Charlie Kirk and The Hamptons

Charlie Kirk and The Hamptons

While Ben Shapiro, the controversial zionist pro-Israel political commentator from the Daily Wire, has committed to donate $1 million to the Charlie Kirk Show, claims are emerging that the late TPUSA leader Charlie Kirk had expressed grievances about ‘blackmail,’ before and following his encounter at the Hamptons with Zionist billionaire Bill Ackman and the Con Inc influencers cartel, which left him feeling quite disillusioned and apparently intimidated. Max Blumenthal from “The Grayzone” reports on X that it was Natasha Hausdorff, an international lawyer and legal director of the UKLFI Charitable Trust, who scolded Charlie Kirk during the group breakfast, as he was facing strong criticism for advocating for his and everyone’s right to question Israel.

Reportedly, Bill Ackman gathered pro-Israel influencers at a Hotel in Bridgehampton, NY, under the pretence of discussing Zohran Mamdani and the alleged danger he represented to the West if he were to become the mayor of New York. However, according to a recent article from The Grayzone, the meeting took an unexpected turn when Ackman directly challenged Kirk regarding his stance on Israel. In the most recent episode of The Chris Hedges Report, Blumenthal elaborates on the friction that arose between Charlie Kirk and Israel during his last months, as well as what to anticipate from a new phase of right-wing oppression following his death. The episode, titled “Israel, Charlie Kirk, and the weaponisation of murder,” is nothing short of enlightening, cutting through the intricate landscape in which a political activist and commentator such as Charlie Kirk must navigate, often caught between his personal beliefs and convictions, and the expectations of his pro-Israeli Zionist financial backers.

VIDEO: Israel, Charlie Kirk, and the Weaponization of Murder (w/ Max Blumenthal) | The Chris Hedges Report (Source: The Chris Hedges YouTube Channel)

Was Charlie Kirk about to make his final move towards converting to Catholicism, aligning himself with his wife and close friend like Candace Owens, distancing himself from the heavily Zionist charged and Israeli-influenced Evangelical movement in the US? And, could Charlie’s capacity to rally his large followers’ base of young conservatives away from the Evangelists be the potential motive behind his assassination? There is substantial evidence indicating that Charlie Kirk was guiding his family toward the Catholic Church; notably, his public appeal to honour the blessed  Virgin Mary, and Mother of God, ” telling Protestants and Evangelicals “to honour her more”, not a typical evangelical rhetoric. (Read more here on “Charlie Kirk and his surprising sentiments toward the Catholic Church”)

VIDEO: Extract from The Charlie Kirk Show where he invites Protestants and Evangelicals “to honour Virgin Mary more” (Source: The Charlie Kirk Show)

Charlie was curious in nature, always eager to learn and debate, and on a few occasions, demonstrated his determination to protect American interests rather than promote a US-led regime change in Iran, to serve Israeli geopolitical goals.. Charlie seems to have enjoyed pushing the envelope and went as far as running a poll on X, which undoubtedly must have enervated his “handlers.”

Apparently, this poll (with 337K voting) had really upset Shapiro, Netanyahu, Levin, Ackman, Shmuley & Co. A ‘turning point’ for sure… pic.twitter.com/4a4wmdf9GJ

— Patrick Henningsen (@21WIRE) September 17, 2025

Many questions regarding the motives behind his assassination are still unanswered, especially those concerning the recent online and behind-the-scenes pressures he spoke of with American journalist Megyn Kelly. It isn’t far-fetched to think that Israel’s anxiety over losing influence over America’s conservative youth could have been overwhelming, prompting a reaction from the US deep state and from those who openly or covertly advocate their “Israel-first” position. It is not impossible that the Israeli leadership and the zionist billionaire donor class in the US may have seen this unwelcome shift as an existential threat and acted accordingly. These, of course, are speculations, and in no way accuse or prove Israel’s complicity in the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

VIDEO: Extract from  Candace Owens’ YouTube Channel: Kirk Shooting Suspect Charged. Something Isn’t Right… | Candace Ep 236) (Source: Candace Owens)

Topics such as Jeffrey Epstein were also of concern for Charlie Kirk, who was starting to question whether Israeli intelligence might have been behind the convicted pedophile blackmail operation in the US.

