57 Scientists & Physicians Call For Immediate Halt to All CV-19 “Vaccinations”

ER Editor: This call for a halt to the vaccines comes from a largely Latin American group of doctors and researchers, including several from Spain. America’s Dr. Peter McCullough is also part of this group, as it well known French geneticist Dr. Alexandra Henrion-Caude.

********

57 Scientists & Physicians Call For Immediate Halt to All CV-19 “Vaccinations”

FRANCESOIR

A group of 57 leading scientists, physicians and policy experts have issued a report calling into question the safety and efficacy of current COVID-19 “vaccines” and are now calling for an immediate end to all vaccination programs – among them geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude.

The therapies used as “vaccines” do not meet the definition of the word vaccine and would be more appropriately called gene therapies or vaccine vector therapies.

There are two certainties regarding the global distribution of these Covid-19 therapies:

  • The first is that governments and the vast majority of the mainstream media are putting all their efforts into getting these experimental drugs to as many people as possible.
  • The second is that those who are willing to face the scorn that comes with asking serious questions about vaccines are essential players in our ongoing efforts to spread the truth.

You can read this manuscript in pre-print below. It was prepared by nearly sixty physicians, scientists, and public policy experts from around the world to be sent urgently to world leaders as well as to all those associated with the production and distribution of the various Covid-19 vaccines in circulation.

There are still far too many unanswered questions about the safety, efficacy and necessity of these Covid-19 therapies.

This study is a bombshell that should be read by everyone, regardless of their views on gene therapies or vaccines.

Not enough citizens are asking questions. Most people simply follow the orders of world governments, as if they had earned our complete trust. This is not the case. This manuscript is a step forward in terms of accountability and the free flow of information on this crucial subject. Please take the time to read it and share it widely.

**************

Mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: urgent questions about vaccine safety that require answers from international health agencies, regulatory authorities, governments and vaccine developers

Authors: Roxana Bruno 1, Peter McCullough 2, Teresa Forcades i Vila 3, Alexandra Henrion-Caude 4  Teresa García-Gasca 5, Galina P. Zaitzeva 6, Sally Priester 7, María J.Martínez Albarracín 8, Alejandro Sousa-Escandon 9, Fernando López Mirones 10, Bartomeu Payeras Cifre 11, Almudena Zaragoza Velilla 10, Leopoldo M. Borini 1, Mario Mas 1, Ramiro Salazar 1, Edgardo Schinder 1, Eduardo A Yahbes 1, Marcela Witt 1, Mariana Salmeron 1, Patricia Fernández 1, Miriam M. Marchesini 1 , Alberto J. Kajihara 1, Marisol V. de la Riva 1, Patricia J. Chimeno 1, Paola A. Grellet 1, Matelda Lisdero 1, Pamela Mas 1, Abelardo J. Gatica Baudo 12, Elisabeth Retamoza 12, Oscar Botta 13 , Chinda C. Brandolino 13, Javier Sciuto 14, Mario Cabrera Avivar 14, Mauricio Castillo 15, Patricio Villarroel 15, Emilia P. Poblete Rojas 15, Bárbara Aguayo 15, Dan I. Macías Flores 15, Jose V. Rossell 16, Julio C. Sarmiento 17, Victor Andrade-Sotomayor 17, Wilfredo R. Stokes Baltazar 18, Virna Cedeño Escobar 19, Ulises Arrúa 20, Atilio Farina del Río 21, Tatiana Campos Esquivel 22, Patricia Callisperis 23, María Eugenia Barrientos 24, Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse 5

Abstract

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic, the race to test new platforms designed to confer immunity to SARS-CoV-2 has been rampant and unprecedented, leading to the emergency authorization of various vaccines. Despite advances in early multidrug therapy for COVID-19 patients, the current mandate is to vaccinate the global population as quickly as possible. The lack of extensive animal testing prior to clinical trials, and approval based on safety data generated in trials that lasted less than 3.5 months, raises questions about the safety of these vaccines. The recently identified role of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein in inducing endothelial damage characteristic of COVID-19, even in the absence of infection, is extremely relevant given that most licensed vaccines induce Spike glycoprotein production in recipients. Given the high rate of occurrence of adverse events and the wide range of adverse event types reported to date, as well as the potential for vaccine-induced disease enhancement, Th2 immunopathology, autoimmunity, and immune evasion, there is a need for a better understanding of the benefits and risks of mass vaccination, particularly in groups excluded from clinical trials. Despite calls for caution, the risks of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 have been downplayed or ignored by health organizations and government authorities. We call for the need for a pluralistic dialogue in health policy.

