Google Under Fire After New Study Shows Profound Political Bias
Google once had the motto “don’t be evil.” The Big Tech giant has long abandoned this motto, as well as any shred of ethics.
But if The Department of Justice (DOJ) and a coalition of eight states get their way, its parent company Alphabet is going to be forced to play by a fair set of rules.
In the suit, filed in federal court in Virginia, the Justice Department argues Google has “corrupted legitimate competition” in the online ad space through a “systematic campaign to seize control of” online tools used for digital advertising. It is seeking to break up Google’s ad monopoly under the federal Sherman Act—which prohibits monopolization and the attempt or conspiracy to monopolize goods or services.
“Google, a single company with pervasive conflicts of interest, now controls the technology used by nearly every major website publisher to offer advertising space for sale, the leading tools used by advertisers to buy that advertising space, and the largest ad exchange that matches publishers with advertisers each time that ad space is sold,” the lawsuit states.
The lawsuit alleges that Google has bought out its ad tech competitors to “wield its dominance” online. The Big Tech juggernaut compels advertisers to use its service and “disrupt[s] their ability to use competing products effectively.”
“Google is a monopolist and engages in a wide variety of conduct that only a monopolist can accomplish,” the lawsuit states. “The Supreme Court has warned that there are such things as antitrust evils. This litigation will establish that Google is guilty of such antitrust evils, and it seeks to ensure that Google won’t be evil anymore.”
It’s going to be a tough task. In addition to de-listing and burying outlets, such as Becker News, Slay News, the Gateway Pundit, Trending Politics, and other center-right websites on its search engine, it also coerces editorial decisions made on websites by withdrawing Google Ads availability if a publisher comments on “forbidden” subjects, such as the Russia-Ukraine War, the Covid pandemic response, mRNA vaccines, or election integrity, in a manner that does not promote state-approved narratives.
This is a creeping digital totalitarianism, where a Big Tech company acts as a ‘de facto’ dictatorship over online territory. It lords over smaller companies with the aid of government officials it lobbies and politicians whose favor it intends to buy.
Google is not even running a “benevolent dictatorship.” There is recent non-partisan research showing just how profound the bias runs at Google.
According to an AllSides study, Google News heavily promotes left-leaning media outlets—both in the news articles featured on its homepage and in the search results for specific topics. It also buries right-leaning outlets.
“Imbalanced or heavily biased news search results can have a negative impact on our democracy and elections,” Julie Mastrine, director of marketing and media bias ratings at AllSides, told The Daily Signal in a statement. “When people cannot access the full range of views on political and societal issues, they are subject to partisan manipulation and cannot truly decide for themselves.”
“The AllSides balanced newsfeed solves the problem of biased online news aggregation by curating articles from the left, center, and right, so people can get diverse perspectives and think for themselves,” she added.
A Google spokesperson downplayed the report in comments to The Daily Signal.
“Our systems do not take political ideology into account, and we go to extraordinary lengths to build our products for everyone,” the spokesperson claimed. “This study’s methodology is deeply flawed. It cherry-picked a few topics and ran for a very brief period of time, presenting a misleading picture of Google News.”
John Gable, CEO of AllSides, told The Daily Signal that Google News‘ biased results could be “an accident” of Google’s algorithms or a byproduct of a slant in overall internet news content.
“It is possible that an informal policy or the preferences of Google News leadership or employees intentionally support delivering a certain political bias in its news aggregation,” Gable said. “It is also possible that the biased results could be an accident of the algorithms and systems Google uses, or it could reflect the bias of internet news content overall.
“It might also suggest that one political side has been more effective at online communication and marketing than another. Finally, it could just be profit motive, either intentional or accidental, in which news from one political side leads to more views, clicks, and ad revenue than others,” he added.
“Even if not intentional, Google appears to have decided that the problem of political bias is not a sufficiently important problem to address, or has so far been unable to address it effectively,” Gable said. “Regardless of the cause or intent, if Google News intends to support a free and independent democratic society and provide its readers with the ability to consume a variety of perspectives and decide for themselves the best course, it is failing in that objective.”
The All Sides report lays bare how biased Google News has become. It promotes left-wing websites over right-wing websites at a clip of 20:1!
You can also note that there is no such thing as a “lean right” website, according to the study.
The study gives examples of the websites that Google News promotes: CNN, BBC News, NY Times, Reuters, Politico, CNBC, NBC News, The Guardian, Washington Post, and CBS News.
It is freshing to see the editorial perspectives of these news outlets accurately categorized.
Note: I was once the long-time senior managing editor and director of viral media for the “Independent Journal Review,” which is currently considered a “lean right” website above. ~Kyle Becker
Big Tech giants pose the biggest threat to Americans’ freedom. Because if there isn’t an open flow of information in the United States, we cannot be “free.”
(TBL) published this article from Becker News as compiled and written by Kyle Becker
Header featured image (edited) credit: The logo of Google LLC is seen at the Google Store Chelsea in New York City, U.S., January 20, 2023. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo
Emphasis added by (TLB) editors
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.