From ‘Full House’ To The Big House: Lori Loughlin, Others Face Jail In College Admissions Scandal
(ZeroHedge) The American justice system has been criticized (and not without reason) for allowing white collar criminals to get off with fines, community service or probation, while poor mothers who – and we’re just throwing out an example here – used a relative’s address to enroll their child in a better public school system wind up in jail.
But as the backlash to the college cheating scandal intensifies, will Aunt Becky’s (aka Lori Loughlin) white privilege be enough to spare her from a stint in the big house? It’s looking increasingly plausible that it won’t.
To wit, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that federal prosecutors who have been negotiating pre-indictment plea deals with some of the 33 parents arrested in the college admissions cheating scandal are insisting on at least some jail time.
Federal authorities and at least some parents accused in the college-admissions cheating case are negotiating possible guilty pleas, according to people familiar with the matter.
Prison time may be included in pre-indictment plea deals, the people said. Nearly all the 33 parents accused in the case face a single charge of conspiring to commit what is known as honest-services fraud. Most haven’t been indicted.
The Wall Street Journal reported that prosecutors could add money laundering conspiracy charges for some of the parents as soon as next week. Two parents were indicted on such a charge on Tuesday.
Per WSJ, prosecutors are expected to indict some of the parents on charges of money laundering, to be added to the charges of honest services fraud (a type of mail fraud) that the group is facing. Most of the 33 parents who were arrested in the sweep haven’t been formally indicted, due to the opportunity to negotiate a pre-indictment plea.
And in a sign that prosecutors are putting the screws to parents, a lawyer for one couple who spoke with WSJ said his clients had rejected a deal offered by prosecutors, and would plead not guilty at trial.
“They are definitely incentivizing parents to plead now and get a better deal than if they are indicted,” Mr. Hooper said. He said he was told ahead of time that the money-laundering conspiracy charge would be added in the indictment.
All told, 50 people were charged for their alleged roles in a sprawling scheme allegedly masterminded by Newport Beach, Calif., college-admissions consultant Rick Singer who bribed test proctors, coaches and others to help get the marginal-student children of wealthy parents into a top school.
One thing is for sure: Given the media attention and intense public outrage over the scandal, prosecutors aren’t going to just let the parents off with a sweetheart deal. As the above-mentioned lawyer told WSJ: “They are trying to expand this.”
(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and commented on by Tyler Durden.
Related article from The Liberty Beacon:
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: The Liberty Beacon contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.