Introduction

Since the declaration of the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020, more than 150 million cases and 3 million deaths have been reported worldwide. Despite advances in early outpatient multidrug therapy for high-risk patients, resulting in an 85% reduction in Covid-19-related hospitalizations and deaths [1], the current control paradigm is mass vaccination. Although we recognize the effort involved in the development, production, and emergency licensure of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we are concerned that the risks have been minimized or ignored by health organizations and government authorities, despite calls for caution [2-8].

Vaccines against other coronaviruses have never been approved for use in humans, and data generated in the development of coronavirus vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies show that they can worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and Th2 immunopathology, regardless of the vaccine. platform and delivery method [9-11]. Vaccine-induced disease enhancement in SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccinated animals is known to occur following viral challenge and has been attributed to immune complexes and Fc-mediated viral uptake by macrophages, which increase T cell activation and inflammation [11 -13].

In March 2020, vaccine immunologists and coronavirus experts assessed the risks of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine based on SARS-CoV vaccine trials in animal models. The panel concluded that ADR and immunopathology were a real concern, but stated that their risk was insufficient to delay clinical trials, although continued monitoring would be required [14]. Although there is no clear evidence of the occurrence of ADRs and vaccine-related immunopathology in volunteers immunized with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines [15], safety trials to date have not specifically addressed these serious adverse events (SAEs). Given that follow-up of volunteers did not exceed 2-3.5 months after the second dose [16-19], it is unlikely that such an SAE was observed. Despite 92 reporting errors, it cannot be ignored that even taking into account the number of vaccines administered, according to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the number of deaths per million doses of vaccine administered increased more than 10-fold. We believe there is an urgent need for an open scientific dialogue on vaccine safety in the context of large-scale vaccination.

In this article, we describe some of the risks of mass vaccination in the context of exclusion criteria for phase 3 trials and discuss the GSS reported in national and regional adverse event registration systems. We highlight unanswered questions and draw attention to the need for a more cautious approach to mass vaccination. We believe there is an urgent need for an open scientific dialogue on vaccine safety in the context of large-scale vaccination.

Exclusion criteria for the SARS-CoV-2 phase 3 trial

With few exceptions, SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials have excluded elderly individuals [16-19], making it impossible to identify the occurrence of post-vaccination eosinophilia and increased inflammation in the elderly. Studies of SARS-CoV vaccines have shown that immunized elderly mice are at particularly high risk for potentially lethal Th2 immunopathology [9,20]. Despite this evidence and the extremely limited data on the safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the elderly, mass vaccination campaigns have focused on this age group from the beginning. Most trials have also excluded pregnant and lactating volunteers, as well as those with chronic and severe conditions such as tuberculosis, hepatitis C, autoimmunity, coagulopathies, cancer, and immunosuppression [16-29], although these recipients are now offered the vaccine under the premise of safety.

Another exclusion criterion in almost all trials was prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2. This is unfortunate because it denied the possibility of obtaining highly relevant information regarding post-vaccination adverse events in individuals who already have anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies. To the best of our knowledge, ADEs are not routinely monitored for any age or medical condition group currently administered the vaccine. Furthermore, despite a substantial proportion of the population already having antibodies [21], testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status prior to vaccine administration is not routinely performed.

Will serious adverse events from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines go undetected?

COVID-19 encompasses a broad clinical spectrum, ranging from very mild to severe pulmonary pathology and fatal multi-organ disease with inflammatory, cardiovascular, and blood coagulation dysregulation [22-24]. In this sense, vaccine-related ADR or immunopathology would be clinically indistinguishable from severe COVID-19 [25]. Furthermore, even in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 virus, the spike glycoprotein alone causes endothelial damage and hypertension in vitro and in vivo in Syrian hamsters by downregulating angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and impairing mitochondrial function [26]. Although these results need to be confirmed in humans, the implications of this finding are staggering, as all vaccines licensed for emergency use are based on the administration or induction of spike glycoprotein synthesis. In the case of mRNA and adenovirus vectorized vaccines, no studies have examined the duration of spike production in humans after vaccination.

