ER Editor: See also this RT report titled Mandatory vaccines are ‘necessary in democratic society,’ don’t infringe human rights, EU court rules. Of note:
Making children get jabs for common diseases is ‘necessary in democratic society’ and is in their best interests, the European Court for Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on Thursday in a landmark decision against anti-vaxxers. (ER: Note the RT choice of label)
It’s the first time the ECHR has ruled on mandatory vaccinations for children against common diseases. While the case dealt with the Czech Republic’s laws that require schoolchildren to have jabs against diseases like whooping cough, tetanus and measles, it has implications when it comes to compulsory Covid jabs.
Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR, said the ruling reinforces the possibility of compulsory vaccination under the current coronavirus pandemic conditions.
Seasoned observers of the European Court of Human Rights know that it is up to its neck in Soros influence. Here are a couple of things we’ve published from early 2020:
It indeed remains to be seen what effect this will have on Covid vaccination policy for the rest of us.
For British readers, we obtained the following from the Jonathan Law channel on Telegram, which explains why the UK’s Human Rights Act 1998 is so critical in this regard, since rulings from the ECHR cannot supersede the Act, nor is there any UK law mandating vaccines:
Dystopian Nightmare as European Court of Human Rights rules Mandatory Vaccination is Legal
THE DAILY EXPOSE
This judgment “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under conditions of the current COVID-19 epidemic,” according to Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR.
The decision said that the compulsory vaccines administered by Czech health authorities were in line with the “best interests” of children. “The objective has to be that every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity,” it added.
The court ruled that the Czech health policy was not in violation of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights. By Czech law, children must be vaccinated against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles. The case was brought to the court by families that had been fined or whose children had been refused access to a nursery for failing to comply with their legal vaccination duty.
The ruling is bound to please Tony Blair who has been working tirelessly to ensure the United Kingdom enforces a “vaccine passport” system. Something which, if it came to fruition, would essentially be a freedom pass.
We know for a fact that the authorities do not want to vaccinate every man, woman and child for the good of their health, as we can see from the data over the past twelve months that this alleged new disease kills only 0.2% of those it infects and the majority of deaths occur in those who are aged over 85 and have underlying health conditions.
Which leads to the question of why exactly do they want to vaccinate every man, woman and child?
(Please comment your thoughts below)
The ruling by the ECHR has set a precedent that obligatory vaccinations may not contravene the European Convention on Human Rights.
When will this dystopian nightmare end?
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.