Jan. 6 committee precedent could be a boon for GOP Hunter Biden probe
Garland’s appointment of U.S. Attorney David Weiss to special counsel will strengthen the congressional investigation of Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings. ~Alan Dershowitz
By
The precedent set by the House Jan. 6th Select Committee in obtaining relevant documents as evidence against former President Donald Trump and issuing subpoenas for their investigation could be a boon for Republicans in the congressional probe into the Biden family’s overseas business dealings.
The Jan. 6 panel demonstrated that it could conduct oversight and gain access to evidence and witnesses even as the Justice Department conducted a sprawling criminal probe into the same figures and issues, and House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer told Just the News he plans to ride those precedents.
“They set a lot of precedent during that Jan. 6 committee that I think they’re gonna regret with respect to this Biden investigation,” he told the Just the News, No Noise television show.
Comer and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan are currently investigating President Joe Biden’s possible involvement in Hunter’s foreign business deals. Biden has repeatedly said he had no knowledge or involvement with his son’s businesses, but documents and testimony given to the committee call those denials into question.
Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed David Weiss, U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware, to special counsel on Friday. Weiss has been leading the investigation since 2019.
Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz (pictured below) told Just the News that making Weiss a special counsel will strengthen the congressional investigation into the extent of Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings.
“I think it should increase the power of Congress to look into this,” he said during an interview on Friday. “I think it shows that there is still room for more investigation, and that Congress can play an important role in getting to the bottom of that.”
He noted that Congress has a “constitutional power to check and balance the executive and so the fact that there’s an ongoing investigation should not be an absolute barrier for Congress to do its job.”
Dershowitz said that Congress can insist on “subpoenaing prosecutors and then if they refuse, they can be held in contempt and it could go to the courts and we’ll see how the courts decide it.”
He told Just the News that Weiss becoming special counsel could turn out to be a sign that he’s pursuing more serious charges against Hunter.
“This could be a big deal, this change, because it’s not the fact that he’s special counsel, it’s the fact that he’s moving the case to the Central District of California, dropping the original plea bargain. It suggests that maybe he’s focusing on more serious matters, we just don’t know. And I guess we’ll we’ll find out,” he said. “I think it would have been better if a separate independent counsel were appointed, not be a U.S. Attorney from Delaware, but we’ll see where this goes.”
Dershowitz argued that the appointment of Weiss as special counsel “seems to be in violation of Justice Department regulations that require that the person be outside of the government.”
Reacting to Weiss’ appointment, Comer said it’s “part of the Justice Department’s efforts to attempt a Biden family coverup in light of [House Oversight Republicans’] mounting evidence of President Biden’s role in his family’s schemes selling ‘the brand’ for millions of dollars to foreign nationals.”
Dershowitz was asked for his response to Comer and other Republicans arguing that Garland’s move at this time could point to a cover-up attempt.
“I think reasonable people could see that and therefore the appearance of justice is not satisfied by this,” he said. “The appearance of justice would be satisfied by appointing an absolutely distinguished, unquestioned outsider, somebody who’s not in the government, somebody who had nothing to do with this investigation previously; that would have been the better course for purposes of making sure the appearance of justice was satisfied.”
He also addressed the potential reasoning behind Garland’s decision to elevate Weiss as opposed to someone new to special counsel.
“I think he wants to be seen as allowing the investigation to proceed to its natural conclusion but he’s not prepared to take the giant step of appointing a new prosecutor now. Appointing a new prosecutor would also delay the process,” he said. “There’s some argument that it should be pursued by the same person who has the institutional memory and the history. There are arguments both ways.”
Just the News asked Dershowitz about whether the way the House Jan. 6 Select Committee investigation was carried out could help the House GOP in their Hunter Biden probe.
“I think they should go forward and they should insist on their constitutional right to check the executive branch but I’m sure the prosecutors will say, ‘no, we’re not going to allow our people to disclose an ongoing investigation’ and that’s going to end up in court,” he said.
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News. Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Header featured image (edited) credit: Comer/Jordan/Getty Images
Insert/Dershowitz/John Lamparski/Getty Images
Emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply