
Australian Data: Cancer Epidemic in Gardasil Girls
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
The verdict is now inescapable: Gardasil is killing girls.
The Australian government’s cancer data show the dramatic rise in cervical cancer in young girls vaccinated with Gardasil. Merck markets Gardasil as a prophylactic against cervical cancers despite the company’s own pre-licensing studies that showed a 44.6% INCREASE in cervical cancers among girls exposed to HPV virus prior to vaccination (up to 30% may be exposed in the birth canal).
Government numbers show a 16% cancer increase in 25-year-olds, a 28% increase in 30-year-olds, several years post vaccination.
••••
••••
The obsequious global press have widely quoted and credited the claims of the Gardasil vaccine’s inventor, Ian Fraser (who collects millions in Gardasil royalty payments), that Gardasil is poised to abolish cervical cancer in Australia. The official data put the lie to Fraser’s chicanery.
Since 2007, all girls and women up to age 26 have been offered the HPV vaccine in Australia. Government numbers show a 16% cancer increase in 25-year-olds, a 28% increase in 30-year-olds, several years post vaccination. The 30-year-old’s rate increased from 5.4/100k to 6.9/100k. The 25- year-old’s rate rose from 3.2 to 3.7 per 100k.
Meanwhile, deaths in older women (unvaccinated) are decreasing possibly due to successful early Pap screening. This points to the vaccine as the clear culprit in vaccinated women—either fro:
- vaccine failure,
- reduced Pap screening (likely due in some cases to confidence in the HPV vaccine),
- type replacement (the 9 HPV strains targeted by the vaccine are replaced by more virulent strains) or from,
- pathogenic priming.
Fraser also dismisses the stories of tens of thousands of girls globally who blame Gardasil for their catastrophic autoimmune diseases. “Those girls would have gotten those autoimmune diseases in any case,” Fraser told me last month. “They have nothing to do with the vaccine.”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Stated with caution as to the effectiveness of any relief it is suggested that a careful regime of tested clean water, organic food and many and more vitamins be rapidly applied to those who were injected. The potential of having any remission may -partly- rest upon vitamin D See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913549/
the article admits rightfully the unknowns and need to find out more about Vitamin D but the fact is that other non cited authorities specify mega doses temporarily given as beneficial, of course under a doctors care they tell it. Hard to decide whether doctors who do whatever comes their way by salesmen and advisory can be taken to be correct and studied. There is always more info, nobody is right or wrong is unfair but in part true. What is true today is wrong tomorrow. The best solution is long term controlled testing instead of the current trend to use the patients as trial guinea pigs, problem is the cost of trials kills profits and the long term financial benefits to keep a company afloat that can dissolve with paperwork outweigh the caution of long term testing. The apparent adage the medical companies believe in is two fold, one there are too many people and we need to make money, unfair and cruel but inciteful. Let the patient / buyer beware, trust must be earned. Rejecting the rusk to vaccinate must be the official populations response.