I have often said that most Americans, seemingly oblivious to the tyrannical takeover of our government in Washington D.C., will indeed fight for three things (1) food and water; (2) the right to bear arms; and, (3) access to a free and uncontrolled internet.
The right to bear arms is under serious attack by various levels of government in this country. Our food and water supply are in the process of being horded by the global elite to the point that artificial shortages are in our near future. Most Americans remain oblivious to this plot and how far this plot has progressed to create huge price increases accompanied by artificially created shortages (e.g. T. Boone Pickens buying up the Ogallala water aquifer).
In the past 24 hours, much has been made about the newest attempt to control the internet because the powers that be don’t like the fact that many of us are being successful in waking up our fellow Americans as to the dangers posed by the criminal Obama administration and its unconstitutional policies. Subsequently, in the third leg of the complete subjugation of the American people, Obama is proposing a type of NDAA version of internet control in which one’s website could simply disappear, without due process, and the blogger could be fined and/or imprisoned.
This is not the first time that this criminal government has put the only version of non-censored content left in America under attack. Consider Senator John McCain’s actions over the past several years.
Minister of Propaganda John McCain
Once upon a time, I received an invitation to attend a victory party in Memphis, for my part in opposing a draconian attempt to censor the internet. The part was to celebrate a grassroots victory over a senate bill which would have gutted net neutrality and would have subsequently subjected internet users, internet businesses and internet “bloggers” to the censorship whims of various communications firms (e.g., Verizon Wireless, A T & T, Bell South, etc.).
Six years ago, a strong grassroots movement gathered nearly 2 million signatures and prevented the then lame-duck congress from privatizing the internet at the expense of the American public’s right to self-expression. However, that victory, was short-lived, thanks to Arizona Senator, John McCain.
McCain Proposed Debtors Prison for Political Activists
At that time, John McCain had introduced a bill that would have fined bloggers up to $300,000 for “offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards”. McCain has publicly expressed his distaste for blogs in the past and this is why any protestation that he was simply aiming to “protect the children” with this legislation fell on deaf ears. His opposition largely to a free internet stemmed from the fact that many, including myself, have been critical of McCain’s in-laws and their past connections to organized crime which ultimately served to fund the rise of McCain’s political career. This fact alone, I believe, explains McCain’s obsession with gaining control over the internet.
McCain’s proposed legislation would have proven to be an effective control mechanism against free speech because comment boards are notoriously hard to moderate and the links are almost impossible to verify because they can change content after initial publication. Also, any site, such as mine, which are critical of criminal government policies, could have become the target of covert government infiltration by a column of government agents which could have embedded controversial content on any undesirable site This kind of reminds one of how Hitler burned down the Reichstag and blamed the communists as a means to gain control over the German government which ultimately led to the imposition of totalitarianism.
If the McCain flavor of censorship had passed, this legislation would have marked the end of previously unrestrained opinions. McCain’s proposed censorship hid behind the pretense of protecting children, would have wiped out self-expression on the internet.
McCain’s legislation was referred to as the “Stop the Online Exploitation of Our Children Act.” The legislation demanded that a Stalinist-type army of informants and spies would browse various websites looking for inappropriate internet material which might pose a threat to children. McCain’s internet army would have then passed the information on to the relevant police authorities and subsequent bloggers could be fined $300,000 or face jail time, thus, creating a version of an internet debtors prison .One oversight by the moderator, one day off from the internet, could have spelled doom for the financial future of a blogger. What citizen could have afforded to take that chance? Hence, your right to self-expression would have been sacrificed. Your first amendment right to self-expression is technically still intact. However, the personal affordability to exercise free speech would have been severely jeopardized
If either of these bills had passed, it would have marked the end of internet freedom as we know it today. Therefore, Obama’s most recent attempt to censor the internet is nothing new as it is merely an extension of what McCain began six years ago.
If only everybody watched and believed the CNN clown show of news, what a beautiful world it would be according to the globalists. Few citizens would be aware and nobody could effectively question the draconian agenda of the globalists as it is being directed towards humanity.
To that end, the Obama White House has announced the creation of a new interagency working group to address what it calls a growing problem. This new federal interagency group will be led by Quintan Wiktorowicz, who presently serves as the White House senior director for community partnerships on the national security staff. The new group will be called “The Interagency Working Group to Counter Online Radicalization” and will be tasked with the implementation of an Internet safety program to address online violent extremism. Wiktorowicz recently stated: “Violent extremist groups ─ like Al Qaeda and its affiliates and adherents, violent supremacist groups, and violent “sovereign citizens” ─ are leveraging online tools and resources to propagate messages of violence and division. These groups use the Internet to disseminate propaganda, identify and groom potential recruits, and supplement their real-world recruitment efforts. Some members and supporters of these groups visit mainstream fora to see whether individuals might be recruited or encouraged to commit acts of violence, look for opportunities to draw targets into private exchanges, and exploit popular media like music videos and online video games. Although the Internet offers countless opportunities for Americans to connect, it has also provided violent extremists with access to new audiences and instruments for radicalization.”
If Wiktorowics were referring exclusively to terrorist groups such as al Qaeda, then no red flags would be raised whatsoever concerning the new program. But he never specified nor defined terms such as “violent supremacist groups” or “violent sovereign citizens.”
“Violent extremist groups ─ like Al Qaeda and its affiliates and adherents, violent supremacist groups, and violent “sovereign citizens” ─ are leveraging online tools and resources to propagate messages of violence and division. These groups use the Internet to disseminate propaganda, identify and groom potential recruits, and supplement their real-world recruitment efforts. Some members and supporters of these groups visit mainstream fora to see whether individuals might be recruited or encouraged to commit acts of violence, look for opportunities to draw targets into private exchanges, and exploit popular media like music videos and online video games. Although the Internet offers countless opportunities for Americans to connect, it has also provided violent extremists with access to new audiences and instruments for radicalization.”
Wiktorowics is not referring to al Qaeda. He specifically uses the term “violent sovereign citizens.” The term “sovereign citizen” is something that I have previously warned the American public about. You would be wise to visit the following link about what constitutes a dangerous “sovereign citizen” according to this criminal government. This term is already being used by Larimer County, Colorado Eight Circuit Judge, Julie Field, as the justification to steal the child of Stacy Lynne for her activism in her community against an attempted Agenda 21 takeover.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has raised red flags on several occasions as their internal memos referring to conservative Christians who believe the Bible, pro-life citizens who are against abortion, Tea Party activists, Ron Paul supporters, Libertarians, Constitutionalists and political conservatives who believe in a strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution as “potential homegrown terrorists.” I believe that these groups, and more, will be the target of Obama’s latest imitation of Stalin.
This internet censorship intentions of Obama is not about preventing terrorism, this is about shutting you and I up and these policies represents a resurrection of John McCain’s attempt to stop journalists from speaking about the criminal past of his political benefactors which happens to come from his in-laws. In a similar vein, Obama is no doubt tired of seeing the name Barry Sotero in print. Obama has grown weary of reading about his real father, Frank Davis, and the fact that he was a porno producing pervert who happened to occupy a prominent position in the American Communist Party. Obama is tired about reading about his exploits in helping to secure federal funds for Valerie Jarrett when she was Chicago’s queen of the slumlords. But most of all, Obama wants to squelch the internet warning messages which serve to alert the American public as to his intentions of destroying America as we know it and then replacing it with a communist dictatorship which will be devoid of all of our civil liberties. The internet is Obama’s opposition of command and control. Command and control if an enemy is always the first target when a military target is being attacked.
DO YOU NOW UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE UNDER ATTACK BY A CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT?
The Road to Tyranny, Let Me Count the Ways
The Obama administration has declared war upon the Second Amendment through advocating for extreme gun control. This modern day version of the Sheriff of Nottingham has also eviscerated the Fifth Amendment through the passage and the implementation of the NDAA which allows for secret arrests without due process of law. The Sixth and Eighth Amendments are also gone under this President as evidenced by the fact that this lunatic is directly responsible for the murder of three U.S. citizens that we know of under the NDAA and through the use of drones on Americans. And now, Obama has his sites set on the First Amendment.
What Is a Good Citizen To Do?
Americans must become self-sufficient with regard to food and water to avoid having these essentials used against an uncooperative public as happened in the former Soviet Union. As you may recall, Stalin starved 20 million Ukrainians to death for opposing his tyranny.
Americans must never surrender their guns, under any circumstances, lest we become vulnerable to attack by the Obama Brown Shirts. However, without free use of the internet, our ability to mount a massive counter movement in opposition to the tyranny which has become pervasive in this country, is seriously compromised. It could, however, be argued that the Founding Fathers launched a successful revolution against the Crown without the internet. They used the Committees of Correspondence and simple work of mouth. We do have some electronic options available as well. For example, I believe that many of us could become proficient with Shortwave radio as a means to communicate. We can still text and send images via our cell phones. And we could engage in civil disobedience (e.g. mass refusal to pay taxes). We could begin to broadcast from primitively constructed pirate radio stations.
I think Obama and his fellow communists are going to find that stamping out the word of freedom is more difficult than they realize. What suggestions do you have to offer on how we can oppose this tyranny? Please list them below.