It added that health authorities have “only recommended wearing of masks in cases of gatherings with a high density of people outside” and gave the prefecture until September 8 to amend their orders to exclude areas where conditions were not “likely to favour the spread” of the disease.
Officials must also remove periods of the day in which “there is no particular risk of spreading the virus” from the orders.
A civil liberty group called “Les Essentialistes” brought the case against authorities, arguing that the decrees were disproportionate and inefficient.
The prefecture said on Twitter that it “took note” of the ruling and that the judge had “confirmed the validity” of setting up a rule enforcing mandatory mask-wearing.
The ruling in Lyon followed two similar decisions earlier this week in Strasbourg, in the north-east of France, and in Seine-Maritime, in the north-west.
Seine-Maritime, which includes the cities of Rouen and Le Havre, saw a judge rule that obligatory mouth and nose covering should be limited to the most densely populated areas between 07:00 and 02:00 and not be applied in natural spaces or when performing physical activity.
The prefecture issued a new decree on Friday which now only affects 44 municipalities, down from 71 previously.
“In the Seine-Maritime department, the virus is still actively circulating,” the prefecture said in a statement.
“In Normandy, the effective reproduction rate of the virus, which corresponds to the number of people that a positive case will infect, is now 1.51 as of August 28, 2020.
“The departmental incidence rate, i.e. the number of positive cases per 100,000 inhabitants, has reached 17.19, which is above the vigilance threshold of 10,” it added.
In Strasbourg, situated in the Grand-Est region, which is among the most heavily-impacted in the country, a judge also ordered that municipalities with low population density be excluded from the rules making masks mandatory.
The association “Victims of COVID-19 France” has announced it plans to take similar legal action in at least 15 other cities across the country.
“We are neither for nor against the mask, but the right mask, at the right time, in the right place, we are for coherence and proportionality of actions in relation to the situation.
“We ask for the for the obligation to wear masks outside to be suspended,” the group said on Twitter.
The government has made face masks mandatory on public transport and at work to curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2 — the virus that causes COVID-19 — but several cities in France including Paris, Toulouse and Marseille have also made them compulsory outside.
The country is among the hardest-hit in Europe and has so far recorded more than 300,000 confirmed cases and 30,706 deaths. (ER: Yes, according to highly dubious statistics, as well as a track record of blocking access to once widely-available hydroxychloroquine and locking up the elderly in carehomes.)
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.