TLB: Click on images to enlarge.
Shocking DOJ Jewish Lobby case files released under a Freedom of Information Act show President Kennedy & AG Robert Kennedy were fighting the Zionists When Murdered.
Contributed to TLB by: Nicky Nelson
These fascinating historical documents were released on June 10, 2008 under a Freedom of Information Act filing. I have in bold critical information just prior to President Kennedy’s murder; click on the date to see the original documents.
Keep in mind the dates that President John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy were murdered while reading these historical documents regarding their efforts to get the nefarious Jewish Lobby in America registered as Foreign Agents as is required by law; AZC (American Zionist Counsil) / AIPAC (The American Israeli Public Affairs Committee).
Instead of the Kennedy brothers accomplishing this critical goal, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee AIPAC applied for a federal tax exemption in 1967 and the “Federal” Reserve’s criminal collection agency, the IRS aka the US Treasury Department grants it—backdated to 1953!!! Click here: 11/27/1967
Congressman Donald Rumsfeld sent a letter to Robert F. Kennedy on behalf of the Zionists and status of AZC FARA registration on 07/15/1963. It appears Rumsfeld has been working on behalf of Israel and the Zionists his entire career and we know what a big help he was to Israel during 9/11 when 3,000 of our countrymen were burned alive in broad daylight.
FARA – The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) was enacted in 1938. Fd ARA is a disclosure statute that requires persons acting as agents of foreign principals in a political or quasi-political capacity to make periodic public disclosure of their relationship with the foreign principal, as well as activities, receipts and disbursements in support of those activities. Disclosure of the required information facilitates evaluation by the government and the American people of the statements and activities of such persons in light of their function as foreign agents. The FARA Registration Unit of the Counterespionage Section (CES) in the National Security Division (NSD) is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Act.
22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq – United States Code
Title 28 C.F.R. Part 5 – Judicial Administration
(10/17/1963 – J. Walter Yeagley notes of DOJ AZC meeting attended by Nicholas Katzenbach. “Judge Rifkind then made a plea for no registration, stating it was the opinion of most of the persons affiliated with the Council that such registration would be so publicized by the American Council on Judaism that it would eventually destroy the Zionist movement… he did not believe his clients would file any papers or sign any papers indicating that the organization was an agent of a foreign principal. I told him that any such information or material that is supplied on that basis would be made part of the Department’s public files available for inspection by the public…”)
About one month after this last correspondence ^ Kennedy was murdered, November 22, 1963. Zionism and the Jewish Lobby lived on… President Kennedy was now dead.
See Christopher Bollyn’s “LBJ & the Zionist Cover-up of the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy” http://www.bollyn.com/lbj-the-zionist-cover-up-of-the-conspiracy-to-kill-kennedy-2/#sthash.oAEfaxVR.dpuf
The article continues below…
DOJ orders the AZC to Register as a Foreign Agent
“Attached hereto is the entire file relating to the American Zionist Council and our efforts to obtain its registration under the terms of the Foreign Agents Registration Act…“
In the early 1960’s Israel funneled $5 million (more than $35 million in today’s dollars) into US propaganda and lobbying operations. The funds were channeled via the quasi governmental Jewish Agency‘s New York office into an Israel lobby umbrella group, the American Zionist Council. Senate Foreign Relations Committee investigations and hearings documented funding flows, propaganda, and public relations efforts and put them into the record. But the true fate of the American Zionist Council was never known, except that its major functions were visibly shut down and shifted over to a former AZC unit known as the “Kenen Committee,” called the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (or AIPAC) in the late 1960’s. The following chronology provides links to images of original Department of Justice case files released on June 10, 2008 under a Freedom of Information Act filing.
John F. Kennedy President, Robert F. Kennedy Attorney General
* AZC (American Zionist Counsil)
* AIPAC (The American Israeli Public Affairs Committee)
|08/27/1962||AZC internal memo – Lenore Karp to Rabbi Jerome Unger about AZC Department of Public Information literature distribution.|
|Undated||1962-1963 AZC Public Relations Plan summary|
|10/31/1962||Assistant Attorney General and Director of the Internal Security Division J. Walter Yeagley notifies Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy “…we are soliciting next week the registration of the American Zionist Council under the Foreign Agents Registration Act...You may be aware that the American Zionist Council is composed of representatives of the various Zionist organizations in the United States including the Zionist Organization of America.“|
|11/06/1962||Nathan B. Lenvin, head of the FARA section, memo to central files, about a meeting with Jewish Agency representative Maurice M. Boukstein who asks about FARA applicability to AZC. “…in his view it was doubtful that any great protest would be made since in the discussions he has had with various officials connected both with the Zionist Council and the Jewish Agency he had made it clear in his view an agency relationship would result which may require registration.’”|
|11/14/1962||Edwin Guthman letter to Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach about future AZC FARA registration order. “I doubt very much there will be any fuss. I don’t think the American Zionist Council is in any position to do so…the Council has compromised its position.” OK’d by Robert F. Kennedy.|
|11/21/1962||DOJ orders AZC to register under FARA “…receipt of such funds from the American Section of the Jewish Agency for Israel constitutes the Council an agent of a foreign principal…the Council’s registration is requested.”|
|12/06/1962||AZC President Rabbi Irving Miller response to DOJ “The request for registration contained in your letter raises many questions of fact and of relationships which first must be resolved by us before compliance can be made. Therefore, it is requested that you be good enough to grant us a delay of 120 days…”|
|Isaiah L. Kenen incorporates the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Washington, DC|
DOJ draft file memo about 01/23/1963 DOJ meeting with AZC head legal counsel Simon H. Rifkind “…he had advised his client to discontinue completely the agency relationship and cut off the receipt of any additional funds…Mr. Lenvin pointed out specifically that the termination of the ‘activities’ on the part of AZC did not absolve it of its obligation to register…”
|01/25/1963||Article in the National Jewish Post, filed in FARA Section – “AZC Gives Up $ to Avoid Foreign Agent Registration”|
|02/01/1963||DOJ Executive Assistant Thomas Hall memo to Nathan Lenvin updating meeting notes “Mr. Hall emphasized that a contrary conclusion would not of course be reached during the course of this meeting and suggested that the subject submit a detailed argument as to why it was of the opinion it should not be required to register….”|
|02/08/1963||DOJ AZC January 23, 1963 meeting notes by Nathan Lenvin filed “discontinuance of receipt of such funds thus terminating the agency relationship did not absolve the Council of its obligation to register.”|
|02/19/1963||American Council for Judaism (AJC) newsletter. “The American Zionist Council (coordinating political action arm of all U.S. Zionist organizations) was asked last month by the Justice Department to register as a ‘foreign agent’ of the State of Israel.”|
|03/07/1963||New York Times reporter Tony Lewis calls FARA section to verify AZC foreign agent order state AJC press release.|
|3/23/1963||AZC Counsel “Memorandum of Law in support of our position that the American Zionist Council is not required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938.”|
|04/01/1963||Nathan Lenvin file memo of DOJ AZC meeting on April 1, 1963- AZC Memorandum of Law rejected. “…if necessary I would be willing to recommend, if the representatives of the Council insisted upon these points, that the matter be litigated.”|
|04/05/1963||Thomas Hall memo with J. Walter Yeagley notes “Okay, but let’s get it concluded. Have we sent them J.A. reg[istration] statement?”|
|05/02/1963||Nathan Lenvin file memo of DOJ AZC meeting on May 2, 1963 “Finally, Judge Rifkind raised the point…that the vast number of Jews who adhered to the principles of Zionism could not understand how ‘our administration’ could do such harm to the Zionist movement and impair the effectiveness of the Council by insistence on registration. He appealed to the discretionary power of the Department…Mr. Katzenbach then noted that if the Council made a full disclosure of the receipt and expenditure of the funds it had received from the Jewish Agency so that such information would then be available for public inspection the purposes and objectives of the Registration Act might well be accomplished and very likely there would be nothing further for the Government to do…”|
|05/23/1963||First Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hearings on Israeli Foreign Agents (Senate Records)|
