COVID-19: Do We Even Need a Vaccine?

COVID-19: Do We Even Need a Vaccine?

By TLB Contributing Partner: Christina England, BA, Hons

After a second week of limited UK news, other than news on the coronavirus, one topic that has received an enormous amount of coverage is the news that a new vaccine is being fast-tracked through the system, in a bid to combat this killer virus.

It appears that researchers are so keen to have all of us vaccinated with this new vaccine that human studies have already begun and this experimental vaccine is currently being tested on humans at the Kaiser Permanente research facility in Seattle, Washington.

On March 17, 2020, BBC News reported that the first person to receive the vaccination was Jennifer Haller, a 43-year-old mother of two from Seattle, who was vaccinated on Monday, March 16, 2020. According to their report, she told reporters that:

“This is an amazing opportunity for me to do something,”

I am sure that many would agree with her sentiments. However, The Liberty Beacon questions why anyone would agree to be a guinea pig for a vaccine trial that they heard about on Facebook. Especially when you consider that, according to the Daily Mail, these studies were taking place to prove whether or not this vaccine was not only safe but even viable.

Do We Even Need a Vaccine?

There is one fact that the general public is being denied and that is that there is absolutely no need for a COVID-19 vaccination. This is because, according to research, it is possible to prevent and even cure many upper respiratory tract infections, including COVID-19, with high doses of vitamin C.

In 1999, H.C. Gorton and K. Javis, published a study titled The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing and relieving the symptoms of virus-induced respiratory infections. They wrote that:

Investigators tracked the number of reports of cold and flu symptoms among the 1991 test population of the facility compared with the reports of like symptoms among the 1990 control population. Those in the control population reporting symptoms were treated with pain relievers and decongestants, whereas those in the test population reporting symptoms were treated with hourly doses of 1000 mg of Vitamin C for the first 6 hours and then 3 times daily thereafter. Those not reporting symptoms in the test group were also administered 1000-mg doses 3 times daily.

Their results demonstrated that:

Overall, reported flu and cold symptoms in the test group decreased 85% compared with the control group after the administration of megadose Vitamin C.

Their study was not the only study to find that vitamin C was effective in aiding in the recovery of patients with respiratory tract infections.


In fact, according to an article written by Dr. Andrew Saul that was recently published by the Caduceus Magazine, the coronavirus pandemic can be dramatically slowed, or even halted altogether, with the immediate widespread use of high doses of vitamin C (ascorbic acid).

On his website, Dr. Saul wrote that:

Vitamin C for COVID 19 is officially recommended by the government of Shanghai and protocol published by the Chinese Medical Association.

Dr. Sauls information was reiterated by Global Research, who announced on their website that:

Intravenous vitamin C is already being employed in China against COVID-19 coronavirus. I am receiving regular updates because I am part of the Medical and Scientific Advisory Board to the International Intravenous Vitamin C China Epidemic Medical Support Team. Its director is Richard Z. Cheng, MD, PhD; associate director is Hong Zhang, PhD.

They stated that:

Dr. Cheng, who is a US board-certified specialist in anti-aging medicine, adds:

Vitamin C is very promising for prevention, and especially important to treat dying patients when there is no better treatment. Over 2,000 people have died of the COIV-19 outbreak and yet I have not seen or heard large dose intravenous vitamin C being used in any of the cases. The current sole focus on vaccine and specific antiviral drugs for epidemics is misplaced.””

Global Research continued that:

He adds that:

Early and sufficiently large doses of intravenous vitamin C are critical. Vitamin C is not only a prototypical antioxidant, but also involved in virus killing and prevention of viral replication. The significance of large dose intravenous vitamin C is not just at antiviral level. It is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that kills most people from coronaviral pandemics (SARS, MERS and now NCP). ARDS is a common final pathway leading to death.””

Additional information form Dr. Cheng

1. High dose Vitamin C is curing patients in China. IV Vit C 10-20 grams treating #COVID19 50 Treated, all recovered. No Side effects. Dr. Richard Cheng MD, PhD, Shanghai.

and …

2. The DOSAGE matters. Use HIGH dose or the results will not be achieved.

However, despite all the evidence to support the administration of high dose vitamin C, all information on the subject is being suppressed by Google and the social media platform, Facebook.

Global Research concluded that:

Anyone saying that vitamin therapy can stop coronavirus is already being labeled as promoting false informationand promulgating fake news.””

They continued that:

Indeed, the World Health Organization (WHO) has, literally, met with Google and Facebook and other media giants to stop the spread of what they declare to be wrong information. See this.

Their actions are extremely worrying and lead many of us to question what their motives could be for blocking such important information.

