DHS outsourced Censorship to 3rd parties, then tried Cover Up
Federal government’s moves show it “implicitly admitting that its censorship activities are unconstitutional,” ~House Judiciary GOP report
The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency outsourced its “censorship operation” to a nonprofit it funded following a First Amendment lawsuit by Louisiana and Missouri attorneys general, “implicitly admitting that its censorship activities are unconstitutional,” according to an interim staff report by House Judiciary Committee Republicans shared with Just the News.
CISA also wanted to use the Center for Internet Security, which operates the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) and Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC), as its “mouthpiece” to obfuscate its own role in censorship, the report says.
It cites spring 2022 meeting notes from the subcommittee on “Protecting Critical Infrastructure from Misinformation & Disinformation,” which was established by CISA’s Cybersecurity Advisory Committee.
The notes show that the so-called MDM Subcommittee was “fully aware” of the contemporaneous “severe public outcry” about DHS’s Disinformation Governance Board, which was disbanded after a few months, and the AGs’ lawsuit against the Biden administration and CISA for pressuring social media to censor disfavored narratives, according to the report.
The subcommittee discussed circumventing the First Amendment by outsourcing these activities to third parties, which would also “avoid the appearance of government propaganda,” according to meeting notes quoted by House Judiciary Republicans.
Suzanne Spaulding, a former CIA legal advisor who’s currently at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and Geoff Hale, who leads CISA’s Election Security Initiative, “suggested designating the ISACs as the clearing house [sic] for information to avoid the appearance of government propaganda,” the meeting notes say. The report characterized this as “laundering” the government’s messages through EI-ISAC.
Spaulding emailed Kate Starbird, cofounder of the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public and MDM Subcommittee chair, worrying that it was “only a matter of time” before their work was publicly exposed and suggesting they be “proactive in telling our story.” Starbird agreed, saying they had “a couple of pretty obvious vulnerabilities.”
House Judiciary Republicans said CISA “still has not adequately complied with a subpoena for relevant documents, and much more factfinding is necessary.”
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News. Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Header featured image (edited) credit: Alejandro Mayorkas/open public card file
Emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.