|06/28/1963||Wall Street Journal article “Federal lawyers near decision on whether to require the American Zionist Council to register as an agent of the Israeli government. High Justice Department officials weigh the risk of offending Jewish opinion in the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Fulbright also eyes the council’s activities.”|
|06/28/1963-07/26/1963||Citizen telegrams and letters urging FARA decision based on legal merits rather than political considerations.|
|07/02/1963||Irene Bowman FARA section file memo on a June 28, 1963 DOJ AZC meeting, “Mr. Adrian W. DeWind and a Mr. Kahn (ph) of the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison …for the purpose of submitting for the Department’s examination a stack of publications and several books prepared by the American Zionist Council….Prior to Mr. DeWind’s departure he said he was disturbed by what he described as the speed with which the American Council on Judaism learned that the Department had solicited the registration of the American Zionist Council. He wondered whether there was a leak in the Department.”|
|07/15/1963||Congressman Donald Rumsfeld letter to Robert F. Kennedy about status of AZC FARA registration.|
|07/19/1963||Thomas K. Hall Memo to Deputy AG Katzenbach and J. Walter Yeagley on Wall Street Journal Article. Yeagley notes “I called Judge Rifkind Thursday July 18. He said he thought the material had been submitted and was ‘embarrassed.’ Fri[day] someone else from the firm called asking for still another 2 or 3 weeks as their controller or someone is in Europe.”|
|07/19/1963||J. Walter Yeagley responds to Rumsfeld “ultimate determination will be based on the law as applied to the facts…not on any consideration of its effect on the public opinion of the Jewish community…”|
|07/26/1963||American Council for Judaism Letter to RFK about AZC FARA registration “I am enclosing latest issue of our newsletter, Brief, featuring our comments on the Department of Justice investigation of the American Zionist Council…”|
|07/26/1963||Theresa Green FARA memo about AZC phone call request for two week filing deadline extension.|
|7/30/1963||Routing memo from Deputy AG Nicholas Katzenbach to J. Walter Yeagley “I guess this is the correct response. Rifkind should be needled, but much depends on Fulbright, too.”|
|8/1/1963||Second Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hearings on Israeli Foreign Agents (Senate Records)|
|08/14/1963||FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover offers J. Walter Yeagley FBI assistance to investigate the AZC “In view of recent public hearings…it is requested that you advise whether any investigation is desired….”|
|8/14/1963||J. Walter Yeagley response to 7/30/1963 Katzenbach routing memo (copy from above) “Mr. Hall – is it time to write Rifkind—or send memo to A.G. or send in FBI?”|
|08/15/1963||Thomas K. Hall internal FARA memo about AZC legal counsel “stalling hoping that time will resolve the difficulties faced by the AZC…We should go on record with the AG (copy to deputy) outlining the posture of this matter and indicate the need for more drastic action…“|
|8/16/1963||Irene Bowman, FARA section analysis on alleged AZC FARA violations derived from Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings. “…the Department should insist on the immediate registration of the American Zionist Council under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, and if such registration is not forthcoming, appropriate action should be taken to enforce such a request.”|
|08/17/1963||AZC Executive Director Rabbi Jerome Unger letter and filing to FARA Section “Enclosed wherewith are the two reports of Income and Expenditures of the American Zionist Council…”|
|08/20/1963||Nathan Lenvin query asking if Irene Bowman would accept as FARA registration, Bowman: “Absolutely not!”|
|08/22/1963||J. Walter Yeagley memo to Nicholas Katzenbach: “There is also attached a proposed letter from me to Judge Rifkind requesting a registration to be filed within ten days.”|
|08/23/1963||J. Walter Yeagley to FBI Director “..registration was originally solicited by letter dated November 21, 1962…Pending a determination as to whether further letter should be written insisting on registration no investigation will be required. You will be kept advised of developments in this matter.”|
|10/11/1963||DOJ Demand for AZC Registration “the Department expects a response from you within 72 hours with regard to this matter.”|
|10/17/1963||J. Walter Yeagley notes of DOJ AZC meeting attended by Nicholas Katzenbach. “Judge Rifkind then made a plea for no registration, stating it was the opinion of most of the persons affiliated with the Council that such registration would be so publicized by the American Council on Judaism that it would eventually destroy the Zionist movement…he did not believe his clients would file any papers or sign any papers indicating that the organization was an agent of a foreign principal. I told him that any such information or material that is supplied on that basis would be made part of the Department’s public files available for inspection by the public…”|
President Kennedy was murdered one month after this last entry on November 22, 1963, during he and his brother’s struggle to get the Jewish Lobby to register as foreign agents as is required by law.
It’s hard to imagine that the President of the United States and the Attorney General were unable to accomplish this critical goal given their authority and positions of power.
In addition, President Kennedy had recently signed Executive Order 11110 to stop the Jewish Banker’s “Federal” Reserve:
“On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superseded by any subsequent Executive Order.
In simple terms, it is still valid. When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy – the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money – without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110 gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.” This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury’s vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated.
It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America. “United States Notes” were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a “Federal Reserve Note” issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a “United States Note” from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy’s Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says “Federal Reserve Note” on the top while the other says “United States Note”. Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number. President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper “currency” circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes. Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes.
This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level…(Excerpts from John P. Curran’s JFK vs The Federal Reserve)
“Final Judgment” by Michael Collins Piper is a MUST READ recommended by Jim Condit Jr. You can read this fascinating well-documented book for free by clicking on the photo below, or you can purchase your own copy.
PDF provided by American Free Press
Another book recommended by Jim Condit Jr. is “There’s a Fish in the Courtroom” by. Copies of this controversial book run between $107 -$632 on Amazon. Click the photo for more information:
Kennedy was also going to put an end to the traitorous CIA and stated he wanted to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.” (3)
(In late April 1961, over fourteen hundred members of the Cuban Expeditionary Forces landed at the Bay of Pigs, in Cuba. Their mission was to overthrow the communist regime of Cuban President Fidel Castro. The mission was a striking failure. Almost immediately it became known that the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) trained the “freedom fighters:” Cubans trained to overthrow the Castro regime. American President John F. Kennedy had approved the mission. President Kennedy soon after the failure spoke at a meeting of the American Association of Newspaper Editors and assumed all blame for the failed invasion. His staff then began leaking information to reporters, blaming the failure on anyone except the administration. (1)President Kennedy was quoted as saying, “How could I have been so stupid?” to trust the groups who were advising him, such as the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS). (2) Even more damning to the CIA was a reputed quote by President Kennedy that he wanted to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.” (3) ) Source: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jfk_cia.htm
Lyndon B. Johnson President, Robert F. Kennedy Attorney General
|12/11/1963||AZC Counsel to DOJ “…our client is not prepared to register as an agent of a foreign government. It has, however, no reluctance to make this information available voluntarily…”|
|01/02/1964||Deputy AG Katzenbach asks DOJ FARA section to prepare a “reply for his signature in a friendly rather than a hostile tone…to the effect that the material he submitted is not satisfactory…”|
|01/10/1964||Deputy AG Katzenbach letter to AZC counsel “The material you submitted is much less useful than what I had expected you were going to submit and of course there is no disclosure unless the data is available for public inspection.”|
|01/16/1964||AZC counsel Rifkind to Katzenbach “I shall try to accommodate my trip to Washington to some occasion when I am there on other business..”|
|02/03/1964||Nathan Lenvin meetings with AZC counsel Rifkind “Judge Rifkind opened the meeting by showing me a pamphlet distributed by the American Council for Judaism which contained charges that Zionists were acting as propaganda agents for the State of Israel…he was concerned that any disclosure which were being made should not be such as to substantiate these charges made by the American Council [for Judaism]… Mr. Rothenberg made one caviat, that they would have to be sure anything they submitted would not ultimately prejudice the organization in the eyes of the public.”|
|02/10/1964||Ed Guthman Letter to J. Walter Yeagley “I don’t see how we can accept a caveat that an organization won’t submit information that might prejudice it publicly.”|
|02/10/1964||J. Walter Yeagley letter to AZC counsel Rothenberg “the Department is not concerned with the Council’s expenditures in connection with exempt activities such as Hebrew education and culture but requests that the Council submit a statement detailing its other expenditures and particularly those under the category of the Department of Information and Public Relations…”|
|02/12/1964||AZC counsel Rothenberg acknowledgement “I acknowledge receipt of your letter…”|
|03/16/1964||AZC counsel Rothenberg letter to Lenvin – “You are familiar, I know, with the agreement reached between Judge Rifkind and Mr. Katzenbach, in the presence of Mr. Yeagley, with regard to additional information to be furnished your Section. Such agreement was reached, as I understand it, in the realization by Mr. Katzenbach that with the present size of the staff of the Council it would be indeed burdensome to furnish your department with itemization of expenses of the past two years. A sample itemization was therefore forwarded to you for a period of approximately three months.”|
|03/16/1964||James Weldon FARA letter to Rothenberg “it is requested you advise of your progress in this matter”.|
|04/28/1964||AZC counsel Rothenberg letter to Weldon “Reference is made to my letter of March 16 addressed to Mr. Nathan B. Lenvin.”|
|04/30/1964||Assistant AG Yeagley note to Deputy Attorney General Katzenbach “This is the most blatant stall we have encountered. Do you mind suggesting what we do next because all of us here would call their records before a grand jury.”|
|05/4/1964||Assistant AG Yeagley note to Katzenbach forwarding 3/16/1964 Rothenberg inquiry “Here is tickler from Rothenberg about his March 16 letter on the American Zionist Council. Do you want me to do something on this?”|
Lyndon B. Johnson President, Nicholas Katzenbach acting Attorney General
|10/07/1964||Acting AG Katzenbach letter to AZC counsel Rothenberg “While we have endeavored to make our requests as reasonable as possible, we cannot accept your suggestion since the information offered is not in compliance with the Act or what we thought our understanding was with Judge Rifkind.”|
|10/20/1964||Irene Bowman FARA section review of AZC filing for 1962 and 1962 – “sample itemization deemed deficient.”|
|10/30/1964||Nathan Lenvin notes October 22, 1964 DOJ-AZC meeting – “Mr. Katzenbach had to excuse himself shortly after the meeting commenced because of urgent business elsewhere, but before he left he made clear to Mr. Rothenberg that, in response to the latter’s assertion that to submit all of the financial information we had previously requested for a two- to two-and-a-half year period would be a great burden on the subject, we would accept a statement as to a typical three month expenditure projected for the entire period concerned.” Assistant AG Yeagley notes “They are to include the names for confid[ential] info of the Dept.—not for public file.”|
|11/04/1964||AZC counsel Rothenberg letter “Pursuant to understanding reached at our meeting…I write to give you an outline of the information to be submitted.”|
|11/09/1964||Nathan Lenvin FARA section cover memo to Bowman “looks okay to me, please prepare a reply”|
|11/18/1964||J. Walter Yeagley letter to AZC counsel Rothenberg “Your proposed outline of the information to be contained in the report appears to be in accordance with our understanding.”|
|11/23/1964||AZC counsel Rothenberg letter to Nathan Lenvin, FARA section – “In accordance with our understanding I have asked the American Zionist Council to proceed with the preparation of the report.”|
|01/19/1965||Irene Bowman FARA section memo to Nathan Lenvin – “To date to my knowledge no such report has been submitted.”|
Lyndon B. Johnson President, Nicholas Katzenbach Attorney General
|02/25/1965||Nathan Lenvin FARA memo to files – “The delay, according to Mr. Rothenberg, was caused by the inability of the subject to collect all of the information we wanted in the detail it was indicated…”|
Harry A. Steinberg, Executive Director AZC cover letter and filing to FARA section “There is also enclosed herewith, in duplicate, a listing of persons who have received funds as shown in the record of disbursements. Mr. Rothenberg has requested of you that this listing be kept separate and apart from the record of disbursements in any public files in your Section.”