On the basis of the precautionary principle, it is parsimonious to consider that vaccine-induced spike synthesis could cause clinical signs of severe COVID-19 and be erroneously counted as new cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections. If this is the case, the true adverse effects of the current global vaccination strategy may never be recognized unless studies specifically examine this issue. There is already non-causal evidence of temporary or sustained increases in COVID-19 deaths following vaccination in some countries (Fig.1), and in light of the pathogenicity of spike, these deaths need to be studied in depth to determine whether they are related to vaccination.

Unanticipated adverse reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines

Autoimmunity is another critical issue to consider given the global scale of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 has many immunogenic proteins and all but one of its immunogenic epitopes have similarities to human proteins [27]. These can act as a source of antigens, leading to autoimmunity [28]. While it is true that the same effects could be observed in natural infection with SARS-CoV-2, vaccination is intended for most of the world’s population, whereas it is estimated that only 10% of the world’s population has been infected with SARS-CoV -2, according to Dr. Michael Ryan, head of emergencies at the World Health Organization. We could not find evidence that any of the currently licensed vaccines have screened and excluded homologous immunogenic epitopes to avoid potential autoimmunity due to pathogenic priming.

Some adverse events, including blood clotting disorders, have already been reported in healthy, young vaccinees. These cases have led to the suspension or cancellation of the use of ChAdOx1-nCov-19 and Janssen adenoviral vectorized vaccines in some countries. It has now been proposed that vaccination with ChAdOx1-nCov-19 may result in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (ITT) mediated by platelet-activating antibodies to platelet factor-4, which clinically mimics heparin-induced autoimmune thrombocytopenia [29]. Unfortunately, the risk was overlooked when these vaccines were approved, although adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia has been known for more than a decade and has been a consistent event with adenoviral vectors [30]. The risk of TTIV would likely be higher in individuals already at risk for blood clots,

At the population level, there could also be vaccine-related impacts. SARS-CoV-2 is a rapidly evolving RNA virus that has so far produced more than 40,000 variants [32,33], some of which affect the antigenic domain of the spike glycoprotein [34,35]. Given the high mutation rates, vaccine-induced synthesis of high levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies could theoretically lead to suboptimal responses against subsequent infections by other variants in vaccinated individuals [36], a phenomenon known as “sin”[37] or antigenic priming [38]. The extent to which mutations affecting SARS-CoV-2 antigenicity will become fixed during viral evolution is unknown [39], but vaccines could likely act as selective forces resulting in variants with higher infectivity or transmissibility. Given the high similarity among known SARS-CoV-2 variants, this scenario is unlikely [32,34], but if future variants were to differ further in key epitopes, the global vaccination strategy could have helped shape an even more dangerous virus. This risk was recently brought to the attention of WHO in the form of an open letter [40].

Discussion

The risks described here are a major obstacle to further global vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Evidence of the safety of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is needed before exposing more people to the risk of these experiments, as the release of a candidate vaccine without time to fully understand the resulting health impact could lead to an exacerbation of the current global crisis. [41]. Risk stratification of vaccinees is critical. According to the British government, people under 60 years of age have an extremely low risk of dying from COVID-19. However, according to Eudravigillance, most serious adverse events following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination occur in people aged 18 to 64 years. Of particular concern is the planned vaccination schedule for children aged 6 years and older in the United States and the United Kingdom. Dr. Anthony Fauci recently projected that adolescents nationwide will be vaccinated in the fall and younger children in early 2022, and the United Kingdom is awaiting trial results to begin vaccinating 11 million children under the age of 18. to the experimental vaccines, as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that they have a 99.997% survival rate if infected with SARS-CoV-2. Not only is COVID-19 irrelevant as a threat to this age group, but there is no reliable evidence to support the efficacy or effectiveness of the vaccine in this population or to rule out harmful side effects of these experimental vaccines. In this sense, when physicians counsel patients on the elective administration of COVID-19 vaccination.

In conclusion, in the context of the rushed emergency authorization for use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the current gaps in our understanding of their safety, the following questions must be raised:

  • Is it known whether cross-reacting antibodies from previous coronavirus infections or vaccine-induced antibodies can influence the risk of unintended pathogenesis after vaccination with COVID-19?
  • Has the specific risk of ADRs, immunopathology, autoimmunity, and serious adverse reactions been clearly disclosed to vaccine recipients to meet the medical ethics standard of patient understanding for informed consent? If not, what are the reasons and how could it be implemented?
  • What is the rationale for administering the vaccine to each individual when the risk of dying from COVID-19 is not equal across age groups and clinical conditions and when the phase 3 trials excluded the elderly, children, and frequent specific conditions?
  • What are the legal rights of patients if they are harmed by a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine? Who will cover the costs of medical treatment? If claims were to be settled with public funds, has the public been informed that vaccine manufacturers have been granted immunity and that their responsibility to compensate those harmed by the vaccine has been transferred to taxpayers?

In the context of these concerns, we propose stopping mass vaccination and opening an urgent, pluralistic, critical and scientifically based dialogue on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination between scientists, physicians, international health agencies, regulatory authorities, governments and vaccine developers. This is the only way to bridge the current gap between scientific evidence and public health policy regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We are convinced that humanity deserves a deeper understanding of the risks than what is currently presented as the official position. An open scientific dialogue is urgent and necessary to avoid the erosion of public confidence in science and public health and to ensure that WHO and national health authorities protect the interests of humanity during the current pandemic.

There is an urgent need to return public health policy to evidence-based medicine, based on careful evaluation of relevant scientific research. It is imperative to follow the science.

1  https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-reported-sars-cov-2-deaths-in-england/covid-19-confirmed-deaths-in-england-report

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any business or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

McCullough PA, Alexander PE, Armstrong R et al. Traitement multidrogue séquentiel multiforme hautement ciblé de l’infection ambulatoire précoce à haut risque par le SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Rev Cardiovasc Med (2020) 21: 517-530. doi: 10.31083 / j.rcm.2020.04.264

Arvin AM, Fink K, Schmid MA, et al. Une perspective sur le renforcement potentiel dépendant des anticorps du SARS-CoV-2. Nature (2020) 484: 353–363. doi: 10.1038 / s41586-020-2538-8

Coish JM, MacNeil AJ. Hors de la poêle et dans le feu? Diligence raisonnable justifiée pour ADE dans COVID-19. Microbes infectés (2020) 22 (9): 405-406. doi: 10.1016 / j.micinf.2020.06.006

Eroshenko N, Gill T, Keaveney ML et coll. Implications de l’augmentation de l’infection dépendante des anticorps pour les contre-mesures contre le SARS-CoV-2. Nature Biotechnol (2020) 38: 788–797. doi: 10.1038 / s41587-020-0577-1

Pologne GA. Tortues, lièvres et vaccins: une mise en garde pour le développement d’un vaccin contre le SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine (2020) 38: 4219–4220. doi: 10.1016 / j.vaccine.2020.04.073

Shibo J.Ne vous précipitez pas pour déployer les vaccins et médicaments COVID-19 sans garanties de sécurité suffisantes. Nature (2000) 579 321. doi: 10.1038 / d41586-020-00751-9

Munoz FA, Cramer JP, Dekker CL et al. Maladie renforcée associée au vaccin: définition de cas et lignes directrices pour la collecte de données, l’analyse et la présentation des données sur la sécurité de la vaccination. Vaccin (2021) https : // doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . vaccin . 2021 . 01 . 055

Cardozo T, Veazey R. Divulgation du consentement éclairé aux sujets des essais vaccinaux d’un risque d’aggravation de la maladie clinique par les vaccins COVID-19. Int J Clin Pract (2020) 28: e13795. doi: 10.1111 / ijcp.13795

Bolles D, Long K, Adnihothram S et coll. Un vaccin contre le coronavirus du syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère à double inactivation fournit une protection incomplète chez la souris et induit une réponse pulmonaire pro-inflammatoire éosinophile accrue lors de la provocation. J Virol (2001) 85: 12201-12215. doi: 10.1128 / JVI.06048-11

Weingartl H, Czub M, Czub S, et al. Vaccination avec le virus de la vaccine modifié Le vaccin recombinant à base d’Ankarab contre le syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère est associé à une hépatite accrue chez les furets. J Virol (2004) 78: 12672-12676. doi: 10.1128 / JVI.78.22.12672-12676.2004272

Tseng CT, Sbrana E, Iwata-Yoshikawa N, et al. L’immunisation avec les vaccins contre le coronavirus du SARS conduit à une immunopathologie pulmonaire en cas de provocation avec le virus du SARS. PLoS One (2012) 7 (4): e35421. doi: 10.1371 / journal.pone.0035421

Iwasaki A, Yang Y. Le danger potentiel de réponses d’anticorps sous-optimales dans COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol (2020) 20: 339–341. doi: 10.1038 / s41577-020-0321-6

Vennema H, de Groot RJ, Harbour DA, et al. Mort précoce après une provocation par le virus de la péritonite infectieuse féline due à l’immunisation par le virus de la vaccine recombinant. J Virol (1990) 64: 1407-1409

Lambert PH, Ambrosino DM, Andersen SR, et al. Rapport de synthèse de consensus pour la réunion du CEPI / BC du 12 au 13 mars 2020: Évaluation du risque d’amélioration de la maladie avec les vaccins COVID-19. Vaccin (2020) 38 (31): 4783-4791. doi: 10.1016 / j.vaccine.2020.05.064

de Alwis R, Chen S, Gan S et al. Impact du renforcement immunitaire sur la thérapie par globuline hyperimmunisée polyclonale Covid-19 et le développement de vaccins. EbioMedicine (2020) 55: 102768. doi: 10.1016 / j.ebiom.2020.102768

Folegatti PM, Ewer KJ, Aley PK, et al. Sécurité et immunogénicité du vaccin ChAdOx1 nCoV? 287 19 contre le SARS-CoV-2: un rapport préliminaire d’un essai contrôlé randomisé de phase 1/2, en simple aveugle. Lancet (2020) 396: 467–783. doi: 10.1016 / S0140-6736 (20) 31604-4

Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N.Innocuité et efficacité du vaccin BNT162b2 ARNm Covid-19. N Engl J Med (2020) 383: 2603-2615. doi: 10.1056 / NEJMoa2034577

Ramasamy MN, Minassian AM, Ewer KJ et al. Innocuité et immunogénicité du vaccin ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 administré dans un régime de premier coup de pouce chez les adultes jeunes et vieux (COV002): un essai de phase 2/3 randomisé, contrôlé en simple aveugle Lancet (2021) 396: 1979–93. doi: 10.1016 / S0140-6736 (20) 32466-1

Chu L, McPhee R, Huang W et coll. Groupe d’étude ARNm-1273. Un rapport préliminaire d’un essai randomisé contrôlé de phase 2 sur l’innocuité et l’immunogénicité du vaccin ARNm-1273 SARS-CoV-2. Vaccin (2021) S0264-410X (21) 00153-5. doi: 10.1016 / j.vaccine.2021.02.007

Liu L, Wei Q, Lin Q et coll. Les IgG anti-pic provoquent de graves lésions pulmonaires aiguës en biaisant les réponses des macrophages au cours d’une infection aiguë par le SARS-CoV. JCI Insight (2019) 4 (4): e123158. doi: 10.1172 / jci.insight.123158.

Ioannidis PA. Taux de mortalité par infection du COVID-19 déduit des données de séroprévalence. Bull WHO (2021) 99: 19–33F. http : // dx . doi . org / 10 . 2471 / BLT . 20 . 265892

Martines RB, Ritter JM, Matkovic E et coll. Pathologie et pathogenèse du SARS-CoV-2 associé à la maladie mortelle à coronavirus, États-Unis Emerg Infect Dis (2020) 26: 2005-2015. doi: 10.3201 / eid2609.202095

Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Caractéristiques et leçons importantes de l’épidémie de maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) en Chine: résumé d’un rapport de 72314 cas du Centre chinois de contrôle et de prévention des maladies. JAMA (2020) 323: 1239-1242. doi: 10.1001 / jama.2020.2648

Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y et al. Découvertes pathologiques du COVID-19 associé au syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë. Lancet Respiratory Med (2020) 8: 420-422 doi: 10.1016 / S2213-2600 (20) 30076-X

Negro F. L’amélioration dépendante des anticorps joue-t-elle un rôle dans la pathogenèse du COVID-19? Swiss Medical Weekly (2020) 150: w20249. doi: 10.4414 / smw.2020.20249317

Lei Y, Zhang J, Schiavon CR et al., Spike Protein Empairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2. Circulation Res (2021) 128: 1323–1326. https : // doi . org / 10 . 1161 / CIRCRESAHA . 121 . 318902

Lyons-Weiler J.L’amorçage pathogène contribue probablement à la maladie grave et critique et à la mortalité du COVID-19 via l’auto-immunité, J Translational Autoimmunity (2020) 3: 100051. doi: 10.1016 / j.jtauto.2020.100051