Why is This Extremely Important Information Being Suppressed?

One theory as to why curing the coronavirus with vitamin C has been suppressed is that many believe that the coronavirus pandemic will give world governments the perfect excuse to mandate vaccinations.

It is interesting to note the fact that shortly before there was any mention of the deadly coronavirus pandemic, there were mass protests around the world in opposition to mandatory vaccination being introduced.

Therefore, in order to push vaccinations onto unwilling participants, governments and world leaders would need to come up with an idea that would make accepting vaccination more appealing.

In an article titled We’re Not Going Back to Normal, author Gideon Litchfield explains exactly how they are planning to force us to accept vaccinations.

He wrote:

Its now widely agreed (even by Britain, finally) that every country needs to flatten the curve: impose social distancing to slow the spread of the virus so that the number of people sick at once doesnt cause the health-care system to collapse, as it is threatening to do in Italy right now. That means the pandemic needs to last, at a low level, until either enough people have had Covid-19 to leave most immune (assuming immunity lasts for years, which we don’t know) or theres a vaccine.

He continued:

How long would that take, and how draconian do social restrictions need to be? Yesterday President Donald Trump, announcing new guidelines such as a 10-person limit on gatherings, said that with several weeks of focused action, we can turn the corner and turn it quickly.In China, six weeks of lockdown are beginning to ease now that new cases have fallen to a trickle.

Litchfield stated that he believes that it will not end there. He believes that as long as someone in the world has the virus, then breakouts will keep on reoccurring until better systems are put in place. He stated that:

In a report yesterday (pdf), researchers at Imperial College London proposed a way of doing this: impose more extreme social distancing measures every time admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) start to spike, and relax them each time admissions fall.

He wrote that:

What counts as social distancing? The researchers define it as All households reduce contact outside household, school or workplace by 75%.That doesnt mean you get to go out with your friends once a week instead of four times. It means everyone does everything they can to minimize social contact, and overall, the number of contacts falls by 75%.

Under this model, the researchers conclude, social distancing and school closures would need to be in force some two-thirds of the timeroughly two months on and one month offuntil a vaccine is available, which will take at least 18 months (if it works at all). They note that the results are qualitatively similar for the US.””

Litchfield concluded that:

“We dont know exactly what this new future looks like, of course. But one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public transport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity – an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been vaccinated against the latest virus strains.”

In other words, according to Litchfields predictions, by tracking our every move, and putting more and more restrictions on our freedom, world government will endeavour force us to comply with their guidelines and accept the vaccination.

This is what our future could look like.

Interestingly this is something that Larry Cook, who runs the website Stop Mandatory Vaccinations, has been saying for weeks.

What Could Happen if Parents Refuse to Have Their Children Vaccinated?

If these rules are put in place, then there really is no telling what rules and regulations will be inflicted on parents. For a while now many states in the US have been refusing to allow unvaccinated students to attend school. Just imagine what could happen if Litchfields predictions come to fruition.

Children would no longer have the freedom to run and play and go out with friends. The unvaccinated would be unable to go to cinemas, discos, birthday parties and clubs like the scouts.

They would be unable to attend preschools, schools and colleges and more and more parents could lose their children to child protection services for neglecting to have them vaccinated.

Sadly, this has already begun to happen.

Children Medically Kidnapped for Vaccine Schedule Refusal

In Tulsa, Oklahoma, US, on January 10, 2020, two children, aged five and three, were forcibly removed from the family home after CPS workers obtained a court order under what their parents say was a false affidavit, stating that their children were being neglected.

In an email, parents Tamsen and Reggie Bowles told us that:

They swore under penalty of perjury that the boys had rings around their eyes and appeared to be malnourished. Now, we have proof that this is false.

Mrs. Bowles explained that:

Once the boys were taken by the sheriff’s deputies to the emergency room, none of this showed up on the medical reports. Instead, the medical reports showed that they were in good shape, healthy, and well-nourished. Even though nothing in the medical reports warranted any further examination, four days later they took them to the CPS pediatrician, and she didn’t even bother look at the three-year-old, since he was fine, but concluded that the five-year-old has autism, and besides that, no other problems. Since they had no other reason to hold them, they had to come up with a reason, so they decided that we were “negligent” in not treating him according to the protocol that they would decide to treat with.

The protocol that CPS was referring to was the fact that this family did not believe in vaccinating their children. This was because they believed that their eldest child, Nigel, had become autistic after receiving routine vaccination.

