Pfizer Scientist Expresses Concern Over Covid Vaccines Causing Heart Inflammation
In an undercover video from Project Veritas, a Pfizer senior associate scientist named Chris Croce appears to express concern over the mRNA shots being linked to a form of heart inflammation called myocarditis as early as 2021.
Despite this concern, Pfizer continued to back the “safe and 100% effective” line, even in regards to young persons at miniscule risk from the Covid disease.
“These data confirm the favorable efficacy and safety profile of our vaccine and position us to submit a Biologics License Application to the U.S. FDA,” said Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla in an April 2021 release. “The high vaccine efficacy observed through up to six months following a second dose and against the variant prevalent in South Africa provides further confidence in our vaccine’s overall effectiveness.”
In the video, Project Veritas reports that a Pfizer scientist acknowledged that the mRNA Covid shots were being tested for a potential link to myocarditis.
Big Pharma has long known of potential Covid-19 vaccine side effects…They just didn’t want to say so publicly.
In 2021 @Pfizer scientist Chris Croce told our journalist that they were already testing for links between their vaccine and myocarditis…
— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) January 9, 2023
According to the video, Croce states that about 3,000 blood samples from patients were being sent to a laboratory for testing. Harvard Medical School researchers publishing at the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation have since isolated “free spike antigens” in young persons that are being associated with an increased risk of myocarditis.
A potential link between the mRNA shots and myocarditis was established as early as July 2021. The MMWR report hosted at the National Institutes of Health acknowledged reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in mRNA vaccine recipients. The NIH, however, continued to recommend vaccination for young persons, even for those who had natural immunity from prior infection.
In a related video released in October of last year, the Pfizer scientist reportedly commented, “You’re protected for longer” if you have natural antibodies compared to the COVID vaccine’s spike antibodies.
The #TwitterFiles reveal that COVID-19 natural immunity was being censored on social media.
You might recall when we caught a @Pfizer scientist saying your antibodies are better than their vax.
‘Your [COVID] antibodies are probably better than the [Pfizer] vaccination.’ pic.twitter.com/0QanaXbmnQ
— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) January 9, 2023
“You’re protected most likely for longer since there was a natural response,” he said.
In the video, he appears to add, “I work for an evil corporation… Our organization is run on COVID money.”
Nick Carl, one of the scientists, says on video: “When somebody is naturally immune—like they got COVID—they probably have better, like not better, but more antibodies against the virus.”
“So your antibodies are probably better at that point than the vaccination,” he added later.
The New England Journal of Medicine in June 2021 established that natural immunity antibodies were superior to spike antibodies.
Natural immunity “protection was higher than that conferred after the same time had elapsed since receipt of a second dose of vaccine among previously uninfected persons,” the study concluded.
It was recently revealed by Elon Musk’s #TwitterFiles that Pfizer director Scott Gottlieb had contacted Twitter’s top lobbyist in August 2021 to shut down conversation on the social media platform about natural immunity.
Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla was earlier slammed by a British regulator for making “disgracefully misleading” claims about the Covid mRNA shots also known as “Covid vaccines.”
UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog, the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), found that Dr. Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, made “misleading” statements about healthy children purportedly benefiting from the vaccines.
In an interview with the BBC, Bourla claimed that “there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely, are in favour of” vaccinating children ages five to 11 against Covid-19.
“There is simply no evidence that healthy schoolchildren in the UK are at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they are is disgracefully misleading,” watchdog group UsforThem said.
The pharmaceutical company is being sued by Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson, who is citing ‘falsified data’ and manipulated clinical trials in her legal argument that the company committed fraud.
(TLB) published this article from Becker News as compiled and written by Kyle Becker
Header featured image (edited) credit: Hand clutching chest/orginal BN article/shutterstock
Emphasis added by (TLB) editors
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.