An H, Park J. Molecular Mimicry Map (3M) of SARS-CoV-2: Prediction of potentiellement immunopathogenic SARS-CoV-2 epitopes via une nouvelle approche immunoinformatique. bioRxiv [Pré-impression]. 12 novembre 2020 [cité le 19 avril 2020] https : // doi . org / 10 . 1101 / 2020 . 11 . 12 . 344424

Greinacher A, Thiele T, Warkentin TE, Weisser K, Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. Thrombocytopénie thrombotique après vaccination ChAdOx1 nCov-19. N Engl J Med (2021). doi: 10.1056 / NEJMoa2104840

Othman M, Labelle A, Mazzetti I et al. Thrombocytopénie induite par adénovirus: le rôle du facteur von Willebrand et de la P-sélectine dans la médiation de la clairance plaquettaire accélérée. Blood (2007) 109: 2832-2839. doi: 10.1182 / sang-2006-06-032524

Ortel TL. Facteurs de risque thrombotiques acquis en milieu de soins intensifs. Crit Care Med (2010) 38 (2 Suppl): S43-50. doi: 10.1097 / CCM.0b013e3181c9ccc8

Grubaugh ND, Petrone ME, Holmes EC. Nous ne devons pas nous inquiéter lorsqu’un virus mute lors d’épidémies. Nat Microbiol (2020) 5: 529-530. https : // doi . org / 10 . 1038 / s41564 – 020 – 0690 – 4

Greaney AJ, Starr TN, Gilchuk P et coll. Cartographie complète des mutations au domaine de liaison aux récepteurs de pointe du SARS-CoV? 339 2 qui échappent à la reconnaissance des anticorps. Cell Host Microbe (2021) 29: 44–57.e9. doi: 10.1016 / j.chom.2020.11.007.

Lauring AS, Hodcroft EB. Variantes génétiques du SARS-CoV-2 – Que signifient-elles? JAMA (2021) 325: 529-531. doi: 10.1001 / jama.2020.27124

Zhang L, Jackson CB, Mou H et coll. La mutation D614G dans la protéine de pointe SARS-CoV-2 réduit l’excrétion de S1 et augmente l’infectivité. bioRxiv [Pré-impression]. 12 juin 2020 [cité le 19 avril 2021] https : // doi . org / 10 . 1101 / 2020 . 06 . 12 . 148726

Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S et al. Sheffield COVID-19 Genomics Group. Suivi des changements dans le pic de SARS-CoV-2: preuve que le D614G augmente l’infectivité du virus COVID-19. Cellulaire (2020) 182: 812-827.e19. doi: 10.1016 / j.cell.2020.06.043

Francis T. Sur la doctrine du péché antigénique originel. Proc Am Philos Soc (1960) 104: 572-578.

Vibroud C, Epstein SL. La première grippe est éternelle. Science (2016) 354: 706–707. doi: 10.1126 / science.aak9816

Weisblum Y, Schmidt F, Zhang F et al. Échapper aux anticorps neutralisants par les variants de protéine de pointe CoV-2 du SARS? 354. Elife (2020) 9: e61312. doi: 10.7554 / eLife.61312

Vanden Bossche G (6 mars 2021) https : // dryburgh . com / wp – 356content / uploads / 2021 / 03 / Geert _ Vanden _ Bossche _ Ouvert _ Lettre _ OMS _ Mars _ 6 _ 2021 . pdf

Coish JM, MacNeil AJ. Hors de la poêle et dans le feu? Diligence raisonnable justifiée pour ADE dans COVID-19. Microbes infectés (2020) 22 (9): 405-406. doi: 10.1016 / j.micinf.2020.06.006

Figure legends

Figure 1. number of new deaths due to COVID-19 compared with the number of people who received at least one dose of vaccine for selected countries. The graph shows data from the start of vaccination to May 3, 365, 2021. A) India (9.25% of vaccinated population), B) Thailand (1.58% of vaccinated population), C) Colombia (6.79% of vaccinated population), D) Mongolia (31.65% of vaccinated population), E) Israel (62.47% of vaccinated population), F) Worldwide (7.81% of vaccinated population). Graphs were constructed using data from Our World in Data (accessed May 4, 2021)

https : // github . com / owid / covid – 19 – données / arbre / maître /public / données / vaccinations

