It’s Unconstitutional: US Ban On Pot Users Owning Guns

It’s Unconstitutional: US Ban On Pot Users Owning Guns

The DOJ tried to relate the general firearms ban against marijuana users. The Court wasn’t having it.


Another week, another defeat for the gun-grabbers: A federal law barring marijuana users from owning and possessing firearms has been ruled unconstitutional.  

In a 54-page ruling in favor of Jared Harrison handed down Friday in Oklahoma, U.S. District Judge Patrick Wyrick said the government cannot claim that Harrison’s “mere status as a user of marijuana justifies stripping him of his fundamental right to possess a firearm.”

It’s the latest of many rulings against gun restrictions that are following in the widening wake of last June’s watershed U.S. Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.

U.S. District Judge Patrick Wyrick (AP/ Sue Ogrocki via The Journal Record

That case established a test that judges across the country must now apply when evaluating gun control laws: Such laws must be “consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm ownership.”

“The mere use of marijuana carries none of the characteristics that the Nation’s history and tradition of firearms regulation supports,” wrote Wyrick. Further, “the United States has not identified a single historical law that is ‘distinctly similar'” to the one barring marijuana users from possessing firearms.

The DOJ tried to relate the general firearms ban against marijuana users to laws that targeted intoxicated people. Wyrick, a Trump appointee, wasn’t having it:

“The restrictions imposed by each law only applied while an individual was actively intoxicated or using intoxicants. Under these laws, no one’s right to armed self-defense was restricted based on the mere fact that he or she was a user of intoxicants…

Where the seven [DOJ-cited] laws took a scalpel to the right of armed self-defense, [this marijuana-gun law] takes a sledgehammer to the right.” 

Harrison’s public defender, Laura Deskin, called the ruling a “step in the right direction for a large number of Americans who deserve the right to bear arms and protect their homes just like any other American.” The federal goverment is expected to appeal the decision.

Harrison was pulled over in Lawton, Oklahoma in May 2022 for failing to stop at a red light. The officer smelled marijuana, and a subsequent search of the vehicle produced a loaded revolver on the driver-side floor. At the time, Harrison was on probation for aggravated assault.

A federal grand jury indicted him for possessing a firearm with knowledge that he was an unlawful user of marijuana. The aggravated assault charge had no bearing on the prosecution: In Wyrick’s words, the federal case had the government arguing that, “Harrison’s mere status as a user of marijuana justified stripping him of his fundamental right to possess a firearm.” 

Expect the Bruen test to continue hacking away at America’s thicket of gun law that infringe on a fundamental human right.


(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and written by Tyler Durden

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Gun on plant leaf/orginal ZH article

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors



Stay tuned to …



The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.