occupy less than 500 square feet of living space, the Obama administration, as I write these words, is actively plotting to get you out of your home and into densely populated urban areas and this will be fully exposed in Part Four of this series as the draconian concept of megacities is fully explored.

If you have not read parts 1&2 of this series click on these links

Part One    Part Two

About the Author

Dave Hodges is the host of the popular radio talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.

© 2014. The Common Sense Show.  The Logo and Articles are protected by U.S. Copyright Laws, and are not to be downloaded or reproduced in any way without the written permission of Dave Hodges. Copyright 2014. Dave Hodges. All Rights Reserved

TLB recommends you visit Dave here:

CSS-Offical-New-Logo

Click on image to visit site

See featured article and read comments here: http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/08/26/the-agenda-21-depopulation-of-rural-areas-will-give-obama-stalin-like-control-over-food/