VIDEO: Kirk’s take on Epstein. (Source: MiddleEastEye)

Sadly, Charlie’s disappearance is already being weaponised, with Zionist hawks flocking to take over his show, offering funding from undiclosed source, whilst opportunistic zionists embeded in the limping Trump administration are shamelessly using the tragedy as an opportunity to politicise this public execution, clumsily painting the 22-year-old Tyler Roninson, the alleged assassin of Charlie Kirk, as a member of a Discord’s far-left activist group. The warmongering, the inconsistency, and the level of speculation surrounding the events that led to this fatal day are almost unprecedented. The Federal and State investigation into this tragic event has turned into a circus and a witch hunt, where the true identity of the crime planners and the whereabouts of the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk have remained elusive. There is a significant amount of circumstantial evidence suggesting a professional coordinated hit, yet all available efforts and resources appear to be directed towards the Discord messages group, transgenderism, and an unyielding media campaign focused on placing the blame on the Democrats. The hard questions are yet to be asked.

Tyler James Robinson, 22, faces accusations of shooting right-wing political activist and commentator Charly Kirk on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem on September 10. He was officially charged and made a court appearance on Tuesday, facing counts of aggravated murder, committing a violent offense in the presence of a child, discharging a firearm resulting in serious bodily injury, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. The charging documents were submitted by County Attorney Jeffrey S. Gray in the District Court of Utah, which provides insights into the investigation surrounding the shooting and disclosed a text message exchange between Mr Robinson and a roommate, in which he allegedly confessed to the murder of Mr Kirk. Policy consultant, author, and independent investigative journalist, Adam Cochran, has broken down the document for us to better understand the legal routes, the inconsistencies and how FBI Director Cash Patel may have compromised the admissibility of evidence on the grounds of coercion, by confirming on national TV the use of “aggressive interrogation posture.”

1/22

The charging document of Tyler Robinson in the Charlie Kirk case has been filed in Utah.

Here’s what’s important and what’s notably ***missing*** from the document! pic.twitter.com/pWe6YJC4pt

— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) September 16, 2025

The Hampton showdown is an important event that needs to be properly understood and backed by irrefutable evidence, which we are confident the relevant journalists and media influencers will disclose while protecting their source. Although there is no proof, at least not yet,  that Israel was involved in the murder of Charlie Kirk, we can not exclude any possibilities without understanding who Tyler Robinson was and what his true motivation was, but more importantly, what took him over the edge. Journalist Ken Klippenstein, who has obtained leaked Discord chat messages from one of Tyler’s childhood friends, concludes that “the picture that emerges from the messages bears little resemblance to the media version, emphasising Washington’s partisan approach and obsession with the Discord messages, and the cost of polarisation that demonises the other side.

In the Charlie Kirk case, the choice of words holds significant weight, and it might be more accurate to describe his death not as murder or assassination, but as a disgraceful silencing…

Lance D Johnson reports for News Target…

The Hamptons showdown: How billionaire Bill Ackman’s Israel ‘intervention’ pushed Charlie Kirk to the edge of a Catholic conversion

Imagine sitting across from a billionaire who holds the purse strings to your organisation, your reputation, maybe even your safety. Now imagine he’s not just asking for your compliance—he’s demanding it, with a list of your supposed sins laid out like evidence in a trial. That’s the scene Charlie Kirk walked into in August in the Hamptons, where billionaire pro-Israel activist Bill Ackman convened what sources describe as an “intervention” to bully Kirk back into line.

Journalists from The Grayzone spoke with at least five sources close to Charlie Kirk. These sources provided new details on the type of pressure Kirk was receiving from billionaires, candidates for higher office, and the heads of foreign governments. In fact, Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu had recently offered to organise a massive infusion of pro-Israel money into Turning Point USA, money and influence that Kirk refused. Kirk was also recently criticised for providing a platform for “anti-Semites”, even though these speakers were bringing up valid points about the Israeli government. That said, let’s be clear, NaturalNews is not outright accusing anyone of a conspiracy to assassinate Charlie Kirk; however, transparency regarding these issues is important for the future of Turning Point USA regarding Kirk’s legacy and commitment, and the future of the movement.

