FDA Sued in Federal Court Over Withholding Vaccine Safety Data
BECKER NEWS
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is being sued for withholding the results of Covid-19 vaccine safety analyses.
The new lawsuit, filed by the nonprofit Children’s Health Defense (CHD) in federal court in Washington on January 26, contends the FDA’s actions violate federal law.
“Numerous scientists, physicians, public health experts, and other concerned individuals have questioned the safety of COVID-19 injections, and many thousands of post-injection adverse events have been reported to the federal government,” the lawsuit argues. “However, throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government has continued to tout COVID-19 injections as ‘safe and effective,’ and to assure the public thatfederal agencies are vigilantly monitoring their safety.”
The FDA Sued Over Withholding Covid Data by Kyle Becker on Scribd
The lawsuit seeks the raw results from the FDA’s analyses of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS, which the FDA runs with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, accepts reports of post-vaccination adverse events. However, both the FDA and CDC have routinely criticized the VAERS system that both the agencies run.
The FDA by protocol is supposed to run Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining on VAERS reports to see if safety signals are triggered. These signals are meant to guide evaluations of vaccines for potential Adverse Events (AEs).
“A report to VAERS does not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event. But VAERS can give CDC and FDA important information. If it looks as though a vaccine might be causing a problem, FDA and CDC will investigate further and take action if needed,” the CDC claims on its website.
The FDA has denied CHD’s request for these analyses, claiming the records are “intra-agency memoranda consisting of opinions, recommendations, and policy discussions within the deliberative process of FDA, from which factual information is not reasonably segregable.”
The FDA adds that such analysis “contains a discussion of legal and policy matters and fall within the attorney work product and attorney-client privileges as enunciated by the Supreme Court.”
The Food and Drug Administration is a “public health agency” denying the American people transparency over its vaccine analyses, even as its guidelines have been used to justify federal, state, and city vaccine mandates. The lawsuit seeks to shed more light on the FDA’s justification for labeling the vaccines “safe and effective.”
_________
RELATED
Shadowy Military Operation Uncovered to Spy on Covid Response Critics, Treat Them as ‘Enemies of the State’
‘This is Brazen Government Censorship: ‘White House Directly Asked that Tucker Carlson and Tomi Lahren Be Silenced Over Covid Vaccines
*********
(TLB) published this article from Becker News as compiled and written by Kyle Becker
Header featured image FDA/orrinal BN article
Emphasis added by (TLB) editors
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply