The Liberty Beacon project
What follows is information concerning one of the most controversial topics in discussion today … Genocide or Eugenics and the use of vaccines to accomplish these goals on a global scale. This is the second publication of this article by TLB with the support of the author … Yes it is that important so please read on.
Preface by: Roger Landry (TLB)
The rising level of infertility globally is an issue of much contemplation. Nowhere is it more evident or rising at a faster rate than in the USA.
Is it a coincidence that America is also the most vaccinated society on this planet?
Is it even believable that the US government and its health agencies claim to have no answers for us?
Is it conceivable that there are forces and global organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), plotting a serious reduction in our numbers … whether we like it or not, leaving us no say in such a vital and person matter?
Do you wish to have the decision on whether you will “be allowed” or “able” to have a child left in the hands of some cold heartless global statistician, without your knowledge or consent?
In fact there are many among us who herald the concept of population reduction today saying (mistakenly), it is required to save the planet.
BUT what would their reaction be if they suddenly became aware that via the mechanism of vaccination, THEY had been robbed (permanently and intentionally) of the ability to have a family, a legacy … WITHOUT their knowledge or permission. I would guarantee a change in mindset so fast it would throw you into a spin
And if you think this is only happening in poor third world countries … get your head out of your butt, and please read the first and second comments again !!!
What follows should come as a serious wake up call to you because all said above … is in fact already a reality!
Please read on …
WHO Caught Recommending Vaccinations Known To Render Primates Infertile
By TLB Staff Writer: Christina England
A report of a meeting, recently uncovered from the Internet archives, revealed that in 1992, the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the World Bank, met in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the then-current status for the development of “fertility regulating vaccinations.”http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/61301/1/WHO_HRP_WHO_93.1.pdf
At first glance, it appeared the WHO were discussing various methods of family planning with women’s health advocates and scientists from developing countries. On further reading however, something far more worrying emerged.
During the introduction, the WHO discussed “fertility regulation” and how their specialist program would carry out activities to strengthen the research capabilities of developing countries, enabling them to meet their own research needs and participate in the global effort in human reproduction research.
The Meeting Takes a Sinister Turn
There were twenty participants at the meeting, ten scientists and clinicians from Australia, Europe, India and the USA involved in funding Fertility Regulatory Vaccines (FRVs) research; and ten women’s health advocates from Africa, North and South America, Asia and Europe, with backgrounds in immunology, service delivery and social and clinical research, as well as a wide experience of working with women.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a new approach to “fertility regulation.”
On page 12 of the report, the groups can be found discussing the development of vaccinations against hCG, a hormone produced by the cells surrounding the early embryo and later by the placenta during pregnancy.
Primates are Rendered Infertile
The WHO stated that hCG is a hormone produced by the body to establish and maintain a pregnancy and further stated that when primates were vaccinated using anti-hCG vaccines, they were rendered infertile without any detectable alteration to their menstrual cycle!
What I found even more worrying was the lack of indication as to whether their infertility was permanent or temporary.
According to the WHO, anti-hGC vaccinations were being developed independently by the National Institute of Immunology (NII) in New Delhi, the Population Council in New York and Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP).
The report stated that most of the work was still in the experimental stages; however, vaccines using other hormones had reached the clinical testing stages.
The Plot Deepens
On page 15, the report stated that it had been “noted that the research on all three anti hCG vaccines was still at an early stage and that a further 5-10 years of testing, evaluation and further development would probably be needed before any of these vaccines would be suitable for marketing.”
Nothing strange here; however, on page 17, alarm bells began to ring as the authors revealed that the main carriers being used in the prototype vaccines were the diphtheria toxoid DT and the tetanus toxoid TT.
The WHO is Caught Red-Handed Experimenting on Women in India
In 1994, the World Health Organization gave many women in developing countries aged between 15 and 45 a tetanus vaccine containing the hCG hormone.
An organization known as the Comité Pro Vida de Mexico became suspicious of the protocols surrounding the vaccines and obtained several vials for testing. It was discovered that some of the vials contained human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This is the exact same hormone that the WHO, the UNDP, the UNFPA and the World Bank were discussing just two years earlier. (Link to organization) http://www.microsofttranslator.com/bv.aspx?ref=SERP&br=ro&mkt=en-GB&dl=en&lp=ZH-CHS_EN&a=http%3a%2f%2fcn.bing.com%2fdict%2fcomite%2520pro%2520vida%2520de%2520mexio
When combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, the vaccines caused a woman’s body to produce antibodies against pregnancy, forcing her body to abort the fetus spontaneously. The ThinkTwice Global Vaccine Institute, reporting on the story, stated:
“In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman’s body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.
However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.” http://thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm
Curiously, no men, boys or babies were vaccinated during the program. The only people vaccinated with this particular vaccine were women aged between 15 and 45. Was it a coincidence that these vaccines were only given to women of childbearing age? After all, anyone can contract tetanus, can’t they?
If the Comité had not become suspicious, then no one would have been any wiser. However, one question still remains: Was this a deliberate attempt by the WHO to reduce the population? The answer may lay in a paper written in 1997.
Girls and Women as Fertility Control Guinea Pigs
In 1997, a paper by G.P. Talwar titled Vaccines for Control of Fertility and Hormone Dependent Cancers, published by Immunology and Cell Biology stated:
“The twentieth century is marked by an unprecedented rise in the population. Four billion people will be added to the world population in 73 years of this century, whereas the global population attained the two billion mark only in 1927. In India, the population increases by 18 million per year, equivalent to the entire population of Australia.
Although a number of methods are available for contraception, they are not suited to many people in economically developing countries and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the contraceptive needs of 350 million couples are unmet.” http://www.nature.com/icb/journal/v75/n2/abs/icb199726a.html
Once again, at first glance, it appears that the scientists were trying to develop a vaccine to use as an alternative method of contraception, to be offered at fertility clinics; that is, until you read deeper into the paper.
On page 185 in the section titled Operational Strategy, the author stated:
“Both hCG and LHRH are self hormones in humans and are poor antigens. To improve their immunogenicity, they are derivatized with haptenic groups as followed by Stevens ct al. in their initial studies or they are chemically linked to carriers to enlist T helper cell activity. We used carriers, first tetanus toxoid (TT) and later diphtheria toxoid (DT) or cholera toxin chain B (CTB). Tetanus accounts a large mortality of women at the time of delivery, which in developing countries, often occurs in places other than maternity homes/clinics. TT conjugates conferred immunoprophylactic benefit against tetanus, besides overcoming immunological tolerance to the self hormone. Diversification of carriers on repeat immunization avoided hyperimmunization against a given carrier and carrier-induced immunosuppression.”
Reading on, the section titled Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, reads as follows:
“Human chorionic gonadotropin was a preferred choice as a target for a contraceptive vaccine of three groups of investigators. Although the existence of’ leaky genes making small amounts of hCG in the non-pregnant state has been observed by William Odell. the hormone thus made is not conspicuous in its bioactivity nor appreciable in amount, hCG is a definite marker of pregnancy, when trophoblastic and other tumors are excluded. Its synthesis and secretion begins at the pre-implantation stage, as observed in the vitro-fertilized human embryo. It is involved in implantation since marmoset (south or central American monkey) embryos exposed to anti-phCG antibodies do not implant.’”
The author continued by adding:
“Interception of conception by anti-hCG antibodies is also supported by phase II clinical trials where no lengthening of the luteal phase was observed in women who were protected from becoming pregnant. As pregnancy is deemed to begin only after implantation of the embryo to the endometrium. hCG vaccine by preventing it is not an abortifacient but a contraceptive vaccine. hCG is also required for corpus luteum support and production of progesterone during the first 7 weeks until the placenta takes over. It thus has a role in both establishing and supporting pregnancy. Its chemistry was known by the early 1970s and it could be purified from pregnancy urine.”
These vaccines appear to be strikingly similar not only to the vaccines that were given to the women in developing countries for tetanus in 1994, but also the vaccinations that were being discussed by the WHO, the UNDP, the UNFPA and the World Bank, in 1992.
So, were the women and children living in developing countries in 1994 deliberately experimented on? It certainly appears that they were, as the vaccine trials using the tetanus vaccine on women and girls of childbearing age took place three years before the 1997 paper was written.
The Deception Continues a Decade After the WHO Meeting in Geneva
In 2012, the British Medical Journal published a paper by Dr. Deidrie Little titled Premature Ovarian Failure 3 Years After Menarche in a 16 Year-Old Girl Following Human Papillomavirus Vaccination, in which she detailed the case of a sixteen year-old girl suffering from premature menopause after receiving the HPV vaccine Gardasil. The summary of the paper stated:
“Premature ovarian failure in a well adolescent is a rare event. Its occurrence raises important questions about causation, which may signal other systemic concerns. This patient presented with amenorrhoea after identifying a change from her regular cycle to irregular and scant periods following vaccinations against human papillomavirus. She declined the oral contraceptives initially prescribed for amenorrhoea. The diagnostic tasks were to determine the reason for her secondary amenorrhoea and then to investigate for possible causes of the premature ovarian failure identified.
Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination. The young woman was counseled regarding preservation of bone density, reproductive implications and relevant follow-up. This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry.” http://casereports.bmj.com/content/2012/bcr-2012-006879.abstract
As the BMJ charges a fee to read their articles, interested readers can find a report about the case on the Weekly Briefing of the Population Research Institute’s website. The report stated that Dr. Little said that before the sixteen year-old received the vaccine Gardasil during the fall of 2008, her menstrual cycle was perfectly normal. However, by January 2009, her cycle had become irregular, and over the course of the next two years, her menses (bleeds) had become increasingly irregular. By 2011, she had ceased menstruating altogether.
The Weekly Briefing stated:
“In the Australian case, after testing the levels of numerous hormones, and the function of various internal organs, the girl was diagnosed by Dr. Little as having “premature ovarian failure”, which is defined as “the presence of menopausal gonadotrophin levels in association with over 3 months of amenorrhoea or oligomenorrhoea before age 40 years.”
Further testing confirmed that all of her eggs—every last one—were dead. She was and is totally and irrevocably infertile.”
The Weekly Briefing article has since been removed, but a complete copy of the article can be found on several websites, including Population Research Institute. http://pop.org/content/teenage-girl-becomes-infertile-after-gardasil-vaccination
Yet More Evidence Emerges
In 2013, a paper titled Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine and Primary Ovarian Failure: Another Facet of the Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants was written by Serena Colafrancesco, Carlo Perricone, Lucija Tomljenovic, and Yehuda Shoenfeld and published by the American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. www.luontaisnetti.fi/hpv/3%20cases%20of%20Primary%20Ovarian%20
Their paper identified three cases of young women who had presented with ovarian failure after receiving the HPV vaccine. After studying each case in detail, Dr. Colafrancesco and her team determined that:
“All three patients developed secondary amenorrhea following HPV vaccinations, which did not resolve upon treatment with hormone replacement therapies. In all three cases sexual development was normal and genetic screen revealed no pertinent abnormalities (i.e., Turner’s syndrome, Fragile X test were all negative). Serological evaluations showed low levels of estradiol and increased FSH and LH and in two cases, specific auto-antibodies were detected (antiovarian and anti thyroid), suggesting that the HPV vaccine triggered an autoimmune response. Pelvic ultrasound did not reveal any abnormalities in any of the three cases. All three patients experienced a range of common non-specific post-vaccine symptoms including nausea, headache, sleep disturbances, arthralgia and a range of cognitive and psychiatric disturbances. According to these clinical features, a diagnosis of primary ovarian failure (POF) was determined which also fulfilled the required criteria for the ASIA syndrome.”
The team concluded that:
“We documented here the evidence indicating the potential of the HPV vaccine to trigger a life disabling autoimmune-mediated condition such as POF. Given that persistently infected women with HPV seem not to develop cancer if they are regularly screened and that the long-term clinical benefits of HPV vaccination are still a matter of speculation, a more rigorous assessment of vaccine risks and benefits is recommend. Thus, physicians should remain within the rigorous rules of evidence-based medicine, to adequately assess the risks versus the benefits of HPV vaccination.”
The CMSRI Supporting Scientists From Around the World
It is a well-known fact that scientists researching the dangers of vaccinations have immense difficulty in having their work funded and this is where an organization known as the CMSRI steps in.
The CMSRI was established to provide funding for research to address eroding national health, particularly in very young and elderly populations and funds research into the biological effects of vaccines.
Their mission is:
• “To provide scientific research to address gaps in the knowledge about the biological and genetic risk factors for vaccine induced brain and immune dysfunction, including lack of adequate safety data, particularly for delayed or chronic health outcomes;
• Evaluate the biological and genetic reactivity of vaccine additives such as aluminum adjuvants (immune stimulating agents), mercury preservatives and other toxic ingredients;
• Research the effects of multiple vaccine exposures and their potential impact on development of chronic illness, disability, cancer, fertility and neurodegenerative disease;
• Evaluate bias in reporting of vaccine risks and benefits; and
• Research and quantify incidence of novel vaccine-associated autoimmune diseases;
• To provide information to government agencies responsible for developing national vaccine policies, the media and the public to address real and perceived vaccine safety concerns.”
If were not for organizations like CMSRI, funding scientists carrying out such important work, then the public would remain ignorant of the truth surrounding the dangers of vaccinations.
To see the important work funded and/or supported by the CMSRI, or to simply offer a donation go to http://www.cmsri.org
Although the HPV vaccines do not contain the hCG hormone, they do contain the stabilizer Polysorbate 80, which has also been proven in studies to cause infertility. https://suite.io/joanna-karpasea-jones/wb225k
What I have discovered, I am sure that many would agree, is absolutely horrific. Vaccinations known to cause infertility have been used intentionally for many years. It is obvious that the World Health Organization, who have stated on their website that they are “articulating ethical and evidence-based policy options,” do not practice what they preach.
We must ask ourselves two questions:
1. How ethical it is to inject thousands of women and children in India with a vaccine known to cause infertility?
2. How ethical is it to inject thousands of women and children with a vaccine containing ingredients proven in studies to cause primary ovarian failure?
My research has led me to believe that for many years our governments have chosen to play God with our lives, without our consent or our knowledge. This is not only barbaric, it is also unlawful.
Extra research papers from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Infertility+vaccines
TLB asks that you to please visit the site (below this comment) for some outstanding/pertinent information. Be a part of something great …
Click on the above image to visit the site
Christina England was born and educated in London, U.K. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980. For the last decade, Christina England has been investigating the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Her articles have had over 500,000 hits and she is now known worldwide for her groundbreaking journalism work.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
TLB has other above the fold articles, videos and stories available by clicking on “HOME” at the top of this post. Never miss a new post, sign up for E-Mail alerts at the bottom of the Home page and get a link dropped right to your in-box.
TheLibertyBeacon.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.