Key points:

• Bill Ackman hosted a contentious meeting in the Hamptons where he and other pro-Israel figures confronted Charlie Kirk over his criticism of Israeli influence.
• Kirk left the meeting upset, allegedly feeling “blackmailed” and concerned about Israeli pressure on his organisation.
• Ackman denied the claims, calling them “totally false,” but refused to provide evidence to back his denial.
• The meeting included influential pro-Israel operatives, some of whom later participated in Israeli-government-funded trips to Gaza.
• Kirk was reportedly considering converting to Catholicism, distancing himself from the evangelical Zionism that dominates conservative circles.
• Before his death, Kirk resisted offers from Netanyahu for funding and a meeting in Jerusalem.

A meeting that allegedly turned hostile

According to sources close to Kirk, on a sweltering August day in the Hamptons, Charlie Kirk walked into what he thought would be a strategy session about a New York mayoral candidate. Instead, according to five sources familiar with the event, he found himself ambushed. Bill Ackman, the hedge fund manager and staunch Israel advocate, had gathered a group of influencers—not for policy discussion, but for an intervention. The target? Kirk’s increasingly critical stance on Israel and his concerns about free speech with anti-semitism laws threatening dissent in America.

The confrontation quickly turned ugly. Ackman presented Kirk with a detailed list of his perceived offenses against Israel, from platforming critics at Turning Point USA events to questioning the U.S.-Israel relationship. An unknown British woman joined in, screaming at Kirk as the tension escalated. One attendee called the whole thing “a disaster.” Another said Kirk left feeling as though he’d been subjected to “blackmail.”

The pressure wasn’t just about ideology—it was about control. Ackman allegedly demanded Kirk rescind his invitation to Tucker Carlson for an upcoming TPUSA event. Carlson, a vocal critic of Israel’s influence, had become a liability in the eyes of pro-Israel donors. Kirk refused.

The breaking point

The Hamptons meeting wasn’t an isolated incident. For months, Kirk had been fielding angry calls and messages from pro-Israel donors, including Netanyahu himself, who reportedly offered to funnel massive amounts of money into TPUSA—if Kirk toed the line. According to a longtime friend, Kirk was “angry” and “frightened” by the intimidation campaign. In an August interview with Megyn Kelly, he vented about the relentless attacks on his character.

“It’s all of a sudden, ‘Oh, Charlie, he’s no longer with us.’ Wait a second—what does ‘with us’ mean, exactly? I’m an American, okay? I represent this country,” Kirk said. “The more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question… we start to say, ‘whoa, hold the boat here.’”

His defiance was short-lived. Weeks after the Hamptons showdown, Kirk was dead. Ackman, who had publicly praised Kirk just a day after his death, now faces questions about his role in the pressure campaign. He’s denied the allegations, calling them “totally false,” but when asked for proof, he refused to provide it.

A movement at a crossroads

Kirk’s death leaves behind a conservative movement at war with itself. The Hamptons meeting exposed a fault line: between those who demand unquestioning loyalty to Israel and those who believe America’s interests should come first, and truth matters when discussing Israel’s actions in the Middle East. Ackman’s strong-arm tactics—backed by a network of pro-Israel billionaires—reveal just how high the stakes are.

Kirk’s final months suggest he was searching for a way out. He’d begun attending Catholic Mass with his wife, Erika, and was considering conversion—a significant shift for someone raised in the evangelical tradition, where support for Israel is often treated as a religious obligation. His friends, like Candace Owens and Catholic influencer Bree Solsdadt, have confirmed this spiritual transformation.

Now, as TPUSA moves forward without him, the question remains: Will the organisation honor Kirk’s legacy of independent thought and rise to the occasion, daring to question Israel and the narratives forced onto American political organisations? Or will it become just another cog in the machine of foreign influence? At the very least, imagine the pressure that 31-year-old Charlie Kirk had on him in his final days, with billionaires and foreign governments pushing him to take money and push their narratives – narratives that shape the future of a generation… One thing is certain: The battle for Charlie Kirk’s soul didn’t end with his death. It’s only just beginning.

Sources include: TheGrayZone.com – TPUSA.com – X.com – Enoch Brighteon.ai

 

(TLB) PUBLISHED THIS ARTICLE FROM 21WIRE

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA – BECOME A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV  &VISIT OUR TELEGRAM CHANNEL

Header featured image (edited) credit: Org. post content. Emphasis, video & editing added by (TLB)

••••

••••

Stay tuned…

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.