|03/02/1965||AZC FARA section filing for April 1, 1962 to June 30, 1962 (public)|
|03/02/1965||AZC FARA section filing for April 1, 1962 to June 30, 1962 (non-public)|
|03/23/1965||Irene Bowman, FARA memo that AZC filing is in “substantial compliance” Irene Bowman handwritten note “I agree with the conclusion that the material be accepted and put into form for public examination.”|
|03/24/1965||Irene Bowman, FARA retraction and list of AZC filing inadequacies “While it appears possible to make up a registration statement from documents furnished by a prospective registrant, these documents should furnish all of the information required by the Act to be stated in a registration statement. The above material, none of which is executed under oath, fails to provide the following information which is material for the purpose of the Act…:”|
|03/31/1965||Nathan Lenvin file transfer to J. Walter Yeagley – “Attached hereto is the entire file relating to the American Zionist Council and our efforts to obtain its registration under the terms of the Foreign Agents Registration Act…In her memorandum to Files, Mrs. Bowman points out certain lacunae, which fail to establish all of this material as meeting all of the requirements for registration…we were well aware that no full and complete registration statement in the ordinary sense would ever be received…only alternative to a refusal to accept what has been submitted as compliance with the Act would be to institute prosecutive proceedings, which would be impractical…no useful purpose would be served by including these names in the material which would be made available for public inspection.”|
|4/08/1965||Nathan Lenvin instruction memo to Ulda Eldred, FARA section “The material filed by the American Zionist Council (AZC) was filed in accordance with an understanding between the Department and the AZC…If you should receive inquiries as to whether the AZC is registered under the Act, you should respond in the negative. You should advise, however, that the AZC has filed information with this Section which is available for public examination.|
|05/17/1965||Nathan Lenvin / J. Walter Yeagley notice to files – “…material of the AZC was placed in an expandable portfolio to distinguish it in appearance from the registration statements which are filed in manila folders. In the event Mrs. Eldred receives inquiries as to whether the AZC is registered under the Act, she has been instructed to respond in the negative.”|
|05/14/1965||J. Walter Yeagley Yeagley requests closure of AZC case at the FBI “the material does not comprise a registration statement but does supply basic information regarding the activities of the AZC financed in part by the Jewish Agency…”|
|05/20/1965||Nathan Lenvin to J. Walter Yeagley on special handling/case closure – Yeagley handwritten note “OK. This seems to be what attorney Gen[eral] Kennedy and the then Dep[uty] AG Katzenbach had in mind.”|
|06/22/1965||05/17/1965 New York Times article: AZC convenes a major meeting at Jewish Agency New York headquarters “revising its program to strengthen every phase of Jewish religious and cultural life in this country….there should be no appeasement at the expense of Israel.” FARA section file copy, reviewed by DOJ officials.|
|The American Israel Public Affairs Committee AIPAC applies for a federal tax exemption. The US Treasury Department grants it—backdated to 1953.|
Documentation Source: The Israel Lobby Archive – http://www.irmep.org/ila/azcdoj/
For constantly updated content, http://IsraelLobby.org
Congress is powerfully controlled by the organized Jewish Lobby through such organizations as The American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the Anti-defamation League (ADL), who happens to be funding the training of our out-of-control Law Enforcement Officials in Israel. Click on photo to read more.