Mrs. Bowles continued that:

After they were taken, we met up with CPS and talked to them. They lied to us again by telling us we did not meet the criteria to take them home, by saying the three-year-old was “borderline” and the five-year-old was “off the scale. Both statements were proven to be false by the E.R. reports. Both boys were well within their weight for their age group.

This information was confirmed by their medical records:

After examining all of the childrens medical records, as requested by their parents, we found little evidence to support the CPSs claims that these two children were neglected or undernourished.

One report did state that Nigel had been observed shoving large amounts of food into his mouth to the point of becoming concerned for choking, however, as many parents of severely autistic children would know, this could in fact be a behavior problem, rather than a marker for starvation.

Especially as the same report stated that:

During a follow-up medical assessment, Dr. P——– indicated that she would not diagnose Nigel as failure to thrive’ …”

One thing that did appear in several of the medical reports that we were given to examine was the fact that the parents refuse vaccinations, which led us to believe that this was the real reason behind these children being medically kidnapped.

Please listen to the Bowles family tell their story to Sallie O. Elkordy on The Sallie and Mary show.

Please also read Ms. Elkordy’s blog where she lists family after family with similar stories.


Whilst Litchfields predictions and the consequences that they could have on our family life may appear to be extremely far-fetched, he could be closer to the truth than we think.

I say this because on April 2, 2020, an article appeared in The Daily Telegraph that gave four strategies as to how our current situation may soon end. These strategies, were uncannily akin to those predicted by Litchfield.

Strategy 1

The Telegraph stated that:

Under the first strategy, some social distancing and lockdown measures would continue throughout much of the year, but there would be breaks in which life would get back to normal.

They continued that:

A fragmentary, regional lockdown would give the NHS a series of breaks, allowing it to ramp up capacity and then enjoy quieter periods.

And it would allow time for a vaccine or treatment to be created and for immunity in the population to build up slowly.

Mark Woolhouse, Professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh, said: “It’s almost certain to be a partial release. Whatever measures are relaxed, that runs the risk that the epidemic curve will start to increase again.””

Sounding familiar? This is exactly what Litchfield predicted.

Strategy 2

The Telegraph stated that:

Shielding the vulnerable, and allowing the healthy or immune out to carry on with their lives and get back to work, could be a way to break the deadlock and allow major parts of society to return to normal. 

The Government has promised that antibody tests – which show whether someone has had the virus and is now immune – will be available within weeks, and Britons could soon be issued “immunity certificates” that would allow them to leave the lockdown.

In the coming weeks, public health experts are also due to start community surveillance to find out how many people have had the virus, which could end the need for a lockdown.

Again. this is exactly what Litchfield predicted.

Strategy 3

The Telegraph stated:

This strategy involves waiting until the virus is at a very low level, lifting restrictions and combating the remaining cases through aggressive contact tracing, testing, isolation, and precision quarantine zones.

The method has been adopted successfully in Singapore and South Korea, which have coped far better than most other countries, and have done so without major lockdowns. 

Jeremy Hunt, the former Health Secretary and Chairman of the Health Select Committee, said such a strategy could save months of “anguish and economic strife.””

And finally, the most predicted strategy of all, is strategy four:

Strategy 4

The Telegraph stated the following:

The final option is to wait it out until a vaccine or treatment is available and then build up herd immunity. Many scientists think that is the only long-term solution to getting life back to normal.

Taking all of the above information into consideration, The Liberty Beacon are convinced that COVID-19 was no accident. We believe that COVID-19 was a planned event and this belief is borne out by this video: 


About the Author: Christina England, BA Hons, Research Journalist and Author

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specialising in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.

After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities. She currently writes for VacTruth, Health Impact News, GreenMedInfo, The Liberty Beacon, Vaccine Impact and Medical Kidnap on immunisation safety and efficacy.

She has co-authored the book – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. She also compiled the book Shattered Dreams: The HPV Vaccine Exposed

Her website is Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice


Read more articles by Christina



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

2 Comments on COVID-19: Do We Even Need a Vaccine?

  1. Brilliant article thank you Christina.
    Perhaps you should write another article:
    Instead of asking “Do we even need a vaccine?” the new article’s title may be:
    “Do we ever need a vaccine?”

  2. Covid-19 has been identified as a cold virus. Regardless of what other virus, such as Sars, links onto it, it is still a cold virus. Why has medical science never before achieved a viable vaccine for colds? Because they mutate into other strains, making it impossible to use the vaccine effectively after a few months. And there are hundreds of such cold viruses, so isn’t it apparent that vaccines are an ineffective way to fight a cold virus? Imagine concocting hundreds of different cold vaccines, each of which will mutate, eventually creating the need for thousands of cold vaccines in a never-ending parade of new cold virus strains and so on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.