Affiliations

*

1 Epidemiólogos Argentinos Metadisciplinarios. República Argentina.
2 Centre médical de l’Université Baylor. Dallas, Texas, États-Unis.
3 Monestir de Sant Benet de Montserrat, Montserrat, Espagne
4 INSERM U781 Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Cité, Institut Imagine, Paris, France.
5 École des sciences naturelles. Université autonome de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexique.
6 Professeur retraité d’immunologie médicale. Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexique.
7 Médicos por la Verdad Puerto Rico. Centre médical d’Ashford. San Juan, Porto Rico.
8 Professeur retraité de processus de diagnostic clinique. Université de Murcie, Murcie, Espagne
9Urologue Hôpital Comarcal de Monforte, Université de Saint-Jacques-de-Compostelle, Espagne.
10 Biólogos por la Verdad, Espagne.
11 Biologiste à la retraite. Université de Barcelone. Spécialisé en microbiologie. Barcelone, Espagne.
12 Centre de médecine intégrative MICAEL (Medicina Integrativa Centro Antroposófico Educando en Libertad). Mendoza, République argentine.
13 Médicos por la Verdad Argentina. República Argentina. ´
14 Médicos por la Verdad Uruguay. República Oriental del Uruguay.
15 Médicos por la Libertad Chili. República de Chile.
16 Médecin, orthopédiste. República de Chile.
17 Médicos por la Verdad Perú. República del Perú.
18Médicos por la Verdad Guatemala. República de Guatemala.
19 Concepto Azul SA Équateur.
20 Médicos por la Verdad Brasil. Brésil.
21 Médicos por la Verdad Paraguay.
22 Médicos par Costa Rica.
23 Médicos por la Verdad Bolivie.
24 Médicos por la Verdad El Salvador.
* Correspondance: Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse,  karina.acevedo.whitehouse@uaq.mx

************

Source

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

2 Comments on 57 Scientists & Physicians Call For Immediate Halt to All CV-19 “Vaccinations”

  1. I agree fully with these scientists they are spot on in their assessment of this injection and the reason it is too early to be giving it in masse to the public.
    Just by reading articles about this technology right from the beginning I saw the greater picture of autoimmune disease being a possible outcome from its use. My mouth literally dropped open . I can’t believe it is happening in front of our eyes. I feel so sorry for the masses of people who have taken it without understanding the effects it can cause. These are latent effects but in some people it may come sooner than later. All in the name of fear.
    “We have nothing to fear but fear itself “
    Have we forgotten so soon.

  2. Excellent Article.
    What is absolutely crucial at this point, is proper transparency and full disclosure of the true incidence of Serious Adverse Reactions to vaccines.The inappropriate use and administration of an ever expansive schedule of multiple vaccinations in young infants and children who are systemically Immunocompromised.Its already well established that from infancy up to the age of three years old,the Brain and Central Nervous System are going through the most rapid stage of neuro development. The accumulative negative effects of multiple immunizations in an infant with any form of underlying immune system compromise, suppression or dysfunction can be completely devastating and life altering, potentially lethal in some incidences.”ScreeningB4Vaccines” for proper identification of immune irregularities, even the cases that may be contraversially aqquired through direct injury to the developing Brain and Central Nervous System (birth related trauma/injury) must be officially identified as “Contraindicated” when it comes to the current childhood Vaccination schedule. And particularly around the use of Live Virus Vaccinations as they carry the greatest risk of serious adverse systemic injury in an already systemically vulnerable infant/ child.
    This cohort of susceptible infants within the general population have been increasing at an alarming rate annually across the globe. Vaccine viral/toxin Associated Neurological Infections post vaccination in a susceptible host. Vaccine Induced Autoimmune Diseases are also on the increase at an alarming rate as more and more individual vaccines are developed and added to the scedule.Autoimmune inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
    130 new vaccines currently in production within industry, and the development of stronger adjuvants to illicite an even stronger immune responce in the recipient? Where will it all end???
    This Global situation has now reached a critical stage.
    It’s unethical, immoral and quiet frankly unconscionable to allow it escalate any further without proper Global Governmental Intervention to work to redress this blatant oversight and preventable silent pandemic of neurodevelopmental disability in this generation of vulnerable children. Namely AUTISM and related neurodevelopmental disability. From mild impairment to profound regressive autism. Now at rates as high as 4.2% in some parts of the developed world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*