Dr. Yeadon Comments on “Dr. Pierre Kory Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed”

ER Editor: We’ve commented on this site before how the likes of Drs. Robert Malone, Pierre Kory, Peter McCullough and others are slippery and suspicious. They’re also clever, likely with sophisticated backup. Here’s a prime example of that, involving the promotion of Ivermectin, which former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon helps us recognize.

Over the last four years, REAL truthers have come into the light. We believe Yeadon is one of them.

So what is wrong with pushing Ivermectin (or HCQ), which is obviously a useful and relatively harmless drug?

This is where it gets tricky.

Kudos, too, to Dr. Paul Alexander, who comments on this. See —

Hhhmmm, Dr. Mike Yeadon is treading on DANGEROUS ground here, ground where lots, many will vilify him & move to cancel him & they tried (some successfully) in the Freedom Movement …

***

We would be covering some old ground by putting this out in its entirety, but it’s well worth a read. Charles Wright does an updated look at Dr. Pierre Kory, and it ain’t good (but we have included the introduction here) —

Fact Check of claims made in Tucker Carlson’s interview of Dr. Pierre Kory, President of the FLCCC

A growing number of medical professionals, including Dr. Michael Yeadon, have reported there was no such thing as a viral Pandemic. (16). (ER: We’ve read Yeadon and he believes, as we have since the start, that something was ‘seeded’. We assume he means some sort of bioweapon.)

Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey have broken down the fraudulent methods used to generate the fictitious SARS-CoV-2 virus sequence in China (31). SARS-CoV-2 has never existed in human blood in the sequence uploaded to GenBank. This sequence was generated by computers that sliced up all materials found in the lung fluid samples of hospitalized patients with pneumonia in China into the tiniest pieces. The computer programs then reassembled these tiny “contigs” into a predetermined “coronavirus” template and discarded the rest of the material that did not fit the coronavirus template – a technique the Baileys describe as building something out of Legos.

Meaningless positive “COVID” PCR tests subsequently formed the backbone of “COVID” statistics that falsely claimed what did and did not “cure COVID.” None of these statistics are valid because “COVID” does not exist. PCR tests amplify tiny bits of genetic material from human samples and compare them to a genetic sequence that is generated from common materials such as bacteria and human DNA in the lung fluid samples of hospitalized pneumonia patients in China – almost certainly bacterial pneumonia.

Pawpaws, quail, and goats tested positive for “COVID” in a country that dared to question and test Science instead of blindly following it. (27). The medical community does not have a clue what minute particles the PCR tests amplify, where those particles came from originally, or what their role is in the human body. A positive “COVID” PCR test does not identify a disease or a disease symptom. Many of the “COVID” positive cases were said to be “asymptomatic.”

While foundational theories of virology are still in question, it is a relatively simple thing to prove with macro data that deaths assigned to “COVID” should instead be assigned to Hospital Homicides, vaccines, and other causes of death, and that not one person in the world has died from “COVID.”

Statistical analysis promoted by the FLCCC (ER: Kory’s outfit) has been used as a weak and false alibi for Doctors and Hospitals that have killed their patients. The FLCCC compares the tremendous disparity in death rates between Hospitals using “COVID” protocols to the death rates of Doctors in private practice using “early treatment” methods. Although “early treatment” of flu-like symptoms is a sound medical practice, the FLCCC deceptively frames the disparity in death rates as “early treatments save lives” instead of “Hospitals killed their patients.” A Doctor who perhaps has more “COVID” deaths on his hands than any other Doctor in the country just happens to be President of the FLCCC.

***

Pushing IVM in the face of a Covid onslaught with a vaccine threatening everyone might seem like a bold and courageous move, indeed exemplary. But, as Yeadon notes, it makes people feel threatened by something assumed therefore to be real and natural, people who would then be more likely to take a genetic vaccine BECAUSE IVERMECTIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE TO THEM. Pardon our language – it’s total ass-saving for Kory’s abysmal hospital death record in ICU, as noted above. AND a horrible psyop played on thoroughly frightened people, who would have genuinely wanted to take IVM. Yeadon is right to sound the alarm on such medical people.

Clever, well-crafted messaging plays on our background assumptions and fears, leading us to do things against our interests.

********