According to former Congressman Jim Traficant, who ended up doing nearly 8-years in prison for going up against the Jewish Lobby, both the Congress and the Senate; both houses are powerfully controlled by AIPAC, in fact he said they were “owned” by them.
The Hon. Jim Traficant passed away after a freak accident on his family farm in 2014 during the launch of Project Freedom USA which meant to do away with the “Federal” Reserve and their criminal collection agency, the IRS. Jim Condit Jr. was running against Speaker of the House, John Boehner, at the time and had been working and traveling with Traficant the last 6-months of his life helping him with this project. We carry on with Target Freedom USA in his memory.
He was one of the last honest and freedom loving Americans to serve in Congress. Jim was one of the few to speak out about Israel’s stranglehold on American politics. The world has lost a great and courageous man. (2014) RIP – Jim Condit Jr.
“As stated by the late, former Congressman Jim Traficant, former Presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan, former Senator Friz Hollins, and former Congressman Paul Findley, Congress is powerfully controlled by the organized Jewish Lobby through such organizations as AIPAC (The American Israeli Public Affairs Committee). Congressmen and women must be nominated and elected who will throw off this foreign control of our nation.
Republican Paul Findley Dares to Speak Out Again – AIPAC exposed!
Former Congressman paul Findley was a Congressman from Illinois who talks for 1 hours about how AIPAC (American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) controls the US Congress, State Legislators, and City Councilman, — in conjunction with their fellow operatives for the organized Jewish Lobby in the Big Media.” – Jim Condit Jr
A Dire Plea to the Media and Chilling Warning to Americans from President John F. Kennedy before he died.
Don’t think the Zionists could take over the U.S. and keep it out of the Zionist controlled media? Listen to this alarming speech.
“…The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.
Today no war has been declared–and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.
If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions–by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security–and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.
For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.
The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.
The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.
On many earlier occasions, I have said–and your newspapers have constantly said–that these are times that appeal to every citizen’s sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.
I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.
Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: “Is it news?” All I suggest is that you add the question: “Is it in the interest of the national security?” And I hope that every group in America–unions and businessmen and public officials at every level– will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests.
And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.
Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.
– II –
It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face…”
For the entire transcript from the Presidential Library:
So what are the possible repercussions of the Kennedy’s not being able to get the Zionists and Jews to register as foreign agents? How powerful have the Zionists become? What do the Zionist/Jews/Dual-US-Israeli Citizens own and control?
Nearly all major media (96%) and global means of communicating. Banking and finance are controlled at every corner and the Rothschild Zionist’s Crowning Jewel? The Not-So-Federal “Federal” Reserve that has been destroying America and the world around us since 1913 along with their Criminal Collection Agency the IRS that same year, and the creation of the Anti-defamation League in 1913 to protect the Jewish bankers that had taken over America.
IMPORTANT MEDIA CONTROL VIDEO:
Brother Nathanael presents his 4 Point Plan to deal with AIPAC’s stranglehold.
The ADL – The Anti-Defamation League
The Rothschilds (German Jews) had more money than governments and didn’t want it confiscated, they needed a safe haven to protect their wealth. The Rockefellers and Rothschild Zionists set up their “Federal” Reserve in 1913 along with their criminal collection agency the IRS. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 showing the intent to make a “Jewish” state in Palestine, against the Torah.
(“…United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people…”)
Then the Rothschild and Rockefeller families create the UN and about 1948 take over Palestine using their alliance with the British and the UN; Party A (Britain) gives Party B’s property (Palestine) to Party C (Rothschild’s Zionist Israel). Israel is the head of the snake and the “Federal” Reserve. – Nicky Nelson
Nicky Nelson is a freedom loving patriot, activist and freelance writer for several blogs and websites including The Liberty Beacon project. Nicky was also highly instrumental in laying the foundation for TLB, something we will always be extremely grateful for.
TLB recommends you visit Target Freedom USA for more pertinent articles and information.