ER Editor: This is a big story doing the rounds on Substack overnight. Others (here, here and here) have picked it up.
This is what got Dr Billy Bay suspended by AHPRA.
He crashed the Australian Medical Association Annual meeting and served them notice to the harms of the vaccines.
Instead of being given a medal of honour, he got suspended.
He won in court yesterday and had that decision… pic.twitter.com/vkBrgfoJHE
I have won 🏆 the right back to be a doctor 👨⚕️ and more importantly the right for all doctors to speak freely about #vaccines 😊.
Truly, God has given me everything 🤲 Praise Jesus and thank you to my wonderful supporters without whom none of this would have possible. Freedom!!… pic.twitter.com/3KEUHMGnpY
Breaking News: Vindication for Dr. William Bay as Supreme Court Reinstates Medical License!
“The vaccines are bad. The vaccines are no good. And people should be afforded the right to informed consent to choose these so-called vaccines!”
AUSSIE17
Dec 13, 2024
In a landmark decision, the court has ruled in favor of Dr. William Bay, marking a significant win for those questioning mainstream COVID Vaccine narratives.
This comes after a lengthy legal battle against the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and the Medical Board of Australia, who unjustly suspended Dr. Bay’s registration as a general practitioner because he spoke out against the COVID vaccines.
I shared a clip of Dr. William Bay from a few years ago when he boldly spoke out against experimental mRNA gene therapy, often mislabeled as “vaccines,” to a group of uncomfortable indoctrinated doctors at a medical conference. You can view the original clip in this thread (Point Number 8) or read the entire transcript to see how the pharmaceutical industry subtly “indoctrinates” doctors. [LINK] — ER: Worth checking out!
Dr. Bay, known for his outspoken views on COVID-19 experimental vaccines, faced severe consequences, including a medical license suspension. However, the court found that the suspension decision was marred by bias and procedural unfairness. It’s a clear call to joy for the medical-truth community that has long advocated for transparency and fairness in healthcare regulations.
In his statement following the judgment, Dr. Bay did not hold back: “So, if I wasn’t clear before AHPRA, let me be very clear now. The vaccines are bad. The vaccines are no good. And people should be afforded the right to informed consent to choose these so-called vaccines.” His reinstatement means he can openly criticize vaccines without fear, a bold move that sets a precedent for other practitioners who wish to express their concerns freely.
The comprehensive ruling by Justice Bradley not only reinstates Dr. Bay’s medical license but also holds AHPRA accountable for the legal costs incurred throughout the proceedings. Dr. Bay is now free to practice medicine once again, which includes the ability to prescribe treatments like Ivermectin, a pharma bashed controversial but crucial option in his toolkit.
The ruling declared that decisions made by AHPRA and the Board were invalid, thus freeing Dr. Bay from the unjust limitations placed on his medical practice. The court pointed out several flaws, including a lack of evidence supporting any claims of misconduct and a failure to provide Dr. Bay a fair chance to defend himself. This legal validation suggests that AHPRA and the Board might have acted more out of political motivation than genuine public safety concerns.
For Dr. Bay, this isn’t just about regaining his right to practice medicine—it’s a triumph of his voice against bureaucratic overreach and a testimony to standing firm on one’s beliefs. And for the wider community, this verdict is a hopeful pointer to the necessity for accountability and fairness in the regulation of medical professionals.
Given the court’s findings, Dr. Bay should consider pursuing legal action for damages against AHPRA for the loss of income and potential harm to his reputation during this prolonged suspension. The court’s decision implicitly supports the view that he was unfairly treated, opening the door for further legal redress and, perhaps, compensation for the unwarranted impact on his career.
This verdict shines a light on the critical importance of rights to a fair hearing and underscores the role of rigorous judicial oversight to prevent the misuse of regulatory power.
Congratulations to Dr. Bay on this vindication—his case serves as a powerful reminder that justice, although sometimes delayed, is indeed achievable!
Featured image source: https://www.couriermail.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=CMWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.couriermail.com.au%2Ftruecrimeaustralia%2Fpolice-courts-qld%2Fantivax-dr-william-bay-fights-licence-suspension-in-supreme-court-hearing%2Fnews-story%2F052849a6c1da18fd1eec306be7572972&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPA-Segment-2-NOSCORE
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply